Literature DB >> 28361550

Mercury in fish products: what's the best for consumers between bluefin tuna and yellowfin tuna?

Gaetano Cammilleri1, Mirella Vazzana2, Vincenzo Arizza2, Francesca Giunta1, Antonio Vella1, Gianluigi Lo Dico1, Vita Giaccone1, Salvatore V Giofrè3, Giuseppe Giangrosso1, Nicola Cicero4,5, Vincenzo Ferrantelli1.   

Abstract

A total of 205 bluefin and yellowfin tuna samples were examined for mercury detection in order to verify possible differences and have a detailed risk assessment of the two tuna species. The results showed significant higher mercury concentration in muscle tissue of bluefin tuna respect yellowfin tuna (p < 0.001) with mean concentration of 0.84 mg/kg and maximum value of 1.94 mg/kg. These differences can be due the different biological and ecological aspects of the two tuna species and to different oceanographic aspects between Atlantic Ocean and Mediterranean sea. The results obtained in this study suggest an advisable containment of the sources of pollution and further studies on the closed-loop farming of bluefin tuna, in order to ensure the product safety.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mercury; bluefin tuna; fish products; heavy metals; mercury direct analyser; yellowfin tuna

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28361550     DOI: 10.1080/14786419.2017.1309538

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Prod Res        ISSN: 1478-6419            Impact factor:   2.861


  7 in total

1.  Investigating toxic metal levels in popular edible fishes from the South Durban basin: implications for public health and food security.

Authors:  Sanjeev Debipersadh; Timothy Sibanda; Ramganesh Selvarajan; Richard Naidoo
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Histological and Chemical Analysis of Heavy Metals in Kidney and Gills of Boops boops: Melanomacrophages Centers and Rodlet Cells as Environmental Biomarkers.

Authors:  Alessio Alesci; Nicola Cicero; Angelo Fumia; Claudia Petrarca; Rocco Mangifesta; Vincenzo Nava; Patrizia Lo Cascio; Sebastiano Gangemi; Mario Di Gioacchino; Eugenia Rita Lauriano
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2022-04-27

Review 3.  Seafood Intake as a Method of Non-Communicable Diseases (NCD) Prevention in Adults.

Authors:  Dominika Jamioł-Milc; Jowita Biernawska; Magdalena Liput; Laura Stachowska; Zdzisław Domiszewski
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 5.717

4.  Mercury Detection in Benthic and Pelagic Fish Collected from Western Sicily (Southern Italy).

Authors:  Gaetano Cammilleri; Francesco Giuseppe Galluzzo; Francesco Fazio; Andrea Pulvirenti; Antonio Vella; Gianluigi Maria Lo Dico; Andrea Macaluso; Gabriele Ciaccio; Vincenzo Ferrantelli
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  Development of a Rapid and Eco-Friendly UHPLC Analytical Method for the Detection of Histamine in Fish Products.

Authors:  Antonello Cicero; Francesco Giuseppe Galluzzo; Gaetano Cammilleri; Andrea Pulvirenti; Giuseppe Giangrosso; Andrea Macaluso; Antonio Vella; Vincenzo Ferrantelli
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  A representative sampling of tuna muscle for mercury control.

Authors:  Pierluigi Piras; Antonino Bella; Maurizio Cossu; Gianuario Fiori; Andrea Sanna; Giannina Chessa
Journal:  Ital J Food Saf       Date:  2020-12-03

7.  Monitoring of Environmental Hg Occurrence in Tunisian Coastal Areas.

Authors:  Amel Jebara; Vincenzo Lo Turco; Caterina Faggio; Patrizia Licata; Vincenzo Nava; Angela Giorgia Potortì; Rosalia Crupi; Hedi Ben Mansour; Giuseppa Di Bella
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.