Yucheng Zhang1, Carlos Guerra-Nuñez2, Ivo Utke2, Johann Michler2, Piyush Agrawal1, Marta D Rossell1, Rolf Erni1. 1. Electron Microscopy Center, Empa, Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology , Überlandstrasse 129, CH-8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland. 2. Laboratory of Mechanics of Materials and Nanostructure, Empa, Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology , Feuerwerkstrasse 39, CH-3602 Thun, Switzerland.
Abstract
Controlled synthesis of a hybrid nanomaterial based on titanium oxide and single-layer graphene (SLG) using atomic layer deposition (ALD) is reported here. The morphology and crystallinity of the oxide layer on SLG can be tuned mainly with the deposition temperature, achieving either a uniform amorphous layer at 60 °C or ∼2 nm individual nanocrystals on the SLG at 200 °C after only 20 ALD cycles. A continuous and uniform amorphous layer formed on the SLG after 180 cycles at 60 °C can be converted to a polycrystalline layer containing domains of anatase TiO2 after a postdeposition annealing at 400 °C under vacuum. Using aberration-corrected transmission electron microscopy (AC-TEM), characterization of the structure and chemistry was performed on an atomic scale and provided insight into understanding the nucleation and growth. AC-TEM imaging and electron energy loss spectroscopy revealed that rocksalt TiO nanocrystals were occasionally formed at the early stage of nucleation after only 20 ALD cycles. Understanding and controlling nucleation and growth of the hybrid nanomaterial are crucial to achieving novel properties and enhanced performance for a wide range of applications that exploit the synergetic functionalities of the ensemble.
Controlled synthesis of a hybrid nanomaterial based on titanium oxide and single-layer graphene (SLG) using atomic layer deposition (ALD) is reported here. The morphology and crystallinity of the oxide layer on SLG can be tuned mainly with the deposition temperature, achieving either a uniform amorphous layer at 60 °C or ∼2 nm individual nanocrystals on the SLG at 200 °C after only 20 ALD cycles. A continuous and uniform amorphous layer formed on the SLG after 180 cycles at 60 °C can be converted to a polycrystalline layer containing domains of anatase TiO2 after a postdeposition annealing at 400 °C under vacuum. Using aberration-corrected transmission electron microscopy (AC-TEM), characterization of the structure and chemistry was performed on an atomic scale and provided insight into understanding the nucleation and growth. AC-TEM imaging and electron energy loss spectroscopy revealed that rocksalt TiO nanocrystals were occasionally formed at the early stage of nucleation after only 20 ALD cycles. Understanding and controlling nucleation and growth of the hybrid nanomaterial are crucial to achieving novel properties and enhanced performance for a wide range of applications that exploit the synergetic functionalities of the ensemble.
Functionalization of carbon-based
nanomaterials with metal oxides
exploits synergetic combination of the two complementary material
systems, promoting enhanced performance and novel functionalities
that could be beneficial for a wide range of applications. In particular,
applications such as solar cells, batteries, nanoelectronics, and
biosensors can benefit from the combination of the superior mechanical
strength, high electrical conductivity, and large specific surface
of single-layer graphenes (SLGs)[1−3] with the large energy bandgap,
superior photocatalytic property,
and biocompatibility of TiO2.[4−6] Consequently, there has
been increasing research interest in the
hybrid nanomaterial, and a great deal of research effort has been
spent to understand and control its synthesis.[7]Among all the techniques for synthesizing the hybrid nanomaterial,
atomic layer deposition (ALD) is the most suitable. The deposition
technique relies on self-limiting surface reactions of two precursors
that are introduced into the reaction chamber in a sequential manner.
