| Literature DB >> 28351934 |
Daisuke Ennishi1, Anja Mottok1, Susana Ben-Neriah1, Hennady P Shulha1, Pedro Farinha1, Fong Chun Chan1, Barbara Meissner1, Merrill Boyle1, Christoffer Hother1, Robert Kridel1, Daniel Lai2, Saeed Saberi2, Ali Bashashati2, Sohrab P Shah2, Ryan D Morin3, Marco A Marra3, Kerry J Savage1, Laurie H Sehn1, Christian Steidl1, Joseph M Connors1, Randy D Gascoyne1, David W Scott1.
Abstract
The clinical significance of MYC and BCL2 genetic alterations in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), apart from translocations, has not been comprehensively investigated using high-resolution genetic assays. In this study, we profiled MYC and BCL2 genetic alterations using next-generation sequencing and high-resolution SNP array in 347 de novo DLBCL cases treated with R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) at the British Columbia Cancer Agency. Cell-of-origin (COO) subtype was determined by Lymph2Cx digital gene expression profiling. We showed that the incidence of MYC/BCL2 genetic alterations and their clinical significance were largely dependent on COO subtypes. It is noteworthy that the presence of BCL2 gain/amplification is significantly associated with poor outcome in activated B-cell-like and BCL2 translocation with poor outcome in germinal center B-cell subtypes, respectively. Both have prognostic significance independent of MYC/BCL2 dual expression and the International Prognostic Index (IPI). Furthermore, the combination of BCL2 genetic alterations with IPI identifies markedly worse prognostic groups within individual COO subtypes. Thus, high-resolution genomic assays identify extremely poor prognostic groups within each COO subtype on the basis of BCL2 genetic status in this large, uniformly R-CHOP-treated population-based cohort of DLBCL. These results suggest COO subtype-specific biomarkers based on BCL2 genetic alterations can be used to risk-stratify patients with DLBCL treated with immunochemotherapy.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28351934 DOI: 10.1182/blood-2016-11-747022
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Blood ISSN: 0006-4971 Impact factor: 22.113