Literature DB >> 28351937

Presentation and outcome of patients with 2016 WHO diagnosis of prefibrotic and overt primary myelofibrosis.

Paola Guglielmelli1,2, Annalisa Pacilli1,2, Giada Rotunno1,2, Elisa Rumi3,4, Vittorio Rosti5, Federica Delaini6, Margherita Maffioli7,8, Tiziana Fanelli1,2,9, Alessandro Pancrazzi1,2, Daniela Pietra10, Silvia Salmoiraghi6, Carmela Mannarelli1,2, Annalisa Franci1,2, Chiara Paoli1,2, Alessandro Rambaldi6,11, Francesco Passamonti7,8, Giovanni Barosi5, Tiziano Barbui12, Mario Cazzola3,4, Alessandro M Vannucchi1,2.   

Abstract

The 2016 revision of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of myeloproliferative neoplasms defines 2 stages of primary myelofibrosis (PMF): prefibrotic/early (pre-PMF) and overt fibrotic (overt PMF) phase. In this work, we studied the clinical and molecular features of patients belonging to these categories of PMF. The diagnosis of 661 PMF patients with a bone marrow biopsy at presentation was revised according to modern criteria; clinical information and annotation of somatic mutations in both driver and selected nondriver myeloid genes were available for all patients. Compared with pre-PMF, overt PMF was enriched in patients with anemia, thrombocytopenia, leukopenia, higher blast count, symptoms, large splenomegaly, and unfavorable karyotype. The different types of driver mutations were similarly distributed between the 2 categories, whereas selected mutations comprising the high mutation risk (HMR) category (any mutations in ASXL1, SRSF2, IDH1/2, EZH2) were more represented in overt PMF. More patients with overt PMF were in higher International Prognostic Scoring System risk categories at diagnosis, and the frequency increased during follow-up, suggesting greater propensity to disease progression compared with pre-PMF. Median survival was significantly shortened in overt PMF (7.2 vs 17.6 years), with triple negativity for driver mutations and presence of HMR mutations representing independent predictors of unfavorable outcome. The findings of this "real-life" study indicate that adherence to 2016 WHO criteria allows for identification of 2 distinct categories of patients with PMF where increased grades of fibrosis are associated with more pronounced disease manifestations, adverse mutation profile, and worse outcome, overall suggesting they might represent a phenotypic continuum.
© 2017 by The American Society of Hematology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28351937     DOI: 10.1182/blood-2017-01-761999

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   25.476


  44 in total

Review 1.  Management of Myelofibrosis-Related Cytopenias.

Authors:  Prithviraj Bose; Srdan Verstovsek
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.952

Review 2.  JAK2 (and other genes) be nimble with MPN diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy.

Authors:  Michele Ciboddo; Ann Mullally
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2018-11-30

3.  Positive impact of molecular analysis on prognostic scores in essential thrombocythemia: a single center prospective cohort experience.

Authors:  Damien Luque Luque Paz; Olivier Mansier; Jérémie Riou; Carole Conejero; Lydia Roy; Célia Belkhodja; Valérie Ugo; Stéphane Giraudier
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 9.941

4.  Early/prefibrotic primary myelofibrosis in patients who were initially diagnosed with essential thrombocythemia.

Authors:  Ayako Kamiunten; Kotaro Shide; Takuro Kameda; Masafumi Ito; Masaaki Sekine; Yoko Kubuki; Tomonori Hidaka; Keiichi Akizuki; Yuki Tahira; Takanori Toyama; Noriaki Kawano; Kousuke Marutsuka; Kouichi Maeda; Masanori Takeuchi; Hiroshi Kawano; Seiichi Sato; Junzo Ishizaki; Haruko Shimoda; Kiyoshi Yamashita; Hitoshi Matsuoka; Kazuya Shimoda
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 2.490

Review 5.  New Concepts of Treatment for Patients with Myelofibrosis.

Authors:  Prithviraj Bose; Mansour Alfayez; Srdan Verstovsek
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2019-01-24

6.  Mutant calreticulin in myeloproliferative neoplasms.

Authors:  Joan How; Gabriela S Hobbs; Ann Mullally
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 7.  SOHO State-of-the-Art Update and Next Questions: MPN.

Authors:  Prithviraj Bose; Jason Gotlib; Claire N Harrison; Srdan Verstovsek
Journal:  Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk       Date:  2018-01

Review 8.  Molecular Pathogenesis of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Influence of Age and Gender.

Authors:  Jeffrey Patterson-Fortin; Alison R Moliterno
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 3.952

9.  JAK2, CALR, MPL and ASXL1 mutational status correlates with distinct histological features in Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms.

Authors:  Waihay J Wong; Robert P Hasserjian; Geraldine S Pinkus; Lawrence J Breyfogle; Ann Mullally; Olga Pozdnyakova
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 10.  Current treatment algorithm for the management of patients with myelofibrosis, JAK inhibitors, and beyond.

Authors:  Claire N Harrison; Donal P McLornan
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2017-12-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.