Literature DB >> 28350824

Time- and radiation-dose dependent changes in the plasma proteome after total body irradiation of non-human primates: Implications for biomarker selection.

Stephanie D Byrum1, Marie S Burdine1, Lisa Orr1, Samuel G Mackintosh1, Simon Authier2, Mylene Pouliot2, Martin Hauer-Jensen3, Alan J Tackett1.   

Abstract

Acute radiation syndrome (ARS) is a complex multi-organ disease resulting from total body exposure to high doses of radiation. Individuals can be exposed to total body irradiation (TBI) in a number of ways, including terrorist radiological weapons or nuclear accidents. In order to determine whether an individual has been exposed to high doses of radiation and needs countermeasure treatment, robust biomarkers are needed to estimate radiation exposure from biospecimens such as blood or urine. In order to identity such candidate biomarkers of radiation exposure, high-resolution proteomics was used to analyze plasma from non-human primates following whole body irradiation (Co-60 at 6.7 Gy and 7.4 Gy) with a twelve day observation period. A total of 663 proteins were evaluated from the plasma proteome analysis. A panel of plasma proteins with characteristic time- and dose-dependent changes was identified. In addition to the plasma proteomics study reported here, we recently identified candidate biomarkers using urine from these same non-human primates. From the proteomic analysis of both plasma and urine, we identified ten overlapping proteins that significantly differentiate both time and dose variables. These shared plasma and urine proteins represent optimal candidate biomarkers of radiation exposure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28350824      PMCID: PMC5370149          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174771

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

In today’s society, there is a distinct threat of terrorist attacks from chemical, biological, radiological, and/or nuclear weapons. Populations that are exposed to high radiation doses develop acute radiation syndrome (ARS), an acute illness caused by whole body exposure to a high dose of penetrating radiation over a short interval. Exposure to high ionizing radiation levels is associated with a wide range of biological effects including damage to macromolecules (e.g., DNA, proteins and lipids), increased mitochondria-dependent generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), apoptosis, stress-related responses, and defects in the ability of cells to divide properly leading to an onset of symptoms. The range and severity of symptoms are dose dependent where lower doses tend to affect the hematopoietic system and gastrointestinal tract, while higher doses can result in cardiovascular and neurological effects and rapid death. Cell death from radiation is directly proportional to the mitotic rate and indirectly proportional to the cell’s state of differentiation. Areas of the body most affected by total body irradiation include the hematopoietic system, intestines, skin, spermatogenic cells and vascular system. To effectively use existing therapies and even design new drugs as radiation countermeasures, suitable biomarkers that can be used to quantify radiation exposure (time and dose) are essential. Readily accessible biological samples for biomarker detection include urine and plasma [1]. A recent study compared the ability of plasma and urine to serve as sources of biomarkers for acute kidney injury (AKI) and concluded that the biomarkers identified in plasma had better discriminative power for preoperative risk stratification and early postoperative detection of AKI [2]. Our group previously reported a set of significantly differentiating urine proteins identified by high-resolution mass spectrometry from a study of twenty-four Rhesus macaque animals exposed to two different levels of gamma-irradiation (Co-60 at 6.7 Gy and 7.4 Gy) with a twelve day observation period [3]. In the current study, we examined the plasma from the same animals and identified a series of complementary biomarkers of radiation exposure. The overlapping plasma and urine candidate biomarkers are the first identified panel of putative biomarkers of radiation exposure in the Rhesus macaque model, which has immediate implications for human health and potential application in biodosimetry.

