| Literature DB >> 28360895 |
Jens A Hammerl1, Cornelia Göllner1, Claudia Jäckel1, Holger C Scholz2, Karsten Nöckler1, Jochen Reetz1, Sascha Al Dahouk1, Stefan Hertwig1.
Abstract
Virulent phages have been used for many years to type Brucella isolates, but until recently knowledge about the genetic makeup of these phages remains limited. In this work the host specificity and genomic sequences of the original set (deposited in 1960) of VLA Brucella reference phages Tb, Fi, Wb, Bk2, R/C, and Iz were analyzed and compared with hitherto described brucellaphages. VLA phages turned out to be different from homonymous phages in other laboratories. The host range of the phages was defined by performing plaque assays with a wide selection of Brucella strains. Propagation of the phages on different strains did not alter host specificity. Sequencing of the phages TbV, FiV, WbV, and R/CV revealed nucleotide variations when compared to same-named phages previously described by other laboratories. The phages Bk2V and IzV were sequenced for the first time. While Bk2V exhibited the same deletions as WbV, IzV possesses the largest genome of all Brucella reference phages. The duplication of a 301 bp sequence in this phage and the large deletion in Bk2V, WbV, and R/CV may be a result of recombination caused by repetitive sequences located in this DNA region. To identify new phages as potential candidates for lysotyping, the host range and Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) of 22 non-reference Brucella phages were determined. The phages showed lysis patterns different from those of the reference phages and thus represent novel valuable candidates in the typing set.Entities:
Keywords: Brucella; genome; lysotyping; phage; virulent
Year: 2017 PMID: 28360895 PMCID: PMC5350156 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00408
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Host range determination of .
| + | + | + | + | − | + | |
| 2 × 109 | 2 × 109 | 2 × 109 | 2 × 109 | NL | 2 × 109 | |
| 7 × 107 | 4 × 107 | 2 × 108 | 2 × 108 | NL | 6 × 107 | |
| 1 × 108 | 1 × 108 | 1 × 109 | 1 × 108 | NL | 3 × 108 | |
| 1 × 108 | 6 × 106 | 1 × 107 | 2 × 108 | NL | 3 × 107 | |
| 2 × 108 | 6 × 106 | 1 × 107 | 3 × 107 | NL | 3 × 107 | |
| 1 × 108 | 1 × 107 | 1 × 108 | 1 × 107 | NL | 1 × 107 | |
| 6 × 107 | 6 × 107 | 1 × 107 | 2 × 107 | NL | 3 × 107 | |
| 4 × 107 | 1 × 106 | 3 × 108 | 7 × 107 | NL | 7 × 106 | |
| 8 × 107 | 2 × 107 | 3 × 107 | 3 × 107 | NL | 2 × 107 | |
| ± | − | + | − | − | + | |
| 1 × 107 | NL | 1 × 108 | NL | NL | 1 × 108 | |
| NL | NL | 1 × 107 | NL | NL | 5 × 106 | |
| 3 × 107 | NL | 6 × 107 | NL | NL | 5 × 107 | |
| ± | − | ± | ± | − | ± | |
| 1 × 109 | NL | 2 × 108 | 5 × 107 | NL | 2 × 108 | |
| GI | NL | GI | GI | NL | GI | |
| 1 × 107 | NL | 3 × 107 | NL | NL | 3 × 107 | |
| 5 × 108 | NL | 4 × 108 | NL | NL | 3 × 108 | |
| 5 × 108 | NL | 5 × 108 | NL | NL | 2 × 108 | |
| − | − | − | − | + | − | |
| NL | NL | NL | NL | 2 × 108 | NL | |
| + | + | + | + | − | + | |
| 1 × 109 | 2 × 107 | 2 × 108 | 1 × 108 | NL | 1 × 108 | |
| − | − | − | − | − | − | |
| NL | NL | NL | NL | 1 × 107 | NL | |
| − | − | − | − | − | − | |
| GI | GI | GI | GI | NL | GI | |
| + | − | + | − | − | − | |
| 4 × 106 | NL | 2 × 106 | NL | NL | NL | |
| + | + | + | + | − | + | |
| 1 × 109 | 2 × 105 | 5 × 108 | 2 × 107 | NL | 2 × 108 | |
| − | − | − | − | − | − | |
| NL | NL | NL | NL | NL | NL | |
| + | + | + | + | − | + | |
| 2 × 109 | 3 × 107 | 1 × 109 | 2 × 108 | NL | 5 × 108 | |
| 1 × 109 | 2 × 108 | 1 × 109 | 4 × 108 | NL | 2 × 108 | |
+, Plaque formation, −, no plaque formation. bv, biovar; NL, no lysis; GI, growth inhibition.
Figure 1HindIII restriction analysis of the VLA . Fragments that are present in TbV, FiV, and IzV but absent in WbV, Bk2V, and R/CV are marked by asterisks.
Figure 2Genome organization of the VLA . The upper panel shows the gene map of IzV. Putative genes are colored according to the predicted functions of their gene products Table S4. SNPs identified by comparison with the other reference phages are indicated by orange rectangles (A–Q). For a better overview, only one SNP per gene is shown. A list with all SNPs is presented in Table S3. The lower panel illustrates the gene composition of the six VLA reference phages. Relevant genes are numbered. In WbV, Bk2V and R/CV ORF27 and ORF28 are deleted, while ORF18 exhibits only are partial deletion. In IzV and R/CV ORF57 is splitted into two ORFs IzV additionally contains the novel ORF 25 generated by sequence duplication.
Figure 3Analysis of the large (2.443 bp) InDel in Gene arrangement in this DNA region. The position of the repeats RS-A, RS-B, and RS-C and of the additional inverted repeat present in IzV are indicated. (B) Alignment of the sequences flanking the InDel. The DNA fragment deleted in WbV, Bk2V, and R/CV borders on the 9 bp direct repeats RS-A and RS-B.
Host range of other brucellaphages.
| + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | |
| + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | |
| + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | |
| + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | |
| + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | |
| + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | |
| + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | |
| + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | |
| − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | |
| − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | |
| − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | |
| (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | |
| − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | |
| − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | |
| (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | − | |
| − | (+) | − | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | − | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | − | − | (+) | |
| − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | |
| + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | |
| − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | ||
| − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | ||
| − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | ||
| (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | − | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | |
| − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | |
| + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | |
| + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
+, Plaque formation; (+), reduced plaque formation in comparision to B. abortus strain S19; −, no plaque formation.
Figure 4Phylogenetic relationships of brucellaphages based on SNP analysis (Table . Analysis was conducted by using the Accelrys DS Gene Software package.