| Literature DB >> 28361037 |
Saixiang Feng1, Chenggang Xu1, Kaijie Yang1, Haihong Wang2, Huiying Fan1, Ming Liao1.
Abstract
In Haemophilus parasuis, the genes HAPS_0217 and HAPS_1695 are predicted to encode long-chain fatty acid-CoA ligases (FACSs). These proteins contain ATP/AMP signature motifs and FACS conserved motifs that are homologous to those in Escherichia coli FadD (EcFadD). In this study, we demonstrate that HAPS_0217 and HAPS_1695 can functionally replace EcFadD in the E. coli fadD mutant JW1794, and were thus designated fadD1 and fadD2, respectively. An evaluation of kinetic parameters indicated that FadD1 and FadD2 have a substrate preference for long-chain fatty acids. Moreover, FadD2 exhibited substrate inhibition in the presence of high concentrations of oleic acid. Single mutants of each of the fadD genes were easily constructed, whereas double mutants were not. These results were further confirmed using genomic site-directed mutagenesis, which supported the idea that H. parasuis requires either fadD1 or fadD2 for survival. The fadD1 mutant exhibited slower growth than the wild-type strain SC096, and its complementation resulted in a restored phenotype. The wild-type strain did not grow on chemically defined medium without the addition of oleic acid, indicating that lipids are a vital nutrient for this bacterium. Additionally, strains with a disrupted fadD1 gene also exhibited increased sensitivity to quinolone antibiotics, including levofloxacin, enrofloxacin, ciprofloxacin and nalidixic acid.Entities:
Keywords: FadD; Haemophilus parasuis; acyl-CoA synthetase; fatty acid; quinolones
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28361037 PMCID: PMC5350145 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00072
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol ISSN: 2235-2988 Impact factor: 5.293
Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study.
| DH5α | F−, ϕ80d/ | Laboratory collection |
| BW25113 | Datsenko and Wanner, | |
| JW1794 | BW25113 | Baba et al., |
| BL21 (DE3) | F−, | Thermofisher |
| Serovar 4 clinical isolate | Zhang et al., | |
| SF345 (Δ | SC096 Δ | This study |
| SF346 (Δ | SC096 Δ | This study |
| SF347 (Δ | SC096 complemented Δ | This study |
| SF348 (Δ | SC096 complemented Δ | This study |
| SF350 | SC096 | This study |
| SF351 | SC096 | This study |
| SF352 | SC096 | This study |
| SF353 | SC096 | This study |
| SF354 | SC096 | This study |
| SF355 | SC096 | This study |
| SF356 | SC096 | This study |
| pMD19-T (simple) | T-vector, Amp | Takara Inc |
| pK18mobsacB | Suicide and narrow-broad-host vector, Kan | Schafer et al., |
| pSF115 | Kanamycin resistance cassette carrying complementation vector; Kan | Zou et al., |
| pET-28b | Kan | Novagen |
| pBAD24 | Amp | Guzman et al., |
| pBAD24m | Amp | Zhu et al., |
| p34S-Gm | Gentamicin resistance cassette carrying vector; Gm | Dennis and Zylstra, |
| pSF116 | Gentamicin resistance cassette carrying complementation vector; Gm | Zhou et al., |
| pSF224 | This study | |
| pSF225 | This study | |
| pSF226 | This study | |
| pSF227 | This study | |
| pSF228 | This study | |
| pSF229 | This study | |
| pSF230 | A disruption cassette containing gentamicin resistance cassette, the upstream and downstream sequences of | This study |
| pSF231 | A disruption cassette containing gentamicin resistance cassette, the upstream and downstream sequences of | This study |
| pSF232 | PCR-amplified | This study |
| pSF233 | A fragment containing erythromycin resistance cassette and the intact | This study |
| pSF234 | carrying | This study |
| pSF235 | carrying | This study |
| pSF236 | carrying | This study |
| pSF237 | carrying | This study |
| pSF238 | carrying | This study |
| pSF239 | PCR-amplified | This study |
| pSF240 | This study | |
| pSF241 | This study | |
| pSF242 | This study | |
| pSF243 | This study | |
| pSF244 | This study | |
Sequences of the PCR primers used in this study.
