| Literature DB >> 28358415 |
Muren Huhe1, Shuangshuang Liu1, Yang Zhang1, Zheng Zhang1, Zhinan Chen1.
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to investigate the prognostic significance of the expression of transcription factors, c-Fos, c-Jun and transmembrane protein CD147, in urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB). The current study investigated the clinical significance of these factors in the development, progression and survival analysis of UCB. Immunohistochemistry was employed to analyze c‑Fos, c‑Jun and CD147 expression in 41 UCB cases and 34 non‑cancerous human bladder tissues. These results were scored in a semi‑quantitative manner based on the intensity and percentage of tumor cells that presented immunoreactivity. Protein levels of CD147, c‑Fos and c‑Jun expression were upregulated in 22 (53.7%), 10 (24.4%) and 9 (22.0%) UCB cases, respectively. High levels of c‑Jun correlated with the AJCC cancer staging manual (7th edition; P=0.038). Univariate analysis revealed that upregulated CD147 (P=0.038) or c‑Jun (P=0.008) was associated with poor overall survival (OS), respectively. Further analysis revealed that either CD147‑c‑Fos‑c‑Jun co‑expression (P=0.004), or CD147‑c‑Jun co‑expression (P=0.037) and c‑Fos‑c‑Jun co‑expression (P<0.001) were associated with poor OS. Multivariate analysis suggested that either upregulation of CD147, c‑Jun or c‑Fos were independent risk indicators for death in UCB patients. Increased expression of c‑Jun or CD147, as well as co‑expression of CD147‑c‑Jun, c‑Jun‑c‑Fos or CD147‑c‑Jun‑c‑Fos has prognostic significance for UCB patients. Therefore, high CD147 and c‑Jun expression may serve roles in tumor progression and may be diagnostic and therapeutic targets in UCB whether alone or in combination.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28358415 PMCID: PMC5428553 DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2017.6411
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Med Rep ISSN: 1791-2997 Impact factor: 2.952
CD147, c-Fos, and c-Jun expression in 41 patients with urothelial carcinoma of the bladder.
| CD147 (%) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Factor | +++(n=3) (%) | ++(n=6) (%) | +(n=13) (%) | -(n=19) (%) | P-value | |
| Age (y) | ||||||
| >71 (n=20) | 1 (5.0) | 2 (10.0) | 7 (35.0) | 10 (50.0) | 0.393 | |
| ≤71 (n=21) | 2 (9.5) | 4 (19.0) | 6 (28.6) | 9 (42.9) | ||
| Sex | ||||||
| Male (n=35) | 3 (8.6) | 6 (17.1) | 11 (31.4) | 15 (42.9) | 0.165 | |
| Female (n=6) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 2 (33.3) | 4 (66.7) | ||
| Growth pattern | ||||||
| Papillary (n=11) | 0 (0) | 2 (18.2) | 5 (45.5) | 4 (36.4) | 0.964 | |
| Nonpapillary (n=30) | 3 (10.0) | 4 (13.3) | 8 (26.7) | 15 (50.0) | ||
| WHO grade | ||||||
| Low (n=3) | 0 (0) | 1 (33.3) | 2 (66.7) | 0 (0) | 0.338 | |
| High (n=38) | 3 (7.9) | 5 (13.2) | 11 (28.9) | 19 (50.0) | ||
| Lymph node invasion | ||||||
| Negative (n=37) | 2 (5.4) | 6 (16.2) | 10 (27.0) | 19 (51.4) | 0.136 | |
| Positive (n=4) | 1 (25.0) | 0 (0) | 3 (75.0) | 0 (0) | ||
| TNM stage | ||||||
| Low (Tis) (n=6) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 4 (66.7) | 2 (33.3) | 0.649 | |
