Literature DB >> 28352362

Feasibility of continuous, catheter-directed thrombolysis using low-dose urokinase in combination with low molecular-weight heparin for acute iliofemoral venous thrombosis in patients at risk of bleeding.

Guoping Chen1, Wangyin Shi1, Xu He1, Wensheng Lou1, Liang Chen1, Jianping Gu1.   

Abstract

The present study aimed to examine the feasibility of catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) using continuous infusion of low-dose urokinase in combination with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) for acute iliofemoral venous thrombosis. This retrospective analysis included patients with symptomatic acute iliofemoral venous thrombosis who received CDT using continuous infusion of low-dose urokinase in combination with LMWH within the past four years. Urokinase was administered at 1×104 U/h and 2×104 U/h in patients at high-risk and low-risk of bleeding, respectively. Measurements included urokinase dosage, duration, clinical outcomes and CDT-related complications. A total of 46 patients were included (high-risk, n=17; low-risk, n=29). In the high-risk patients, 64.7% experienced dissolution of ≥50% thrombi after a median CDT duration of 8 days (range, 6-10 days) and median total urokinase dose of 1.92×106 units (range, 1.44-2.4×106 units). In the low-risk patients, 82.8% achieved dissolution of ≥50% thrombi after a median CDT duration of 7 days (range, 4-10 days) and a median total urokinase dose of 3.36×106 units (range, 1.92-4.80×106 units). Remission of clinical symptoms after CDT was achieved in 15 (88.2%) and 28 (96.6%) cases in high-risk and low-risk patients, respectively. No treatment-associated pulmonary embolism or major bleeding was observed. Three (6.5%) subjects (high-risk, n=1; low-risk, n=2) experienced minor bleeding. In conclusion, continuous infusion of low-dose urokinase via CDT in combination with LMWH is effective and safe for acute iliofemoral venous thrombosis in patients with one or more risk factor for bleeding.

Entities:  

Keywords:  catheter-directed thrombolysis; deep venous thrombosis; iliofemoral thrombosis; urokinase

Year:  2017        PMID: 28352362      PMCID: PMC5348685          DOI: 10.3892/etm.2017.4023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Ther Med        ISSN: 1792-0981            Impact factor:   2.447


  28 in total

1.  Executive summary: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Gordon H Guyatt; Elie A Akl; Mark Crowther; David D Gutterman; Holger J Schuünemann
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  Catheter-directed thrombolysis for lower extremity deep venous thrombosis: report of a national multicenter registry.

Authors:  M W Mewissen; G R Seabrook; M H Meissner; J Cynamon; N Labropoulos; S H Haughton
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 3.  Pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis.

Authors:  Samuel Z Goldhaber; Henri Bounameaux
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Adjunctive percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy for lower-extremity deep vein thrombosis: clinical and economic outcomes.

Authors:  Hyun S Kim; Ajanta Patra; Ben E Paxton; Jawad Khan; Michael B Streiff
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.464

5.  Catheter-direct thrombolysis versus pharmacomechanical thrombectomy for treatment of symptomatic lower extremity deep venous thrombosis.

Authors:  Peter H Lin; Wei Zhou; Alan Dardik; Firas Mussa; Panos Kougias; Nasim Hedayati; Joseph J Naoum; Hosam El Sayed; Eric K Peden; Tam T Huynh
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Rationale and design of the ATTRACT Study: a multicenter randomized trial to evaluate pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis for the prevention of postthrombotic syndrome in patients with proximal deep vein thrombosis.

Authors:  Suresh Vedantham; Samuel Z Goldhaber; Susan R Kahn; Jim Julian; Elizabeth Magnuson; Michael R Jaff; Timothy P Murphy; David J Cohen; Anthony J Comerota; Heather L Gornik; Mahmood K Razavi; Lawrence Lewis; Clive Kearon
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 4.749

7.  Long-term outcomes of catheter directed thrombolysis for lower extremity deep venous thrombosis without prophylactic inferior vena cava filter placement.

Authors:  Clinton D Protack; Andrew M Bakken; Nikhil Patel; Wael E Saad; David L Waldman; Mark G Davies
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 8.  Endovascular treatment options in the management of lower limb deep venous thrombosis.

Authors:  Sarfraz Ahmed Nazir; Arul Ganeshan; Sheraz Nazir; Raman Uberoi
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 2.740

9.  Comparison of urokinase, alteplase, and reteplase for catheter-directed thrombolysis of deep venous thrombosis.

Authors:  Michael R Grunwald; Lawrence V Hofmann
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.464

10.  Catheter-directed thrombolysis with a continuous infusion of low-dose urokinase for non-acute deep venous thrombosis of the lower extremity.

Authors:  Binbin Gao; Jingyong Zhang; Xuejun Wu; Zonglin Han; Hua Zhou; Dianning Dong; Xing Jin
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2011-01-03       Impact factor: 3.500

View more
  2 in total

1.  Feasibility of low-dose infusion of alteplase for unsuccessful thrombolysis with urokinase in deep venous thrombosis.

Authors:  Maofeng Gong; Boxiang Zhao; Xu He; Jianping Gu; Guoping Chen
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 2.447

2.  Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis With a Continuous Infusion of Low-Dose Alteplase for Subacute Proximal Venous Thrombosis: Efficacy and Safety Compared to Urokinase.

Authors:  Maofeng Gong; Xu He; Jinhua Song; Boxiang Zhao; Wanyin Shi; Guoping Chen; Jianping Gu
Journal:  Clin Appl Thromb Hemost       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 2.389

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.