| Literature DB >> 28358366 |
Rui Dong1, Yifan Yang1, Zhen Shen1, Chao Zheng1, Zhu Jin1, Yanlei Huang1, Zhien Zhang1, Shan Zheng1, Gong Chen1.
Abstract
Biliary atresia is a rare, devastating disease of infants where a fibroinflammatory process destroys the bile ducts, leading to fibrosis and biliary cirrhosis, and death if untreated. The cause and pathogenesis remain largely unknown. We tried to investigate factors involved in biliary atresia, especially forkhead box A3 (Foxa3), which might exert a role in the treatment of liver disease. We used RNA sequencing to sequence the whole transcriptomes of livers from six biliary atresia and six choledochal cysts patients. Then, we employed a rat disease model by bile duct ligation (BDL) and adenovirus transduction to address the function of Foxa3 in biliary atresia. We found that tight junction, adherence junction, cell cycle, apoptosis, chemokine singling, VEGF and MAPK signaling pathways were enriched in biliary atresia livers. We showed that Foxa3 expression was notably decreased in liver samples from biliary atresia patients. More importantly, we found that its lower expression predicted a poorer overall survival of biliary atresia patients. Rats that received BDL surgery and Foxa3 expression adenovirus resulted in a significant decrease in the deposition of collagen, and expression of profibrotic cytokines (transforming growth factor-β and connective tissue growth factor) and fibrosis markers (α-smooth muscle actin, collagen I and collagen III), as compared with rats that received BDL surgery and control adenovirus. Our data suggested a protection role for Foxa3 during the progression of liver fibrosis in biliary atresia, and thereby supported increasing Foxa3 as a targeted treatment strategy.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28358366 PMCID: PMC5386589 DOI: 10.1038/cddis.2017.99
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cell Death Dis Impact factor: 8.469
Figure 1Histological analyses of livers from biliary atresia patients and control. (a) HE and (b) Masson's trichrome staining
Statistically significant KEGG classifications of enrichment in biliary atresia patients
| FC_GAMMA_R_MEDIATED_PHAGOCYTOSIS | 96 | 0.0000 | 0.4904 |
| CELL_CYCLE | 124 | 0.0000 | 0.4553 |
| PANCREATIC_CANCER | 70 | 0.0000 | 0.4754 |
| UBIQUITIN_MEDIATED_PROTEOLYSIS | 132 | 0.0000 | 0.4414 |
| PATHWAYS_IN_CANCER | 320 | 0.0010 | 0.3949 |
| T_CELL_RECEPTOR_SIGNALING_PATHWAY | 107 | 0.0010 | 0.4608 |
| SMALL_CELL_LUNG_CANCER | 84 | 0.0020 | 0.4556 |
| ENDOMETRIAL_CANCER | 52 | 0.0021 | 0.5053 |
| COLORECTAL_CANCER | 62 | 0.0031 | 0.4647 |
| HEDGEHOG_SIGNALING_PATHWAY | 53 | 0.0064 | 0.4819 |
| AXON_GUIDANCE | 128 | 0.0080 | 0.3976 |
| ADHERENS_JUNCTION | 73 | 0.0083 | 0.4452 |
