Literature DB >> 28355868

Seeing and thinking: Foundational issues and empirical horizons.

Chaz Firestone1, Brian J Scholl1.   

Abstract

The spectacularly varied responses to our target article raised big-picture questions about the nature of seeing and thinking, nitty-gritty experimental design details, and everything in between. We grapple with these issues, including the ready falsifiability of our view, neuroscientific theories that allow everything but demand nothing, cases where seeing and thinking conflict, mental imagery, the free press, an El Greco fallacy fallacy, hallucinogenic drugs, blue bananas, subatomic particles, Boeing 787s, and the racial identities of geometric shapes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28355868     DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X16000029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Sci        ISSN: 0140-525X            Impact factor:   12.579


  3 in total

Review 1.  Action potential influences spatial perception: Evidence for genuine top-down effects on perception.

Authors:  Jessica K Witt
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-08

2.  The No-Report Paradigm: A Revolution in Consciousness Research?

Authors:  Irem Duman; Isabell Sophia Ehmann; Alicia Ronnie Gonsalves; Zeynep Gültekin; Jonathan Van den Berckt; Cees van Leeuwen
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 3.473

3.  Pre-cueing, the Epistemic Role of Early Vision, and the Cognitive Impenetrability of Early Vision.

Authors:  Athanassios Raftopoulos
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-07-10
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.