Literature DB >> 28358666

A study of the beam-specific interplay effect in proton pencil beam scanning delivery in lung cancer.

Minglei Kang1, Sheng Huang1, Timothy D Solberg1,2, Rulon Mayer3, Andy Thomas3, Boon-Keng Kevin Teo1, James E McDonough1, Charles B Simone1,4, Liyong Lin1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: For lung tumors with large motion amplitudes, the use of proton pencil beam scanning (PBS) can produce large dose errors. In this study, we assess under what circumstances PBS can be used to treat lung cancer patients who exhibit large tumor motion, based on the quantification of tumor motion and the dose interplay.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: PBS plans were optimized on average 4DCT datasets using a beam-specific PTV method for 10 consecutive patients with locally advanced non-small-cell-lung-cancer (NSCLC) treated with proton therapy to 6660/180 cGy. End inhalation (CT0) and end exhalation (CT50) were selected as the two extreme scenarios to acquire the relative stopping power ratio difference (Δrsp) for a respiration cycle. The water equivalent difference (ΔWET) per radiological path was calculated from the surface of patient to the iCTV by integrating the Δrsp of each voxel. The magnitude of motion of voxels within the target follows a quasi-Gaussian distribution. A motion index (MI (>5mm WET)), defined as the percentage of target voxels with an absolute integral ΔWET larger than 5 mm, was adopted as a metric to characterize interplay. To simulate the treatment process, 4D dose was calculated by accumulating the spot dose on the corresponding respiration phase to the reference phase CT50 by deformable image registration based on spot timing and patient breathing phase.
RESULTS: The study indicated that the magnitude of target underdose in a single fraction plan is proportional to the MI (p < .001), with larger motion equating to greater dose degradation and standard deviations. The target homogeneity, minimum, maximum and mean dose in the 4D dose accumulations of 37 fractions varied as a function of MI.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that MI can predict the level of dose degradation, which potentially serves as a clinical decision tool to assess whether lung cancer patients are potentially suitable to receive PBS treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28358666     DOI: 10.1080/0284186X.2017.1293287

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Oncol        ISSN: 0284-186X            Impact factor:   4.089


  14 in total

Review 1.  Proton beam therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Authors:  Shahed N Badiyan; Jason K Molitoris; Mingyao Zhu; Erica Glass; Tejan Diwanji; Charles B Simone
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2018-04

2.  Functional lung avoidance and response-adaptive escalation (FLARE) RT: Multimodality plan dosimetry of a precision radiation oncology strategy.

Authors:  Eunsin Lee; Jing Zeng; Robert S Miyaoka; Jatinder Saini; Paul E Kinahan; George A Sandison; Tony Wong; Hubert J Vesselle; Ramesh Rengan; Stephen R Bowen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 3.  Advances in the use of motion management and image guidance in radiation therapy treatment for lung cancer.

Authors:  Jason K Molitoris; Tejan Diwanji; James W Snider; Sina Mossahebi; Santanu Samanta; Shahed N Badiyan; Charles B Simone; Pranshu Mohindra
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 4.  Reirradiation for locoregionally recurrent non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Melissa A L Vyfhuis; Stephanie Rice; Jill Remick; Sina Mossahebi; Shahed Badiyan; Pranshu Mohindra; Charles B Simone
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Optimization of motion management parameters in a synchrotron-based spot scanning system.

Authors:  Jedediah E Johnson; Michael G Herman; Jon J Kruse
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Investigation of inter-fraction target motion variations in the context of pencil beam scanned proton therapy in non-small cell lung cancer patients.

Authors:  Lydia A den Otter; Renske M Anakotta; Menkedina Weessies; Catharina T G Roos; Nanna M Sijtsema; Christina T Muijs; Margriet Dieters; Robin Wijsman; Esther G C Troost; Christian Richter; Arturs Meijers; Johannes A Langendijk; Stefan Both; Antje-Christin Knopf
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Advanced proton beam dosimetry part II: Monte Carlo vs. pencil beam-based planning for lung cancer.

Authors:  Dominic Maes; Jatinder Saini; Jing Zeng; Ramesh Rengan; Tony Wong; Stephen R Bowen
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2018-04

8.  Technical Note: Multiple energy extraction techniques for synchrotron-based proton delivery systems may exacerbate motion interplay effects in lung cancer treatments.

Authors:  James E Younkin; Danairis Hernandez Morales; Jiajian Shen; Xiaoning Ding; Joshua B Stoker; Nathan Y Yu; Terence T Sio; Thomas B Daniels; Martin Bues; Mirek Fatyga; Steven E Schild; Wei Liu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 4.506

Review 9.  Advances in proton therapy in lung cancer.

Authors:  Melissa A L Vyfhuis; Nasarachi Onyeuku; Tejan Diwanji; Sina Mossahebi; Neha P Amin; Shahed N Badiyan; Pranshu Mohindra; Charles B Simone
Journal:  Ther Adv Respir Dis       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 4.031

10.  Feasibility study: spot-scanning proton arc therapy (SPArc) for left-sided whole breast radiotherapy.

Authors:  Sheng Chang; Gang Liu; Lewei Zhao; Joshua T Dilworth; Weili Zheng; Saada Jawad; Di Yan; Peter Chen; Craig Stevens; Peyman Kabolizadeh; Xiaoqiang Li; Xuanfeng Ding
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 3.481

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.