Ali Doruk1, Muharrem Dugenci2, Filiz Ersöz2, Taner Öznur1. 1. Department of Psychiatry, Gülhane Military Medical Academy, Ankara, Turkey. 2. Department of Industrial Engineering, Karabuk University, Karabük, Turkey.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: We aimed to explore the relationship between intolerance of uncertainty (IU) and coping mechanisms in a nonclinical sample with the same age and educational level. METHODS: The Coping Orientations to Problems Experienced (COPE) scale was used to evaluate the coping mechanisms. The IU scale was used to evaluate IU situations. RESULTS: We found that the negative impact of uncertainty on the action in female students was greater than males. While female students used more planning, instrumental support, reinterpretation, religion, emotional support, venting, and mental disengagement coping styles, male students used more humor, denial, and alcohol/drug abuse coping styles. Subjects with psychological problems had higher IU scores and used some more coping mechanisms (restraint, acceptance, behavioral disengagement, and alcohol/drug abuse) than the others. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that healthy subjects use different coping styles and respond differently to uncertainty in both genders.
INTRODUCTION: We aimed to explore the relationship between intolerance of uncertainty (IU) and coping mechanisms in a nonclinical sample with the same age and educational level. METHODS: The Coping Orientations to Problems Experienced (COPE) scale was used to evaluate the coping mechanisms. The IU scale was used to evaluate IU situations. RESULTS: We found that the negative impact of uncertainty on the action in female students was greater than males. While female students used more planning, instrumental support, reinterpretation, religion, emotional support, venting, and mental disengagement coping styles, male students used more humor, denial, and alcohol/drug abuse coping styles. Subjects with psychological problems had higher IU scores and used some more coping mechanisms (restraint, acceptance, behavioral disengagement, and alcohol/drug abuse) than the others. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that healthy subjects use different coping styles and respond differently to uncertainty in both genders.
Entities:
Keywords:
Coping mechanisms; healthy populations; intolerance of uncertainty; psychological problems; university students
Authors: Donald E Bailey; Lawrence Landerman; Julie Barroso; Patricia Bixby; Merle H Mishel; Andrew J Muir; Lisa Strickland; Elizabeth Clipp Journal: Psychosomatics Date: 2009 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 2.386