| Literature DB >> 28358016 |
En-Qiang Chen1,2, Meng-Lan Wang1,2, Dong-Mei Zhang1,2, Ying Shi1,2, Do-Bo Wu1,2, Li-Bo Yan1,2, Ling-Yao Du1,2, Ling-Yun Zhou1,2, Hong Tang1,2.
Abstract
Hepatitis B virus-related acute-on-chronic liver failure (HBV-ACLF) is a life-threatening condition, and the lipid metabolism disorder is common in the development of this disease. This prospective observational study aimed to define the characteristics of plasma apolipoprotein A-V (apoA-V) in long-term outcome prediction of HBV-ACLF, and a total of 330 HBV-ACLF patients were included and followed for more than 12 months. In this cohort, the 4-week, 12-week, 24-week and 48-week cumulative mortality of HBV-ACLF was 18.2%(60/330), 50.9%(168/330), 59.7%(197/330) and 63.3%(209/330), respectively. As compared to survivors, the non-survivors had significantly lower concentrations of plasma apoA-V on admission. Plasma apoA-V concentrations were positively correlated with prothrombin time activity (PTA), and negatively correlated with interleukin-10, tumor necrosis factor-α, and iMELD scores. Though plasma apoA-V, PTA, total bilirubin(TBil) and blood urea nitrogen(BUN) were all independent factors to predict one-year outcomes of HBV-ACLF, plasma apoA-V had the highest prediction accuracy. And its optimal cutoff value for one-year survival prediction was 480.00 ng/mL, which had a positive predictive value of 84.68% and a negative predictive value of 92.23%. In summary, plasma apoA-V decreases significantly in non-survivors of HBV-ACLF, and it may be regarded as a new predictive marker for the prognosis of patients with HBV-ACLF.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28358016 PMCID: PMC5372093 DOI: 10.1038/srep45576
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Baseline characteristics of survivors and non-survivors among HBV-ACLF patients.
| Total (n = 330) | Survivor (n = 121) | Death (n = 209) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 43.38 ± 11.72 | 40.31 ± 11.07 | 45.16 ± 11.74 | <0.001 |
| Gender (M/F) | 290/40 | 104/17 | 186/23 | 0.414 |
| HBeAg (+/−) | 140/190 | 56/65 | 84/125 | 0.281 |
| HBV DNA (log10copies/mL) | 4.44 (3.11) | 4.20 (2.80) | 4.72 (3.25) | 0.220 |
| PTA(%) | 24.17 ± 8.29 | 29.42 ± 6.74 | 21.14 ± 7.56 | <0.001 |
| TBil (μmol/L) | 360.65 (177.30) | 310.60 (118.00) | 398.0 (206.9) | <0.001 |
| ALT(IU/L) | 160.50 (443.50) | 134.00 (387.50) | 174.00 (509.5) | 0.061 |
| ALB(g/L) | 31.50 ± 5.33 | 32.08 ± 5.95 | 31.16 ± 4.93 | 0.129 |
| Amon(μmol/L) | 75.00 (61.75) | 64.00 (54.00) | 80.00 (61.50) | 0.003 |
| BUN(μmol/L) | 4.76 (4.57) | 4.22 (2.63) | 5.87 (6.61) | <0.001 |
| Cr(μmol/L) | 79.70 (40.75) | 74.00 (23.30) | 88.00 (55.50) | <0.001 |
| GGT(IU/L) | 66.50 (73.00) | 68.00 (71.00) | 65.00 (73.00) | 0.521 |
| AFP (ng/mL) | 60.44 (172.23) | 103.60 (252.39) | 50.84 (124.96) | 0.004 |
| Infection (%) | 83 (25.15%) | 19 (15.70%) | 64 (30.62%) | 0.003 |
| TNFα (ng/L)⍰ | 388.55 (283.34) | 312.39 ± 186.68 | 417.94 ± 172.47 | <0.001 |
| IL10 (pg/mL) | 33.23 ± 7.73 | 29.29 ± 6.73 | 35.51 ± 7.36 | <0.001 |
| iMELD socre | 48.54 ± 8.62 | 42.51 ± 6.59 | 52.03 ± 7.69 | <0.001 |
| TG (mmol/L) | 0.91 ± 0.15 | 0.92 ± 0.13 | 0.74 ± 0.18 | 0. 051 |
| HDL-C(mmol/L) | 0.29 (0.24) | 0.30 (0.31) | 0.26 (0.21) | 0.045 |
| LDL-C (mmol/L) | 1.01 ± 0.19 | 1.03 ± 0.23 | 0.78 ± 0.17 | 0.069 |
| AVT before admission(%) | 10 (3.03%) | 6 (4.95%) | 4 (1.91%) | 0.180 |
| AVT after admission(%) | 277 (83.94) | 103 (85.12) | 174 (83.25) | 0.656 |
| Plasmapheresis after admission(%) | 151 (45.76) | 54 (44.63) | 97 (46.41) | 0.754 |
| Serum ApoA-V | 398.58 ± 253.32 | 641.91 ± 168.20 | 257.71 ± 175.48 | <0.001 |
Figure 1The distribution of serum apolipoproteins in HBV-ACLF patients.
(A) apolipoprotein A-V; (B): apolipoprotein A-I; (C): apolipoprotein B.
Figure 2The correlation of serum apolipoprotein A-V levels with general laboratory variables.
Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
Figure 3The correlation of serum apolipoprotein A-V levels with iMEDL score (A) and other laboratory variables (B~F). Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
Multivariate analysis of laboratory variables to predict the survival of HBV-ACLF.
| Variables | B | S.E. | Wald | OR (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ApoA-V | −0.006 | 0.001 | 112.033 | 0.994 (0.009–0.995) | 0.000 |
| iMELD socre | 0.019 | 0.010 | 3.695 | 1.019 (1.000–1.038) | 0.055 |
| PTA | −0.047 | 0.010 | 21.449 | 0.954 (0.935–0.973) | 0.000 |
| AFP | −0.001 | 0.000 | 3.309 | 0.999 (0.998–1.000) | 0.069 |
| IL10 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 1.038 | 1.000 (1.000–1.000) | 0.308 |
| BUN | 0.042 | 0.011 | 13.976 | 1.043 (1.020–1.066) | 0.000 |
| ApoA-I | 0.176 | 0.386 | 0.208 | 1.193 (0.560–2.542) | 0.648 |
| Infection | −0.087 | 0.168 | 0.267 | 0.917 (0.659–1.275) | 0.605 |
| TBil | 0.003 | 0.001 | 23.238 | 1.003 (1.002–1.004) | 0.000 |
| TNFα | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.765 | 1.000 (0.999–1.001) | 0.382 |
| Cr | −0.001 | 0.001 | 0.630 | 0.999 (0.997–1.001) | 0.427 |
| ApoB | 0.300 | 0.302 | 0.985 | 1.350 (0.746–2.443) | 0.321 |
| Amon | −0.002 | 0.001 | 2.012 | 0.998 (0.995–1.001) | 0.156 |
Figure 4Accuracy of the serum apoA-V as compared to that of PTA, TBil and BUN in predicting the survival of the patients with HBV-ACLF at different time point using Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.
(A) for 48 weeks; (B) for 4 weeks; (C) for 12 weeks; (D) for 24 weeks.
Figure 5Predictive value of admission serum apoA-V level (cut-off value of >480 ng/mL) on the survival of HBV-ACLF.