Literature DB >> 28350789

Dependence of cancer risk from environmental exposures on underlying genetic susceptibility: an illustration with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and breast cancer.

Jing Shen1, Yuyan Liao2, John L Hopper3, Mandy Goldberg2, Regina M Santella1,4, Mary Beth Terry1,2,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Most studies of environmental risk factors and breast cancer are conducted using average risk cohorts.
METHODS: We examined the association between polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH)-albumin adducts in bloods from baseline and breast cancer risk in a prospective nested case-control study (New York site of the BCFR, 80 cases and 156 controls). We estimated the 10-year absolute breast cancer risk by a risk model that uses pedigree information (BOADICEA) and evaluated whether the increased risk from PAH differed by absolute risk.
RESULTS: Women with detectable levels of PAH had a twofold association with breast cancer risk (odds ratio (OR)=2.04; 95% CI=1.06-3.93) relative to women with non-detectable levels. The association increased with higher levels of PAH (⩾median) and by a higher level of absolute breast cancer risk (10-year risk ⩾3.4%: OR=4.09, 95% CI=1.38-12.13).
CONCLUSIONS: These results support that family-based cohorts can be an efficient way to examine gene-environment interactions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28350789      PMCID: PMC5418454          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2017.81

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


Many epidemiological studies, particularly those using population-based ascertainment, do not include a substantial proportion of subjects with a cancer family history, and are therefore not enriched for underlying genetic susceptibility (Terry ). This can have an impact on both the precision and ability to identify associations if the risk gradient depends on underlying genetic susceptibility (i.e., gene–environment interactions). Improving precision can be readily accomplished through sampling more individuals. However, increasing the sample size without ensuring adequate individuals at greater disease susceptibility are included will limit the ability to detect gene–environment interactions. Thus, the role of a given environmental factor may be under-recognised if gene–environment interactions exist. Using a family-based cohort enriched with individuals across the risk spectrum, we illustrate the importance of having sufficient numbers of individuals across the risk spectrum to properly test the role of environmental factors on cancer risk. We illustrate this concept by estimating the association between polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and breast cancer risk as a function of a woman's underlying genetic risk inferred from her cancer family history. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, a group of compounds with two or more fused benzene rings, are environmental contaminants that play an important carcinogenic role due to widespread population exposure (Phillips, 1983; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010). Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons can be bio-transformed into reactive intermediates that form covalent PAH-DNA adducts that have mutagenic properties to initiate and/or promote tumorigenesis (Phillips, 1983). Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons are lipophilic, are stored in the fat tissue of the breast and have shown endocrine-disrupting and obesogenic capabilities to cause mammary cancer in rodents (Morris and Seifter, 1992). The potential carcinogenic mechanisms of metabolised PAHs may be partially due to their structural similarities with oestrogenic compounds that affect hormone signalling pathways or increase the bioaccumulation capacity in adipose tissue and increase breast cancer risk (Macon and Fenton, 2013; Zhang ). Therefore, the International Agency for Research on Cancer has classified selected PAHs, such as benzo[a]pyrene, as human carcinogens (IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010); the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also lists PAHs as possible carcinogens (Mumtaz ). Several large studies have examined the role of PAHs on breast cancer risk. The Long Island Breast Cancer Study Project (LIBCSP), a population-based case–control study, found a statistically significant increased risk for women with detectable levels of PAH-DNA adducts in blood (Gammon , 2004), and estimated a 50% greater risk of breast cancer for women in the highest vs lowest quintile of PAH-DNA adducts. Breast cancer was increased by 40% for women reporting ever burning synthetic logs (associated with bulky PAH-DNA adducts) in their homes (White ), and 44% for women exposed to the highest level (vs below the median) of vehicular traffic (Mordukhovich ). Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon exposures from other sources, including tobacco smoking (Gaudet ), dietary intake (White ), grilled and smoked meats(Fu ; Di Maso ), also contribute to increased breast cancer risk. However, two cohort studies have not observed any associations with PAHs and breast cancer risk that may be due to use of the postlabelling assay that is not specific for PAH adducts or measuring non-carcinogenic PAH markers in urine where urinary measures only reflect short-term exposure (Lee ; Saieva ). A growing number of studies found that exposure to PAHs may further enhance breast cancer risk for women carrying higher susceptibility genetic variants involved in carcinogen metabolism, DNA repair and cell cycle control pathways (Terry ; Gaudet ; Mordukhovich ). These stronger associations in subgroups defined by genetic variants suggests that women with higher breast cancer risk based on family history would also have higher risk but detecting interactions between environmental carcinogens and underlying risk requires a sufficient number of women at higher risk for cancer. We hypothesised that the women at greater risk of breast cancer from PAH exposure are the women who have higher underlying absolute risk of breast cancer predicted from their cancer family history.

