Meena S Moran1, Yinjun Zhao2, Shuangge Ma2, Youlia Kirova3, Alain Fourquet3, Peter Chen4, Karen Hoffman5, Kelly Hunt5, Julia Wong6, Lia M Halasz6, Gary Freedman7, Robert Prosnitz7, Michael Yassa8, David H A Nguyen8, Tarek Hijal9, Bruce G Haffty10, Elaine S Wai11, Pauline T Truong11. 1. Smilow Cancer Center, Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut. 2. Department of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut. 3. Department of Radiation Therapy, Institut Curie, Paris, France. 4. Department of Radiation Therapy, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, Michigan. 5. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston. 6. Department of Radiation Oncology, Harvard Medical School, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts. 7. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. 8. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Montreal, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 9. Department of Radiation Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 10. Department of Radiation Therapy, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey. 11. Department of Radiation Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: The use of a radiotherapy (RT) boost to the tumor bed after whole-breast RT (WBRT) for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is largely extrapolated from invasive cancer data, but robust evidence specific to DCIS is lacking. OBJECTIVE: To compare ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) in women with DCIS treated with vs without the RT boost after breast-conserving surgery and WBRT. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective analysis pooled deidentified patient-level data from 10 academic institutions in the United States, Canada, and France from January 1, 1980, through December 31, 2010. All patients had newly diagnosed pure DCIS (no microinvasion), underwent breast-conserving surgery, and received WBRT with or without the boost with a minimum of 5 years of follow-up required for inclusion in the analysis. Given the limited events after WBRT, an a priori power analysis was conducted to estimate the DCIS sample size needed to detect the anticipated benefit of the boost. Data were uniformly recoded at the host institution and underwent primary and secondary reviews before analysis. Sample size calculations (ratio of patients who received the boost dose to those who did not, 2:1; α = .05; power = 80%) estimated that 2982 cases were needed to detect a difference of at least 3%. The final analysis included 4131 patients (2661 in the boost group and 1470 in the no-boost group) with a median follow-up of 9 years and media boost dose of 14 Gy. Data were collected from July 2011 through February 2014 and analyzed from March 2014 through August 2015. INTERVENTIONS: Radiotherapy boost vs no boost. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence. RESULTS: The analysis included 4131 patients (median [SD] age, 56.1 [10.9] years; range, 24-88 years). Patients with positive margins, unknown estrogen receptor status, and comedo necrosis were more likely to have received an RT boost. For the entire cohort, the boost was significantly associated with lower IBTR (hazard ratio [HR], 0.73; 95% CI, 0.57-0.94; P = .01) and with IBTR-free survival (boost vs no-boost groups) of 97.1% (95% CI, 0.96-0.98) vs 96.3% (95% CI, 0.95-0.97) at 5 years, 94.1% (95% CI, 0.93-0.95) vs 92.5% (95% CI, 0.91-0.94) at 10 years, and 91.6% (95% CI, 0.90-0.93) vs 88.0% (95% CI, 0.85-0.91) at 15 years. On multivariable analysis accounting for confounding factors, the boost remained significantly associated with reduced IBTR (HR compared with no boost, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.50-0.91; P = .01) independent of age and tamoxifen citrate use. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This patient-level analysis suggests that the RT boost confers a statistically significant benefit in decreasing IBTR across all DCIS age groups, similar to that seen in patients with invasive breast cancer. These findings suggest that a DCIS RT boost to the tumor bed could be considered to provide an added incremental benefit in decreasing IBTR after a shared discussion between the patient and her radiation oncologist.
