Literature DB >> 28355104

Laparoscopic Colectomy Versus Open Colectomy for Treatment of Transverse Colon Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Qingbin Wu1,2, Mingtian Wei1,3, Zengpanpan Ye2, Liang Bi1,2, Erliang Zheng1,2, Tao Hu1,2, Chaoyang Gu1,2, Ziqiang Wang1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The surgical management of transverse colon cancer (TCC) is still not standardized. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the effect of laparoscopic colectomy (LC) for treatment of TCC in terms of short-term and long-term outcomes compared with open colectomy.
METHOD: A systematic literature search with no limits was performed in PubMed and Embase. The last search was performed on September 15, 2016. The short-term outcomes included intraoperative outcomes, postoperative outcomes, and oncological surgical quality. The long-term outcomes included overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS).
RESULTS: Thirteen articles and one conference abstract published between 2010 and 2016 with a total of 1728 patients were enrolled in this meta-analysis. LC was associated with significant less estimated blood loss, fewer total postoperative complications, and shorter time to first flatus, time to liquid diet, length of hospital stay, and length of postoperative hospital stay. However, longer operative time was needed in LC. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups concerning the intraoperative complications, mortality, ileus, anastomotic leakage, bleeding, wound infection, abdominal infection, lymph nodes harvested, proximal resection margin, distal resection margin, OS, or DFS.
CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis suggests that LC is a safe and feasible technique for TCC associated with less estimated blood loss, fewer total postoperative complications, quicker recovery of intestinal function, shorter length of hospital stay, and equivalent long-term outcomes. Furthermore, a large-scaled, prospective randomized controlled study is warranted to verify those results.

Entities:  

Keywords:  laparoscopic colectomy; open colectomy; transverse colon cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28355104     DOI: 10.1089/lap.2017.0031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A        ISSN: 1092-6429            Impact factor:   1.878


  5 in total

Review 1.  Comparing the safety, efficacy, and oncological outcomes of laparoscopic and open colectomy in transverse colon cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ioannis Baloyiannis; Konstantinos Perivoliotis; Panagiotis Ntellas; Katerina Dadouli; George Tzovaras
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Laparoscopic colectomy for diverticulitis in patients with pre-operative respiratory comorbidity: analysis of post-operative outcomes in the United States from 2005 to 2017.

Authors:  Richa Patel; Pavel Zagadailov; Aziz M Merchant
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Laparoscopic and open surgery in patients with transverse colon cancer: short-term and oncological outcomes.

Authors:  A Matsumoto; H Shinohara; H Suzuki
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2021-09-06

Review 4.  Surgical outcomes of various surgical approaches for transverse colon cancer.

Authors:  Hyo Jun Kim; Ji Won Park
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2022-03-15

5.  Audit of laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer in Morocco: A report of the results of a prospective multicentre cohort study.

Authors:  Aya El Yaakoubi; Salma Lahmadi; Amine Benkabbou; Raouf Mohsine; Abdelkader Belkouchi; Tijani El Harroudi; Hadj Omar El Malki; Abdelmalek Hrora; Amine Souadka; Mohammed Anass Majbar
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2022-08-03
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.