Literature DB >> 28358415

Expression levels of transcription factors c-Fos and c-Jun and transmembrane protein HAb18G/CD147 in urothelial carcinoma of the bladder.

Muren Huhe1, Shuangshuang Liu1, Yang Zhang1, Zheng Zhang1, Zhinan Chen1.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to investigate the prognostic significance of the expression of transcription factors, c-Fos, c-Jun and transmembrane protein CD147, in urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB). The current study investigated the clinical significance of these factors in the development, progression and survival analysis of UCB. Immunohistochemistry was employed to analyze c‑Fos, c‑Jun and CD147 expression in 41 UCB cases and 34 non‑cancerous human bladder tissues. These results were scored in a semi‑quantitative manner based on the intensity and percentage of tumor cells that presented immunoreactivity. Protein levels of CD147, c‑Fos and c‑Jun expression were upregulated in 22 (53.7%), 10 (24.4%) and 9 (22.0%) UCB cases, respectively. High levels of c‑Jun correlated with the AJCC cancer staging manual (7th edition; P=0.038). Univariate analysis revealed that upregulated CD147 (P=0.038) or c‑Jun (P=0.008) was associated with poor overall survival (OS), respectively. Further analysis revealed that either CD147‑c‑Fos‑c‑Jun co‑expression (P=0.004), or CD147‑c‑Jun co‑expression (P=0.037) and c‑Fos‑c‑Jun co‑expression (P<0.001) were associated with poor OS. Multivariate analysis suggested that either upregulation of CD147, c‑Jun or c‑Fos were independent risk indicators for death in UCB patients. Increased expression of c‑Jun or CD147, as well as co‑expression of CD147‑c‑Jun, c‑Jun‑c‑Fos or CD147‑c‑Jun‑c‑Fos has prognostic significance for UCB patients. Therefore, high CD147 and c‑Jun expression may serve roles in tumor progression and may be diagnostic and therapeutic targets in UCB whether alone or in combination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28358415      PMCID: PMC5428553          DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2017.6411

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Med Rep        ISSN: 1791-2997            Impact factor:   2.952


Introduction

Bladder cancer is the second most common urologic malignancy amongst males (1). In 2015 in the United States, it was estimated that there were 74,000 new cases of bladder cancer and 16,000 deaths (2). Transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) or urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB) account for 90% of all bladder cancer cases, and are divided in 2 variants: non-muscle invasive or muscle invasive. The non-muscle invasive form has a high rate of recurrence (50%), and it progresses to muscle invasive form in ~11% of the cases (3). Despite advances in multi-treatment approaches, including surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy, the clinical outcomes of bladder cancer patients remain unsatisfactory (4,5). This is due to considerable tumor variability and heterogeneity, even within the same pathological stage. Predicting a prognosis by examining the clinicopathological characteristics remains difficult. Therefore, identification of novel prognostic factors with high sensitivity and specificity is important to evaluate the prognosis of UCB and individualize treatment strategies. CD147 is a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily. It is widely expressed in human tumors and plays a central role in the progression of many cancers by stimulating the secretion of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and cytokines (6). CD147 regulates cell proliferation, apoptosis, metastasis, differentiation and chemical drug resistance (6). In addition, recent studies have demonstrated that the level of CD147 is associated with the prognosis of patients in many cancers (6). Furthermore, CD147 is recognized as an effective therapeutic target for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (7,8) and additional cancers (9,10), and exciting clinical progress has been made in HCC treatment with CD147-directed monoclonal antibodies (11). The activator protein-1 transcription factor, AP-1, is principally composed of homodimers of the Jun family (c-Jun, JunB and JunD), heterodimers of the members of Fos (c-Fos, FosB, Fra-1 and Fra-2) and Jun, or cAMP response element-binding protein/activating transcription factor family members (12). Homo- or hetero- forms of the AP-1 complex can activate target gene expression by binding to 12-O-Tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate-(or TPA)-responsive elements, which are also known as AP-1 sites (consensus sequence, 5-TGAG/CTCA-3), in promoter or enhancer regions (12). Evidence has demonstrated that AP-1 serves an important role in inflammation, cellular migration, metastasis and cell proliferation, apoptosis and transformation (13). More importantly, several studies have revealed that the AP-1 complex is involved in carcinogenesis of various tumor types, such as ovarian cancer, breast cancer and skin cancer. For example, c-Fos has been identified as independent predictor of decreased survival in breast cancer (14). High levels of c-Fos expression are associated with high-grade lesions and poor prognosis in osteosarcoma and endometrial carcinoma (15,16). High levels of c-Jun protein have been identified in 31% of primary and metastatic lung tumors (17). In breast cancer, activated c-Jun is expressed predominantly at the invasive front of breast cancer and is associated with proliferation and angiogenesis (18). However, there has been little research into the levels of c-Jun and c-Fos in patients with urothelial carcinoma of bladder tissues. In the present study, the prognostic significance of c-Fos, c-Jun and CD147 expression was examined by performing immunohistochemistry with a tissue microarray of samples from 41 patients with UCB. In addition, the correlation between c-Fos, c-Jun and CD147 expression in UCB was investigated to supply more reliable judgments of the prognosis of UCB patients.

