Literature DB >> 28357655

Is breast compression associated with breast cancer detection and other early performance measures in a population-based breast cancer screening program?

Nataliia Moshina1, Sofie Sebuødegård1, Solveig Hofvind2,3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We aimed to investigate early performance measures in a population-based breast cancer screening program stratified by compression force and pressure at the time of mammographic screening examination. Early performance measures included recall rate, rates of screen-detected and interval breast cancers, positive predictive value of recall (PPV), sensitivity, specificity, and histopathologic characteristics of screen-detected and interval breast cancers.
METHODS: Information on 261,641 mammographic examinations from 93,444 subsequently screened women was used for analyses. The study period was 2007-2015. Compression force and pressure were categorized using tertiles as low, medium, or high. χ 2 test, t tests, and test for trend were used to examine differences between early performance measures across categories of compression force and pressure. We applied generalized estimating equations to identify the odds ratios (OR) of screen-detected or interval breast cancer associated with compression force and pressure, adjusting for fibroglandular and/or breast volume and age.
RESULTS: The recall rate decreased, while PPV and specificity increased with increasing compression force (p for trend <0.05 for all). The recall rate increased, while rate of screen-detected cancer, PPV, sensitivity, and specificity decreased with increasing compression pressure (p for trend <0.05 for all). High compression pressure was associated with higher odds of interval breast cancer compared with low compression pressure (1.89; 95% CI 1.43-2.48).
CONCLUSIONS: High compression force and low compression pressure were associated with more favorable early performance measures in the screening program.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer screening; Breast compression; Early performance measures; Mammography

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28357655     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-017-4214-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  3 in total

1.  Comparison of technical parameters and women's experience between self-compression and standard compression modes in mammography screening: a single-blind randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Natalia Arenas; Rodrigo Alcantara; Margarita Posso; Javier Louro; Daniela Perez-Leon; Belén Ejarque; Mónica Arranz; Jose Maiques; Xavier Castells; Francesc Macià; Marta Román; Ana Rodríguez-Arana
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Influence of breast compression pressure on the performance of population-based mammography screening.

Authors:  Katharina Holland; Ioannis Sechopoulos; Ritse M Mann; Gerard J den Heeten; Carla H van Gils; Nico Karssemeijer
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 6.466

Review 3.  Mammographic compression practices of force- and pressure-standardisation protocol: A scoping review.

Authors:  Elizabeth Serwan; Donna Matthews; Josephine Davies; Minh Chau
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2020-05-18
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.