R C Merchant1, M A Clark2, T Liu3, J G Rosenberger4, J Romanoff3, J Bauermeister5, K H Mayer6. 1. Department of Emergency Medicine, Alpert Medical School, Brown University, USA; Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Brown University, USA. Electronic address: rmerchant@lifespan.org. 2. Department of Quantitative Health Sciences and Center for Health Policy and Research, University of Massachusetts Medical School, USA. 3. Department of Biostatistics, Center for Statistical Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, USA. 4. Department of Biobehavioral Health, Pennsylvania State University, USA. 5. Department of Health Behavior & Health Education, Center for Sexuality and Health Disparities, University of Michigan, USA. 6. Fenway Community Health, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We assessed preferences of social media-using young black, Hispanic and white men-who-have-sex-with-men (YMSM) for oral fluid rapid HIV self-testing, as compared to other currently available HIV testing options. We also identified aspects of the oral fluid rapid HIV self-test that might influence preferences for using this test instead of other HIV testing options and determined if consideration of HIV testing costs and the potential future availability of fingerstick rapid HIV self-testing change HIV testing preferences. STUDY DESIGN: Anonymous online survey. METHODS: HIV-uninfected YMSM across the United States recruited from multiple social media platforms completed an online survey about willingness to use, opinions about and their preferences for using oral fluid rapid HIV self-testing and five other currently available HIV testing options. In a pre/post questionnaire format design, participants first indicated their preferences for using the six HIV testing options (pre) before answering questions that asked their experience with and opinions about HIV testing. Although not revealed to participants and not apparent in the phrasing of the questions or responses, the opinion questions concerned aspects of oral fluid rapid HIV self-testing (e.g. its possible advantages/disadvantages, merits/demerits, and barriers/facilitators). Afterward, participants were queried again about their HIV testing preferences (post). After completing these questions, participants were asked to re-indicate their HIV testing preferences when considering they had to pay for HIV testing and if fingerstick blood sample rapid HIV self-testing were an additional testing option. Aspects about the oral fluid rapid HIV self-test associated with increased preference for using the test (post-assessment vs pre-assessment of opinion topics) were identified through multivariable regression models that adjusted for participant characteristics. RESULTS: Of the 1975 YMSM participants, the median age was 22 years (IQR 20-23); 19% were black, 36% Hispanic, and 45% white; and 18% previously used an oral fluid rapid HIV self-test. Although views about oral fluid rapid HIV self-testing test were favorable, few intended to use the test. Aspects about the oral fluid rapid HIV self-test associated with an increased preference for using the test were its privacy features, that it motivated getting tested more often or as soon as possible, and that it conferred feelings of more control over one's sexual health. Preferences for the oral fluid rapid HIV self-test were lower when costs were considered, yet these YMSM were much more interested in fingerstick blood sampling than oral fluid sampling rapid HIV self-testing. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the perceived advantages of the oral fluid rapid HIV self-test and favorable views about it by this population, prior use as well as future intention in using the test were low. Aspects about oral fluid rapid HIV self-testing identified as influential in this study might assist in interventions aimed to increase its use among this high HIV risk population as a means of encouraging regular HIV testing, identifying HIV-infected persons, and linking them to care. Although not yet commercially available in the United States, fingerstick rapid HIV self-testing might help motivate YMSM to be tested more than oral fluid rapid HIV self-testing.
