Sang-Yeol Lee1, Seon-Chill Kim2, Young-Ik Lee3. 1. Department of Physical Therapy, College of Science, Kyungsung University, Republic of Korea. 2. Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Keimyung University, Republic of Korea. 3. Department of Oriental Sports Medicine, College of Health and Therapy, Daegu Haany University, Republic of Korea.
Abstract
[Purpose] The aim of this study was to develop a new handle holder by modifying the inclination of the existing handle holder to reduce load on the wrist joints. [Subjects and Methods] The subjects of this study consisted of 25 elderly people aged 65 years or older accustomed to a walker-assisted gait. Two types of handle holders ((1) standard handle holder (2) inclination handle holder) were applied to all subjects and their wrist joint movement and muscle activity were measured while they conducted 10 cycle walker-assisted gait. [Results] The use of an inclination handle holder during the walker-assisted gait decreased considerably the extensor carpi radialis longus activity and angles of the ulnar deviation and wrist extension. [Conclusion] Improvements in the overall structure of a walker may be a new tool for improving existing walker users but the replacement cost will be expensive. The inclination handle holder presented in this study decreases the burden on the wrist joints of walker users without any overall structural changes in the walker, thereby reducing the occurrence of musculoskeletal diseases of the wrist joint during the walker-assisted gait of elderly people.
[Purpose] The aim of this study was to develop a new handle holder by modifying the inclination of the existing handle holder to reduce load on the wrist joints. [Subjects and Methods] The subjects of this study consisted of 25 elderly people aged 65 years or older accustomed to a walker-assisted gait. Two types of handle holders ((1) standard handle holder (2) inclination handle holder) were applied to all subjects and their wrist joint movement and muscle activity were measured while they conducted 10 cycle walker-assisted gait. [Results] The use of an inclination handle holder during the walker-assisted gait decreased considerably the extensor carpi radialis longus activity and angles of the ulnar deviation and wrist extension. [Conclusion] Improvements in the overall structure of a walker may be a new tool for improving existing walker users but the replacement cost will be expensive. The inclination handle holder presented in this study decreases the burden on the wrist joints of walker users without any overall structural changes in the walker, thereby reducing the occurrence of musculoskeletal diseases of the wrist joint during the walker-assisted gait of elderly people.
Owing to ongoing progression of the aging population, the quality of life of the elderly is
becoming a serious concern. Elderly people feel a sense of discomfort due to degeneration.
For safe movements, elderly people utilize diverse gait aiding instruments in their ordinary
life. Among them, walkers are gait-assisting tools used by many elderly people that provide
base of support (BOS) widely and maintain a stable gait1). A walker comprises 40% of the humans’ gait cycle and a base of
support is obtained during the swing phase when the risk of falling down is highest, thereby
reducing the risk of falls and assisting in a stable gait2, 3).The use of a walker has the merit of obtaining stability during movement but imparts
excessive pressure on the upper limb joints, such as the wrists where the pressure is not
delivered during gait4). The handle of most
walkers consists of two horizontal bars1),
which significantly affects how the walker grasps the holder and pressure is delivered to
the ground by the angles5). The holder of
the horizontal bar type causes excessive wrist deviation, resulting in cumulative repetitive
motion to the wrists while using the walker, which adversely affects the wrist joints6). A walker has the potential to trigger
secondary diseases, such as carpal tunnel syndrome. According to existing research, those
accustomed to a walker have smaller ulnar deviation and wrist extension angles than those
who are not7). This suggests that a wrist
injury is likely to result from cumulative repetitive motions when the elderly are not
accustomed to the gait using a walker when they use the holder of existing horizontal bar
type. In many studies, a walker has the advantage of increasing the gait stability while
failing to maintain a neutral position in the wrists, which highlights the need to develop a
handle to adjust the posture and reduce the pressures on the wrist joints8). Accordingly, this study evaluated a handle
holder that may decrease the load on the wrists during gait using a walker by improving the
existing horizontal bar type handle.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS
The subjects of this study consisted of elderly people aged 65 or older who had used a
walker for at least one year. They were accustomed to walker gait. In addition, their walker
gait was longer than 50 m. Their mini-mental state examination score was 24 point or higher.
