Literature DB >> 2836060

Resistance of human leukemic and normal lymphocytes to drug-induced DNA cleavage and low levels of DNA topoisomerase II.

M Potmesil1, Y H Hsiang, L F Liu, B Bank, H Grossberg, S Kirschenbaum, T J Forlenza, A Penziner, D Kanganis, T J Forlenzar.   

Abstract

Adriamycin, amsacrine, and etoposide produce protein-associated DNA breaks in numerous cell types. However, in vitro exposure to Adriamycin (0.1-50.0 micrograms/ml) resulted in no detectable DNA cleavage in lymphocytes from patients with B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or in either B- or T-lymphocytes from normal donors. In contrast, DNA cleavage was observed in T-cells from CLL patients. Exposure to amsacrine or etoposide caused at least 50-fold less DNA cleavage in CLL and normal lymphocytes as compared to L1210 cells. These findings cannot be accounted for by differences in drug uptake. An attempt was made to explain the relative resistance of human lymphocytes to drug-induced DNA cleavage. DNA topoisomerase II, an intracellular target of tested drugs, was assayed in CLL and normal human blood lymphocytes by immunoblotting. The enzyme was detected neither in unfractionated lymphocytes nor in the enriched B- and T-cells from 28 untreated patients with CLL (Stage 0-IV) and from seven normal donors. Exponentially growing L1210 cells had approximately 7 x 10(5) enzyme copies per cell, suggesting a 100-fold higher content than that of CLL or normal lymphocytes. There were, however, detectable levels of DNA topoisomerase II in cells obtained from patients with diffuse histiocytic, nodular poorly differentiated and nodular mixed lymphomas, in Burkitt's lymphoma, acute lymphoblastic leukemia and CLL with prolymphocytic transformation. DNA topoisomerase I, a potential target for anticancer chemotherapy, was detectable in CLL and normal lymphocytes, as well as in cells of other malignancies tested. The above results may offer an explanation for the ineffectiveness of Adriamycin in the treatment of CLL. It could be suggested that low levels of DNA topoisomerase II contribute to drug resistance operating in human malignancies with a large compartment of nonproliferating cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2836060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  25 in total

1.  Gadd45, a p53-responsive stress protein, modifies DNA accessibility on damaged chromatin.

Authors:  F Carrier; P T Georgel; P Pourquier; M Blake; H U Kontny; M J Antinore; M Gariboldi; T G Myers; J N Weinstein; Y Pommier; A J Fornace
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  Increased expression of death receptors 4 and 5 synergizes the apoptosis response to combined treatment with etoposide and TRAIL.

Authors:  S B Gibson; R Oyer; A C Spalding; S M Anderson; G L Johnson
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 3.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of irinotecan.

Authors:  G G Chabot
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  Targeted disruption of the mouse topoisomerase I gene by camptothecin selection.

Authors:  S G Morham; K D Kluckman; N Voulomanos; O Smithies
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  Comparison of in vitro activities of camptothecin and nitidine derivatives against fungal and cancer cells.

Authors:  M Del Poeta; S F Chen; D Von Hoff; C C Dykstra; M C Wani; G Manikumar; J Heitman; M E Wall; J R Perfect
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Immunocytochemical detection of DNA topoisomerase type II in primary breast carcinomas: correlation with clinico-pathological features.

Authors:  G Tuccari; A Rizzo; G Giuffrè; G Barresi
Journal:  Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histopathol       Date:  1993

7.  Enhanced killing of cancer cells by poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors and topoisomerase I inhibitors reflects poisoning of both enzymes.

Authors:  Anand G Patel; Karen S Flatten; Paula A Schneider; Nga T Dai; Jennifer S McDonald; Guy G Poirier; Scott H Kaufmann
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 8.  Mind the gap: a survey of how cancer drug carriers are susceptible to the gap between research and practice.

Authors:  Darren Lars Stirland; Joseph W Nichols; Seiji Miura; You Han Bae
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 9.776

Review 9.  Topoisomerase inhibitors. A review of their therapeutic potential in cancer.

Authors:  B K Sinha
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 9.546

10.  "Atypical" multidrug resistance in human ovarian cancer cell line A2780 selected for resistance to doxorubicin (A2780 DX3).

Authors:  G Cimoli; M Valenti; E Noviello; S Parodi; A Mazzoni; E Rovini; F De Sessa; P Russo
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.553

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.