OBJECTIVES: We assessed preferences of social media-using young black, Hispanic and white men-who-have-sex-with-men (YMSM) for oral fluid rapid HIV self-testing, as compared to other currently available HIV testing options. We also identified aspects of the oral fluid rapid HIV self-test that might influence preferences for using this test instead of other HIV testing options and determined if consideration of HIV testing costs and the potential future availability of fingerstick rapid HIV self-testing change HIV testing preferences. STUDY DESIGN: Anonymous online survey. METHODS:HIV-uninfected YMSM across the United States recruited from multiple social media platforms completed an online survey about willingness to use, opinions about and their preferences for using oral fluid rapid HIV self-testing and five other currently available HIV testing options. In a pre/post questionnaire format design, participants first indicated their preferences for using the six HIV testing options (pre) before answering questions that asked their experience with and opinions about HIV testing. Although not revealed to participants and not apparent in the phrasing of the questions or responses, the opinion questions concerned aspects of oral fluid rapid HIV self-testing (e.g. its possible advantages/disadvantages, merits/demerits, and barriers/facilitators). Afterward, participants were queried again about their HIV testing preferences (post). After completing these questions, participants were asked to re-indicate their HIV testing preferences when considering they had to pay for HIV testing and if fingerstick blood sample rapid HIV self-testing were an additional testing option. Aspects about the oral fluid rapid HIV self-test associated with increased preference for using the test (post-assessment vs pre-assessment of opinion topics) were identified through multivariable regression models that adjusted for participant characteristics. RESULTS: Of the 1975 YMSM participants, the median age was 22 years (IQR 20-23); 19% were black, 36% Hispanic, and 45% white; and 18% previously used an oral fluid rapid HIV self-test. Although views about oral fluid rapid HIV self-testing test were favorable, few intended to use the test. Aspects about the oral fluid rapid HIV self-test associated with an increased preference for using the test were its privacy features, that it motivated getting tested more often or as soon as possible, and that it conferred feelings of more control over one's sexual health. Preferences for the oral fluid rapid HIV self-test were lower when costs were considered, yet these YMSM were much more interested in fingerstick blood sampling than oral fluid sampling rapid HIV self-testing. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the perceived advantages of the oral fluid rapid HIV self-test and favorable views about it by this population, prior use as well as future intention in using the test were low. Aspects about oral fluid rapid HIV self-testing identified as influential in this study might assist in interventions aimed to increase its use among this high HIV risk population as a means of encouraging regular HIV testing, identifying HIV-infectedpersons, and linking them to care. Although not yet commercially available in the United States, fingerstick rapid HIV self-testing might help motivate YMSM to be tested more than oral fluid rapid HIV self-testing.
Authors: Duncan A MacKellar; Linda A Valleroy; John E Anderson; Stephanie Behel; Gina M Secura; Trista Bingham; David D Celentano; Beryl A Koblin; Marlene LaLota; Douglas Shehan; Hanne Thiede; Lucia V Torian; Robert S Janssen Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Alexandra M Oster; Christopher H Johnson; Binh C Le; Alexandra B Balaji; Teresa J Finlayson; Amy Lansky; Jonathan Mermin; Linda Valleroy; Duncan Mackellar; Stephanie Behel; Gabriela Paz-Bailey Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2014-04
Authors: Renee Stein; Kathleen Green; Kelly Bell; Carlos A Toledo; Gary Uhl; Andrea Moore; Gene A Shelley; Felicia P Hardnett Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2011-05
Authors: H Irene Hall; Ruiguang Song; Philip Rhodes; Joseph Prejean; Qian An; Lisa M Lee; John Karon; Ron Brookmeyer; Edward H Kaplan; Matthew T McKenna; Robert S Janssen Journal: JAMA Date: 2008-08-06 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Sarah J Marks; Roland C Merchant; Melissa A Clark; Tao Liu; Joshua G Rosenberger; Jose Bauermeister; Kenneth H Mayer Journal: AIDS Patient Care STDS Date: 2017-11 Impact factor: 5.078
Authors: Anna E Wentz; Roland C Merchant; Melissa A Clark; Tao Liu; Joshua G Rosenberger; José A Bauermeister; Kenneth H Mayer Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2018-12-07 Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Roland C Merchant; Melissa A Clark; Tao Liu; Justin Romanoff; Joshua G Rosenberger; Jose Bauermeister; Kenneth H Mayer Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2018-01
Authors: Roland C Merchant; Justin Romanoff; Melissa A Clark; Tao Liu; Joshua G Rosenberger; Jose Bauermeister; Kenneth H Mayer Journal: Am J Mens Health Date: 2017-07-10
Authors: Christopher L Bennett; Sarah J Marks; Joshua G Rosenberger; José A Bauermeister; Melissa A Clark; Tao Liu; Kenneth H Mayer; Roland C Merchant Journal: J Int Assoc Provid AIDS Care Date: 2020 Jan-Dec
Authors: Ucheoma Nwaozuru; Juliet Iwelunmor; Jason J Ong; Sawsan Salah; Chisom Obiezu-Umeh; Oliver Ezechi; Joseph D Tucker Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2019-12-27 Impact factor: 2.655