Background: A range of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) has been found to follow a social pattern whereby socioeconomic status predicts either a higher or lower risk of disease. Comprehensive evidence on the socioeconomic distribution of NCDs across Europe, however, has been limited. Methods: Using cross-sectional 2014 European Social Survey data from 20 countries, this paper examines socioeconomic inequalities in 14 self-reported NCDs separately for women and men: heart/circulatory problems, high blood pressure, back pain, arm/hand pain, foot/leg pain, allergies, breathing problems, stomach/digestion problems, skin conditions, diabetes, severe headaches, cancer, obesity and depression. Using education to measure socioeconomic status, age-controlled adjusted risk ratios were calculated and separately compared a lower and medium education group with a high education group. Results: At the pooled European level, a social gradient in health was observed for 10 NCDs: depression, diabetes, obesity, heart/circulation problems, hand/arm pain, high blood pressure, breathing problems, severe headaches, foot/leg pain and cancer. An inverse social gradient was observed for allergies. Social gradients were observed among both genders, but a greater number of inequalities were observed among women. Country-specific analyses show that inequalities in NCDs are present everywhere across Europe and that inequalities exist to different extents for each of the conditions. Conclusion: This study provides the most up-to-date overview of socioeconomic inequalities for a large number of NCDs across 20 European countries for both women and men. Future investigations should further consider the diseases, and their associated determinants, for which socioeconomic differences are the greatest.
Background: A range of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) has been found to follow a social pattern whereby socioeconomic status predicts either a higher or lower risk of disease. Comprehensive evidence on the socioeconomic distribution of NCDs across Europe, however, has been limited. Methods: Using cross-sectional 2014 European Social Survey data from 20 countries, this paper examines socioeconomic inequalities in 14 self-reported NCDs separately for women and men: heart/circulatory problems, high blood pressure, back pain, arm/hand pain, foot/leg pain, allergies, breathing problems, stomach/digestion problems, skin conditions, diabetes, severe headaches, cancer, obesity and depression. Using education to measure socioeconomic status, age-controlled adjusted risk ratios were calculated and separately compared a lower and medium education group with a high education group. Results: At the pooled European level, a social gradient in health was observed for 10 NCDs: depression, diabetes, obesity, heart/circulation problems, hand/arm pain, high blood pressure, breathing problems, severe headaches, foot/leg pain and cancer. An inverse social gradient was observed for allergies. Social gradients were observed among both genders, but a greater number of inequalities were observed among women. Country-specific analyses show that inequalities in NCDs are present everywhere across Europe and that inequalities exist to different extents for each of the conditions. Conclusion: This study provides the most up-to-date overview of socioeconomic inequalities for a large number of NCDs across 20 European countries for both women and men. Future investigations should further consider the diseases, and their associated determinants, for which socioeconomic differences are the greatest.
Authors: Katherine J Ombrellaro; Nita Perumal; Johannes Zeiher; Jens Hoebel; Till Ittermann; Ralf Ewert; Marcus Dörr; Thomas Keil; Gert B M Mensink; Jonas D Finger Journal: Sports Med Open Date: 2018-06-07
Authors: Vanessa Kraege; Peter Vollenweider; Gérard Waeber; Stephen J Sharp; Maite Vallejo; Oscar Infante; Mohammad Reza Mirjalili; Fatemeh Ezoddini-Ardakani; Hassan Mozaffari-Khosravi; Mohammad Hasan Lotfi; Masoud Mirzaei; Marie Méan; Pedro Marques-Vidal Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-10-09 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Pamela Barbadoro; Antonella D'Alleva; Sara Galmozzi; Gemma Zocco; Francesco Di Stanislao; Emilia Prospero; Marcello Mario D'Errico Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-06-12 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Katie Thomson; Frances Hillier-Brown; Adam Todd; Courtney McNamara; Tim Huijts; Clare Bambra Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2018-07-13 Impact factor: 3.295