Literature DB >> 28349777

Aortic Curvature Is a Predictor of Late Type Ia Endoleak and Migration After Endovascular Aneurysm Repair.

Richte C L Schuurmann1,2, Kim van Noort1,2, Simon P Overeem1,2, Kenneth Ouriel3, William D Jordan4, Bart E Muhs5, Yannick 't Mannetje6, Michel Reijnen7, Bram Fioole8, Çağdaş Ünlü9, Peter Brummel10, Jean-Paul P M de Vries1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the association between aortic curvature and other preoperative anatomical characteristics and late (>1 year) type Ia endoleak and endograft migration in endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) patients.
METHODS: Eight high-volume EVAR centers contributed 116 EVAR patients (mean age 81±7 years; 103 men) to the study: 36 patients (mean age 82±7 years; 31 men) with endograft migration and/or type Ia endoleak diagnosed >1 year after the initial EVAR and 80 controls without early or late complications. Aortic curvature was calculated from the preoperative computed tomography scan as the maximum and average curvature over 5 predefined aortic segments: the entire infrarenal aortic neck, aneurysm sac, and the suprarenal, juxtarenal, and infrarenal aorta. Other morphological characteristics included neck length, neck diameter, mural neck calcification and thrombus, suprarenal and infrarenal angulation, and largest aneurysm sac diameter. Independent risk factors were identified using backward stepwise logistic regression. Relevant cutoff values for each of the variables in the final regression model were determined with the receiver operator characteristic curve.
RESULTS: Logistic regression identified maximum curvature over the length of the aneurysm sac (>47 m-1; p=0.023), largest aneurysm sac diameter (>56 mm; p=0.028), and mural neck thrombus (>11° circumference; p<0.001) as independent predictors of late migration and type Ia endoleak.
CONCLUSION: Aortic curvature is a predictor for late type Ia endoleak and endograft migration after EVAR. These findings suggest that aortic curvature is a better parameter than angulation to predict post-EVAR failure and should be included as a hostile neck parameter.

Entities:  

Keywords:  abdominal aortic aneurysm; aneurysm diameter; angulation; aortic curvature; aortic neck; complications; endovascular aneurysm repair; geometry; migration; mural thrombus; stent-graft; type Ia endoleak

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28349777     DOI: 10.1177/1526602817700378

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endovasc Ther        ISSN: 1526-6028            Impact factor:   3.487


  3 in total

1.  Editorial: Clinical and Hemodynamic Performance of Aortic Endografts.

Authors:  Efstratios Georgakarakos
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2018-06-22

Review 2.  Is Evar Feasible in Challenging Aortic Neck Anatomies? A Technical Review and Ethical Discussion.

Authors:  Pasqualino Sirignano; Silvia Ceruti; Francesco Aloisi; Ascanio Sirignano; Mario Picozzi; Maurizio Taurino
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-30       Impact factor: 4.964

3.  A Statistical Shape Model of the Morphological Variation of the Infrarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Neck.

Authors:  Willemina A van Veldhuizen; Richte C L Schuurmann; Frank F A IJpma; Rogier H J Kropman; George A Antoniou; Jelmer M Wolterink; Jean-Paul P M de Vries
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 4.241

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.