Materials and methods

Animals

The animals used in this study have been previously reported by Byrum et al. 2016 [3]. Briefly, the Rhesus monkey was selected for the study due to the fact it is a well characterized model for ARS and is the most commonly studied animal in radiation research under the US FDA Animal Rule. Procedures involving the care and use of animals in this study were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) prior to conduct. During this study the care and use of animals were conducted in accordance with the principles outlined in the current Guidelines. The contract research organization (CRO) conducting the study was and is accredited by AAALAC. There were 24 animals included in the study, which consisted of 4 animals per radiation dose (0, 6.7, and 7.4 Gy) and day of necropsy (day 4 and day 7). There were only 2 animals per radiation dose (6.7 and 7.4 Gy) for necropsy day 12. In accordance to historical data from irradiated and control animals, we selected radiation levels of 6.7 Gy and 7.4 Gy to cause significant GI-injury while insuring survival of some animals out to 12 days post-irradiation. The days 4 and 7 represent the time points for major GI-injury, while day 12 is a later endpoint to investigate GI-injury repair. Whole-body irradiation was performed as previously described. In brief, the animals were exposed to a single uniform total body dose of gamma radiation from a Co—60 source (Theratron1000) at a dose rate of approximately 60 cGy/min for 12 minutes. Animal numbers were selected based on the planned statistical analyses, assuming that all responses analyzed will be approximately normally distributed. With 4 animals per dose group on necropsy days 4 and 7, and 2 animals per dose group on necropsy day 12, there will be approximately 80% power to detect dose and time effects with a significance level of 5%, assuming differences of 1 standard deviation in responses between adjacent doses and between adjacent necropsy days. All animals were monitored throughout the study period. Clinical observations were recorded on all animals twice daily until Day 3 and 4 times daily from Day 4 to 12 (at least every 6 hours). Clinical observations included particular attention to infections, hemorrhage, mucositis, diarrhea, emesis, and individual food intake. A detailed clinical examination was performed on each animal prior to animal assignment, prior to irradiation and every 3 days thereafter, including the day of irradiation (prior to irradiation) and prior to necropsy. Room environments were controlled and continuously monitored to maintain air temperature, relative humidity, consistent light dark cycles, and 10–15 air changes per hour. All animals were housed individually in stainless steel monkey cages equipped with an automatic watering system. Municipal tap water (which was exposed to ultraviolet light and purified by reverse osmosis) were provided to the animals ad libitum, except during designated procedures, via an automatic watering system or water bottles. A standard certified commercial chow (Harlan Teklad Certified Hi-Fiber Primate Diet #7195C) was provided to the animals twice daily and removed overnight prior to irradiation. Treats or fresh fruits/vegetables were provided as part of the animal enrichment program. To minimize distress, all animals were given an acclimation period of at least 1 week following their arrival to the facility and prior to the start of irradiation. Animals were also acclimated the radiotherapy chair and transportation process. Positive reinforcement consisting of non-human primate treats and/or fruit juice were utilized to facilitate acclimation. The Clinical Veterinarian monitored all animal health assessments. In the event an animal became ill, supportive care would be offered for the following indications: 1.) pain, 2.) weight loss >15% of body weight, 3.) dehydration, 4.) fever, and/or 5.) bacterial infection. Protocols were in place that allowed for the early euthanasia of animals in unrelievable pain or distress. Clinical criteria for premature euthanasia were: 1.) respiratory distress, 2.) anorexia (for at least 3 days), 3.) weight loss in excess of 20% of body weight, 4.) unresponsiveness, 5.) acute blood loss (>10% overall estimated blood volume), 6.) seizure activity, and 7.) abnormal appearance. Animals were to be euthanized if one of the above criteria were met. Euthanasia procedures were the same for animals prematurely euthanized or euthanized at specified study endpoints. For euthanasia, the animals were sedated with an intramuscular injection of a combination of ketamine hydrochloride and acepromazine, and then euthanized by an intravenous overdose of sodium pentobarbital, followed by exsanguination. There were no illnesses, premature deaths, or early euthanasia of any animals in the study.

Plasma collection

The 24 Rhesus macaque plasma samples included in this study correspond directly with the previously published urine samples [3]. Venous samples were observed from a peripheral vein (i.e. femoral or cephalic veins). Each blood sample was collected into tubes containing K2 EDTA as anticoagulant and kept on wet ice pending centrifugation. Within 30 minutes of collection, blood samples were centrifuged under refrigeration (set to +4°C at 1500 g RCF) for targeted 10 minutes. Plasma was transferred into 4 separate tubes, placed on dry ice pending storage in a freezer set to -70°C.

High-resolution proteomics

The top 20 most abundant proteins (albumin, IgG, transferrin, fibrinogen, IgA, α2-Marcroglobulin, IgM, α1-Antitrypsin, complement C3, haptoglobulin, apolipoprotein A1, A3 and B; α1-Acid Glycoprotein, ceruloplasmin, complement C4, C1q; IgD, prealbumin, and plasminogen) in the plasma were removed using the ProteoPrep 20 Plasma Immunodepletion Kit (Sigma-Aldrich, PROT20). Twenty micrograms of protein from depleted plasma was resolved by 4–20% Tris-Glycine SDS-PAGE (Life Technologies) and the proteins were visualized by Coomassie-staining (Fig 1A). Each gel lane was sliced into 20 bands 2 mm in size. Gel bands were destained (50% methanol, 100 mM ammonium bicarbonate), followed by treatment with 10 mM Tris[2-carboxyethyl] phosphine to reduce protein disulfide bonds and 50 mM iodoacetamide to block reformation of cysteine disulfide bonds. Gel slices were then dehydrated in acetonitrile, followed by addition of 100 ng porcine sequencing grade modified trypsin in 100 mM ammonium bicarbonate and incubated at 37°C for 12–16 hours. Peptide products were then acidified in 0.1% formic acid. Tryptic peptides were separated by reverse phase Jupiter Proteo resin (Phenomenex) on a 100 × 0.075 mm column using a nanoAcquity UPLC system (Waters). Peptides were eluted using a 40 min gradient from 97:3 to 35:65 buffer A:B ratio. [Buffer A = 0.1% formic acid, 0.5% acetonitrile; buffer B = 0.1% formic acid, 75% acetonitrile]. Eluted peptides were ionized by electrospray (1.9 kV) followed by MS/MS analysis using collision induced dissociation on an LTQ Orbitrap Velos mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific). MS data were acquired using the FTMS analyzer in profile mode at a resolution of 60,000 over a range of 375 to 1500 m/z. MS/MS data were acquired for the top 15 peaks from each MS scan using the ion trap analyzer in centroid mode and normal mass range with normalized collision energy of 35.0.
Fig 1

The plasma proteome from non-human primates following gamma-irradiation was analyzed by high-resolution mass spectrometry.

A) Representative gel image of replicate samples from the day 4 time point under varying gamma-irradiation doses of 0 Gy, 6.7 Gy, and 7.4 Gy. Plasma was first depleted of the top 20 most abundant plasma proteins, resolved by SDS-PAGE and visualized by Coomassie-staining. B) The Venn diagrams show the number of shared and unique proteins at days 4, 7, and 12 post-irradiation at both 6.7 Gy and 7.4 Gy radiation exposures. C) The number of shared and unique proteins identified in a dose-dependent analysis (non-irradiated, 6.7 Gy, and 7.4 Gy exposures) at each time point (days 4, 7, 12).