Therefore, it allows deposition of conformal layers of metal oxides
with a monolayer precision.[8,9] It is particularly suitable
for nanostructures with a large aspect
ratio such as carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and SLGs. A great deal of research
effort has been spent to elaborate the carbon nanomaterials with ALD
of metal oxides.[10−13] For instance, Robinson et al. studied the impact of ALD
of TiO2 on the electronic properties of epitaxial graphenes
for the development of graphene-based transistors and found that a
continuous and amorphous TiO2 coverage appeared to improve
graphene mobility.[14] Ban et al. deposited
an amorphous and conformal TiO2 layer on graphene sheets,
which demonstrated its potential
as an electrode material in a Li-ion battery.[15] Merchant et
al. fabricated nanopores in free-standing graphene sheets
for DNA translocations and reported reductions in the ionic current
noise level of orders of magnitude when the graphene was covered with
15 nm TiO2.[16] On the other side,
Wang et al. achieved a high efficiency
in perovskite solar cells that contained nanocomposites made of crystalline
TiO2 nanoparticles and graphenes.[17] These studies indicate that the ideal morphology and
nanostructures vary for different applications, necessitating control
over the synthesis of the hybrid material. Here we have employed atomic-scale
transmission electron microscopy (TEM) for a detailed study of titaniumoxide deposited on SLG with ALD, aiming to gain insight into the nucleation
mechanism and consequently control over the crystallinity and morphology
of the ensemble.
Experiments
Free-standing SLGs sitting on a TEM Cu grid with a carbon lacey
network as support were acquired from TedPella. The samples were transferred
directly into a home-built, hot-wall ALD reactor chamber for deposition.
Prior to each deposition, the samples were annealed at 200 °C
in the chamber for several hours to minimize surface contamination
and absorbents. Titanium isopropoxideTi[OCH(CH3)2]4 (TTIP) kept at 90 °C and H2O at 40
°C were used as precursors with Ar as a carrier gas. The gas
delivery
lines to the ALD reactor were heated to 100 °C. Every ALD cycle
consisted of a 1 s pulse with a 5 s exposure time for each precursor,
followed by a 90 s purge for TTIP and a 120 s purge for H2O using 50 sccm of Ar during pulsing and purging. Twenty cycles of
titanium oxide were deposited at 60 and 200 °C. As a comparison,
180 cycles were deposited at 60 °C on another sample, followed
by postdeposition in situ annealing in the TEM instrument
at 400 °C.The nanostructure was characterized with a JEOL
2200FS TEM instrument
operated at 200 kV for diffraction contrast imaging and selected area
electron diffraction (SAED). With the same microscope, in
situ annealing experiments were performed with a Gatan furnace-based
heating holder. Atomic-scale TEM imaging was conducted using a JEOL
ARM200F microscope equipped with two hexapole type spherical aberration
correctors and a cold field-emission gun operated at 80 kV. To further
enhance image resolution and contrast, exit-wave reconstruction (EWR)
was performed on selected regions by taking a focal series and employing
the Gerchberg–Saxton algorithm in MacTempas.[18] For the focal series, 50 images with a focal interval
of 1 nm were taken. Electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS) was performed
in TEM mode using a high-speed Enfinium SE spectrometer with an energy
resolution around
0.4 eV.
Results and Discussion
Figure shows the
atomic-resolution images showing the morphologies of a pristine SLG
and the SLGs deposited with titanium oxide after only 20 cycles at
60
and 200 °C. The atomic resolution was achieved using a third-order
spherical
aberration-corrected microscope, with a small negative value of approximately
−10
μm adopted for the third-order spherical aberration
coefficient and a small overfocus to optimize the phase contrast with
respect to the fixed small positive
fifth-order spherical aberration.[19] Under
this condition, the carbon atoms in the SLG appear
bright with an enhanced contrast, as shown in panel a. Areas of the
pristine SLG with the size of a few hundred square nanometers can
be routinely observed, decorated with holes, few-layer graphenes,
and carbonaceous contaminants that probably stemmed from the film
transfer. In situ annealing up
to 300 °C was found to have a limited effect in removing the
contaminants and extending the clean pristine area. The ALD temperature,
however, has a dramatic effect on the morphology of the titanium oxide
even at the very early stage of the nucleation, i.e.,
after only 20 cycles, as shown in panels b and c. At 60 °C, the
SLG surface appears to be entirely covered with an amorphous
layer of titanium oxide. The SLG lattice is not visible in the image,
although the fast Fourier transform (FFT) still shows the reflections.
