| Literature DB >> 28355868 |
Chaz Firestone1, Brian J Scholl1.
Abstract
The spectacularly varied responses to our target article raised big-picture questions about the nature of seeing and thinking, nitty-gritty experimental design details, and everything in between. We grapple with these issues, including the ready falsifiability of our view, neuroscientific theories that allow everything but demand nothing, cases where seeing and thinking conflict, mental imagery, the free press, an El Greco fallacy fallacy, hallucinogenic drugs, blue bananas, subatomic particles, Boeing 787s, and the racial identities of geometric shapes.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 28355868 DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X16000029
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Behav Brain Sci ISSN: 0140-525X Impact factor: 12.579