Literature DB >> 28360015

Health-related quality of life in patients with locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer treated with etirinotecan pegol versus treatment of physician's choice: Results from the randomised phase III BEACON trial.

Chris Twelves1, Javier Cortés2, Joyce O'Shaughnessy3, Ahmad Awada4, Edith A Perez5, Seock-Ah Im6, Patricia Gómez-Pardo7, Lee S Schwartzberg8, Véronique Diéras9, Denise A Yardley10, David A Potter11, Audrey Mailliez12, Alvaro Moreno-Aspitia13, Jin-Seok Ahn14, Carol Zhao15, Ute Hoch15, Mary Tagliaferri15, Alison L Hannah16, Hope S Rugo17.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) enhances understanding of treatment effects that impact clinical decision-making. Although the primary end-point was not achieved, the BEACON (BrEAst Cancer Outcomes with NKTR-102) trial established etirinotecan pegol, a long-acting topoisomerase-1 (TOP1) inhibitor, as a promising therapeutic for patients with advanced/metastatic breast cancer (MBC) achieving clinically meaningful benefits in median overall survival (OS) for patients with stable brain metastases, with liver metastases or ≥ 2 sites of metastatic disease compared to treatment of physician's choice (TPC). Reported herein are the findings from the preplanned secondary end-point of HRQoL. PATIENTS AND METHODS: HRQoL, assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30) (version 3.0) supplemented by the breast cancer-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-BR23), was evaluated post randomisation in 733 of 852 patients with either anthracycline-, taxane- and capecitabine-pretreated locally recurrent or MBC randomised to etirinotecan pegol (n = 378; 145 mg/m2 every 3 weeks (q3wk)) or single-agent TPC (n = 355). Patients completed assessments at screening, every 8 weeks (q8wk) during treatment, and end-of-treatment. Changes from baseline were analysed, and the proportions of patients achieving differences (≥5 points) in HRQoL scores were compared.
RESULTS: Differences were seen favouring etirinotecan pegol up to 32 weeks for global health status (GHS) and physical functioning scales (P < 0.02); numerical improvement was reported in other functional scales. The findings from HRQoL symptom scales were consistent with adverse event profiles; etirinotecan pegol was associated with worsening gastrointestinal symptoms whereas TPC was associated with worsened dyspnoea and other systemic side-effects. Analysis of GHS and physical functioning at disease progression showed a decline in HRQoL in both treatment arms, with a mean change from baseline of -9.4 and -10.8 points, respectively.
CONCLUSION: There was evidence of benefit associated with etirinotecan pegol compared with current standard of care agents in multiple HRQoL measurements, including global health status and physical functioning, despite worse gastrointestinal symptoms (e.g. diarrhoea). Patients in both arms had a decline in HRQoL at disease progression. STUDY NUMBER: NCT01492101.
Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Advanced breast cancer; Etirinotecan pegol; Metastatic breast cancer; NKTR-102; Quality of life

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28360015     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.02.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  5 in total

1.  The underreporting of phase III chemo-therapeutic clinical trial data of older patients with cancer: A systematic review.

Authors:  Karlynn BrintzenhofeSzoc; Jessica L Krok-Schoen; Beverly Canin; Ira Parker; Amy R MacKenzie; Thuy Koll; Ritika Vankina; Christine D Hsu; Brian Jang; Kathy Pan; Jennifer L Lund; Edith Starbuck; Armin Shahrokni
Journal:  J Geriatr Oncol       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 3.599

2.  ATTAIN: Phase III study of etirinotecan pegol versus treatment of physician's choice in patients with metastatic breast cancer and brain metastases.

Authors:  Debu Tripathy; Sara M Tolaney; Andrew D Seidman; Carey K Anders; Nuhad Ibrahim; Hope S Rugo; Chris Twelves; Veronique Dieras; Volkmar Müller; Mary Tagliaferri; Alison L Hannah; Javier Cortés
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2019-05-10       Impact factor: 3.404

Review 3.  Therapy of breast cancer brain metastases: challenges, emerging treatments and perspectives.

Authors:  Nuria Kotecki; Florence Lefranc; Daniel Devriendt; Ahmad Awada
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 8.168

4.  Judicialization of health: profile of demands for oncological medicines in a state in the central region of Brazil.

Authors:  Leila Abou Salha; Flávia Costa Reis; Roberta Moreira Gonçalves; Jordão Horácio da Silva Lima; Nádia Abou Salha; Roney Pereira Pinto; José Elmo de Menezes; Eduardo Perez Oliveira; Pedro Lopes Ferreira; Maria Alves Barbosa
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2022-08-17

5.  Randomized Open Label Phase III Trial of Irinotecan Plus Capecitabine versus Capecitabine Monotherapy in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer Previously Treated with Anthracycline and Taxane: PROCEED Trial (KCSG BR 11-01).

Authors:  In Hae Park; Seock-Ah Im; Kyung Hae Jung; Joo Hyuk Sohn; Yeon Hee Park; Keun Seok Lee; Sung Hoon Sim; Kyong-Hwa Park; Jee Hyun Kim; Byung Ho Nam; Hee-Jun Kim; Tae-Yong Kim; Kyung-Hun Lee; Sung-Bae Kim; Jin-Hee Ahn; Suee Lee; Jungsil Ro
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 4.679

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.