In contrast, crystalline nuclei with a size of ∼2 nm were observed
at 200 °C. The nuclei are mainly located in the few-layer graphene
and contamination
region, with the clean pristine region largely free of nucleation,
because of the inert nature of SLG. Similar observations were reported
for the nucleation of ALDtitanium oxide on the surface of CNTs.[20] It is believed that at the low ALD temperature
physisorption
of precursor molecules is favored on the SLG areas inert to chemisorption;
increasing the ALD temperatures desorbs the physisorb water and TTIP
molecules effectively, and nucleation is observed on only surface
defect sites or sites with reactive groups allowing the formation
of a thermodynamically stronger chemical bond.
Figure 1
Atomic-resolution TEM
images showing the morphology of (a) a pristine
single-layer graphene (SLG), (b) a SLG deposited with 20 cycles of
titanium oxide at 60 °C, and (c) a SLG deposited with 20 cycles
of titanium oxide at 200 °C. The insets show the corresponding
Fourier transforms.
Atomic-resolution TEM
images showing the morphology of (a) a pristine
single-layer graphene (SLG), (b) a SLG deposited with 20 cycles of
titanium oxide at 60 °C, and (c) a SLG deposited with 20 cycles
of titanium oxide at 200 °C. The insets show the corresponding
Fourier transforms.The morphology of the titanium oxide layer can
be further modified
with a postdeposition annealing at a high temperature under vacuum,
to convert the uniform
amorphous layer to a conformal crystalline film. Using this method,
an ∼10 nm thin monocrystalline anatase TiO2–CNT
core–shell nanostructure was achieved, in which
a conformal anatase layer composed of large domains free of defects
was formed to surround the CNTs.[21] The
same procedure was applied here to the titaniumoxide on SLG. A uniform coverage of amorphous titanium oxide on the
SLG surface was first obtained after 180 ALD cycles at 60 °C,
as shown in panels a and b of Figure . The film thickness was ∼20 nm, measured using
the log ratio method in EELS.[22] Because
of the free-standing geometry of the graphene
layer on the Cu grid, the film is deposited on both sides, so that
the thickness of each layer is ∼10 nm. This renders a growth
per cycle (GPC) of ∼0.05 nm/C at 60 °C. The sample was
annealed in situ at 400 °C under vacuum in the
TEM instrument, i.e., ∼ 2 × 10–5 Torr.
Large crystalline domains were instantaneously formed as soon as
the temperature reached 400 °C. The boundary between two such
domains is delineated in Figure c. The indexed SAED
pattern in Figure d indicates the mere presence of the anatase phase. The size of the
domains extends up to a few hundred nanometers, as shown in the color-coded
bright field (BF) image in Figure e. Within each domain, no defects such as dislocations
or stacking faults were observed. Therefore, a continuous layer consisting
of large anatase domains on SLG can be formed via this postdeposition
annealing method.
Figure 2
(a) High-resolution TEM
image showing the morphology of a SLG deposited
with 180 cycles of TiO2 at 60 °C and (b) the corresponding
SAED pattern. (c) Formation of the crystalline
grains in the sample after in situ annealing at 400
°C and (d) the corresponding SAED pattern. (e) Color-coded BF
image
showing the distribution of the grains after annealing.