| High (T1-T4a) (n=35) | 3 (8.6) | 6 (17.1) | 9 (25.7) | 17 (48.6) | ||
| Tumor diameter | ||||||
| >4 cm (n=16) | 0 (0) | 5 (31.3) | 6 (37.5) | 5 (31.3) | 0.355 | |
| ≤4 cm (n=25) | 3 (12.0) | 1 (4.0) | 7 (28.0) | 14 (56.0) | ||
| AJCC cancer staging | ||||||
| Tis (n=12) | 1 (8.3) | 1 (8.3) | 4 (33.3) | 6 (50.0) | 0.554 | |
| 1–2 (n=11) | 0 (0) | 2 (18.2) | 4 (36.4) | 5 (45.5) | ||
| 3–4 (n=18) | 2 (11.1) | 5 (27.8) | 3 (16.7) | 8 (44.4) | ||
| c-Fos (%) | ||||||
| Factor | +++(n=0) | ++(n=1) (%) | +(n=9) (%) | −(n=31)(%) | P-value | |
| Age (y) | ||||||
| >71 (n=20) | – | 0 (0) | 6 (30.0) | 14 (70.0) | 0.693 | |
| ≤71 (n=21) | – | 1 (4.8) | 3 (14.3) | 17 (81.0) | ||
| Sex | ||||||
| Male (n=35) | – | 1 (2.9) | 6 (17.1) | 28 (80.0) | 0.220 | |
| Female (n=6) | – | 0 (0) | 3 (50.0) | 3 (50.0) | ||
| Growth pattern | ||||||
| Papillary (n=11) | – | 1 (9.1) | 1 (9.1) | 9 (81.8) | 0.973 | |
| Nonpapillary (n=30) | – | 0 (0) | 8 (26.7) | 22 (73.3) | ||
| WHO grade | ||||||
| Low (n=3) | – | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 3 (100.0) | 0.336 | |
| High (n=38) | – | 1 (2.6) | 9 (23.7) | 28 (73.7) | ||
| Lymph node invasion | ||||||
| Negative (n=37) | – | 1 (2.7) | 7 (18.9) | 29 (78.4) | 0.330 | |
| Positive (n=4) | – | 0 (0) | 2 (50.0) | 2 (50.0) | ||
| TNM stage | ||||||
| Low (Tis) (n=6) | – | 1 (16.7) | 0 (0) | 5 (83.3) | 0.731 | |
| High (T1-T4a) (n=35) | – | 0 (0) | 9 (25.7) | 26 (74.3) | ||
| Tumor diameter | ||||||
| >4 cm (n=16) | – | 1 (6.3) | 3 (18.8) | 12 (75.0) | 0.651 | |
| ≤4 cm (n=25) | – | 0 (0) | 6 (24.0) | 19 (76.0) | ||
| AJCC cancer staging | ||||||
| Tis (n=12) | – | 1 (8.3) | 2 (16.7) | 9 (75.0) | 0.552 | |
| 1–2 (n=11) | – | 0 (0) | 3 (27.3) | 8 (72.7) | ||
| 3–4 (n=18) | – | 0 (0) | 4 (22.2) | 14 (77.8) | ||
| c-Jun (%) | ||||||
| Factor | +++ (n=0) | ++ (n=0) | + (n=9) (%) | − (n=32) (%) | P-value | |
| Age (y) | ||||||
| >71 (n=20) | – | – | 2 (10.0) | 18 (90.0) | 0.130 | |
| ≤71 (n=21) | – | – | 7 (33.3) | 14 (66.7) | ||
| Sex | ||||||
| Male (n=35) | – | – | 8 (22.9) | 27 (77.1) | 1.000 | |
| Female (n=6) | – | – | 1 (16.7) | 5 (83.3) | ||
| Growth pattern | ||||||
| Papillary (n=11) | – | – | 2 (18.2) | 9 (81.8) | 1.000 | |
| Nonpapillary (n=30) | – | – | 7 (23.3) | 23 (76.7) | ||
| WHO grade | ||||||
| Low (n=3) | – | – | 0 (0) | 3 (100) | 1.000 | |
| High (n=38) | – | – | 9 (23.7) | 29 (76.3) | ||
| Lymph node invasion | ||||||
| Negative (n=37) | – | – | 7 (18.9) | 30 (81.1) | 0.204 | |
| Positive (n=4) | – | – | 2 (50.00) | 2 (50.0) | – | |
| TNM stage | ||||||
| Low (Tis) (n=6) | – | – | 2 (33.3) | 4 (66.7) | 0.597 | |
| High (T1-T4a) (n=35) | – | – | 7 (20.0) | 28 (80.0) | – | |
| Tumor diameter | ||||||
| >4 cm (n=16) | – | – | 5 (31.3) | 11 (68.8) | 0.276 | |
| ≤4 cm (n=25) | – | – | 4 (16.0) | 21 (84.0) | – | |
| AJCC cancer staging | ||||||
| Tis (n=12) | – | – | 1 (8.3) | 11 (91.7) | 0.038 | |
| 1–2 (n=11) | – | – | 1 (9.1) | 10 (90.9) | – | |
| 3–4 (n=18) | – | – | 7 (38.9) | 11 (61.1) | – | |
| – | – | – | – | – | ||
WHO, World Health Organization; TNM, tumor node metastasis; AJCC, the 7th American Joint Committee on Cancer; -, Negative.