The plasma proteome from non-human primates following gamma-irradiation was analyzed by high-resolution mass spectrometry.

A) Representative gel image of replicate samples from the day 4 time point under varying gamma-irradiation doses of 0 Gy, 6.7 Gy, and 7.4 Gy. Plasma was first depleted of the top 20 most abundant plasma proteins, resolved by SDS-PAGE and visualized by Coomassie-staining. B) The Venn diagrams show the number of shared and unique proteins at days 4, 7, and 12 post-irradiation at both 6.7 Gy and 7.4 Gy radiation exposures. C) The number of shared and unique proteins identified in a dose-dependent analysis (non-irradiated, 6.7 Gy, and 7.4 Gy exposures) at each time point (days 4, 7, 12).

Data analysis

Proteins were identified as reported in Byrum et al. 2016 [3]. The mass spectrometric raw data was analyzed by MaxQuant using a label-free intensity based approach. Proteins were identified by searching against the UniProtKB database (2015_06 release; restricted to Rhesus macaque; 69,970 entries). The MS1 intensities were normalized by using the intensity-based absolute quantification (iBAQ) method implemented in MaxQuant [4, 5]. Quantitative testing was performed in Scaffold Q+S using iBAQ normalized intensity values to detect differential presence of a protein between different samples (time-dependent: days 4, 7, and 12 for both radiation doses 6.7Gy and 7.4Gy; dose-dependent: non-irradiated, 6.7Gy, and 7.4Gy from days 4, 7, and 12). Proteins were tested for significance by Kruskal-Wallis with Benjamini-Hochberg correction in a time and dose dependent manner. Proteins in the time dependent analysis were considered to be significant at p < 0.00509 and p < 0.00653 (corrected Benjamini-Hochberg p-value) for dose levels 6.7 Gy and 7.4 Gy gamma-irradiation exposure. Proteins in the dose-dependent analysis were considered to be significant at p < 0.00179, p < 0.00622, and p < 0.00525 (corrected Benjamini-Hochberg p-value) for days 4, 7, and 12 post-irradiation. The log2 normalized intensity values for each data comparison were visualized by Hierarchical Clustering Explorer (HCE 3.0). The hierarchical clusters were constructed using the average linkage method with Euclidean distance measure in order to cluster the significant proteins and visually inspect trends in the data. Significant proteins were analyzed for pathway expression using QIAGEN’s Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA, QIAGEN Redwood City, www.qiagen.com/ingenuity). Scaffold files from urine (data from [3]) and plasma proteomes were used to identify the total number of proteins found in both body fluids as well as proteins significantly differentiating all sample groups by the Analysis of Variance with normalization by iBAQ and multiple test correction by Benjamini-Hochberg using Scaffold’s Quantitative Analysis tool. Raw data used for all calculations can be found in S1 and S2 Tables.

Results

We investigated changes in plasma proteome in response to total body gamma-irradiation in 24 Rhesus macaque. The plasma was collected and the top 20 most abundant plasma proteins were depleted prior to SDS-PAGE and mass spectrometric analysis (Fig 1A). Using MaxQuant and Scaffold programs, we identified a total of 663 proteins (338,187 spectra) from all 24 samples with a 95% protein probability, a minimum number of peptides of 2, and a 50% peptide probability threshold. The total number of identified proteins from each sample group is displayed in Venn diagrams for both time-dependent and dose-dependent analyses (Fig 1B & 1C). In the time-dependent analysis the number of proteins uniquely identified in the plasma samples was greatest at day 7 (68 proteins) with 6.7 Gy radiation exposure as compared with the higher dose of radiation in which the majority of uniquely identified proteins were identified on day 4 (75 proteins) (Fig 1B). In addition the dose-dependent analysis also shows the majority of uniquely identified proteins are found at day 7 (48 proteins) for the 6.7 Gy exposure but are identified at day 4 (20 proteins) for the 7.4 Gy gamma-irradiation exposure. This indicates more unique proteins are released in the blood due to gamma-irradiation damage at an earlier time point with the higher radiation dose level. These data suggest that certain windows of time have a greater probability for detection of plasma biomarkers of radiation exposure, and that with increasing dose these windows of time are closer to the time of exposure. A label-free mass spectrometric workflow was used to measure relative levels of the proteins identified among the samples. The non-irradiated samples collected on day 4 served as a baseline control and were compared with both 6.7 Gy and 7.4 Gy gamma-irradiated animals for three post-irradiation time points (days 4, 7, and 12). The proteins were identified using MaxQuant and normalized by iBAQ. The log2 normalized intensity values were then analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis with Benjamini-Hochberg multiple test correction for each comparison. Proteins that were found to be significant after p-value correction are listed in Tables 1 and 2. The iBAQ normalized intensity values for all proteins and all samples are listed in S1 Table. Hierarchical cluster heat maps were generated using the log2 normalized intensity values to visually inspect trends in the data from the significantly differentiating proteins in a time-dependent and dose-dependent analysis (Figs 2 and 3). The heat maps show clear differences in protein levels from each comparison. Fig 2 shows the significant proteins from the time-dependent analysis and reveals a trend of proteins changing levels from day 4 to day 12 post-irradiation. For both radiation doses, several protein level changes are observed by day 4. In the dose-dependent analysis, the 6.7 and 7.4 Gy exposures show proteins changing in levels starting on day 4 and continuing through day 12 (Fig 3).
Table 1

Significantly differentiating proteins from days 4, 7, and 12 at both gamma-irradiation doses of 6.7 Gy and 7.4 Gy.