(a) High-resolution TEM
image showing the morphology of a SLG deposited
with 180 cycles of TiO2 at 60 °C and (b) the corresponding
SAED pattern. (c) Formation of the crystalline
grains in the sample after in situ annealing at 400
°C and (d) the corresponding SAED pattern. (e) Color-coded BF
image
showing the distribution of the grains after annealing.Upon deposition at 200 °C, crystalline
titanium oxide nuclei of ∼2 nm were routinely
observed at the very early stage, i.e., after only 20 ALD cycles,
as shown in Figure c. It is particularly interesting to further study the nuclei because
this knowledge can provide clues about the nucleation mechanism. Figure represents an atomic-scale
investigation into the atomic structure of the nuclei. Figure a is an overview image in which
many such nuclei are readily visible. Among the nuclei oriented in
a major zone axis, a crystal lattice with a square symmetry is often
observed, with one example shown in Figure b. Exit-wave reconstructed (EWR) phase images
were attained from focal series of the two regions in panel b, the
phase image of a titanium oxide nucleus acquired from the red box
shown in panel c, and that of the SLG from the blue box shown in panel
d. It is clear that the resolution and contrast are enhanced in the
phase images, from which the distance between the atomic columns can
be accurately measured. The statistics are presented in panel e.
Figure 3
(a) HR-TEM
image with a large field of view showing many ∼2
nm titanium oxide nuclei after 20 ALD cycles at 200 °C on SLG.
(b) One image from the focal series with the selected regions
for exit-wave reconstruction. The phase images of the reconstructed
wave showing one nucleus and the graphene lattice are shown in panels
c and d, respectively. (e) Measured distances between the atomic columns
(denoted by the arrows) compared with the theoretical lattice constants
of SLG, anatase TiO2, and rocksalt TiO.
(a) HR-TEM
image with a large field of view showing many ∼2
nm titanium oxide nuclei after 20 ALD cycles at 200 °C on SLG.
(b) One image from the focal series with the selected regions
for exit-wave reconstruction. The phase images of the reconstructed
wave showing one nucleus and the graphene lattice are shown in panels
c and d, respectively. (e) Measured distances between the atomic columns
(denoted by the arrows) compared with the theoretical lattice constants
of SLG, anatase TiO2, and rocksalt TiO.While the lattice spacing for the SLG matches well with the
theoretical
value, the measured distance between the two nearest atomic columns
for the titanium oxide nucleus, 2.10 Å, is >10% higher than
the theoretical value for anatase TiO2, 1.89 Å,[24] despite the fact that a projection of the TiO2 lattice in the [001] direction should also possess the square
symmetry.
Instead, a rocksalt TiO lattice[25] would
match well with the measurement. In addition, the variation in intensity
among the atomic columns indicates vacancies and nonstoichiometry,
which are often found in the defect rocksalt structure.[26] For all the observed nuclei with the square
symmetry
in other regions, the measured lattice constant always corresponds
well with that of the rocksalt TiO. However, the observation of the
rocksalt lattice is quite sporadic, indicating a small amount of TiO
nuclei, presumably <1%, which could not be detected by X-ray photoelectron
spectroscopy (XPS). At later stages of growth, TiO nuclei do not seem
to persist as the rocksalt lattice was never observed in the film
of 180 cycles. This also indicates that for nucleation of <20 cycles,
the ratio may be larger than 1% and TiO be an intermediate phase at
the initial growth. However, such a hypothesis would need to be clarified
with complementary analysis techniques, such as in situ TEM.Electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS) provided additional
evidence
that the titanium oxide in a reduced form is present at the early
stage of nucleation. EELS spectra from the samples, including 20 cycles
at 60 and 200 °C, 180 cycles at 60 °C, and 180 cycles at
60
°C with postdeposition annealing, were obtained. Fine structures
near the Ti_L2,3 edge and O_K edge were examined and
are presented in Figure . Two features were identified. First, the Ti_L2,3 edge from the annealed sample
shows clearly splitting peaks, which is much less prominent in the
unannealed sample after 180 cycles and almost completely absent for
the samples after 20 cycles. The peak splitting can be explained well
by the molecular orbital (MO) theory for oxides.[23] The MOs for all the titanium oxides with different oxidation
states are similar, but the occupancy of each orbital depends on the
oxidation state and atomic coordination. Sketches of the MOs for anatase
TiO2 and rocksalt TiO are shown in panels c and d of Figure , together with their
unit cells. In the former, the MOs are occupied up to the t1g level and the 2t2g level is empty. In EELS, the electrons
in the Ti_2p core levels can therefore be excited
to the empty 2t2g and 3eg levels, resulting
in the observed peak splitting of the L2,3 edges. For the rocksalt TiO, the 2t2g level is already
filled with electrons and the first available orbital for the excited
electrons is the 3eg level, hence, the disappearance of
the 2t2g peak in the EELS spectra. For any titanium oxide
with the Ti valence between Ti4+ and Ti2+, the
2t2g level would be half-filled and the 2t2g peak in the Ti_L2,3 edge becomes
correspondingly less prominent. For the O_K edge,
the same reason applies to the observed splitting peaks. Second, a
small energy shift of ∼1 eV in the Ti_L2,3 edge was observed upon comparison of the 20-cycle
samples with the 180-cycle samples, as denoted by the dotted line.
