Literature DB >> 28351230

Continuous Monitoring and Visualization of Optimum Spinal Cord Perfusion Pressure in Patients with Acute Cord Injury.

Suliang Chen1, Peter Smielewski2, Marek Czosnyka2,3, Marios C Papadopoulos1, Samira Saadoun1.   

Abstract

The optimum spinal cord perfusion pressure (SCPP) after traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) is unknown. Here, we describe techniques to compute and display the optimum SCPP in real time. We recruited adults within 72 h of severe TSCI (American Spinal Injuries Association [ASIA] grades A-C). A pressure probe and a microdialysis catheter were placed on the injured cord. SCPP was computed as mean arterial pressure (MAP) minus intraspinal pressure (ISP), spinal pressure reactivity index (sPRx) as the running ISP/MAP correlation coefficient, and continuous optimum SCPP (cSCPPopt) as the SCPP that minimizes sPRx in a moving 4-h window. In 45 patients, we monitored ISP and blood pressure. In 14 patients, we also monitored injury site metabolism. cSCPPopt could be computed 45% of the time. Mean cSCPPopt varied by up to 60 mm Hg between patients. Each patient's cSCPPopt varied with time (standard deviation 10-20 mm Hg). Color-coded maps showing the sPRx/SCPP curve evolution enhanced visualization of cSCPPopt. Periods when SCPP ≈ cSCPPopt were associated with low injury site glucose, high pyruvate, and high lactate. Mean SCPP deviation from cSCPPopt correlated with worse neurological outcome at 9-12 months: ASIA grade improved in 30% of patients with <5 mm Hg deviation, 10% of patients with 5-15 mm Hg deviation, and no one with >15 mm Hg deviation. We conclude that real-time computation and visualization of cSCPPopt after TSCI are feasible. cSCPPopt appears to enhance glucose utilization at the injury site and varies widely between and within patients. Our data suggest that targeting cSCPPopt after TSCI might improve neurological outcome.

Entities:  

Keywords:  autoregulation; blood pressure; critical care; spinal cord injuries; vasopressor agents

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28351230     DOI: 10.1089/neu.2017.4982

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurotrauma        ISSN: 0897-7151            Impact factor:   5.269


  13 in total

1.  Transcutaneous contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging of the posttraumatic spinal cord.

Authors:  Zin Z Khaing; Lindsay N Cates; Jeffrey E Hyde; Ryan Hammond; Matthew Bruce; Christoph P Hofstetter
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 2.772

2.  Safety and Feasibility of Lumbar Cerebrospinal Fluid Pressure and Intraspinal Pressure Studies in Cervical Stenosis: A Case Series.

Authors:  Carl Moritz Zipser; José Miguel Spirig; José Aguirre; Anna-Sophie Hofer; Nikolai Pfender; Markus Hupp; Armin Curt; Mazda Farshad; Martin Schubert
Journal:  Acta Neurochir Suppl       Date:  2021

Review 3.  Significance of spinal cord perfusion pressure following spinal cord injury: A systematic scoping review.

Authors:  Cameron M Gee; Brian K Kwon
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2022-09-11

Review 4.  A review of spinal cord perfusion pressure guided interventions in traumatic spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Mathias Møller Thygesen; Tim Damgaard Nielsen; Mads Rasmussen; Dariusz Orlowski; Michael Pedersen; Mikkel Mylius Rasmussen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Targeted Perfusion Therapy in Spinal Cord Trauma.

Authors:  Samira Saadoun; Marios C Papadopoulos
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 7.620

6.  Predictors of Intraspinal Pressure and Optimal Cord Perfusion Pressure After Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Florence R A Hogg; Mathew J Gallagher; Suliang Chen; Argyro Zoumprouli; Marios C Papadopoulos; Samira Saadoun
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 3.210

7.  Efficacy of Ultra-Early (< 12 h), Early (12-24 h), and Late (>24-138.5 h) Surgery with Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Confirmed Decompression in American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale Grades A, B, and C Cervical Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Bizhan Aarabi; Noori Akhtar-Danesh; Timothy Chryssikos; Kathirkamanathan Shanmuganathan; Gary T Schwartzbauer; J Marc Simard; Joshua Olexa; Charles A Sansur; Kenneth M Crandall; Harry Mushlin; Matthew J Kole; Elizabeth J Le; Aaron P Wessell; Nathan Pratt; Gregory Cannarsa; Cara Lomangino; Maureen Scarboro; Carla Aresco; Jeffrey Oliver; Nicholas Caffes; Stephen Carbine; Kanami Mori
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 5.269

Review 8.  Promising neuroprotective strategies for traumatic spinal cord injury with a focus on the differential effects among anatomical levels of injury.

Authors:  Antigona Ulndreaj; Anna Badner; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2017-10-30

9.  Study protocol for an observational study of cerebrospinal fluid pressure in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy undergoing surgical deCOMPression of the spinal CORD: the COMP-CORD study.

Authors:  Carl Moritz Zipser; Nikolai Pfender; Jose Miguel Spirig; Michael Betz; Jose Aguirre; Markus Hupp; Mazda Farshad; Armin Curt; Martin Schubert
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Hemodynamic Management of Acute Spinal Cord Injury: A Literature Review.

Authors:  Young-Seok Lee; Kyoung-Tae Kim; Brian K Kwon
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2020-11-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.