6.7 Gy7.4 Gy
Identified ProteinsAccession Numberp-valueIdentified ProteinsAccession Numberp-value
Alpha-1-antichymotrypsinF6SL790.0001Alpha-2-macroglobulinG7N5X80.0001
Alpha-1-antitrypsinF6SEN60.0001Amine oxidaseG7NIT90.0001
Alpha-2-macroglobulinG7N5X80.0001Apolipoprotein A-IAPOA10.0001
AnnexinF7H0C70.0001Fibronectin isoform 4 preproproteinH9YY120.0001
Antithrombin IIIA0N0660.0001Putative uncharacterized proteinG7N9H70.0001
Apolipoprotein A-IAPOA10.0001Putative uncharacterized proteinG7MJR40.0001
Fibrinogen alpha chainF6UZ600.0001Putative uncharacterized proteinG7NQN40.0001
Fibronectin isoform 4 preproproteinH9YY120.0001Putative uncharacterized proteinG7MT400.0001
PlasminogenF7CC910.0001TransferrinA0A0A7RQ610.0001
Putative uncharacterized proteinG7N9H70.0001Uncharacterized protein (Fragment)F6XU420.0001
Putative uncharacterized proteinG7MJR40.0001Uncharacterized proteinF6TNV90.0001
Putative uncharacterized proteinG7NQN40.0001Uncharacterized proteinF7CEU10.0001
Putative uncharacterized proteinG7MT400.0001Uncharacterized proteinF6WDG60.0001
Putative uncharacterized proteinG7MS630.0001Uncharacterized proteinF6UZ870.0001
TransferrinA0A0A7RQ610.0001Uncharacterized proteinF7FHV90.0001
Uncharacterized protein (Fragment)F6XU420.0001Uncharacterized proteinF6Z0R50.0001
Uncharacterized proteinF6TNV90.0001Uncharacterized proteinF6Y7Q40.0001
Uncharacterized proteinF7HM150.0001Uncharacterized proteinF6X9G90.0001
Uncharacterized proteinF7CEU10.0001Uncharacterized proteinF6TII30.0001
Uncharacterized proteinF6UZ870.0001Putative uncharacterized proteinG7MJU40.0002
Uncharacterized proteinF6UYY80.0001Alpha-1-antichymotrypsinF6SL790.00021
Uncharacterized proteinF7FHV90.0001Coagulation factor X proteinA0N0650.00021
Uncharacterized proteinF6Z0R50.0001Uncharacterized proteinF6X8370.00022
Uncharacterized proteinF6Y7Q40.0001Uncharacterized proteinF7DAU30.00023
Uncharacterized proteinF6X9G90.0001Uncharacterized proteinF7GHV10.00024
Uncharacterized proteinF6TII30.0001Uncharacterized proteinF7HM150.00035
Vinculin isoform VCLI0FH430.0001Uncharacterized proteinF7AB320.00035
Uncharacterized proteinF7HP230.00024C3 and PZP-like alpha-2-macroglobulin domain-containing protein 4G7NG170.00038
Complement C1r subcomponentH9FZ500.00046ProthrombinA0N0640.0007
Gelsolin isoform aH9Z8380.0011Coagulation factor IX proteinA8CZ270.0013
Putative uncharacterized proteinG7NH090.0013AnnexinF7H0C70.0014
AnnexinF7D2H10.0019Putative uncharacterized proteinG7NH090.0015
Uncharacterized proteinF6WYB60.0022Cytokeratin-1F7B7860.0017
Uncharacterized proteinF7H5320.0023Collagen alpha-2(I) chainH9Z2D10.002
Angiotensinogen preproproteinG7MFR40.0027Uncharacterized proteinF7HP230.0021
Putative: complement C4-A isoform 1 (Fragment)H9FF970.0028Intercellular adhesion molecule 1G7NKZ50.0022
Putative uncharacterized proteinG7MJU40.0031Putative uncharacterized proteinG7MFA40.0025
Uncharacterized proteinF6TLR30.0045Putative uncharacterized proteinG7N9X10.0032
Uncharacterized proteinF6UR300.0034
Desmoplakin-3F7H7V00.0036
Gelsolin isoform aH9Z8380.004
Uncharacterized proteinF6YKA70.0045
Antithrombin IIIA0N0660.0047
Complement C1r subcomponentH9FZ500.005
Cytokeratin-6CG7N7200.0054
Uncharacterized protein (Fragment)F7HD190.0058

Proteins were considered significant with p-values less than the Kruskal-Wallis Benjamini-Hochberg corrected values (p < 0.00509 and p < 0.00653 for dose levels 6.7 Gy and 7.4 Gy).

Table 2

Significantly differentiating proteins by gamma-irradiation dose levels of 6.7 Gy and 7.4 Gy at days 4, 7, and 12.