| P1 ( | CATATGGAAAAAATTTGGTTTGA |
| P2 ( | AAGCTTTTACAATTTTCCTTCCATCT |
| P3 ( | CATATGGCTTCTCTCGACTTCCA |
| P4 ( | AAGCTTATGAACGTTCATTAACTTAA |
| P5 ( | ACCGCTTGTGAGATTGAGTTTAGTTCACA |
| P6 ( | ATGTCAATTCGGGATCCGCGCCACATCTAAGGTACGTTCA |
| P7 ( | GATCGGCTTCGTCGACACGTTGTTGCGAGATGAGGAAGTT |
| P8 ( | GTAACTCATAGATCGCATCA |
| P9 (Gm-F) | CGCGGATCCCGAATTGACATCGAATTGACATAAGCCTGTTC |
| P10 (Gm-R) | ACGTGTCGACGAAGCCGATCTCGGCTTGAAC |
| P11 ( | ACCGCTTGTGATCGGCTTCGTCGACACGT |
| P12 ( | ATGTCAATTCGGGATCCGCGGATCGGCTTCGTCGACACGT |
| P13 ( | GATCGGCTTCGTCGACACGTGATCGGCTTCGTCGACACGT |
| P14 ( | GATCGGCTTCGTCGACACGT |
| P15 (Kan-F) | CGCGGATCCCGAATTGACATTTTTATGGACAGCAAGCGAA |
| P16 (Kan-R) | ACGTGTCGACGAAGCCGATCTCAGAAGAACTCGTCAAGAA |
| P17 ( | CGCGTCGACAGTGTTGTGTACTACGGCAG |
| P18 ( | CATGCATGCCTACAATTTTCCTTCCATCTGT |
| P19 ( | CGCGTCGACCTTAAGAATACAGACAAACG |
| P20 ( | CATGCATGCTTAAGTTAATGAACGTTCATTA |
| P21 ( | CTGTGTTTTATATTTTTCTCGTTCATTTACAATTTTCCTTCCATCT |
| P22 ( | AGCTATAAATTATTTAATAAGTAATGAGAATAAGTGGTATATCT |
| P23 (Em-F) | ATGAACGAGAAAAATATAAAACACAG |
| P24 (Em-R) | TTACTTATTAAATAATTTATAGCT |
| P25 (T214A-F) | ATCTGGCGTTTCTTCAATATGCAGGCGGGACAACAGGAGTG |
| P26 (T214A-R) | ATATTGAAGAAACGCCAGAT |
| P27 (G216A-F) | GTTTCTTCAATATACAGGCGCAACAACAGGAGTGGCTAAAGG |
| P28 (G216A-R) | CGCCTGTATATTGAAGAAAC |
| P29 (T217A-F) | TTCTTCAATATACAGGCGGGGCAACAGGAGTGGCTAAAGGG |
| P30 (T217A-R) | CCCGCCTGTATATTGAAGAA |
| P31 (G219A-F) | ATATACAGGCGGGACAACAGCAGTGGCTAAAGGGGCAATGC |
| P32 (G219A-R) | CTGTTGTCCCGCCTGTATAT |
| P33 (E362A-F) | TGAAGGTTATGGTATGACCGCATGTTCCCCATTGATTGCGG |
| P34 (E362A-R) | CGGTCATACCATAACCTTCA |
| P35 ( | AGTTGACCAGCGTACGCT |
| P36 ( | TGACAGACCTGATCAAGT |
| P37 ( | TGCCACCTACATAGCCAG |
| P38 ( | GCGATTGTCGTCGTGTCA |
| P39 ( | TCGTTGGACTATTGCTGA |
| P40 ( | GTGACTGGTATGTAGTAG |
| P41 ( | CCAGTGTTTACAGCCAGACA |
| P42 ( | TAAGATCCGCTTGTGTGCGA |
| P43 ( | GGTGATCGCTTAGACGATCA |
| P44 ( | AATCATCTTGTTGTGCTAGG |
| P45 ( | ATTGCCACACGCAGTGAGTT |
| P46 ( | GGTCATACCATAACCTTCAA |
| P47 ( | GGTGCGACAAATTGCTACTT |
| P48 ( | TCTTCAGGCTTCTTGTAGTA |
| P49 ( | ATGGAAAAAATTTGGTTTGA |
| P50 ( | ATGGCTTCTCTCGACTTCCA |
| P51 ( | AGAATAATTGGTAACAAACCAATA |
Figure 1The acyl-CoA synthetase (FACS) reaction, organization of the The chemical equation of acyl-CoA synthetase reaction. (B) Organization of H. parasuis fadDs clusters. The filled arrows indicate the relative size and transcriptional direction of the genes. The numbers and names below the arrows indicate the gene annotations in the H. parasuis SH0165. The resB and resC genes encode cytochrome C biosynthesis-related proteins. The gene holC encodes DNA polymerase III chi subunit. (C) Alignment of H. parasuis FadDs with homologous of E. coli and H. influenza. The ATP/AMP and FACS motifs are indicated by underlines. Sites of experiment confirmed in E. coli are denoted by asterisks.