| NON_SMALL_CELL_LUNG_CANCER | 54 | 0.0096 | 0.4716 |
| TIGHT_JUNCTION | 128 | 0.0101 | 0.4003 |
| ACUTE_MYELOID_LEUKEMIA | 57 | 0.0105 | 0.4580 |
| SPLICEOSOME | 125 | 0.0121 | 0.3977 |
| CHRONIC_MYELOID_LEUKEMIA | 73 | 0.0145 | 0.4225 |
| PHOSPHATIDYLINOSITOL_SIGNALING_SYSTEM | 75 | 0.0185 | 0.4160 |
| NEUROTROPHIN_SIGNALING_PATHWAY | 124 | 0.0212 | 0.3798 |
| CHEMOKINE_SIGNALING_PATHWAY | 180 | 0.0261 | 0.3565 |
| HOMOLOGOUS_RECOMBINATION | 28 | 0.0284 | 0.5023 |
| BASAL_CELL_CARCINOMA | 53 | 0.0335 | 0.4334 |
| ERBB_SIGNALING_PATHWAY | 87 | 0.0372 | 0.3939 |
| APOPTOSIS | 84 | 0.0379 | 0.3974 |
| THYROID_CANCER | 29 | 0.0394 | 0.4947 |
| NATURAL_KILLER_CELL_MEDIATED_CYTOTOXICITY | 118 | 0.0394 | 0.3762 |
| VEGF_SIGNALING_PATHWAY | 72 | 0.0404 | 0.4117 |
| MAPK_SIGNALING_PATHWAY | 256 | 0.0410 | 0.3409 |
| BASAL_TRANSCRIPTION_FACTORS | 33 | 0.0416 | 0.4796 |
| LEISHMANIA_INFECTION | 70 | 0.0487 | 0.4022 |
| LEUKOCYTE_TRANSENDOTHELIAL_MIGRATION | 110 | 0.0491 | 0.3799 |
Statistically significant KEGG classifications of enrichment in normal control
| RETINOL_METABOLISM | 61 | 0.0000 | −0.6814 |
| METABOLISM_OF_XENOBIOTICS_BY_CYTOCHROME_P450 | 65 | 0.0000 | −0.6900 |
| FATTY_ACID_METABOLISM | 42 | 0.0000 | −0.7198 |
| DRUG_METABOLISM_CYTOCHROME_P450 | 67 | 0.0000 | −0.6611 |
| VALINE_LEUCINE_AND_ISOLEUCINE_DEGRADATION | 44 | 0.0000 | −0.6638 |
| RIBOSOME | 85 | 0.0000 | −0.5872 |
| COMPLEMENT_AND_COAGULATION_CASCADES | 67 | 0.0000 | −0.5820 |
| PRIMARY_BILE_ACID_BIOSYNTHESIS | 16 | 0.0000 | −0.8517 |
| STEROID_HORMONE_BIOSYNTHESIS | 52 | 0.0000 | −0.6167 |
| OXIDATIVE_PHOSPHORYLATION | 112 | 0.0000 | −0.5179 |
| PROPANOATE_METABOLISM | 32 | 0.0000 | −0.6790 |
| TRYPTOPHAN_METABOLISM | 39 | 0.0000 | −0.6453 |
| PARKINSONS_DISEASE | 110 | 0.0000 | −0.5182 |
| PEROXISOME | 78 | 0.0000 | −0.5082 |
| LINOLEIC_ACID_METABOLISM | 26 | 0.0000 | −0.6252 |
| GLYCINE_SERINE_AND_THREONINE_METABOLISM | 31 | 0.0000 | −0.6368 |
| TYROSINE_METABOLISM | 39 | 0.0000 | −0.5651 |
| GLYCOLYSIS_GLUCONEOGENESIS | 59 | 0.0000 | −0.4957 |
| GLYOXYLATE_AND_DICARBOXYLATE_METABOLISM | 15 | 0.0000 | −0.7207 |
| PENTOSE_AND_GLUCURONATE_INTERCONVERSIONS | 26 | 0.0000 | −0.6133 |
| PROTEASOME | 44 | 0.0000 | −0.5106 |
| DRUG_METABOLISM_OTHER_ENZYMES | 49 | 0.0000 | −0.4956 |
| PORPHYRIN_AND_CHLOROPHYLL_METABOLISM | 38 | 0.0000 | −0.5217 |
| ASCORBATE_AND_ALDARATE_METABOLISM | 23 | 0.0000 | −0.5724 |
| BETA_ALANINE_METABOLISM | 21 | 0.0000 | −0.5847 |
| PPAR_SIGNALING_PATHWAY | 65 | 0.0000 | −0.4127 |
| ARACHIDONIC_ACID_METABOLISM | 55 | 0.0000 | −0.4299 |
| PYRUVATE_METABOLISM | 39 | 0.0000 | −0.4370 |
| TERPENOID_BACKBONE_BIOSYNTHESIS | 15 | 0.0000 | −0.5692 |
| RENIN_ANGIOTENSIN_SYSTEM | 16 | 0.0000 | −0.5532 |