Their right hand and foot were their dominant side. They had not experienced surgery to the
upper and lower limbs in the recent six months or suffered a stroke. The average age of the
subjects was 72.9 years (age range: 67 to 80 years old). The average weight and height of
subjects was 69.8 kg and 169.9 cm. All procedures in this Institutional Review
Board-approved project were explained to the participants prior to their involvement in the
study. We declare that the abovementioned manuscript was approved by Ethics Committee of
Kyungsung University according to approval number KSU-16-08-001 and that an Informed Consent
Form was signed by the participants.This study utilized a standard walker to examine the effects on the wrist deviation angle,
muscle activation, and palmar load during the walker-assisted gait using two types of
walkers. This study measured the right hand on all subject.To make the area where the handle holder contacts the hand with contact forms, an
inclination handle holder type (inclination of 15° (IH holder)) and standard handle holder
type (inclination of 0° (SH holder)) were produced and employed (Fig. 1). The handle diameter of the standard walker used in this study was 2 cm. The holder
diameter and length of the walker were 4 cm and 13 cm, respectively. The height of the
holder was adjusted to become the greater trochanter height of the subjects.
Fig. 1.
Experimental walker using two type of handle holder
Experimental walker using two type of handle holderData was collected while the subjects conducted walker-assisted gait of 10 cycles using the
two types of handle holders. The mean value of the middle 6 cycles was used for statistics.
To observe the period when the fore and back feet of the walker contacted the ground, a
wireless footswitch (Noraxon Inc., USA) was attached to the fore and back feet of the
walker. Muscle activation was measured using a Noraxon DTS system (Noraxon Inc., USA) and
wrist movement was measured using a myoMotion system (Noraxon Inc., USA) with an Inertial
Measurement Unit (IMU) sensor. An adjustable thin F-Scan sensor (Tekscan Inc., USA) was used
to measure the palmar load.For the electromyography (EMG) (Noraxon Inc., USA) data, the sampling ratio was set to
1,000 Hz. The band filter and notch filter were set to 20–500 Hz and 60 Hz, respectively,
and the electrodes (IWC-DTS, 9113A-DTS) were used. The signals collected were processed
using the root mean square (RMS) values. For EMG data, a normalized % maximum voluntary
contraction (MVC) was utilized. For muscle activation, the mean value of each cycle was used
for statistics. A hair shave was conducted when necessary to reduce the skin resistance and
fix the electrodes well onto the skin before using the surface electrodes, and the cleanness
was maintained using alcohol cotton swabs9). For the measurements of the wrist movement using myoMotion (Noraxon
Inc., USA), the sampling rate was 200 Hz. The inertial measurement unit sensor was attached
to the back of the subject’s hand to measure the values that changed during gait with the
anatomical position as the standard. The palmar load was measured by attaching a thin F-Scan
sensor of 0.2 mm to the proximal ulnar part and the proximal radial part of the palm with
double-sided tape.To measure the wrist movement, the average value of max angle of the walker-assisted gait’s
middle angle cycle was used for statistics. The muscle activation and movement data were
analyzed simultaneously using myoResarch biomechanical analysis software (Noraxon Inc.,
USA). The palmar load was analyzed using the F-Scan program.A paired sample t-test was conducted to compare the wrist movement, muscle activation, and
palmar load measured during walker-assisted gait using a handle holder. The statistical
significance was set to α=0.05. Unless otherwise noted, all data are reported as the mean ±
standard deviation (SD). The SPSS statistical package was used for data analysis.
RESULTS
An examination of the wrist movement and muscle activity during walker-assisted gait using
an SH holder type and a IH holder type showed that the use of the IH holder type triggered
significantly lower ulnar deviation and wrist extension than that using the SH holder type
(Table 1) (p≤0.05). The flexor carpi radialis activity was also lower when an SH holder
type was used than when an IH holder type was employed (Table 1) (p≤0.05). For the palmar load, the pressure on the proximal ulnar part
decreased when the IH holder type was used compared to when an SH holder type was employed
(Table 1) (p≤0.05).
Table 1.
The comparison of SH holder and IH holder on muscle activation and wrist
movement
SH holder
IH holder
Wrist movement (°)
Ulnar deviation*
33.86 ± 3.35
24.00 ± 3.12
Radial deviation
17.61 ± 4.87
16.61 ± 4.84
Wrist extension*
24.90 ± 3.54
22.20 ± 3.82
Muscle activation (%MVC)
Extensor carpi radialis longus*
40.98 ± 4.50
31.77 ± 4.72
Flexor carpi ulnaris
33.86 ± 3.35
24.00 ± 3.12
Palmar load (kg)
Proximal ulnar part*
5.52 ± 1.76
4.47 ± 1.39
Proximal radial part
7.70 ± 2.19
7.23 ± 1.74
Comfortable level
Modify VAS*
3.48 ± 0.51
2.96 ± 0.46
*p≤0.05, Mean ± SD. SH holder: Standard handle holder; IH holder: inclination handle holder
*p≤0.05, Mean ± SD. SH holder: Standard handle holder; IH holder: inclination handle holder
DISCUSSION
This study was conducted to develop a handle holder aimed at reducing the excessive use of
the wrist joints while maintaining a stable walker structure for elderly people who used a
walker for a long time. The gait is generally a behavior performed repetitively in ordinary
life and provides elderly people with an excessive load and instability, which carries the
risk of triggering many musculoskeletal system disorders10). To reduce this risk, the load is distributed using a
gait-assistance tool, such as a walker. Nevertheless, the horizontal handle type of a
standard walker triggers repetitive and excessive ulnar deviation and extension of the wrist
joints during gait, with the possibility of triggering secondary diseases and pain in the
wrist joints6).In this study, the use of an IH holder decreased the angle of ulnar deviation during
walker-assisted gait. This suggests that the Guyon’s canal pressure and excessive use may
prevent secondary disorders11). In
addition, the angle of extension in the wrist joints decreased together with ulnar
deviation. The repetitive use of wrist extension may generate carpal tunnel syndrome and
secondary diseases resulting from its overuse11). In walker-assisted gait, wrist extension is the excessive movement
of the joints occurring in a walker user not accustomed to extension7). An increase in wrist extension and ulnar deviation occurs
due to a dependence of the weight load on the upper limbs, not the lower limbs, which is
characterized by repetitive motion away from a normal gait pattern. In addition, the risk of
carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) increases when the activity of the flexor is great with the
wrist joints extended12). An IH holder is
considered to reduce the risk of wrist joint syndrome because the walker handle is held and
maintained with the extension reduced in walker-assisted gait. Moreover, the use of an IH
holder decreases the range of repetitive motion of the wrist joints, thereby decreasing the
activity of the extensor carpi radialis longus. This is believed to be because the
occurrence of ulnar deviation decreases the extensor carpi radialis longus while the weight
is moved to the wrist joints. Therefore, use of an SH holder is more likely to trigger a
problem, such as ‘tennis elbow’ in the elbow joints as well as the wrist joints compared to
the use of an IH holder13).In addition, an IH holder decreases the pressure by the proximal ulnar part of the palms,
thereby reducing the load on the ulnar part of the wrist joint and complementing the
problems of the standard walker. Previous research on crutch handle design showed that CTS
could be prevented by the overall dispersion of the pressure distribution through structural
changes of the crutch handle14). An IH
holder also decreased the pressure on the proximal ulnar part while decreasing the pressure
on the radial part from 7.70 ± 2.19 to 7.23 ± 1.74. Nevertheless, the F-Scan system measures
the data on the vertical force only; therefore, continuous research on the shear force will
be necessary.According to the result of this study, during walker-assisted gait, an IH holder causes
smaller ulnar deviation and wrist extension compared to a SH holder and decreases the
extensor carpi radialis longus activity and pressure on the proximal ulnar part. On a
long-term basis, use of an IH holder by elderly people utilizing a walker is expected to
decrease the possibility of triggering secondary lesions in the wrist joints and elbow
joints without a cost burden according to the replacement of a walker.This study is a limited study on handle holders with a 15 degree inclination. The study did
not investigate the pressure on detailed parts on the palm but measured the vertical force
on the palms only. In addition, this study failed to measure the gait variables of users
when using a new handle type. In the future, research on effective walker-assisted gait by
decreasing the load on the upper extremities through diverse structural changes of the
walker handle will continue.During walker-assisted gait, an IH holder decreased the excessive movement and muscular use
of the wrist joints compared to an SH holder. In addition, an IH holder presented in this
study decreased the burden on the wrist joint of the walker users without any overall
structural changes in the walkers, which is likely to decrease the occurrence of
musculoskeletal diseases on the wrist and elbow joints during walker-assisted gait.
Authors: Carol A Giuliani; Ann L Gruber-Baldini; Nan S Park; Lori A Schrodt; Franzi Rokoske; Philip D Sloane; Sheryl Zimmerman Journal: Gerontologist Date: 2008-04
Authors: Bret H Goodpaster; Seok Won Park; Tamara B Harris; Steven B Kritchevsky; Michael Nevitt; Ann V Schwartz; Eleanor M Simonsick; Frances A Tylavsky; Marjolein Visser; Anne B Newman Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 6.053