Figure 2Expression of Transformants of E. coli fadD mutant JW1794 were grown on M9 minimal medium plates with various fatty acids as the sole carbon source. Growth was tested in either the presence or the absence of arabinose. The strains tested were JW1794 carrying plasmids pSF226 encoding fadD1, pSF227 encoding fadD2, respectively, or the vector plasmid, pBAD24m. Ara, arabinose; C14:0, myristic acid; C16:0, palmitic acid; C18:1, oleic acid. (B) Growth curve of JW1794 transformants grown in M9 broth with oleic acid as the sole carbon source. The strains tested were JW1794 carrying plasmids pSF226 encoding fadD1, pSF227 encoding fadD2, respectively, or the vector plasmid, pBAD24m. The data presented are averages of three independent experiments, and error bars represent standard deviations.
Figure 3Purification and biochemical characterization of the two Purification of H. parasuis SC096 FadD1 and FadD2 by native nickel-chelate chromatography. Lane M, molecular mass markers; lane 1–3, proteins from whole cells extraction of BL21 with the vector plasmid pET28b, FadD1, and FadD2 expression strains; lane 4 and 5, supernatant of lysate from FadD1 or FadD2 expression strain; lane 6 and 7, centrifuged precipitation of lysate from FadD1 or FadD2 expression strain; lane 8, purified FadD1; lane 9, purified FadD2. (B,C) Kinetics of FadD1 and FadD2 activity was determined using fatty acids of different concentrations (30–300 μM) as the variable substrates. (D) Kinetics of FadD2 inhibition with oleic acid was determined using variable concentrations (30–300 μM) of oleic acid as the fatty acid substrates. (E) Activities comparison of FadD1 and FadD2 were performed using 150 μM oleic acid as a fatty acid substrate. The error bars of all the experiments represent the mean ± S.D. (n = 4). The asterisks indicated that activity of FadD1 was statistically different (P < 0.01) from that of the FadD2 as judged by the Student's t-test.
Kinetic properties of FadD1 and FadD2 with various substrates.
| FadD1 | C14:0 | 78.42 | 41.48 | 0.083 | 2.01 |
| C16:0 | 92.11 | 39.90 | 0.098 | 2.45 | |
| C18:1 | 51.64 | 15.64 | 0.055 | 3.51 | |
| FadD2 | C14:0 | 1.45 | 173.40 | 0.002 | 0.01 |
| C16:0 | 17.78 | 128.30 | 0.020 | 0.16 | |
| C18:1 | ND | ND | ND | ND | |
Kinetic constants (K.
Nanomole of acyl-CoA formed/min/mg of protein.
μM of FA.
s.
mM.