Day 4Day 7Day 12
Identified ProteinsAccession Numberp-valueIdentified ProteinsAccession Numberp-valueIdentified ProteinsAccession Numberp-value
Alpha-2-macroglobulinG7N5X80.0001Alpha-2-macroglobulinG7N5X80.0001Alpha-2-macroglobulinG7N5X80.0001
Fibrinogen alpha chainF6UZ600.0001Amine oxidaseG7NIT90.0001Apolipoprotein A-IAPOA10.0001
PlasminogenF7CC910.0001AnnexinF7H0C70.0001Fibrinogen alpha chainF6UZ600.0001
Putative uncharacterized proteinG7N9H70.0001Apolipoprotein A-IAPOA10.0001Fibronectin isoform 4 preproproteinH9YY120.0001
Putative uncharacterized proteinG7MJR40.0001Desmoplakin-3F7H7V00.0001Putative uncharacterized proteinG7N9H70.0001
Putative uncharacterized proteinG7NQN40.0001Putative uncharacterized proteinG7N9H70.0001Putative uncharacterized proteinG7MJR40.0001
Putative uncharacterized proteinG7MT400.0001Putative uncharacterized proteinG7MJR40.0001Putative uncharacterized proteinG7NQN40.0001
Putative uncharacterized proteinG7MS630.0001Putative uncharacterized proteinG7NQN40.0001Putative uncharacterized proteinG7MT400.0001
TransferrinA0A0A7RQ610.0001Putative uncharacterized proteinG7MT400.0001Putative uncharacterized proteinG7MS630.0001
Uncharacterized protein (Fragment)F6XU420.0001TransferrinA0A0A7RQ610.0001TransferrinA0A0A7RQ610.0001
Uncharacterized proteinF6TNV90.0001Uncharacterized protein (Fragment)F6XU420.0001Uncharacterized protein (Fragment)F6XU420.0001
Uncharacterized proteinF7CEU10.0001Uncharacterized proteinF6TNV90.0001Uncharacterized proteinF6TNV90.0001
Uncharacterized proteinF6UZ870.0001Uncharacterized proteinF7HM150.0001Uncharacterized proteinF7HM150.0001
Uncharacterized proteinF6Z0R50.0001Uncharacterized proteinF7CEU10.0001Uncharacterized proteinF7CEU10.0001
Alpha-1-antichymotrypsinF6SL790.00017Uncharacterized proteinF6WDG60.0001Uncharacterized proteinF6UZ870.0001
Collagen alpha-2(I) chainH9Z2D10.0008Uncharacterized proteinF6Z0R50.0001Uncharacterized proteinF6UYY80.0001
Uncharacterized proteinF7GHV10.00099Uncharacterized proteinF6Y7Q40.0001Uncharacterized proteinF7FHV90.0001
Uncharacterized proteinF7HP230.0011Vinculin isoform VCLI0FH430.0001Uncharacterized proteinF6Z0R50.0001
Antithrombin IIIA0N0660.0012Uncharacterized proteinF7FHV90.00011Uncharacterized proteinF6Y7Q40.0001
Putative uncharacterized proteinG7N9X10.00022Uncharacterized proteinF6X9G90.0001
Uncharacterized proteinF6TII30.00023Uncharacterized proteinF6TII30.0001
Uncharacterized proteinF6X9G90.00026ProthrombinA0N0640.00019
Complement C1r subcomponentH9FZ500.00027Uncharacterized proteinF7HP230.00024
Uncharacterized proteinF6X8370.00035Gelsolin isoform aH9Z8380.00047
Antithrombin IIIA0N0660.00053Putative uncharacterized protein (Fragment)G7N2L00.0007
Putative uncharacterized proteinG7MJU40.0006Alpha-1-antichymotrypsinF6SL790.00088
Fibronectin isoform 4 preproproteinH9YY120.00066Putative uncharacterized proteinG7NH090.0012
Putative uncharacterized proteinG7NH090.00077Putative: complement C4-A isoform 1 (Fragment)H9FF970.0012
Alpha-amylaseG7MIC00.00091Uncharacterized proteinF7D6T80.0012
Uncharacterized proteinF6SSW90.0011Apolipoprotein(a) (Fragment)APOA0.0015
Alpha-1-antitrypsinF6SEN60.0012Uncharacterized proteinF7AB320.0019
Cofilin-1I0FG050.0013Apolipoprotein(a) (Fragment)F7FPV80.0021
Uncharacterized proteinF6UZ870.0016Alpha-albumin (Fragment)G7MT380.0024
ThioredoxinF6RHG30.0017Putative uncharacterized proteinG7MJU40.0026
Coagulation factor X proteinA0N0650.0018Uncharacterized protein (Fragment)H9H2V90.0033
Cytokeratin-6CG7N7200.0018AnnexinF7D2H10.0036
Putative uncharacterized proteinG7N2G00.001914-3-3 protein zeta/deltaF7EFF60.0037
Talin-1G7NFD20.0019Amine oxidaseG7NIT90.0038
Uncharacterized proteinF6YKA70.0019Uncharacterized proteinF6VZJ50.0044
Alpha-amylaseF7H0E40.002
Complement C3H9EXI60.0025
Angiotensinogen preproproteinG7MFR40.0027
Coagulation factor IX proteinA8CZ270.0027
Cytokeratin-1F7B7860.0031
Uncharacterized proteinF6TLR30.0034
Complement C3I2CT480.0035
AnnexinF7D2H10.0037
Glutathione S-transferase PGSTP10.0037
Tropomyosin beta chain isoform 1F7GSX60.0038
Uncharacterized proteinF7HP230.0041
Putative uncharacterized protein (Fragment)G7N2L00.0054
Uncharacterized proteinF6SGB40.0054
Uncharacterized proteinF7GSK80.0056

Proteins were considered significant with p-values less than the Kruskal-Wallis Benjamini-Hochberg corrected values (p < 0.00179, p < 0.00622, and p < 0.00525 for days 4, 7, and 12).

