| Literature DB >> 28350882 |
Katell Bidet, Dhivya Dadlani, Mariano A Garcia-Blanco.
Abstract
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004242.].Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28350882 PMCID: PMC5370155 DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006295
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Pathog ISSN: 1553-7366 Impact factor: 6.823
Fig 4G3BP1, G3BP2 and CAPRIN1 depletion preferentially inhibits translation of reporters under the control of ISG UTRs.
(A) Schematic representation of IFN-stimulated response element (ISRE)-driven firefly luciferase reporters under the control of GAPDH, IFITM2 or PKR UTRs. (B to G) HuH-7 cells stably transfected with the above constructs were treated with control siGFP or siG12C#1 siRNAs, induced with 1000UI/ml of IFN-β for 10h and firefly luciferase mRNA determined by quantitative real-time RT-PCR and normalized to GAPDH mRNA levels (B-D). Firefly luciferase protein levels were determined by measuring luciferase activity and normalized to total protein concentration (E-G). Both mRNA and protein activity are expressed as fold induction from control, untreated cells (siGFP, IFN-). Fluc measurements for the GAPDH-Fluc, IFITM2-Fluc and PKR-Fluc constructs were derived from 5 independent experiments in triplicate (n = 15). All Fluc mRNA levels were measured in two of these independent experiments (n = 6).
Summary of mRNA induction, protein induction and translation efficiency for each Fluc reporter construct.
Results presented in Fig 4 were compiled and for each construct, the relative translation efficiency was calculated as the ratio of the average firefly luciferase activity induction (normalized to siGFP, untreated cells set as 1) over to the average firefly luciferase mRNA induction (normalized to siGFP, untreated cells set as 1). The fold difference between siGFP + IFN and siG12C +IFN is shown in bold in the fourth column. The p-values for the differences in mRNA and Fluc induction between siGFP + IFN-β and siG12C + IFN-β conditions are indicated: ns, non significant; * p<0.05; ** p<0.01; ***p<0.005.
| Construct | Biological process | siGFP + IFN-β | siG12C#1 + IFN-β |
|---|---|---|---|
| GAPDH-Fluc | mRNA induction | 4.04 ± 0.49 | 2.63± 0.15 * |
| Fluc induction | 3.19 ± 0.26 | 1.91 ± 0.30 ** | |
| Relative translation efficiency | 0.78 | 0.73 | |
| IFITM2-Fluc | mRNA induction | 43.79 ± 14.5 | 27.79± 7.58 (ns) |
| Fluc induction | 24.55 ± 4.53 | 6.12 ± 1.32 *** | |
| Relative translation efficiency | 0.56 | 0.22 | |
| PKR-Fluc | mRNA induction | 5.91 ± 1.06 | 3.85 ± 0.17 (ns) |
| Fluc induction | 5.01 ± 0.40 | 2.49 ± 0.32 *** | |
| Relative translation efficiency | 0.85 | 0.65 |