Figure 4Construction of in-frame deletion and site-direct mutants of Schematic diagram of mutants constructed in this study. Kan, kanamycin-resistant gene; Gm, gentamicin-resistant gene; D1Up, upstream sequence of fadD1; D1Dn, downstream sequence of fadD1; D2Up, upstream sequence of fadD2; D2Dn, downstream sequence of fadD2; T214A, threonine of the site 214 substituted to alanine in FadD1; G216A, glycine of the site 216 substituted to alanine in FadD1; T217A, threonine of the site 217 substituted to alanine in FadD1; G219A, glycine of the site 219 substituted to alanine in FadD1; E362A, glutamic acid of the site 362 substituted to alanine in FadD1. (B) Identification of mutations by PCR. Part 1 showed the PCR analysis of fadD1 region in all 10 strains using primers P41 and P42 as shown in panel A (lane 1, SC096; lane 2, ΔfadD1; lane 3, ΔfadD2; lane 4, fadD1T214A; lane 5, fadD1G216A; lane 6, fadD1T217A; lane 7, fadD1G219A; lane 8, fadD1E362A; lane 9, fadD1G216A–ΔfadD2; lane 10, fadD1G219A–ΔfadD2). Part 2 showed the PCR analysis of fadD2 region using primers P43 and P44 (lane 1, SC096; lane 2, ΔfadD1; lane 3, ΔfadD2; lane 4, fadD1T214A; lane 5, fadD1G216A; lane 6, fadD1T217A; lane 7, fadD1G219A; lane 8, fadD1E362A; lane 9, fadD1G216A–ΔfadD2; lane 10, fadD1G219A–ΔfadD2). The in-frame region of fadD1 and fadD2 were detected using primers P45–P48 as shown in Part 3 (lane 1, SC096; lane 2, ΔfadD1; lane 3, ΔfadD2; lane 4, fadD1T214A; lane 5, fadD1G216A; lane 6, fadD1T217A; lane 7, fadD1G219A; lane 8, fadD1E362A; lane 9, fadD1G216A–ΔfadD2; lane 10, fadD1G219A–ΔfadD2; lane 11, SC096; lane 12, ΔfadD1; lane 13, ΔfadD2; lane 14, fadD1T214A; lane 15, fadD1G216A; lane 16, fadD1T217A; lane 17, fadD1G219A; lane 18, fadD1E362A; lane 19, fadD1G216A–ΔfadD2; lane 20, fadD1–ΔfadD2). Part 4 confirmed the complementation strain using primers P49–P51 as shown in panel A (lane 1, ΔfadD1-complementation and lane 2, ΔfadD2-complementation). (C) Transformants of E. coli fadD mutant JW1794 were grown on M9 minimal medium plates with oleic acid as the sole carbon source. The strains tested were JW1794 carrying plasmids pSF226, pSF240, pSF241, pSF242, pSF243, or pSF244 encoding fadD1, fadD1T214A, fadD1G216A, fadD1T217A, fadD1G219A, or fadD1E362A, respectively.
Construction of .
| pSF313 (Δ | Δ | DNC | NA |
| pSF314 (Δ | Δ | NA | DNC |
| pSF324 | DNC | NA | |
| pSF324 ( | DNC | ||
| pSF324 ( | DNC | NA | |
| pSF324 ( | DNC | ||
| pSF324 ( | DNC | NA | |
DNC, Did not construct.
NA, Not available.
Growth of .
| C14:0 | − | − | + | + | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| C16:0 | − | − | + | + | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| C18:1 | − | − | + | − | + | + | + | + | − |
ND, Not determined.
E. coli complementation strains were grown on M9 minimal medium plates supplemented with 0.1% oleic acid with Brij58 and results were determined after the cells were incubated for 72 or 120 h at 37°C. Growth was denoted as plus sign if growth after 72 h was observed or minus sign when no colonies were apparent at 120 h of incubation.
