Literature DB >> 28360123

Impact of positive pressure ventilation on mean systemic filling pressure in critically ill patients after death.

Xavier Repessé1, Cyril Charron1, Guillaume Geri1,2,3, Alix Aubry1,2, Alexis Paternot1,2, Julien Maizel4,5, Michel Slama4,5, Antoine Vieillard-Baron6,2,3.   

Abstract

Mean systemic filling pressure (Pms) defines the pressure measured in the venous-arterial system when the cardiac output is nil. Its estimation has been proposed in patients with beating hearts by building the venous return curve, using different pairs of right atrial pressure/cardiac output during mechanical ventilation. We raised the hypothesis according to which the Pms is altered by tidal ventilation and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), which would challenge this extrapolation method based on cardiopulmonary interactions. We conducted a two-center, noninterventional, observational, and prospective study, using an arterial and a venous catheter to measure the pressure in the circulatory system at the time of death in critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients with a PEEP. Arterial (Part) and venous pressures (Pra) were recorded in five conditions: at end expiration and end inspiration with and without PEEP and finally once the ventilator was disconnected. Part and Pra did not differ in any experimental conditions. Tidal ventilation increased Pra and Part by 2.4 and 1.9 mmHg, respectively, whereas PEEP increased both values by 1.2 and 1 mmHg, respectively. After disconnection of the ventilator, Pra and Part were 10.0 ± 4.2 and 9.9 ± 4.2 mmHg, respectively. Pms increases during mechanical ventilation, with an effect of tidal ventilation and PEEP. This calls into question the validity of its evaluation in heart-beating patients using cardiopulmonary interactions during mechanical ventilation.NEW & NOTEWORTHY The physiology of the mean systemic filling pressure (Pms) is not well understood in human beings. This study is the first report of a tidal ventilation- and positive end-expiratory pressure-related increase in Pms in critically ill patients. The results challenge the utility and the value estimating Pms in heart-beating patients by reconstruction of the venous return curve using varying inflation pressures.
Copyright © 2017 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  mean systemic filling pressure; mechanical ventilation; venous return

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28360123     DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00958.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)        ISSN: 0161-7567


  5 in total

Review 1.  Determinants of systemic venous return and the impact of positive pressure ventilation.

Authors:  David Berger; Jukka Takala
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-09

Review 2.  Venous return and the physical connection between distribution of segmental pressures and volumes.

Authors:  George L Brengelmann
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 4.733

Review 3.  Venous return and mean systemic filling pressure: physiology and clinical applications.

Authors:  Romain Persichini; Christopher Lai; Jean-Louis Teboul; Imane Adda; Laurent Guérin; Xavier Monnet
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 19.334

4.  The inspiration hold maneuver is a reliable method to assess mean systemic filling pressure but its clinical value remains unclear.

Authors:  Lex M van Loon; Hans van der Hoeven; Peter H Veltink; Joris Lemson
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-11

5.  Changes in mean systemic filling pressure as an estimate of hemodynamic response to anesthesia induction using propofol.

Authors:  Maayan Zucker; Gregory Kagan; Nimrod Adi; Ilai Ronel; Idit Matot; Lilach Zac; Or Goren
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 2.376

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.