Literature DB >> 28357788

Distribution, sources, and potential risk of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soils from an industrial district in Shanxi, China.

Haihua Jiao1,2, Gaopeng Bian1, Xi Chen2, Suiliang Wang1, Xuliang Zhuang2,3, Zhihui Bai4,5.   

Abstract

Concentration, composition profile, orientation distribution, sources, and potential risks of 16 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) were analyzed in 76 surface (0-25 cm) soil samples collected from the Changzhi industrial district in July 2014 using a gas chromatography mass spectrometer (GC-MS QP2010 Ultra) system. The composition patterns of the PAHs were dominated by the presence of four-ring PAHs (average 42.9%), followed by three-ring (average 25.9%), five-ring PAHs (average 25.6%), two-ring PAHs (average 5.03%), and lastly, six-ring PAHs (average 0.641%). Source apportionment of the soil PAHs was also performed by the diagnostic ratios, principal component analysis (PCA), and coefficient of divergence (CD) analysis indicated signatures of PAHs sources (including incineration, coal/wood combustion, and vehicular exhaust emission). The total concentration of 16 PAHs (∑16PAHs) found in the roadsides soils (RS) ranged from 2197 to 25,041 μg kg-1, with an arithmetic mean value of 12,245 μg kg-1; followed by the village soils (VS), which ranged from 2059 to 21,240 μg kg-1, with a mean of 8976 μg kg-1; and lastly, the agricultural soils (AS), which ranged from 794 to 16,858 μg kg-1, with a mean of 3456 μg kg-1. According to the numerical effect-based soils quality guidelines of Maliszewska-Kordybach, the levels of PAHs in the sampled industrial areas range from high to heavy contamination. The values of total benzo[a]pyrene toxicity equivalent values (∑Bapeq16PAHs) in the sample areas ranged from 0.087 to 3611 μg kg-1 with an average of 969 μg kg-1. According to the soil quality guidelines of Canada, values found in the highest range (100 μg kg-1), which are equal to those of ∑Bapeq16PAHs found in the industrial area samples, will exert adverse biological effects. The results of this research could potentially be useful for local governments to control toxicity exposure, promote actions to alleviate PAHs contamination, and to manage human health at both work and industrial areas.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Benzo[a]pyrene; Contamination; PAHs; Potential risk; Soil

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28357788     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-017-8553-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  57 in total

1.  Size distributions of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and elemental carbon. 1. Sampling, measurement methods, and source characterization.

Authors:  C Venkataraman; J M Lyons; S K Friedlander
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  1994-04-01       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Source apportionment of molecular markers and organic aerosol--1. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and methodology for data visualization.

Authors:  Allen L Robinson; R Subramanian; Neil M Donahue; Anna Bernardo-Bricker; Wolfgang F Rogge
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in soils from a multi-industrial city, South Korea.

Authors:  Hye-Ok Kwon; Sung-Deuk Choi
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 7.963

4.  Fate of pentabrominated diphenyl ethers in soil: abiotic sorption, plant uptake, and the impact of interspecific plant interactions.

Authors:  Kevin E Mueller; Sabrina R Mueller-Spitz; Heather F Henry; Anne P Vonderheide; Rajiv S Soman; Brian K Kinkle; Jodi R Shann
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Temporal and spatial variabilities of atmospheric polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), organochlorine (OC) pesticides and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in the Canadian Arctic: results from a decade of monitoring.

Authors:  H Hung; P Blanchard; C J Halsall; T F Bidleman; G A Stern; P Fellin; D C G Muir; L A Barrie; L M Jantunen; P A Helm; J Ma; A Konoplev
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2005-04-15       Impact factor: 7.963

6.  Correlations between PAH bioavailability, degrading bacteria, and soil characteristics during PAH biodegradation in five diffusely contaminated dissimilar soils.

Authors:  M Crampon; F Bureau; M Akpa-Vinceslas; J Bodilis; N Machour; F Le Derf; F Portet-Koltalo
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  Contamination, source, and input route of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in historic wastewater-irrigated agricultural soils.

Authors:  Ning Wang; Hong-Bo Li; Jin-Lin Long; Chao Cai; Jiu-Lan Dai; Juan Zhang; Ren-Qing Wang
Journal:  J Environ Monit       Date:  2012-10-17

Review 8.  PAH and PCB in soils of Switzerland--status and critical review.

Authors:  André Desaules; Stefan Ammann; Franziska Blum; Rahel C Brändli; Thomas D Bucheli; Armin Keller
Journal:  J Environ Monit       Date:  2008-09-18

9.  Evolution of potential ecological impacts of the bottom sediment from the Gulf of Gemlik; Marmara Sea, Turkey.

Authors:  Selma Unlü; Bedri Alpar
Journal:  Bull Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.151

10.  Particle-associated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the atmospheric environment of Zonguldak, Turkey.

Authors:  Mehmet Akyüz; Hasan Cabuk
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2008-08-24       Impact factor: 7.963

View more
  2 in total

1.  Distribution, sources, and toxicity assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in surface soils of a heavy industrial city, Liuzhou, China.

Authors:  Ying Miao; Xiangsheng Kong; Chengxi Li
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Spatial Distribution, Potential Sources, and Health Risk of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in the Surface Soils under Different Land-Use Covers of Shanxi Province, North China.

Authors:  Li Ji; Wenwen Li; Yuan Li; Qiusheng He; Yonghong Bi; Minghua Zhang; Guixiang Zhang; Xinming Wang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 4.614

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.