Literature DB >> 2836057

Further evidence for the involvement of gap-junctional intercellular communication in induction and maintenance of transformed foci in BALB/c 3T3 cells.

H Yamasaki1, F Katoh.   

Abstract

In order to investigate further the role of gap-junctional intercellular communication in the process of cell transformation, we examined the effects of chemicals that modulate gap-junctional communication on the induction and maintenance of transformed foci in BALB/c 3T3 cells. When dibutyryl cyclic AMP, retinoic acid, fluocinolone acetonide, or dexamethasone was added during the induction of cell transformation by standard (3-methylcholanthrene alone) or two-stage (low dose of 3-methylcholanthrene plus phorbol ester) protocols, there was a significant decrease in the number of transformed foci. When BALB/c 3T3 cells are transformed, there is selective intercellular communication between transformed and between surrounding nontransformed cells: transformed cells communicate among themselves but not with surrounding normal cells. Addition of dibutyryl cyclic AMP, retinoic acid, fluocinolone acetonide, or dexamethasone to culture dishes in which transformed foci were present induced communication between transformed cells and surrounding normal cells. In the continuous presence of these chemicals, there was a clear decrease in the number of transformed foci. These chemicals therefore appear capable of reestablishing intercellular communication between transformed and nontransformed cells and of diminishing the number of transformed foci. However, when transformed cells were isolated and placed in culture dishes at clonal density in the presence of these chemicals, there was hardly any decrease in the number of transformed colonies, suggesting that the chemicals cannot revert the phenotype of transformed cells in the absence of normal cells. These results suggest that chemicals that modulate intercellular communication not only inhibit the induction of transformed foci but also revert transformed cells to the normal phenotypes by establishing intercellular communication with surrounding normal cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2836057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  14 in total

1.  Growth suppression of transformed cells by a human placental extract not related to transforming growth factor beta.

Authors:  J L Klein; E Hamel; J L Tayot; H Yamasaki
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 2.  Drug and radiation resistance in spheroids: cell contact and kinetics.

Authors:  P L Olive; R E Durand
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 9.264

3.  Measurement of gap junctional communication by fluorescence activated cell sorting.

Authors:  D T Kiang; R Kollander; H H Lin; S LaVilla; M M Atkinson
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 2.416

Review 4.  Gap junctions and cancer: communicating for 50 years.

Authors:  Trond Aasen; Marc Mesnil; Christian C Naus; Paul D Lampe; Dale W Laird
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 60.716

5.  Epidermal growth factor disrupts gap-junctional communication and induces phosphorylation of connexin43 on serine.

Authors:  A F Lau; M Y Kanemitsu; W E Kurata; S Danesh; A L Boynton
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 4.138

Review 6.  Gap junctional intercellular communication and cell proliferation during rat liver carcinogenesis.

Authors:  H Yamasaki; V Krutovskikh; M Mesnil; A Columbano; H Tsuda; N Ito
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 7.  Aberrant expression and function of gap junctions during carcinogenesis.

Authors:  H Yamasaki
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 9.031

8.  Transformation of BALB/c-3T3 cells: III. Development of a co-culture clonal survival assay for quantification of chemical cytotoxicity in high-density cell cultures.

Authors:  E J Matthews
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Reversible suppression by nalidixic acid of anchorage-independent growth of mouse cells transformed by 3-methylcholanthrene or an activated c-Ha-ras gene.

Authors:  M Kaneko; J Horikoshi
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  AC133+ progenitor cells as gene delivery vehicle and cellular probe in subcutaneous tumor models: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Ali M Rad; A S M Iskander; Branislava Janic; Robert A Knight; Ali S Arbab; Hamid Soltanian-Zadeh
Journal:  BMC Biotechnol       Date:  2009-03-27       Impact factor: 2.563

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.