Materials and methods

Patients and tissues

A total of 41 bladder cancer tissues with histologically confirmed UCB were obtained from the Shanghai Outdo Biotech Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China) from May 2007 to November 2011, and 34 para-cancer normal tissues, which were 5 cm far away from the edge of the tumor, were randomly selected as controls. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Fourth Military Medical University (Xi'an, China). Following transurethral resection and partial or radical cystectomy therapy, all patients were available for follow-up data and provided written and informed consent. Clinical pathological information was obtained from patients' operative and pathological reports, and included: Sex, age, recurrence, metastasis, invasion tumor size and growth pattern, WHO grade, TNM stage, AJCC stage and survival time. The study population comprised 35 men (85.4%) and 6 women (14.6%), with a median age at diagnosis of 71 years (range, 44–85 years). The tumor growth type was papillary in 11 patients (26.8%) and nonpapillary in 30 patients (73.2%); low-grade tumors were observed in 3 patients (7.3%) and high-grade tumors were observed in 38 patients (92.7%). Furthermore, 6 patients (14.6%) had low-stage (Tis) tumors and 35 patients (85.4%) had high-stage tumors (T1, 6; T2, 10; T3, 15; T4a, 4; Table I). There was no recurrence or distant metastasis recorded in all cases. Among these 41 patients, 18 (43.9%) did not survive. The median follow-up period was 35 months (data not shown).
Table I.

CD147, c-Fos, and c-Jun expression in 41 patients with urothelial carcinoma of the bladder.

CD147 (%)

Factor+++(n=3) (%)++(n=6) (%)+(n=13) (%)-(n=19) (%)P-value
Age (y)
  >71 (n=20)1 (5.0)2 (10.0)7 (35.0)10 (50.0)0.393
  ≤71 (n=21)2 (9.5)4 (19.0)6 (28.6)9 (42.9)
Sex
  Male (n=35)3 (8.6)6 (17.1)11 (31.4)15 (42.9)0.165
  Female (n=6)0 (0)0 (0)2 (33.3)4 (66.7)
Growth pattern
  Papillary (n=11)0 (0)2 (18.2)5 (45.5)4 (36.4)0.964
  Nonpapillary (n=30)3 (10.0)4 (13.3)8 (26.7)15 (50.0)
WHO grade
  Low (n=3)0 (0)1 (33.3)2 (66.7)0 (0)0.338
  High (n=38)3 (7.9)5 (13.2)11 (28.9)19 (50.0)
Lymph node invasion
  Negative (n=37)2 (5.4)6 (16.2)10 (27.0)19 (51.4)0.136
  Positive (n=4)1 (25.0)0 (0)3 (75.0)0 (0)
TNM stage
  Low (Tis) (n=6)0 (0)0 (0)4 (66.7)2 (33.3)0.649
  High (T1-T4a) (n=35)3 (8.6)6 (17.1)9 (25.7)17 (48.6)
Tumor diameter
  >4 cm (n=16)0 (0)5 (31.3)6 (37.5)5 (31.3)0.355
  ≤4 cm (n=25)3 (12.0)1 (4.0)7 (28.0)14 (56.0)
AJCC cancer staging
  Tis (n=12)1 (8.3)1 (8.3)4 (33.3)6 (50.0)0.554
  1–2 (n=11)0 (0)2 (18.2)4 (36.4)5 (45.5)
  3–4 (n=18)2 (11.1)5 (27.8)3 (16.7)8 (44.4)

c-Fos (%)