| ONE_CARBON_POOL_BY_FOLATE | 17 | 0.0000 | −0.5381 |
| BUTANOATE_METABOLISM | 32 | 0.0000 | −0.4446 |
| HUNTINGTONS_DISEASE | 167 | 0.0000 | −0.4495 |
| CITRATE_CYCLE_TCA_CYCLE | 29 | 0.0000 | −0.3206 |
| ARGININE_AND_PROLINE_METABOLISM | 54 | 0.0000 | −0.4296 |
| ALZHEIMERS_DISEASE | 154 | 0.0000 | −0.3626 |
| GLUTATHIONE_METABOLISM | 48 | 0.0000 | −0.3144 |
| PRION_DISEASES | 34 | 0.0000 | −0.3474 |
| NEUROACTIVE_LIGAND_RECEPTOR_INTERACTION | 222 | 0.0000 | −0.3628 |
| PENTOSE_PHOSPHATE_PATHWAY | 26 | 0.0078 | −0.3808 |
| HISTIDINE_METABOLISM | 28 | 0.0263 | −0.3546 |
| NICOTINATE_AND_NICOTINAMIDE_METABOLISM | 24 | 0.0348 | −0.3149 |
| STARCH_AND_SUCROSE_METABOLISM | 46 | 0.0357 | −0.3833 |
| PYRIMIDINE_METABOLISM | 98 | 0.0417 | −0.2991 |
Figure 2Validation of RNA-seq data. (a) mRNA levels of CTGF, DAPK1, Foxa3 and EGFL7 were evaluated by qRT-PCR. Data represent mean values±S.D. from three independent experiments. Protein levels of Foxa3 and CTGF in livers of biliary atresia patients and control were assessed by western blotting (b) and immunohistochemistry staining (c) (***P<0.001 versus control)
Figure 3Downregulation of Foxa3 was associated with the overall survival of biliary atresia. Overall survival analysis on 60 biliary atresia patients was performed using the Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank tests
Figure 4Effect of Ad5-Foxa3 treatment on BDL-induced liver fibrosis. Rats received sham operation or bile duct ligation (BDL) as described in Material and Methods. Two weeks later, rats undergoing BDL surgery were injected with Foxa3-expressing adenovirus (Ad5-Foxa3) or control adenovirus (Ad5). After 2 more weeks, liver tissues were collected. (a) Foxa3 expression was evaluated by western blot analysis. Histological analyses were performed by HE (b) and Masson's trichrome staining (c). BDL surgery caused severe liver fibrosis, while Ad5-Foxa3 injection significantly attenuated BDL-induced liver fibrosis (***P<0.001 versus sham-operated group; ###P<0.001 versus BDL+Ad5 group)
Figure 5Effect of Ad5-Foxa3 treatment on expression of profibrotic cytokines and fibrosis markers. (a) Hepatic mRNA and (b) protein levels of TGF-β1, CTGF, α-SMA, Collagen I and Collagen III were assessed by qRT-PCR and western blotting, respectively (**P<0.01 versus sham-operated group, ***P<0.001 versus sham-operated group; ##P<0.01 versus BDL+Ad5 group,, ###P<0.001 versus BDL+Ad5 group). Data represent mean values±S.D. from three independent experiments
Figure 6Expression of Foxa3 and CTGF in rhesus rotavirus (RRV)-induced experimental biliary atresia. (a) Histological analyses by HE or Masson's trichrome staining. (b) Foxa3 and CTGF expression was evaluated by western blot analysis (**P<0.01, ***P<0.001 versus Control group)