Fig 2

Hierarchical cluster of significantly differentiating proteins in a time dependent manner at 6.7 Gy (A) and 7.4 Gy (B) gamma-irradiation exposures. Proteins were clustered using the average linkage method and Euclidean distance metric. Proteins were considered significant by Kruskal-Wallis p-value corrected using Benjamini-Hochberg. Red indicates elevated levels, while blue indicates lower levels of the given protein.

Fig 3

Hierarchical cluster of significantly differentiating proteins in a dose dependent manner from days 4 (A), 7 (B), and 12 (C) post-irradiation. Proteins were clustered using the average linkage method and Euclidean distance metric. Proteins were considered significant by Kruskal-Wallis p-value corrected using Benjamini-Hochberg. Red indicates elevated levels, while blue indicates lower levels of the given protein.

Hierarchical cluster of significantly differentiating proteins in a time dependent manner at 6.7 Gy (A) and 7.4 Gy (B) gamma-irradiation exposures. Proteins were clustered using the average linkage method and Euclidean distance metric. Proteins were considered significant by Kruskal-Wallis p-value corrected using Benjamini-Hochberg. Red indicates elevated levels, while blue indicates lower levels of the given protein. Hierarchical cluster of significantly differentiating proteins in a dose dependent manner from days 4 (A), 7 (B), and 12 (C) post-irradiation. Proteins were clustered using the average linkage method and Euclidean distance metric. Proteins were considered significant by Kruskal-Wallis p-value corrected using Benjamini-Hochberg. Red indicates elevated levels, while blue indicates lower levels of the given protein. Proteins were considered significant with p-values less than the Kruskal-Wallis Benjamini-Hochberg corrected values (p < 0.00509 and p < 0.00653 for dose levels 6.7 Gy and 7.4 Gy). Proteins were considered significant with p-values less than the Kruskal-Wallis Benjamini-Hochberg corrected values (p < 0.00179, p < 0.00622, and p < 0.00525 for days 4, 7, and 12). Interestingly, pathway analysis revealed possible liver and intestinal damage as a consequence of gamma-irradiation (Tables 3 and 4). The LXR/RXR activation pathway is significantly activated at days 4 (4 proteins), 7 (9 proteins), and 12 (7 proteins) post-irradiation with the majority of proteins identified at day 7. LXR/RXR (liver X receptor/retinoid X receptor ligands) activation pathway has been shown previously in human intestinal cell line CaCo-2 to increase the efflux of cholesterol and plays an important role in intestinal HDL production and cholesterol absorption [6]. The liver X receptors are important regulators that control the genes involved in efflux and excretion of cholesterol and lipid homeostasis in tissues including the liver, intestine, and brain [7]. Evidence for the increased activation of these receptors indicates possible liver and intestinal damage due to gamma-irradiation. In addition, the FXR/RXR activation pathway plays a role in regulating metabolic pathways and also leads to efflux and secretion of cholesterol and was found to be activated at day 7 post-irradiation [8]. Evidence also supports the role of FXR (farnesoid X receptor) in the reduction of proinflammatory cytokines in the intestinal tract preventing inflammation and epithelial permeability [9]. The acute phase response pathway is activated for all time points and dose levels and is involved in the response to tissue injury, infection, or inflammation as well as the restoration of homeostasis [10]. Clathrin-mediated endocytosis was found to be significantly activated at day 12 post-irradiation and is involved in the clearance of LDL from the blood stream through endocytosis. Clathrin-coated vesicles form domains of the plasma membrane and are responsible for receptor-mediated endocytosis of ligands such as low density lipoprotein (LD), transferrin, growth factors, and more [11, 12]. The coagulation system and extrinsic and intrinsic prothrombin activation pathways are activated in response to vasculature damage such as bleeding and thrombosis. These pathways work in balance with one another and were identified as up-regulated at different time points and dose levels [13] (Tables 3 and 4).
Table 3

Time-dependent analysis.

Dose: 6.7 GyDose: 7.4 Gy
Pathwayp-valueOverlapp-valueOverlap
Acute Phase Response Signaling4.98E-2314/1699.97E-1510/169
Clathrin-mediated Endocytosis Signaling9.82E-118/1971.99E-076/197
Coagulation System5.41E-178/354.97E-126/35
Extrinsic Prothrombin Activation Pathway4.53E-094/16
FXR/RXR Activation2.68E-128/126
Intrinsic Prothrombin Activation Pathway1.46E-126/29
LXR/RXR Activation1.93E-128/121

The top 5 canonical pathways identified by IPA from proteins significantly differentiating between days 4, 7, and 12 post-irradiation. The pathway p-values are calculated using the right-tailed Fisher Exact Test. The complete list of pathways can be found in S3 Table.

Table 4

Dose-dependent analysis.