Figure 1.The immunohistochemical staining of CD147, c-Fos and c-Jun in UCB. The expression of c-Jun, c-Fos and CD147 was scored as negative, absence; +, weak; ++, moderate; and +++, strong. The images were ×100 (upper row) and ×400 magnification (bottom row). The histogram presents the number of cases with CD147, c-Fos and c-Jun expression in UCB tissues and para-cancer normal tissues. The distribution of 41 cases of UCB and 34 cases of para-cancer tissues is presented in the bar graph. CD147 (negative, 19; +, 3; ++, 6; and +++, 13 in UCB. negative, 34 in para-cancer), c-Fos (negative, 31; +, 9; and ++, 1 in UCB. negative, 13; and +, 21 in para-cancer) and c-Jun (negative, 32; +, 9; in UCB. Negative, 33; and +, 1 in para-cancer), respectively. ***P<0.001, **P<0.01 and *P<0.05 vs. para-cancer. UCB, urothelial carcinoma of the bladder.
CD147, c-Jun and c-Fos expression correlation in 41 patients with urothelial carcinoma of the bladder.
| CD147 | c-Jun | c-Fos | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marker | rho | P-value | rho | P-value | rho | P-value |
| CD147 | – | – | 0.024 | 0.881 | −0.310 | 0.049 |
| c-Jun | 0.024 | 0.881 | – | – | 0.233 | 0.142 |
| c-Fos | −0.310 | 0.049 | 0.233 | 0.142 | – | – |
CD147, c-Fos, and c-Jun co-expressions in 41 patients with urothelial carcinoma of the bladder.
| CD147-c-Jun co-expression | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Factor | Co-expression (n=5) (%) | Non-co-expression (n=36) (%) | P-value |
| Age (y) | |||
| >71 (n=20) | 2 (10.0) | 18 (90.0) | 1.000 |
| ≤71 (n=21) | 3 (14.3) | 18 (85.7) | |
| Sex | |||
| Male (n=35) | 5 (14.3) | 30 (85.7) | 1.000 |
| Female (n=6) | 0 (0) | 6 (100) | |
| Growth pattern | |||
| Papillary (n=11) | 1 (9.1) | 10 (90.9) | 1.000 |
| Nonpapillary (n=30) | 4 (13.3) | 26 (86.7) | |
| WHO grade | |||
| Low (n=3) | 0 (0) | 5 (100) | 1.000 |
| High (n=38) | 5 (13.2) | 33 (86.8) | |
| Lymph nodes invasion | |||
| Negative (n=37) | 5 (13.5) | 32 (86.5) | 1.000 |
| Positive (n=4) | 0 (0) | 4 (100) | |
| TNM stage | |||
| Low (Tis) (n=6) | 0 (0) | 6 (100) | 1.000 |
| High (T1-T4a) (n=35) | 5 (14.3) | 30 (85.7) | |
| Tumor diameter | |||
| >4 cm (n=16) | 0 (0) | 16 (100) | 0.137 |
| ≤4 cm (n=25) | 5 (20.0) | 20 (80.0) | |
| AJCC cancer staging | |||
| Tis (n=12) | 0 (0) | 12 (100) | 0.068 |
| 1–2 (n=11) | 1 (9.1) | 10 (90.9) | |
| 3–4 (n=18) | 4 (22.2) | 14 (77.8) | |
| CD147-c-Fos co-expression | |||
| Factor | Co-expression (n=2) (%) | Non-co-expression (n=39) (%) | P-value |
| Age (y) | |||
| >71 (n=20) | 2 (10.0) | 18 (90.0) | 0.232 |
| ≤71 (n=21) | 0 (0) | 21 (100) | |
| Sex | |||
| Male (n=35) | 2 (5.7) | 33 (94.3) | 1.000 |
| Female (n=6) | 0 (0) | 6 (100) | |
| Growth pattern | |||
| Papillary (n=11) | 2 (18.2) | 9 (81.8) | 0.067 |
| Nonpapillary (n=30) | 0 (0) | 30 (100) | |
| WHO grade | |||
| Low (n=3) | 0 (0) | 3 (100) | 1.000 |
| High (n=38) | 2 (5.3) | 36 (94.7) | |
| Lymph nodes invasion | |||
| Negative (n=37) | 2 (5.4) | 35 (94.6) | 1.000 |
| Positive (n=4) | 0 (0) | 4 (100) | |
| TNM stage | |||
| Low (Tis) (n=6) | 0 (0) | 6 (100) | 1.000 |
| High (T1-T4a) (n=35) | 2 (5.7) | 33 (94.3) | |