Factor+++(n=0)++(n=1) (%)+(n=9) (%)−(n=31)(%)P-value

Age (y)
  >71 (n=20)0 (0)6 (30.0)14 (70.0)0.693
  ≤71 (n=21)1 (4.8)3 (14.3)17 (81.0)
Sex
  Male (n=35)1 (2.9)6 (17.1)28 (80.0)0.220
  Female (n=6)0 (0)3 (50.0)3 (50.0)
Growth pattern
  Papillary (n=11)1 (9.1)1 (9.1)9 (81.8)0.973
  Nonpapillary (n=30)0 (0)8 (26.7)22 (73.3)
WHO grade
  Low (n=3)0 (0)0 (0)3 (100.0)0.336
  High (n=38)1 (2.6)9 (23.7)28 (73.7)
Lymph node invasion
  Negative (n=37)1 (2.7)7 (18.9)29 (78.4)0.330
  Positive (n=4)0 (0)2 (50.0)2 (50.0)
TNM stage
  Low (Tis) (n=6)1 (16.7)0 (0)5 (83.3)0.731
  High (T1-T4a) (n=35)0 (0)9 (25.7)26 (74.3)
Tumor diameter
  >4 cm (n=16)1 (6.3)3 (18.8)12 (75.0)0.651
  ≤4 cm (n=25)0 (0)6 (24.0)19 (76.0)
AJCC cancer staging
  Tis (n=12)1 (8.3)2 (16.7)9 (75.0)0.552
  1–2 (n=11)0 (0)3 (27.3)8 (72.7)
  3–4 (n=18)0 (0)4 (22.2)14 (77.8)

c-Jun (%)

Factor+++ (n=0)++ (n=0)+ (n=9) (%)− (n=32) (%)P-value

Age (y)
  >71 (n=20)2 (10.0)18 (90.0)0.130
  ≤71 (n=21)7 (33.3)14 (66.7)
Sex
  Male (n=35)8 (22.9)27 (77.1)1.000
  Female (n=6)1 (16.7)5 (83.3)
Growth pattern
  Papillary (n=11)2 (18.2)9 (81.8)1.000
  Nonpapillary (n=30)7 (23.3)23 (76.7)
WHO grade
  Low (n=3)0 (0)3 (100)1.000
  High (n=38)9 (23.7)29 (76.3)
Lymph node invasion
  Negative (n=37)7 (18.9)30 (81.1)0.204
  Positive (n=4)2 (50.00)2 (50.0)
TNM stage
  Low (Tis) (n=6)2 (33.3)4 (66.7)0.597
  High (T1-T4a) (n=35)7 (20.0)28 (80.0)
Tumor diameter
  >4 cm (n=16)5 (31.3)11 (68.8)0.276
  ≤4 cm (n=25)4 (16.0)21 (84.0)
AJCC cancer staging
  Tis (n=12)1 (8.3)11 (91.7)0.038
  1–2 (n=11)1 (9.1)10 (90.9)
  3–4 (n=18)7 (38.9)11 (61.1)

WHO, World Health Organization; TNM, tumor node metastasis; AJCC, the 7th American Joint Committee on Cancer; -, Negative.

Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining and evaluation

The expression of c-Jun, c-Fos and CD147 was detected by IHC staining. Briefly, 5 µm sections were cut from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues. Following deparaffinization and dehydration, sections were heated in an autoclave (~120°C, 200 kPa, 2 to 6 min,) in 10 mM citrate buffer (pH 6.0) for antigen retrieval, and treated with 3% H2O2 for 20 min to block the peroxidase. Sections were blocked in 5% goat serum in PBS, followed by overnight incubation at 4°C with anti-c-Jun antibody (1:100 dilution; cat. no. #9165 Cell Signaling Technology, Inc., Danvers, MA, USA), anti-c-Fos antibody (1:500 dilution; cat. no. #2251; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.) andanti-CD147 antibody (1:167 dilution; cat. no. #201508; Cell Engineering Research Center, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China). The signal was detected with streptavidin-peroxidase staining kits (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) and DAB substrate (ZSGB-BIO., Beijing, China). All sections were then counterstained with Mayer's hematoxylin (0.1%) for 5 to 8 min at room temperature (cat. no #715012; Baso Diagnostics, Inc., Zhuhai, Guangdong, China) and then mounted. Images were taken with an inverted microscope (CKX41; Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a digital camera under ×100 and ×400 magnification. Two pathologists evaluated the results independently, with no knowledge of clinicopathological features. The expression of c-Jun, c-Fos and CD147 were scored in a semi-quantitative manner according both the extent and the intensity of the staining: IHC negative, absent; IHC +, faint or weak intensity in >10% of cancer cells; IHC ++, moderate intensity in >10% of cancer cells; and IHC +++, strong intensity in >10% of cancer cells.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software (version, 17.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The relationship between the level of three proteins (c-Fos, c-Jun and CD147) and clinicopathological features was analyzed with chi-squared statistical test (linear-by-linear association or the Fisher exact test) or Spearman correlation analysis, while overall survival (OS) analysis was carried out using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the Log-rank test and the Cox proportional hazards regression model served to identify relevant prognostic factors. All P-values were two sided and P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

The expression characteristicss of c-Jun, c-Fos and CD147 in UCB and normal tissues

A total of 9 of 41 (22.0%) UCB tissues and 1 of 34 (8.8%) para-cancer tissues presented positive staining of c-Jun, respectively. Tumor staining of c-Jun expression was observed in the nucleus staining pattern (Fig. 1), however, only negative or weak immunoreactivity of c-Jun was detected in para-cancer tissues, which indicated that positive c-Jun was more commonly expressed in human UCB than para-cancer tissues (P=0.017; Fig. 1).
Figure 1.

The immunohistochemical staining of CD147, c-Fos and c-Jun in UCB. The expression of c-Jun, c-Fos and CD147 was scored as negative, absence; +, weak; ++, moderate; and +++, strong. The images were ×100 (upper row) and ×400 magnification (bottom row). The histogram presents the number of cases with CD147, c-Fos and c-Jun expression in UCB tissues and para-cancer normal tissues. The distribution of 41 cases of UCB and 34 cases of para-cancer tissues is presented in the bar graph. CD147 (negative, 19; +, 3; ++, 6; and +++, 13 in UCB. negative, 34 in para-cancer), c-Fos (negative, 31; +, 9; and ++, 1 in UCB. negative, 13; and +, 21 in para-cancer) and c-Jun (negative, 32; +, 9; in UCB. Negative, 33; and +, 1 in para-cancer), respectively. ***P<0.001, **P<0.01 and *P<0.05 vs. para-cancer. UCB, urothelial carcinoma of the bladder.

Following IHC in UCB tissues, 10 of 41 cases (24.4%) presented c-Fos staining, which was strong in 1 case (2+ or higher, 2.4%), and weak in 9 cases (1+, 22.0%). The other tissues, including 31 (75.6%) UCB and 13 of 34 (38.2%) normal bladder tissues, demonstrated no staining. Tumor staining of c-Fos expression was observed in the nucleus staining pattern (Fig. 1). CD147 immunoreaction positive (+, ++, +++) was observed in the 22 cases (53.7%) and most tumor cells with diffuse plasma membranous staining of CD147, while none of normal urothelial cells expressed CD147 (Fig. 1), which indicated that the CD147 was more common high expression in human UCB than that in para-cancer normal tissues (P<0.001; Fig. 1). A weak inverse correlation was identified (rho=−0.310, P=0.049; Table II) existed in 41 UCB patients between c-Fos expression (negative, +, ++) and CD147 expression (negative, +, ++, +++). However, neither c-Fos expression (rho =0.233, P=0.142) nor CD147 (rho =0.024, P=0.881) expression had significant association with c-Jun expression (negative, +).
Table II.

CD147, c-Jun and c-Fos expression correlation in 41 patients with urothelial carcinoma of the bladder.

CD147c-Junc-Fos



MarkerrhoP-valuerhoP-valuerhoP-value
CD1470.0240.881−0.3100.049
c-Jun0.0240.8810.2330.142
c-Fos−0.3100.0490.2330.142

Clinicopathological parameter relevance and survival analysis

The protein expression of c-Jun was significantly associated with AJCC cancer staging (P=0.038), while other clinicopathological factors, including age, sex, growth pattern, WHO grade, lymph nodes invasion, tumor node metastatis (TNM) stage and tumor size, had no apparent relationship with c-Jun, c-Fos or CD147 expression (Table I). Neither CD147-c-Jun co-expression (5 cases in 41 UCB patients, 12.2%), CD147-c-Fos co-expression (2 in 41 UCB patients, 5.0%), nor c-Fos-c-Jun co-expression (4 in 41 UCB patients, 9.8%) were associated with any clinicopathological parameters (Table III).
Table III.

CD147, c-Fos, and c-Jun co-expressions in 41 patients with urothelial carcinoma of the bladder.

CD147-c-Jun co-expression

FactorCo-expression (n=5) (%)Non-co-expression (n=36) (%)P-value
Age (y)
  >71 (n=20)2 (10.0)18 (90.0)1.000
  ≤71 (n=21)3 (14.3)18 (85.7)
Sex
  Male (n=35)5 (14.3)30 (85.7)1.000
  Female (n=6)0 (0)6 (100)
Growth pattern
  Papillary (n=11)1 (9.1)10 (90.9)1.000
  Nonpapillary (n=30)4 (13.3)26 (86.7)
WHO grade
  Low (n=3)0 (0)5 (100)1.000
  High (n=38)5 (13.2)33 (86.8)
Lymph nodes invasion
  Negative (n=37)5 (13.5)32 (86.5)1.000
  Positive (n=4)0 (0)4 (100)
TNM stage
  Low (Tis) (n=6)0 (0)6 (100)1.000
  High (T1-T4a) (n=35)5 (14.3)30 (85.7)
Tumor diameter
  >4 cm (n=16)0 (0)16 (100)0.137
  ≤4 cm (n=25)5 (20.0)20 (80.0)
AJCC cancer staging
  Tis (n=12)0 (0)12 (100)0.068
  1–2 (n=11)1 (9.1)10 (90.9)
  3–4 (n=18)4 (22.2)14 (77.8)

CD147-c-Fos co-expression

FactorCo-expression (n=2) (%)Non-co-expression (n=39) (%)P-value

Age (y)
  >71 (n=20)2 (10.0)18 (90.0)0.232
  ≤71 (n=21)0 (0)21 (100)
Sex
  Male (n=35)2 (5.7)33 (94.3)1.000
  Female (n=6)0 (0)6 (100)
Growth pattern
  Papillary (n=11)2 (18.2)9 (81.8)0.067
  Nonpapillary (n=30)0 (0)30 (100)
WHO grade
  Low (n=3)0 (0)3 (100)1.000
  High (n=38)2 (5.3)36 (94.7)
Lymph nodes invasion
  Negative (n=37)2 (5.4)35 (94.6)1.000
  Positive (n=4)0 (0)4 (100)
TNM stage
  Low (Tis) (n=6)0 (0)6 (100)1.000
  High (T1-T4a) (n=35)2 (5.7)33 (94.3)
Tumor diameter
  >4 cm (n=16)1 (6.2)15 (93.8)1.000
  ≤4 cm (n=25)1 (4.0)24 (96.0)
AJCC cancer staging
  Tis (n=12)0 (0)12 (100)0.548
  1–2 (n=11)1 (9.1)10 (90.9)
  3–4 (n=18)1 (5.6)17 (94.4)

c-Fos-c-Jun co-expression

FactorCo-expression (n=4) (%)Non-co-expression (n=37) (%)P-value

Age (y)
  >71 (n=20)1 (5.0)19 (95.0)0.606
  ≤71 (n=21)3 (14.3)18 (85.7)
Sex
  Male (n=35)3 (8.6)32 (91.4)0.483
  Female (n=6)1 (16.7)5 (83.3)
Growth pattern
  Papillary (n=11)0 (0)11 (100)0.559
  Nonpapillary (n=30)4 (13.3)26 (86.7)
WHO grade
  Low (n=3)0 (0)3 (100)1.000
  High (n=38)4 (10.5)34 (89.5)
Lymph nodes invasion
  Negative (n=37)4 (10.8)33 (89.2)1.000
  Positive (n=4)0 (0)4 (100)
TNM stage
  Low (Tis) (n=6)0 (0)6 (100)1.000
  High (T1-T4a) (n=35)4 (11.4)31 (88.6)
Tumor diameter
  >4 cm (n=16)0 (0)16 (100)0.143
  ≤4 cm (n=25)4 (16.0)21 (84.0)
AJCC cancer staging
  Tis (n=12)1 (8.3)11 (91.7)0.383
  1–2 (n=11)0 (0)11 (100)
  3–4 (n=18)3 (16.7)15 (83.3)

WHO, World Health Organization; TNM, tumor node metastasis; AJCC, the 7th American Joint Committee on Cancer.

Univariate survival analyses revealed that high CD147 expression (P=0.038), high c-Jun expression (P=0.008) and high WHO grade (P<0.001; data not shown) were associated with poor OS, whereas high c-Fos expression did not significantly correlate with poor OS for UCB (P=0.225; Fig. 2A-C). Further analysis revealed that either CD147-c-Fos-c-Jun co-expression (P=0.004) or CD147-c-Jun co-expression (P=0.037) and c-Fos-c-Jun co-expression (P<0.001) were also associated with poor OS (Fig. 2D-F). Therefore, it was considered that OS was better in patients who had c-Fos, c-Jun and CD147 all negative expression, or only one of them positive than in those who had double positive or triple positive expression (P=0.008; Fig. 2H).
Figure 2.

OS analysis of c-Fos, c-Jun and CD147 expression in 41 patients with urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. (A) Patients with CD147 positive expression (+, ++, +++) had poorer overall survival rate than those with CD147 negative expression (log-rank test, P=0.038). (B) Patients with c-Jun positive expression (+) had poorer overall survival rate than those with c-Jun negative expression (log-rank test, P=0.008). (C) c-Fos positive expression (+, ++) did not significantly correlate with poor OS (log-rank test, P=0.225). (D) Patients with all the three proteins co-expressed (CD147-c-Fos-c-Jun co-expression) had poorer overall survival rate than the others (log-rank test, P=0.004). (E) Patients with CD147-c-Jun co-expression had poorer overall survival rate than the others (log-rank test, P=0.037). (F) Patients with c-Fos-c-Jun co-expression had poorer overall survival rate than the others (log-rank test, P<0.001). (G) CD147-c-Fos co-expression did not significantly correlate with poor OS (log-rank test, P=0.768). (H) OS was better in patients who had c-Fos, c-Jun and CD147 all negative, or single-protein positive expression than in those who had double-protein positive or triple-protein positive expression (log-rank test, P=0.008). OS, overall survival.

Multivariate analyses (Table IV) demonstrated that high CD147 expression (hazard ratio [HR]=6.889; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.315–36.084; P=0.022), high c-Fos expression (HR=4.636; 95% CI:1.128–19.057; P=0.033), high c-Jun (HR=4.589; 95% CI:1.172–17.968; P=0.029) and even male sex (HR=0.140; 95% CI:0.027–0.732; P=0.020) were independent predictors for poor OS.
Table IV.

Cox multivariate prognostic analysis for 41 patients with urothelial carcinoma of the bladder.

95% CI for HR

MarkerRisk factorP-valueHRLowerUpper
SexMale0.0200.1400.0270.732
CD147Positive0.0226.8891.31536.084
c-FosPositive0.0334.6361.12819.057
c-JunPositive0.0294.5891.17217.968

CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio.