Day 4Day 7Day 12
Pathwayp-valueOverlapp-valueOverlapp-valueOverlap
Actin Cytoskeleton Signaling1.29E-109/228
Acute Phase Response Signaling1.83E-148/1691.83E-1310/1698.10E-1811/169
Clathrin-mediated Endocytosis Signaling3.38E-139/197
Coagulation System1.21E-115/351.51E-137/353.12E-105/35
Extrinsic Prothrombin Activation Pathway1.03E-073/161.96E-094/16
FXR/RXR Activation6.13E-139/126
Intrinsic Prothrombin Activation Pathway2.07E-094/29
LXR/RXR Activation7.17E-074/1214.23E-139/1213.98E-117/121

The top 5 canonical pathways identified by IPA from proteins significantly differentiating between 6.7 Gy and 7.4 Gy gamma-irradiation dose levels. The pathway p-values are calculated using the right-tailed Fisher Exact Test.

The top 5 canonical pathways identified by IPA from proteins significantly differentiating between days 4, 7, and 12 post-irradiation. The pathway p-values are calculated using the right-tailed Fisher Exact Test. The complete list of pathways can be found in S3 Table. The top 5 canonical pathways identified by IPA from proteins significantly differentiating between 6.7 Gy and 7.4 Gy gamma-irradiation dose levels. The pathway p-values are calculated using the right-tailed Fisher Exact Test.

Discussion

The plasma data reported here show a remarkably similar trend to what was previously reported for the analysis of urine from the same Rhesus macaque animals [3]. The data reported also show the importance to study the kinetics of plasma proteins change in level across doses of radiation tested (Figs 2 & 3). Furthermore, unique proteins present in the plasma are more readily detected at earlier time points for higher radiation exposures (Fig 1). Specifically, 7.4 Gy produces more unique proteins at day 4, while 6.7 Gy produces the most unique proteins at day 7. Higher radiation levels are expected to induce more severe changes which appear to translate into earlier characteristic changes to the proteome. Moreover, in the analysis of the urine from the same animals [3], the higher radiation dose (7.4 Gy) resulted in the most unique proteins on day 4 compared to the lower radiation dose (6.7Gy) in which unique proteins were at the highest level on day 7. These results differ from the radiation dose-dependent kinetics observed with citrulline for which higher radiation doses were associated with more pronounced changes at later time points [14]. The distinct kinetics of proteomic changes reported herein presents potential advantages for dosimetry applications for which an earlier assessment of exposure is critical to guide medical management. Results also suggest that the optimal time window for detection of unique proteins at each radiation dose tested is similar for the analysis of plasma and urine. A previous report using proteomics to analyze plasma from radiation accident victims identified different levels of six annotated proteins over 18 gel spots [15]; two of those six proteins were also mis-regulated in the current data set–fibrinogen alpha chain and transferrin. We previously reported the identification of 2346 total proteins in urine and here we report the identification of 663 total proteins in the plasma of the same animals exposed to gamma irradiation. Of all the proteins identified in both data sets, 414 were found to be in common (Fig 4A). The Venn diagram in Fig 4B shows the number of proteins identified from both plasma and urine (414 proteins) that are also identified as significant by ANOVA (p-value < 0.05). From the list of common proteins identified in plasma and urine, 33 and 46 proteins were found to significantly change in abundance in the plasma and urine samples, respectively (Fig 4B). In addition, 10 proteins were found to significantly differentiate between both dose and time points in both plasma and urine from the same animals. These include angiotensinogen preproprotein (G7MFR4), ferritin (F6ZV45), uncharacterized proteins (F6TLR3, F7DHQ1, and F7GRY2), putative uncharacterized protein (G7NQN4 and G7MJ28), serum amyloid A (G7NDT1 and F7DY68), and angiotensin-converting enzyme isoform 1 (H9FJ99). According to UniProtKB database (www.uniprot.org), serum amyloid A is a major acute phase reactant and is the apolipoprotein of the HDL complex, uncharacterized protein F7GRY2 (C9) is involved in the immune response, and uncharacterized protein F7DHQ1 (CRP) regulates interleukin-8 secretion. Therefore, the shedding of these proteins into the plasma and urine indicate increased activity of the immune system in response to radiation exposure. The pathways involved include regulators of the efflux and secretion of cholesterol, clearance of LDL from the blood, and the coagulation system. These 10 proteins detected between the plasma and urine analyses are optimal candidates for further study as biomarkers of radiation exposure.
Fig 4

Venn diagrams show overlapping proteins identified in both plasma and urine samples from gamma-irradiated non-human primates.

A) Total proteins identified in both sample types. B) From the 414 commonly identified proteins between plasma and urine, the Venn diagram shows how many were found to be significant in each sample type by ANOVA with a p-value < 0.05. Ten proteins are identified as significant from both the plasma and urine proteomic analyses.

Venn diagrams show overlapping proteins identified in both plasma and urine samples from gamma-irradiated non-human primates.

A) Total proteins identified in both sample types. B) From the 414 commonly identified proteins between plasma and urine, the Venn diagram shows how many were found to be significant in each sample type by ANOVA with a p-value < 0.05. Ten proteins are identified as significant from both the plasma and urine proteomic analyses.

Normalized iBAQ intensity values.

ANOVA analysis was performed in Scaffold Q+S. Proteins with a p-value < 0.05 are considered significantly different among the gamma-irradiation exposure levels and the days post-irradiation. (XLSX) Click here for additional data file.

Raw data output from MaxQuant consisting of iBAQ, LFQ, and MS/MS count data.

(XLSX) Click here for additional data file.

IPA Canonical pathways by Dose and Time-dependent analysis.

The pathway p-values are calculated using a right-tailed Fisher Exact test and are shown in the -log10 scale. (XLSX) Click here for additional data file.
  15 in total

Review 1.  The structural era of endocytosis.