| Tumor diameter | |||
| >4 cm (n=16) | 1 (6.2) | 15 (93.8) | 1.000 |
| ≤4 cm (n=25) | 1 (4.0) | 24 (96.0) | |
| AJCC cancer staging | |||
| Tis (n=12) | 0 (0) | 12 (100) | 0.548 |
| 1–2 (n=11) | 1 (9.1) | 10 (90.9) | |
| 3–4 (n=18) | 1 (5.6) | 17 (94.4) | |
| c-Fos-c-Jun co-expression | |||
| Factor | Co-expression (n=4) (%) | Non-co-expression (n=37) (%) | P-value |
| Age (y) | |||
| >71 (n=20) | 1 (5.0) | 19 (95.0) | 0.606 |
| ≤71 (n=21) | 3 (14.3) | 18 (85.7) | |
| Sex | |||
| Male (n=35) | 3 (8.6) | 32 (91.4) | 0.483 |
| Female (n=6) | 1 (16.7) | 5 (83.3) | |
| Growth pattern | |||
| Papillary (n=11) | 0 (0) | 11 (100) | 0.559 |
| Nonpapillary (n=30) | 4 (13.3) | 26 (86.7) | |
| WHO grade | |||
| Low (n=3) | 0 (0) | 3 (100) | 1.000 |
| High (n=38) | 4 (10.5) | 34 (89.5) | |
| Lymph nodes invasion | |||
| Negative (n=37) | 4 (10.8) | 33 (89.2) | 1.000 |
| Positive (n=4) | 0 (0) | 4 (100) | |
| TNM stage | |||
| Low (Tis) (n=6) | 0 (0) | 6 (100) | 1.000 |
| High (T1-T4a) (n=35) | 4 (11.4) | 31 (88.6) | |
| Tumor diameter | |||
| >4 cm (n=16) | 0 (0) | 16 (100) | 0.143 |
| ≤4 cm (n=25) | 4 (16.0) | 21 (84.0) | |
| AJCC cancer staging | |||
| Tis (n=12) | 1 (8.3) | 11 (91.7) | 0.383 |
| 1–2 (n=11) | 0 (0) | 11 (100) | |
| 3–4 (n=18) | 3 (16.7) | 15 (83.3) | |
WHO, World Health Organization; TNM, tumor node metastasis; AJCC, the 7th American Joint Committee on Cancer.
Figure 2.OS analysis of c-Fos, c-Jun and CD147 expression in 41 patients with urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. (A) Patients with CD147 positive expression (+, ++, +++) had poorer overall survival rate than those with CD147 negative expression (log-rank test, P=0.038). (B) Patients with c-Jun positive expression (+) had poorer overall survival rate than those with c-Jun negative expression (log-rank test, P=0.008). (C) c-Fos positive expression (+, ++) did not significantly correlate with poor OS (log-rank test, P=0.225). (D) Patients with all the three proteins co-expressed (CD147-c-Fos-c-Jun co-expression) had poorer overall survival rate than the others (log-rank test, P=0.004). (E) Patients with CD147-c-Jun co-expression had poorer overall survival rate than the others (log-rank test, P=0.037). (F) Patients with c-Fos-c-Jun co-expression had poorer overall survival rate than the others (log-rank test, P<0.001). (G) CD147-c-Fos co-expression did not significantly correlate with poor OS (log-rank test, P=0.768). (H) OS was better in patients who had c-Fos, c-Jun and CD147 all negative, or single-protein positive expression than in those who had double-protein positive or triple-protein positive expression (log-rank test, P=0.008). OS, overall survival.
Cox multivariate prognostic analysis for 41 patients with urothelial carcinoma of the bladder.
| 95% CI for HR | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marker | Risk factor | P-value | HR | Lower | Upper |
| Sex | Male | 0.020 | 0.140 | 0.027 | 0.732 |
| CD147 | Positive | 0.022 | 6.889 | 1.315 | 36.084 |
| c-Fos | Positive | 0.033 | 4.636 | 1.128 | 19.057 |
| c-Jun | Positive | 0.029 | 4.589 | 1.172 | 17.968 |
CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio.