| Literature DB >> 28353685 |
K H Baker1, H W I Gray1, V Ramovs1, D Mertzanidou2, Ç Akın Pekşen3,4, C C Bilgin3, N Sykes5, A R Hoelzel1.
Abstract
Species that have been translocated and otherwise manipulated by humans may show patterns of population structure that reflect those interactions. At the same time, natural processes shape populations, including behavioural characteristics like dispersal potential and breeding system. In Europe, a key factor is the geography and history of climate change through the Pleistocene. During glacial maxima throughout that period, species in Europe with temperate distributions were forced south, becoming distributed among the isolated peninsulas represented by Anatolia, Italy and Iberia. Understanding modern patterns of diversity depends on understanding these historical population dynamics. Traditionally, European fallow deer (Dama dama dama) are thought to have been restricted to refugia in Anatolia and possibly Sicily and the Balkans. However, the distribution of this species was also greatly influenced by human-mediated translocations. We focus on fallow deer to better understand the relative influence of these natural and anthropogenic processes. We compared modern fallow deer putative populations across a broad geographic range using microsatellite and mitochondrial DNA loci. The results revealed highly insular populations, depauperate of genetic variation and significantly differentiated from each other. This is consistent with the expectations of drift acting on populations founded by small numbers of individuals, and reflects known founder populations in the north. However, there was also evidence for differentiation among (but not within) physically isolated regions in the south, including Iberia. In those regions we find evidence for a stronger influence from natural processes than may be expected for a species with such strong, known anthropogenic influence.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28353685 PMCID: PMC5520134 DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2017.11
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heredity (Edinb) ISSN: 0018-067X Impact factor: 3.821
Figure 1Map showing fallow deer sampling locations from across Europe. Locations are individually numbered to correspond with the samples presented in Table 1. Locations for samples representing each of the unique haplotypes found in Germany are detailed in Ludwig .
Microsatellite diversity statistics for fallow deer samples at each location
|
|
|
| N | A |
| F | H | H |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||||
| Central | North Madrid and Toledo | 13 | 15 | 1.7 | 1.51 | 0.21 | 0.16 | 0.20 | 0.75 |
| South west | Cadiz Huelva and Jaen | 12 | 25 | 2.3 | 1.75 | 0.13 | 0.20 | 0.23 | 0.83 |
| North | Aiguamolls and Rialp | 14 | 15 | 1.6 | 1.47 | −0.21 | 0.21 | 0.18 | 0.91 |
| Asturias | 11 | 15 | 1.8 | 1.60 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.17 | 0.22 | |
|
| |||||||||
| East central | Castelo Branco | 10 | 13 | 1.7 | 1.61 | 0.15 | 0.19 | 0.23 | 0.89 |
|
| |||||||||
| North | Grosetto | 18 | 15 | 2.3 | 2.21 | 0.04 | 0.42 | 0.43 | 0.25 |
| Siena | 19 | 14 | 2.6 | 2.42 | 0.08 | 0.45 | 0.48 | 0.63 | |
| San Rossore | 20 | 14 | 2.2 | 2.05 | 0.11 | 0.37 | 0.41 | 0.19 | |
|
| |||||||||
| Central south | Essex | 8 | 15 | 2 | 1.88 | −0.03 | 0.34 | 0.33 | 0.29 |
| East | Oxfordshire (P) | 6 | 9 | 2.2 | 2.13 | 0.28 | 0.25 | 0.33 | 0.04 |
| Cambridge and Bedfordshire | 7 | 15 | 2 | 1.90 | −0.04 | 0.35 | 0.34 | 0.08 | |
| North | Shropshire (P) and Cheshire (P) | 4 | 9 | 2.2 | 1.76 | −0.12 | 0.29 | 0.26 | 0.18 |
| Lincolnshire (P) | 5 | 15 | 2.1 | 1.90 | 0.01 | 0.30 | 0.31 | 0.18 | |
| Norfolk (P) | 9 | 24 | 2.2 | 2.00 | 0.08 | 0.35 | 0.38 | 0.07 | |
|
| |||||||||
| N central | Roscommon, Galway and Clare | 1 | 13 | 2.1 | 1.97 | 0.19 | 0.25 | 0.31 | 0.64 |
| East | Wicklow | 3 | 13 | 1.8 | 1.62 | 0.29 | 0.16 | 0.22 | 0.08 |