Authors:  M Marsh; H T McMahon
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-07-09       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Citrulline as a Biomarker for Gastrointestinal-Acute Radiation Syndrome: Species Differences and Experimental Condition Effects.

Authors:  K Bujold; M Hauer-Jensen; O Donini; A Rumage; D Hartman; H P Hendrickson; J Stamatopoulos; H Naraghi; M Pouliot; A Ascah; M Sebastian; M K Pugsley; K Wong; S Authier
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 2.841

3.  Global quantification of mammalian gene expression control.

Authors:  Björn Schwanhäusser; Dorothea Busse; Na Li; Gunnar Dittmar; Johannes Schuchhardt; Jana Wolf; Wei Chen; Matthias Selbach
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  Cytokines and the hepatic acute phase response.

Authors:  H Moshage
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 7.996

Review 5.  Serum and plasma proteomics and its possible use as detector and predictor of radiation diseases.

Authors:  Olivier Guipaud
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.622

Review 6.  Overview of the coagulation system.

Authors:  Sanjeev Palta; Richa Saroa; Anshu Palta
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2014-09

7.  LXR/RXR activation enhances basolateral efflux of cholesterol in CaCo-2 cells.

Authors:  Shubha Murthy; Ella Born; Satya N Mathur; F Jeffrey Field
Journal:  J Lipid Res       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 5.922

8.  Comparison of Plasma and Urine Biomarker Performance in Acute Kidney Injury.

Authors:  Gunnar Schley; Carmen Köberle; Ekaterina Manuilova; Sandra Rutz; Christian Forster; Michael Weyand; Ivan Formentini; Rosemarie Kientsch-Engel; Kai-Uwe Eckardt; Carsten Willam
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Profiling of low molecular weight proteins in plasma from locally irradiated individuals.

Authors:  Reetta Nylund; Elina Lemola; Sonja Hartwig; Stefan Lehr; Anna Acheva; Jutta Jahns; Guido Hildebrandt; Carita Lindholm
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 2.724

Review 10.  Coordinated Actions of FXR and LXR in Metabolism: From Pathogenesis to Pharmacological Targets for Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Lin Ding; Shuguang Pang; Yongmei Sun; Yuling Tian; Li Yu; Ningning Dang
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 3.257

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Nonhuman primates as models for the discovery and development of radiation countermeasures.

Authors:  Vijay K Singh; Ayodele O Olabisi
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Discov       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 6.098

2.  Ionizing radiation exposure: hazards, prevention, and biomarker screening.

Authors:  Hongxiang Mu; Jing Sun; Linwei Li; Jie Yin; Nan Hu; Weichao Zhao; Dexin Ding; Lan Yi
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-04-29       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Time-Dependent Measurement of Nrf2-Regulated Antioxidant Response to Ionizing Radiation Toward Identifying Potential Protein Biomarkers for Acute Radiation Injury.

Authors:  Kate Liu; Elizabeth Singer; Whitaker Cohn; Ewa D Micewicz; William H McBride; Julian P Whitelegge; Joseph A Loo
Journal:  Proteomics Clin Appl       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 3.494

4.  The Gastrointestinal Subsyndrome of the Acute Radiation Syndrome in Rhesus Macaques: A Systematic Review of the Lethal Dose-response Relationship With and Without Medical Management.

Authors:  Thomas J MacVittie; Ann M Farese; George A Parker; William Jackson; Catherine Booth; Gregory L Tudor; Kim G Hankey; Christopher S Potten
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 2.922

5.  Age and sex effects across the blood proteome after ionizing radiation exposure can bias biomarker screening and risk assessment.

Authors:  Britta Langen; Egor Vorontsov; Johan Spetz; John Swanpalmer; Carina Sihlbom; Khalil Helou; Eva Forssell-Aronsson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 4.996

6.  Proteomics of Non-human Primate Plasma after Partial-body Radiation with Minimal Bone Marrow Sparing.

Authors:  Weiliang Huang; Jianshi Yu; Tian Liu; Amy E Defnet; Stephanie Zalesak; Ann M Farese; Thomas J MacVittie; Maureen A Kane
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 2.922

7.  Development of the FAST-DOSE assay system for high-throughput biodosimetry and radiation triage.

Authors:  Qi Wang; Younghyun Lee; Igor Shuryak; Monica Pujol Canadell; Maria Taveras; Jay R Perrier; Bezalel A Bacon; Matthew A Rodrigues; Richard Kowalski; Christopher Capaccio; David J Brenner; Helen C Turner
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Plasma Proteins as Biomarkers of Mortality After Total Body Irradiation in Mice.

Authors:  Hanjiang Fu; Yong Xue; Fei Su; Kexin Ding; Yuan Wang; Haiyue Yu; Jie Zhu; Qing Li; Changhui Ge; Xiaofei Zheng
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 2.658

9.  Candidate protein markers for radiation biodosimetry in the hematopoietically humanized mouse model.

Authors:  Younghyun Lee; Monica Pujol Canadell; Igor Shuryak; Jay R Perrier; Maria Taveras; Purvi Patel; Antonius Koller; Lubomir B Smilenov; David J Brenner; Emily I Chen; Helen C Turner
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Potential Clinical Implications of miR-1 and miR-21 in Heart Disease and Cardioprotection.

Authors:  Branislav Kura; Barbora Kalocayova; Yvan Devaux; Monika Bartekova
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.