Materials and methods

Study design

We conducted a prospective study within the women unaffected with breast cancer at enrolment in the New York site of the Breast Cancer Family Registry (BCFR), a registry of individuals within families with breast and/or ovarian cancer (for details, see John ; Quante ). At recruitment, each eligible subject completed a questionnaire that included information on demographics, lifestyle and environmental factors, past surgeries and family history of cancer (John ). We actively followed participants for subsequent information on cancer incidence and vital status and attempted to verify cancers through pathology reviews and reports and medical records. In the current nested case–control study, we analysed data for 80 prospectively ascertained breast cancer cases and 156 age- and ethnicity-matched controls. All cohort participants provided written informed consent, and the study was approved by the relevant local ethics committees.

PAH-albumin adducts

We measured plasma PAH-albumin adducts by competitive enzyme linked immunosorbent assay using monoclonal antibody 8E11 that recognises benzo(a)pyrene diolepoxide tetrols and related PAH metabolites. A pooled quality control sample was run within each batch (Santella ), and the value was expressed as fmol of PAH per mg albumin.

Absolute risk of breast cancer

We calculated 10-year risk of breast cancer using available family pedigree and vital status data from all family members on cancer diagnoses and age at diagnoses and information on BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations using the risk model BOADICEA (Breast and Ovarian Analysis of Disease Incidence and Carrier Estimation Algorithm) (Antoniou , 2008; Lee ). We used this probability as a continuous risk score in the regression analyses.

Statistical analysis

After descriptive analyses, we used conditional logistic regression based on the matched sets (1 : 2 age and race/ethnicity matched) to estimate breast cancer risk for women with detectable PAH-albumin adducts compared with women with non-detectable adducts (referent). We further categorised detectable adducts based on the median for matched control women with detectable adducts to examine high vs low levels of detectable adducts. We considered the potential confounding effects of age at blood draw and body mass index. We further stratified by menopausal status, smoking status, BOADICEA 10-year risk score (⩾3.4 vs <3.4%) and examined interactions across the continuous BOADICEA score by centring PAH at the mean and including an indicator variable for non-detectable levels. We selected 3.4 as a categorical cutoff for absolute 10-year risk because a commonly used clinical cutoff to indicate high risk for 5-year risk is 1.67%. We also compared interactions using a continuous level of PAH-albumin adducts for those with detectable levels and a continuous 10-year BOADICEA score (Figure 1). We formally tested for statistical significance of interactions through a cross-product term for multiplicative interactions and used the relative excess risk due to interaction (RERI) for additive interactions.
Figure 1

Increase in breast cancer risk from PAH exposure by absolute risk of breast cancer as estimated by the BOADICEA, New York site of the BCFR. Results from a multivariable conditional logistic regression of breast cancer risk with the following covariates: centred PAH-albumin adducts, indicator variable for women with non-detectable levels, continuous BOADICEA score, interactions between BOADICEA and centred PAH-albumin adducts and indicator variable for women with non-detectable values, and further adjusted for age at blood draw, body mass index and smoking status. P-value for multiplicative interaction=0.09.

Results

Table 1 summarises the overall association with categorised PAH. The highest category of PAHs was associated with breast cancer risk (OR=2.89, 95% CI: 1.25–6.69). The associations were higher for women with 10-year BOADICEA score ⩾3.4 (OR=4.09, 95% CI: 1.38–12.13) compared with women with a 10-year BOADICEA score <3.4. The RERI was positive but not statistically significant (RERI=1.75, 95% CI=−1.90, 5.40). Figure 1 shows the association between PAHs and BOADICEA with BOADICEA considered on a continuous scale and PAH levels on a continuous scale for the mean level, the 75th and the 90th percentiles (test for multiplicative interaction P=0.09). The higher the absolute risk of breast cancer, the stronger the association with PAHs. There was no interaction with BOADICEA scores for women with non-detectable levels of PAHs.
Table 1

Plasma PAH-albumin adducts and breast cancer risk categorised by menopausal status and absolute risk score, New York site of the BCFR

 Cases
Controls
      
PAH-albumin adducts (fmolmg−1)N=80%N=156%ORa(95% CI)ORb(95% CI)
All women
Non-detectable2736.07249.3Reference  Reference  
Detectable4864.07450.71.901.003.632.041.063.93
 <Medianc2026.73725.31.490.713.151.590.753.39
 ⩾Median2837.33725.32.661.176.052.891.256.69
Premenopausal women only
Non-detectable1836.05250.0Reference  Reference  
Detectable3264.05250.02.190.994.832.301.005.27
 <Medianc1530.02726.01.810.734.491.930.735.06
 ⩾Median1734.02524.02.911.038.212.871.018.17
Interaction with BOADICEA Risk Scored
Non-detect or Detect <median, <3.4%1216.03827.0Reference  Reference  
Detect⩾Median, <3.4%79.31510.61.750.545.681.810.555.94
Non-detect or detect <median, ⩾3.4%3546.76848.21.650.723.771.540.664.04
Detect⩾Median, ⩾3.4%2128.02014.24.011.3911.584.091.3812.13

Conditional logistic regression, unadjusted.

Conditional logistic regression, adjusted for age at blood draw, body mass index and smoking status.

Median=73.0 fmol mg−1 among controls.

Additive interaction tested using RERI (1.75, 95% CI=−1.90, 5.40).

Discussion

Women with higher PAH albumin adducts had 2–3 times greater breast cancer risk in our cohort. The associations were even stronger for women with higher absolute risk of breast cancer (OR=4.09, 95% CI=1.28–12.13). Our results provide further evidence that PAHs are breast carcinogens and support the stronger associations seen in other studies once subgroups were divided based on risk. For example, in the LIBCSP, traffic-related PAH exposures were positively associated with increased breast cancer risk by interactions with specific polymorphisms in DNA repair genes of ERCC2, XRCC1 and OGG1 (ORs from 2.32 to 2.96) (Mordukhovich ). Associations (∼2-fold and higher) were observed for women with greater inherited genetic susceptibility to the effects of PAH due to variants in carcinogen metabolism, DNA repair, response to oxidative stress and cellular apoptosis genes, as well as the tumour suppressor gene p53 (Terry ; Gaudet ). In addition, constitutional DNA methylation in several breast cancer susceptibility genes (BRCA1, PALB2 and MLH1) has been associated with increased risk of early-onset breast cancers with genetic mutations (both germline and somatic mutations) (Wong ; Scott ). Changes in DNA methylation in RARβ and APC suggest a stronger aetiologic effect of PAH exposure on breast cancer risk for higher susceptibility women (White ). These results are biologically plausible because genetic mutation can disrupt DNA methylation patterns, and hence, impact gene expression and function. Meanwhile, epigenetic changes precede downstream genetic mutation in tumorigenesis that can disable DNA repair functions (You and Jones, 2012). These findings also illustrate the benefit of using high-risk cohorts to examine gene–environment interactions as we covered the full range of underlying breast cancer risk unlike many cohorts that predominantly have only a small proportion of women at high risk. Thus, family-based cohorts can be useful not only for gene discovery but as a very effective way to examine environmental exposures. If replicated in larger cohorts, these results support the hypothesis that PAH may be a strong breast carcinogen for women with greater underlying breast cancer susceptibility.
  30 in total

1.  Constitutional methylation of the BRCA1 promoter is specifically associated with BRCA1 mutation-associated pathology in early-onset breast cancer.

Authors:  Ee Ming Wong; Melissa C Southey; Stephen B Fox; Melissa A Brown; James G Dowty; Mark A Jenkins; Graham G Giles; John L Hopper; Alexander Dobrovic
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2010-10-26

2.  Polymorphism in the DNA repair gene XPD, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-DNA adducts, cigarette smoking, and breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Mary Beth Terry; Marilie D Gammon; Fang Fang Zhang; Sybil M Eng; Sharon K Sagiv; Andrea B Paykin; Qiao Wang; Sharon Hayes; Susan L Teitelbaum; Alfred I Neugut; Regina M Santella
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 3.  ATSDR evaluation of health effects of chemicals. IV. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs): understanding a complex problem.

Authors:  M M Mumtaz; J D George; K W Gold; W Cibulas; C T DeRosa
Journal:  Toxicol Ind Health       Date:  1996 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.273

4.  Environmental toxins and breast cancer on Long Island. I. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon DNA adducts.

Authors:  Marilie D Gammon; Regina M Santella; Alfred I Neugut; Sybil M Eng; Susan L Teitelbaum; Andrea Paykin; Bruce Levin; Mary Beth Terry; Tie Lan Young; Lian Wen Wang; Qiao Wang; Julie A Britton; Mary S Wolff; Steven D Stellman; Maureen Hatch; Geoffrey C Kabat; Ruby Senie; Gail Garbowski; Carla Maffeo; Pat Montalvan; Gertrud Berkowitz; Margaret Kemeny; Marc Citron; Freya Schnabel; Allan Schuss; Steven Hajdu; Vincent Vinceguerra
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Active smoking and breast cancer risk: original cohort data and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mia M Gaudet; Susan M Gapstur; Juzhong Sun; W Ryan Diver; Lindsay M Hannan; Michael J Thun
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 6.  Biological impact of environmental polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (ePAHs) as endocrine disruptors.

Authors:  Yanyan Zhang; Sijun Dong; Hongou Wang; Shu Tao; Ryoiti Kiyama
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 8.071

7.  Vehicular Traffic-Related Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Exposure and Breast Cancer Incidence: The Long Island Breast Cancer Study Project (LIBCSP).

