Literature DB >> 28349703

Comparative effectiveness of botulinum toxin versus non-surgical treatments for treating lateral epicondylitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Yu-Ching Lin1,2, Wei-Ting Wu3,4, Yu-Chun Hsu5, Der-Sheng Han3,4,6, Ke-Vin Chang3,4,6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To explore the effectiveness of botulinum toxin compared with non-surgical treatments in patients with lateral epicondylitis.
METHODS: Data sources including PubMed, Scopus, Embase and Airity Library from the earliest record to February 2017 were searched. Study design, patients' characteristics, dosage/brand of botulinum toxin, injection techniques, and measurements of pain and hand grip strength were retrieved. The standardized mean differences (SMDs) in pain relief and grip strength reduction were calculated at the following time points: 2-4, 8-12, and 16 weeks or more after injection.
RESULTS: Six randomized controlled trials (321 participants) comparing botulinum toxin with placebo or corticosteroid injections were included. Compared with placebo, botulinum toxin injection significantly reduced pain at all three time points (SMD, -0.729, 95% confidence interval [CI], -1.286 to -0.171; SMD, -0.446, 95% CI, -0.740 to -0.152; SMD, -0.543, 95% CI, -0.978 to -0.107, respectively). Botulinum toxin was less effective than corticosteroid at 2-4 weeks (SMD, 1.153; 95% CI, 0.568-1.737) and both treatments appeared similar in efficacy after 8 weeks. Different injection sites and dosage/brand did not affect effectiveness. Botulinum toxin decreased grip strength 2-4 weeks after injection, and high equivalent dose could extend its paralytic effects to 8-12 weeks.
CONCLUSIONS: When treating lateral epicondylitis, botulinum toxin was superior to placebo and could last for 16 weeks. Corticosteroid and botulinum toxin injections were largely equivalent, except the corticosteroid injections were better at pain relief in the early stages and were associated with less weakness in grip in the first 12 weeks.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pain; botulinum toxin; elbow; lateral epicondylitis; rehabilitation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28349703     DOI: 10.1177/0269215517702517

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Rehabil        ISSN: 0269-2155            Impact factor:   3.477


  4 in total

Review 1.  Treatment, Diagnostic Criteria and Variability of Terminology for Lateral Elbow Pain: Findings from an Overview of Systematic Reviews.

Authors:  Luigi Di Filippo; Simone Vincenzi; Denis Pennella; Filippo Maselli
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-14

Review 2.  Current Trends for Treating Lateral Epicondylitis.

Authors:  Gyeong Min Kim; Seung Jin Yoo; Sungwook Choi; Yong-Geun Park
Journal:  Clin Shoulder Elb       Date:  2019-12-01

3.  Clinical efficacy of local injection therapies for lateral epicondylitis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mehdi Tavassoli; Rahmatollah Jokar; Mohammad Zamani; Soraya Khafri; Seyed Mokhtar Esmaeilnejad-Ganji
Journal:  Caspian J Intern Med       Date:  2022

4.  Do we need to improve the reporting of evidence in tendinopathy management? A critical appraisal of systematic reviews with recommendations on strength of evidence assessment.

Authors:  Dimitris Challoumas; Neal L Millar
Journal:  BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med       Date:  2021-02-23
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.