This energy shift, also known as the chemical shift, can be explained
by the core–hole effect in EELS. The hole created in the inner
shell during the excitation of the electron is screened by the electrons
in the outer shell. For the anatase TiO2, the screening
effect is much less due to the unoccupied 2t2g level, and
consequently, the Ti_L2,3 edge is shifted
to the higher-energy losses compared to that of metallic Ti. The screening
of the core–hole for the TiO is much stronger, because the
2t2g level is occupied. In this case, the energy loss is
almost similar to that for metallic Ti and, hence, red-shifted with
respected to that for the anatase TiO2. Indeed, the spectra
observed here correspond well with those for different TiO phases in the study
by Stoyanov.[27] Consistent with the observation
in the atomic-resolution
images, the EELS spectra also indicate the presence of reduced TiO, in particular in the form of rocksalt TiO,
at
the early stage of nucleation after 20 ALD cycles at 200 °C.
In addition, EELS simulation of the Ti_L edge was
performed using a real space multiple-scattering method. Spectra from
anatase TiO2 under strain were calculated (see Figure S1). The simulation also supports the
finding that the observed crystalline nuclei are rocksalt TiO instead
of ∼10% strained anatase TiO2.
Figure 4
(a and b) EELS spectra showing the Ti_L2,3 and O_K edges, acquired from the
ALD titania on
SLG after 20 cycles at 60 °C, 20 cycles at 200 °C, and 180
cycles at 60 °C and after in situ annealing
at 400 °C, respectively. The dashed lines in panel a denote the
∼1
eV energy shift due to different oxidation states of Ti. (c and d)
Molecular orbitals for anatase TiO2 and rocksalt TiO (adapted
from ref (23)), together
with their unit cell of the crystal lattice. The main difference is
the occupancy of the 2t2g (π*) state, which explains
the edge features in the EELS spectra.
(a and b) EELS spectra showing the Ti_L2,3 and O_K edges, acquired from the
ALD titania on
SLG after 20 cycles at 60 °C, 20 cycles at 200 °C, and 180
cycles at 60 °C and after in situ annealing
at 400 °C, respectively. The dashed lines in panel a denote the
∼1
eV energy shift due to different oxidation states of Ti. (c and d)
Molecular orbitals for anatase TiO2 and rocksalt TiO (adapted
from ref (23)), together
with their unit cell of the crystal lattice. The main difference is
the occupancy of the 2t2g (π*) state, which explains
the edge features in the EELS spectra.Here we would
rule out the possibility that the formation of the
rocksalt TiO is due to an electron beam effect such as electron-stimulated
desorption (ESD)[31,32] of oxygen during the TEM analysis.