Discussion

The present study demonstrated that increased expression of c-Jun or CD147 proteins was predictive of poor OS for UCB, although c-Fos protein was not significantly associated with OS. Furthermore, both CD147 and c-Jun positive expression, or all positive expression of c-Fos, c-Jun and CD147, served as an index of poor OS for UCB. All above indicated that overexpression of c-Jun and CD147, perhaps including c-Fos may contribute to tumor progression of UCB. Many genetic factors have been identified as being associated with bladder cancer (19,20). However, not much is understood regarding the molecular mechanisms of its tumorigenesis and tumor progression. CD147 expressed by tumor cells stimulates peritumoral fibroblasts to produce matrix metalloproteinases, thus contributing to tumor invasion and metastasis (21). Previous studies have highlighted the pivotal role of CD147 protein in carcinogenesis and tumor progression. CD147 expression in breast carcinomas is associated with risk factors such as poor histological grade, negative hormone status, the mitotic index and tumor size (22). High CD147 immunostaining scores in hepatocellular carcinomas correlate significantly with tumor grading and tumor-node-metastasis stages (22). It is reported that CD147 is involved in a regulatory loop of miRNA and transcription factors in breast cancer invasion and metastasis (23). In gastric carcinoma, CD147 expression is positively correlated with tumor size, depth of invasion and lymphatic invasion, but not with lymph node metastasis, staging, or differentiation (24). Previous studies of the authors have demonstrated that CD147 may be involved in the progression of prostate cancer and renal cell carcinoma, and can be used as an independent prognostic factor of these cancers (21,25). However, CD147 protein expression patterns within esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and dysplastic lesions are not associated with any of these clinicopathologic factors (26). In the present study, the results indicated that CD147 was overexpressed in human bladder cancer. However, intense expression of CD147 in bladder cancer was not significantly correlated with the TNM stage, WHO grade and tumor size (Table I), which disaccorded with the results of Riethdorf et al (27). In addition, Riethdorf's study identified that the expression levels of CD147 in invasive transitional cell carcinomas of bladder were higher than those in noninvasive tumors (27). These discrepancies suggest that there are different clinical features of CD147 expression in bladder cancer cells of different patients of UCB, in consideration of all cases in the current study with no recurrence and metastasis following transurethral resection and partial or radical cystectomy therapy. It has already been demonstrated that CD147 overexpression is associated with poorer outcome and shorter survival time in patients with solid tumors (28,29). The present findings supported this hypothesis, as CD147 expression was associated with poor survival in univariate analysis (Fig. 2). Cumulatively, these results indicated that CD147 may be one of the key molecular markers to identify high risk of progression in bladder cancer, but other key molecules involved in tumor progression such as transcription factors must be identified to develop more effective therapeutic targets and to supply more reliable judgments of the prognosis of UCB patients. The study of Hagemann et al (30) demonstrated that CD147 activates multiple transcription factors, including AP-1 (c-Fos, c-Jun and FosB) and NF-κB in cardiomyocytes. The AP-1 complex consists of two elements, c-Fos and c-Jun (31). The AP-1 complex has been implicated in the transformation and progression of cancer (32). Although a few studies have discovered some alternative activities of c-Jun like anti-cancer property (33), most research suggests that c-Jun contributes to tumor initiation and increased invasiveness (18,34). In breast cancer, high expression levels of c-Jun in MCF-7 cells can result in an overall increased invasion by increased cellular motility and increased expression of MMP-9 (35). The observed phenotype for MCF-7 cells with c-Jun overexpression is similar to that observed clinically in advanced breast cancer, which had become hormone unresponsive (36). The other most common element of the AP-1 complex, c-Fos, has also been identified as independent predictor of poor survival in breast cancer (14). CD147 has been regarded as a prognostic marker for breast cancer with MMP-9 (37). It seems that there is a reason to examine the hypothesis that c-Jun and CD147, and even c-Fos, are involved in the progression of the human urothelial carcinoma of the bladder, according to the present study results and other previously-mentioned studies. However, future research should aim to elucidate the mechanism of c-Jun, c-Fos and CD147 in bladder cancer progression by enlarging sample size, and studying in in vitro and in vivo models. The present study indicated that increased expression of the c-Jun and CD147 proteins, as well as co-expression of CD147-c-Jun, c-Jun-c-Fos, or CD147-c-Jun-c-Fos has prognostic significance for UCB patients. Therefore, high CD147 and c-Jun expression may serve roles in UCB progression and may be diagnostic and therapeutic targets in UCB whether alone or in combination.
  37 in total

1.  c-Jun activation is associated with proliferation and angiogenesis in invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Marije M Vleugel; Astrid E Greijer; Reinhard Bos; Elsken van der Wall; Paul J van Diest
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.466

2.  Transcriptional upregulation of SPARC, in response to c-Jun overexpression, contributes to increased motility and invasion of MCF7 breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Joseph Briggs; Sandrine Chamboredon; Marc Castellazzi; Julie A Kerry; Timothy J Bos
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2002-10-10       Impact factor: 9.867

3.  bc10: A novel human bladder cancer-associated protein with a conserved genomic structure downregulated in invasive cancer.

