Literature DB >> 28358178

Time-to-intubation in obese patients. A randomized study comparing direct laryngoscopy and videolaryngoscopy in experienced anesthetists.

Fredrik Ander1, Anders Magnuson2, Lars Berggren3, Rebecca Ahlstrand3, Alex de Leon3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Airway management may be difficult in obese patients. Moreover, during prolonged intubation, oxygen desaturation develops rapidly. Videolaryngoscopy improves the view of the larynx, and the Storz® C-MAC™ has been shown to be superior to other videolaryngoscopes in terms of intubation time in obese patients. However, no effort has been made to compare the Storz® C-MAC™ with direct laryngoscopy. The aim of the study was to evaluate if the use of Storz® C-MAC™ may reduce intubation time when compared to direct laryngoscopy (classic Macintosh® blade).
METHODS: Eighty patients with Body Mass Index >35 kg/m2 were randomized to orotracheal intubation using either Macintosh® laryngoscope, or the Storz® C-MAC™ with the standard Macintosh blade. Patients had no previous history of a difficult airway. Time-to-intubation (TTI) was defined as the time from the moment anesthetist took the laryngoscope until end-tidal carbon dioxide was detected.
RESULTS: No significant difference in TTI could be demonstrated between the two devices tested (mean difference -1.7 s (95% CI:-6.9 to 3.5 s). All patients in the videolaryngoscopy group were successfully intubated with the allocated device, whereas five patients in the direct laryngoscopy group required an alternative device for successful intubation. No significant difference regarding the subjective difficulty of intubation and postoperative sore throat between groups was demonstrated.
CONCLUSIONS: In obese patients the airway may be secured equally fast using direct laryngoscopy (Macintosh®) and with videolaryngoscopy using the Stortz® C-MAC™. The risk for failed intubation, however, appears to be greater with direct laryngoscopy, especially in male obese patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28358178     DOI: 10.23736/S0375-9393.17.11740-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Minerva Anestesiol        ISSN: 0375-9393            Impact factor:   3.051


  5 in total

1.  Videolaryngoscopy Versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Patients with Obesity Requiring Tracheal Intubation: a Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michele Carron; Federico Linassi; Giovanna Ieppariello
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 2.  Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adults undergoing tracheal intubation.

Authors:  Jan Hansel; Andrew M Rogers; Sharon R Lewis; Tim M Cook; Andrew F Smith
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-04-04

Review 3.  Airway management in patients suffering from morbid obesity.

Authors:  Wan Jane Liew; Asadi Negar; Prit Anand Singh
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2022-06-20

Review 4.  The patient with obesity and super-super obesity: Perioperative anesthetic considerations.

Authors:  Alan D Kaye; Brock D Lingle; Jordan C Brothers; Jessica R Rodriguez; Anna G Morris; Evan M Greeson; Elyse M Cornett
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2022-06-20

Review 5.  Comparisons of Videolaryngoscopes for Intubation Undergoing General Anesthesia: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Juncheol Lee; Youngsuk Cho; Wonhee Kim; Kyu-Sun Choi; Bo-Hyoung Jang; Hyungoo Shin; Chiwon Ahn; Jae Guk Kim; Min Kyun Na; Tae Ho Lim; Dong Won Kim
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-02-26
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.