IMPORTANCE: The use of a radiotherapy (RT) boost to the tumor bed after whole-breast RT (WBRT) for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is largely extrapolated from invasive cancer data, but robust evidence specific to DCIS is lacking. OBJECTIVE: To compare ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) in women with DCIS treated with vs without the RT boost after breast-conserving surgery and WBRT. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective analysis pooled deidentified patient-level data from 10 academic institutions in the United States, Canada, and France from January 1, 1980, through December 31, 2010. All patients had newly diagnosed pure DCIS (no microinvasion), underwent breast-conserving surgery, and received WBRT with or without the boost with a minimum of 5 years of follow-up required for inclusion in the analysis. Given the limited events after WBRT, an a priori power analysis was conducted to estimate the DCIS sample size needed to detect the anticipated benefit of the boost. Data were uniformly recoded at the host institution and underwent primary and secondary reviews before analysis. Sample size calculations (ratio of patients who received the boost dose to those who did not, 2:1; α = .05; power = 80%) estimated that 2982 cases were needed to detect a difference of at least 3%. The final analysis included 4131 patients (2661 in the boost group and 1470 in the no-boost group) with a median follow-up of 9 years and media boost dose of 14 Gy. Data were collected from July 2011 through February 2014 and analyzed from March 2014 through August 2015. INTERVENTIONS: Radiotherapy boost vs no boost. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence. RESULTS: The analysis included 4131 patients (median [SD] age, 56.1 [10.9] years; range, 24-88 years). Patients with positive margins, unknown estrogen receptor status, and comedo necrosis were more likely to have received an RT boost. For the entire cohort, the boost was significantly associated with lower IBTR (hazard ratio [HR], 0.73; 95% CI, 0.57-0.94; P = .01) and with IBTR-free survival (boost vs no-boost groups) of 97.1% (95% CI, 0.96-0.98) vs 96.3% (95% CI, 0.95-0.97) at 5 years, 94.1% (95% CI, 0.93-0.95) vs 92.5% (95% CI, 0.91-0.94) at 10 years, and 91.6% (95% CI, 0.90-0.93) vs 88.0% (95% CI, 0.85-0.91) at 15 years. On multivariable analysis accounting for confounding factors, the boost remained significantly associated with reduced IBTR (HR compared with no boost, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.50-0.91; P = .01) independent of age and tamoxifen citrate use. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This patient-level analysis suggests that the RT boost confers a statistically significant benefit in decreasing IBTR across all DCIS age groups, similar to that seen in patients with invasive breast cancer. These findings suggest that a DCIS RT boost to the tumor bed could be considered to provide an added incremental benefit in decreasing IBTR after a shared discussion between the patient and her radiation oncologist.
Authors: Rolf H H Groenwold; Ian R White; A Rogier T Donders; James R Carpenter; Douglas G Altman; Karel G M Moons Journal: CMAJ Date: 2012-02-27 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Aurelius Omlin; Maurizio Amichetti; David Azria; Bernard F Cole; Philippe Fourneret; Philip Poortmans; Diana Naehrig; Robert C Miller; Marco Krengli; Cristina Gutierrez Miguelez; David Morgan; Hadassah Goldberg; Luciano Scandolaro; Pauline Gastelblum; Mahmut Ozsahin; Dagmar Dohr; David Christie; Ulrich Oppitz; Ufuk Abacioglu; Guenther Gruber Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Irene L Wapnir; James J Dignam; Bernard Fisher; Eleftherios P Mamounas; Stewart J Anderson; Thomas B Julian; Stephanie R Land; Richard G Margolese; Sandra M Swain; Joseph P Costantino; Norman Wolmark Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2011-03-11 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: I Meattini; L Livi; D Franceschini; C Saieva; F Meacci; L Marrazzo; B Bendinelli; V Scotti; C De Luca Cardillo; J Nori; L Sanchez; L Orzalesi; P Bonomo; D Greto; M Bucciolini; S Bianchi; G Biti Journal: Eur J Surg Oncol Date: 2013-03-20 Impact factor: 4.424
Authors: B Cutuli; N Wiezzane; I Palumbo; P Barbieri; M Guenzi; A Huscher; S Borghesi; C Delva; T Iannone; E Vianello; M-E Rosetto; C Aristei Journal: Cancer Radiother Date: 2016-06-22 Impact factor: 1.018
Authors: Eileen Rakovitch; Steven A Narod; Sharon Nofech-Moses; Wedad Hanna; Deva Thiruchelvam; Refik Saskin; Carole Taylor; Alan Tuck; Bruce Youngson; Naomi Miller; Susan J Done; Sandip Sengupta; Leela Elavathil; Prashant A Jani; Michel Bonin; Stephanie Metcalfe; Lawrence Paszat Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2013-07-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Jack Cuzick; Ivana Sestak; Sarah E Pinder; Ian O Ellis; Sharon Forsyth; Nigel J Bundred; John F Forbes; Hugh Bishop; Ian S Fentiman; William D George Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2010-12-07 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Audree B Tadros; Tracy-Ann Moo; Emily C Zabor; Erin F Gillespie; Atif Khan; Beryl McCormick; Oren Cahlon; Simon N Powell; Robert Allen; Monica Morrow; Lior Z Braunstein Journal: Pract Radiat Oncol Date: 2020-03-20
Authors: Diana R Withrow; Lindsay M Morton; Rochelle E Curtis; Sara J Schonfeld; Amy Berrington de González Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2017-07-25 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: M J Cambra; F Moreno; X Sanz; L Anglada; M Mollà; V Reyes; M Arenas; A Pedro; R Ballester; V García; J Casals; M Cusidó; C Jimenez; J M Escribà; M Macià; J M Solé; A Arcusa; M A Seguí; S Gonzalez; B Farrús; A Biete Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2019-07-01 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Nora H Trabulsi; Alaa A Shabkah; Reem Ujaimi; Omar Iskanderani; Mai S Kadi; Nuran Aljabri; Liane Sharbatly; Manal N AlOtaibi; Ali H Farsi; Mohammed O Nassif; Abdulaziz M Saleem; Nouf Y Akeel; Nadim H Malibary; Ali A Samkari Journal: Cureus Date: 2021-06-08