The acceleration voltage of the incident beam is 80 kV, lower than
the threshold value of the knock-on damage for the carbon atoms in
the graphene, as well as the oxygen and titanium atoms in the crystalline
bulk. For carbon atoms on the edge of a hole or oxygen and titanium
atoms weakly bonded on the surface, the knock-on damage is still possible
at this energy. On the other hand, the incident energy is also much
higher than the usual voltage (∼1 kV) in ESD; therefore, the
cross section for desorption of ions from the surface should be much
smaler. In addition, if the formation of TiO were caused by the ESD
of oxygen, it should form only on the surface. However, the TEM image
(as in Figure b) clearly
shows the same lattice through the thickness. The
observation of reduced TiO was also reported
previously for ALD of titaniumoxide on multiwalled CNTs (MWCNTs) using the same precursors.[20] In addition, an in situ X-ray
photoemission
spectroscopy (XPS) study of ALD of TiO2 on a silicon substrate
revealed the presence of Ti3+ at the initial stage, i.e.,
after only two cycles.[28] However, the amount
of reduced TiO in our sample is believed
to be small, probably
<1%, beyond the limit of detection of XPS. Only the high spatial
resolution offered by the TEM analysis adopted here allows for identification
of the species. The formation of the reduced oxides, particularly
the rocksalt TiO, and its possible transition to the stoichiometric
TiO2 are not fully understood.Coating a 5–10
nm conformal layer of TiO on CNTs by
ALD and using the hybrid as an electron
transport layer in inverted organic photovoltaic cells (OPVCs), Jin
et
al. found
that the charge selectivity for the OPVCs was improved.[29] The energy bandgap of the titanium oxide varies
with
the oxidation state, TiO2 being a wide bandgap semiconductor,
Ti3+ oxides having a narrow bandgap, and TiO possessing
metallic conductivity. Therefore, engineering of the oxide state provides
the option of tuning the light absorption of titanium oxide into the
visible range. Indeed, using a doping method, rocksalt TiO nanocrystals
have been synthesized and exhibited a very large shift of the light
absorption threshold, up to 1.2 eV toward the visible range, compared
with that of the anatase TiO2.[30] However, it appears that the rocksalt TiO and possibly
other TiO species exist in ALD only at
the early stage of
nucleation when the deposited layer is ultrathin. As the ALD proceeds
and the layer becomes thick, the stoichiometry becomes TiO2, forming an anatase phase afterward when the sample is annealed
at a high temperature. Further investigation
is required to understand how the transformation takes place during
the growth stage.
Conclusions
Through
a detailed TEM characterization of titanium oxide deposited
on SLGs, we provide an understanding of ALD nucleation and growth.
By tuning the deposition parameters such as the temperature and the
number of cycles, one can achieve various morphologies of titaniumoxide films on the inert SLG surface: an amorphous layer with uniform
coverage was obtained at a low temperature of 60 °C, decoration
of ∼2 nm nanocrystals at a high temperature of 200 °C,
and a continuous film consisting of laterally extended anatase crystals
on the SLG obtained via postdeposition annealing at 400 °C under
vacuum. AC-TEM imaging
provides direct evidence of the occasional presence of the rocksalt
TiO structure at the early stage of nucleation, which is also consistent
with the chemical analysis using EELS. This study thus paves the way
for
atomic-scale engineering of the interface between metal oxides and
graphenes using ALD.
Authors: Christopher A Merchant; Ken Healy; Meni Wanunu; Vishva Ray; Neil Peterman; John Bartel; Michael D Fischbein; Kimberly Venta; Zhengtang Luo; A T Charlie Johnson; Marija Drndić Journal: Nano Lett Date: 2010-08-11 Impact factor: 11.189
Authors: Jacob Tse-Wei Wang; James M Ball; Eva M Barea; Antonio Abate; Jack A Alexander-Webber; Jian Huang; Michael Saliba; Iván Mora-Sero; Juan Bisquert; Henry J Snaith; Robin J Nicholas Journal: Nano Lett Date: 2013-12-30 Impact factor: 11.189
Authors: Chunmei Ban; Ming Xie; Xiang Sun; Jonathan J Travis; Gongkai Wang; Hongtao Sun; Anne C Dillon; Jie Lian; Steven M George Journal: Nanotechnology Date: 2013-09-25 Impact factor: 3.874