Authors:  Irina Mordukhovich; Jan Beyea; Amy H Herring; Maureen Hatch; Steven D Stellman; Susan L Teitelbaum; David B Richardson; Robert C Millikan; Lawrence S Engel; Sumitra Shantakumar; Susan E Steck; Alfred I Neugut; Pavel Rossner; Regina M Santella; Marilie D Gammon
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 9.031

8.  Indoor air pollution exposure from use of indoor stoves and fireplaces in association with breast cancer: a case-control study.

Authors:  Alexandra J White; Susan L Teitelbaum; Steven D Stellman; Jan Beyea; Susan E Steck; Irina Mordukhovich; Kathleen M McCarty; Jiyoung Ahn; Pavel Rossner; Regina M Santella; Marilie D Gammon
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 5.984

9.  BOADICEA breast cancer risk prediction model: updates to cancer incidences, tumour pathology and web interface.

Authors:  A J Lee; A P Cunningham; K B Kuchenbaecker; N Mavaddat; D F Easton; A C Antoniou
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Breast cancer risk assessment across the risk continuum: genetic and nongenetic risk factors contributing to differential model performance.

Authors:  Anne S Quante; Alice S Whittemore; Tom Shriver; Konstantin Strauch; Mary B Terry
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2012-11-05       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  25 in total

1.  In utero DDT exposure and breast density in early menopause by maternal history of breast cancer.

Authors:  Jasmine A McDonald; Piera M Cirillo; Parisa Tehranifar; Nickilou Y Krigbaum; Natalie J Engmann; Barbara A Cohn; Mary Beth Terry
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 3.143

Review 2.  Chemically induced carcinogenesis in rodent models of aging: assessing organismal resilience to genotoxic stressors in geroscience research.

Authors:  Anna Csiszar; Priya Balasubramanian; Stefano Tarantini; Andriy Yabluchanskiy; Xin A Zhang; Zsolt Springo; Doris Benbrook; William E Sonntag; Zoltan Ungvari
Journal:  Geroscience       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 7.713

3.  Is breast cancer a result of epigenetic responses to traffic-related air pollution? A review of the latest evidence.

Authors:  Debashish Sahay; Mary B Terry; Rachel Miller
Journal:  Epigenomics       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 4.778

4.  Street foods exacerbate effects of the environmental burden of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in Nigeria.

Authors:  Osazuwa Clinton Ekhator; Nnaemeka Arinze Udowelle; Sorbari Igbiri; Rose Ngozi Asomugha; Chiara Frazzoli; Orish Ebere Orisakwe
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  A polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-enriched environmental chemical mixture enhances AhR, antiapoptotic signaling and a proliferative phenotype in breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Larisa M Gearhart-Serna; John B Davis; Mohit Kumar Jolly; Nishad Jayasundara; Scott J Sauer; Richard T Di Giulio; Gayathri R Devi
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2020-12-31       Impact factor: 4.944

6.  Germline Variation and Breast Cancer Incidence: A Gene-Based Association Study and Whole-Genome Prediction of Early-Onset Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Molly Scannell Bryan; Maria Argos; Irene L Andrulis; John L Hopper; Jenny Chang-Claude; Kathleen E Malone; Esther M John; Marilie D Gammon; Mary B Daly; Mary Beth Terry; Saundra S Buys; Dezheng Huo; Olofunmilayo I Olopade; Jeanine M Genkinger; Alice S Whittemore; Farzana Jasmine; Muhammad G Kibriya; Lin S Chen; Habibul Ahsan
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  Estrogen receptor-dependent and independent roles of benzo[a]pyrene in Ishikawa cells.

Authors:  Isabelle Lee; Guannan Zhang; Clementina Mesaros; Trevor M Penning
Journal:  J Endocrinol       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 4.286

8.  Environmental exposures and breast cancer risk in the context of underlying susceptibility: A systematic review of the epidemiological literature.

Authors:  Nur Zeinomar; Sabine Oskar; Rebecca D Kehm; Shamin Sahebzeda; Mary Beth Terry
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 6.498

9.  Air pollution and breast cancer risk in the Black Women's Health Study.

Authors:  Alexandra J White; Allyson M Gregoire; Nicole M Niehoff; Kimberly A Bertrand; Julie R Palmer; Patricia F Coogan; Traci N Bethea
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2020-12-30       Impact factor: 6.498

10.  Prenatal polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, altered ERα pathway-related methylation and expression, and mammary epithelial cell proliferation in offspring and grandoffspring adult mice.

Authors:  Debashish Sahay; Susan E Lloyd; Janelle A Rivera; Jacqueline Jezioro; Jacob D McDonald; Masha Pitiranggon; Beizhan Yan; Matthias Szabolcs; Mary Beth Terry; Rachel L Miller
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 6.498

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.