| South | Waterford, Kilkenny and Tipperary | 2 | 10 | 2 | 1.94 | 0.29 | 0.26 | 0.36 | 0.45 |
|
| |||||||||
| South | Kristianstad, Maltesholm | 15 | 15 | 2.1 | 1.97 | −0.03 | 0.35 | 0.34 | 0.36 |
|
| |||||||||
| East | Gyula | 17 | 7 | 2.2 | 2.10 | −0.14 | 0.34 | 0.30 | 0.93 |
| West | Labod | 16 | 7 | 2.1 | 2.07 | −0.06 | 0.39 | 0.37 | 0.52 |
|
| |||||||||
| South | British Colombia, Sidney Island | Not shown | 24 | 1.6 | 1.46 | −0.09 | 0.15 | 0.14 | 0.83 |
|
| |||||||||
| South west | Antalya, Düzlerçami (P) | 23 | 24 | 1.7 | 1.53 | −0.22 | 0.22 | 0.18 | <0.01 |
| Rhodes | 24 | 24 | 2.7 | 2.12 | 0.23 | 0.26 | 0.34 | 0.01 | |
|
| |||||||||
| South | Eastern Rhodopes | 22 | 14 | 1.7 | 1.62 | 0.10 | 0.19 | 0.21 | 0.95 |
| Totals and averages | 364 | 2.038 | 1.86 | 0.06 | 0.28 | 0.29 | |||
Abbreviations: A, number of alleles; AR, allelic richness; FIS, inbreeding coefficient; He, expected heterozygosity; Ho, observed heterozygosity.
P-values are indicated for multilocus Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium tested against the null hypothesis.
Samples originating from animals in enclosed parks are denoted parenthetically by ‘P’ after location names.
Figure 2Graphical representation of the seven scenarios considered with approximate Bayesian computation using the software DIYABC. See Table 3 and Supplementary Table S7 and Supplementary Figures S4 and S5 for the results of the analysis.
Figure 3Heatmap of pairwise FST values estimated from microsatellite data between all populations. Darker shading indicates higher FST values, as indicated by key to the right of the figure.
Figure 4Assignment probabilities of individuals to putative population clusters at K=3, K=5 and K=10 using the program STRUCTURE 2.3.2. Locations where individuals were sampled are indicated below the graphs. Likelihood support values associated with these analyses are provided in Supplementary Figure S1.
Figure 5Factorial correspondence analysis (FCA) of population multilocus scores computed using GENETIX based on a comparison of the first three factors.
Figure 6Median joining network of phylogenetic relationships among fallow deer mitochondrial haplotypes where the size of the circle indicates relative frequency of the haplotype. Haplotypes represented are based on 683 base pairs of the mtDNA control region.
MtDNA diversity metrics
|
| N | k | h | π | k/N | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spain | 11, 12, 13 | 19 | 4 | 0.456 | 0.00069 | 0.211 |
| Portugal | 10 | 17 | 3 | 0.647 | 0.00507 | 0.177 |
| Italy | 18, 19, 20 | 30 | 7 | 0.731 | 0.01029 | 0.233 |
| England | 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 | 57 | 15 | 0.902 | 0.0031 | 0.263 |
| Ireland | 1, 2, 3 | 16 | 4 | 0.442 | 0.00068 | 0.25 |
| Hungary | 16, 17 | 13 | 3 | 0.513 | 0.0008 | 0.231 |
| Turkey | 23 | 20 | 2 | 0.1 | 0.00028 | 0.1 |
| Bulgaria | 22 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.091 |
| Canada | Not shown | 3 | 1 | – | – | – |
| Rhodes | 24 | 4 | 2 | – | – | – |
| Sweden | 15 | 7 | 1 | – | – | – |
| Slovenia | 25 | 3 | 2 | – | – | – |
Abbreviation: MtDNA, mitochondrial DNA.
Sample size (N), haplotype number (k), haplotype diversity (h), gene diversity (π) and haplotypes per individual (k/N) are shown.
Diversity measures are only given when N>10.
Posterior parameter estimates from ABC analyses for scenario 1 (see Figure 2), where N1, N2 and N3 are effective population size estimates for the extant populations, Tb is the estimated date of lineage splitting and N a is the ancestral effective population size
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 1060 (152–4700) | 1120 (195–4150) | |
| 4190 (955–8880) | 2650 (525–7610) | |
| 1800 (281–6090) | 422 (67–1860) | |
| Tb (YBP) | 12 700 (1850–38 000) | 14 700 (3190–42 500) |
|
| 987 (39–3910) | 238 (16–910) |
Abbreviations: ABC, approximate Bayesian computation; mtDNA, mitochondrial DNA.
We assume a generation time of 1, but see text for alternative interpretations.