Figure 5Analysis of growth, the expression level of The growth curve of wild type and mutants grown in TSA medium with 5% newborn bovine serum and NAD. Only negligible changes in the growth rates were detected. (B) Real-time PCR analysis of fadD1 transcription in SC096 or ΔfadD2. (C) Real-time PCR analysis of fadD2 transcription in SC096 or ΔfadD1. Error bars represent the standard deviation from three independent experiments. No significant changes in transcription were observed in real-time PCR assays. (D) The growth curve of SC096, fadD mutants and fadD1 complementation strain grown in chemical defined medium with the addition of oleic acid. (E) The growth of SC096 and its fadD mutants on chemically defined medium plates in either the presence or the absence of oleic acid. (F) Survival of SC096 and fadD mutant strains in 50 or 80% porcine sera. The data represent means standard errors (n = 3) and no statistical difference was detected.
Susceptibilities of .
| SC096 | 1 | 1 | 64 | 1 | 1 | 0.125 | ≤0.016 | 2 | 16 | ≤0.016 | 8 | 16 | ≥512 | 4 | 0.25 | 0.5 | 2 | 0.032 |
| Δ | 0.25 | 0.25 | 16 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.125 | ≤0.016 | 32 | 4 | ≤0.016 | 2 | 8 | ≥512 | 4 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 1 | 0.032 |
| Δ | 1 | 1 | 64 | 1 | 1 | 0.125 | ≤0.016 | 1 | 16 | ≤0.016 | 32 | 8 | ≥512 | 4 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 2 | 0.032 |
| Δ | 1 | 1 | 64 | 2 | ≥256 | 0.125 | ≤0.016 | 64 | 16 | ≤0.016 | 8 | 16 | ≥512 | 4 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 2 | 0.032 |
LVX, levofloxacin; ENR, enrofloxacin; NAL, nalidixic acid; CIP, ciprofloxacin; ERY, erythromycin; AMP, ampicillin; EFT, ceftiofur; GEN, gentamicin; AMK, amikacin; CTX, cefotaxime; KAN, kanamycin; STR, streptomycin; SMZ, sulfamethoxazole; TMP, trimethoprim; DOX, doxycycline; TET, tetracycline; FF, florfenicol; PB, polymyxin B.
Figure 6GC–MS chromatogram of analysis of free fatty acids extracted from phospholipid of . The fatty acids were derivatized to their methyl esters and then analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy. C14:0, C16:0, C16:1, C18:1, and C18:0 are abbreviations of myristic acid, palmitic acid, palmitoleic acid, oleic acid and stearic acid, respectively.
Fatty acid composition of phospholipid extracts from .
| C14:0 | 6.9 ± 0.5 | 6.7 ± 0.2 | 5.3 ± 0.1 | 4.1 ± 0.7 | 4.8 ± 0.4 |
| C16:0 | 48.4 ± 3.2 | 47.0 ± 4.2 | 48.8 ± 3.9 | 48.5 ± 3.7 | 48.1 ± 2.9 |
| C16:1 | 11.9 ± 1.8 | 9.1 ± 0.8 | 9.3 ± 0.9 | 10.75 ± 0.6 | 11.0 ± 1.0 |
| C18:0 | 29.5 ± 4.2 | 34.6 ± 2.4 | 34.7 ± 3.3 | 34.8 ± 2.5 | 34.2 ± 2.8 |
| C18:1 | 3.3 ± 0.3 | 2.6 ± 0.5 | 2.0 ± 0.8 | 1.9 ± 0.4 | 1.9 ± 0.6 |
The fatty acids listed are those positively assigned by gas chromatographic data and with an abundance of greater than 0.1% in at least one sample. The data presented represent the mean ± S.D. (n = 3) of results from three independent experiments.
Figure 7Proposed model for exogenous fatty acid utilization by . Exogenous fatty acids can be transported through the membrane by an outer membrane protein, for instance, FadL protein. Fatty acids then can be activated by acyl-CoA synthetase and converted to acyl-CoA. For H. parasuis, the enzymes may be FadD1 and FadD2. Subsequently, acyl-CoA can either be degraded to acetyl-CoA through β-oxidation or be utilized by PlsB and PlsC to synthesize the phospholipids then incorporate to the membrane. It should be noted that endogenous fatty acid is essential and can be synthesized from acetyl-CoA by FAS, then used for lipid A or phospholipids biosynthesis.