Authors:  Irina Gromova; Pavel Gromov; Julio E Celis
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2002-04-01       Impact factor: 7.396

4.  c-Jun-mediated anticancer mechanisms of tylophorine.

Authors:  Cheng-Wei Yang; Yue-Zhi Lee; Hsing-Yu Hsu; Chia-Mao Wu; Hwan-You Chang; Yu-Sheng Chao; Shiow-Ju Lee
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 4.944

5.  HAb18G/CD147 functions in invasion and metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Jing Xu; Hui-Yun Xu; Qing Zhang; Fei Song; Jian-Li Jiang; Xiang-Min Yang; Li Mi; Ning Wen; Rong Tian; Li Wang; Hui Yao; Qiang Feng; Yang Zhang; Jin-Liang Xing; Ping Zhu; Zhi-Nan Chen
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.852

6.  Expression of the tumor suppressor protein 14-3-3 sigma is down-regulated in invasive transitional cell carcinomas of the urinary bladder undergoing epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition.

Authors:  José M A Moreira; Pavel Gromov; Julio E Celis
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2004-01-21       Impact factor: 5.911

Review 7.  Diagnosis and treatment of bladder cancer.

Authors:  Sanjeev Sharma; Pankaj Ksheersagar; Poonam Sharma
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 3.292

8.  Results of radical cystectomy for primary bladder cancer. Retrospective study of more than 200 cases.

Authors:  L Giuliani; C Giberti; G Martorana; A Bonamini; G D Natta; S Rovida
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  C-Fos expression is a molecular predictor of progression and survival in epithelial ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  S Mahner; C Baasch; J Schwarz; S Hein; L Wölber; F Jänicke; K Milde-Langosch
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-10-21       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Small molecule inhibitors targeting activator protein 1 (AP-1).

Authors:  Na Ye; Ye Ding; Christopher Wild; Qiang Shen; Jia Zhou
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 8.039

View more
  8 in total

1.  Identification of key genes and pathways in meningioma by bioinformatics analysis.

Authors:  Junxi Dai; Yanbin Ma; Shenghua Chu; Nanyang Le; Jun Cao; Yang Wang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 2.967

2.  Identification of differentially expressed genes and biological pathways in bladder cancer.

Authors:  Fucai Tang; Zhaohui He; Hanqi Lei; Yuehan Chen; Zechao Lu; Guohua Zeng; Hangtao Wang
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 2.952

3.  CD147 expression was positively linked to aggressiveness and worse prognosis of gastric cancer: a meta and bioinformatics analysis.

Authors:  Hua-Chuan Zheng; Bao-Cheng Gong
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-08-09

4.  Identification and validation of an individualized autophagy-clinical prognostic index in bladder cancer patients.

Authors:  Shi-Shuo Wang; Gang Chen; Sheng-Hua Li; Jin-Shu Pang; Kai-Teng Cai; Hai-Biao Yan; Zhi-Guang Huang; Rong-Quan He
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  TTYH3 Modulates Bladder Cancer Proliferation and Metastasis via FGFR1/H-Ras/A-Raf/MEK/ERK Pathway.

Authors:  Polash Kumar Biswas; Yeonjoo Kwak; Aram Kim; Jaekwon Seok; Hee Jeong Kwak; Moonjung Lee; Ahmed Abdal Dayem; Kwonwoo Song; Jae-Yong Park; Kyoung Sik Park; Hyun Jin Shin; Ssang-Goo Cho
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-09-10       Impact factor: 6.208

6.  MicroRNA‑21 serves an important role during PAOO‑facilitated orthodontic tooth movement.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Zhang; Yulou Tian; Xiaofeng Yang; Zhenjin Zhao; Cuijuan Feng; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 2.952

7.  T5224, RSPO2 and AZD5363 are novel drugs against functional pituitary adenoma.

Authors:  Sheng Zhong; Bo Wu; Jiahui Li; Xinhui Wang; Shanshan Jiang; Fangfei Hu; Gaojing Dou; Yuan Zhang; Chunjia Sheng; Gang Zhao; Yunqian Li; Yong Chen
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2019-10-26       Impact factor: 5.682

Review 8.  Selective antagonism of cJun for cancer therapy.

Authors:  Andrew Brennan; James T Leech; Neil M Kad; Jody M Mason
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2020-09-11
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.