Literature DB >> 28349268

Segmental vs non-segmental thoracic pedicle screws constructs in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: is there any implant alloy effect?

Mario Di Silvestre1, Georgeous Bakaloudis2, Carlo Ruosi2, Valerio Pipola2, Gianluca Colella2, Tiziana Greggi2, Alberto Ruffilli2, Francesco Vommaro2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to understand how many anchor sites are necessary to obtain maximum posterior correction of idiopathic scoliotic curve and if the alloy of instrumentation, stainless steel or titanium, may have a role in the percent of scoliosis correction.
METHODS: We reviewed 143 consecutive patients, affected by AIS (Lenke 1-2), who underwent a posterior spinal fusion with pedicle screw-only instrumentation between 2002 and 2005. According to the implant density and alloy used we divided the cohort in four groups.
RESULTS: All 143 patients were reviewed at an average follow-up of 7, 2 years, the overall final main thoracic curve correction averaged 61.4%, whereas the implant density within the major curve averaged 71%. A significant correlation was observed between final% MT correction and preoperative MT flexibility and implant density.
CONCLUSIONS: When stainless steel instrumentation is used non-segmental pedicle screw constructs seem to be equally effective as segmental instrumentations in obtaining satisfactory results in patients with main thoracic AIS. When the implant alloy used is titanium one, an implant density of ≥60% should be guaranteed to achieve similar results.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; Implant density; Posterior instrumented fusion only; Titanium vs stainless steel

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28349268     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-017-5046-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  16 in total

1.  Pedicle screw instrumentation and spinal deformities: have we gone too far?

Authors:  John McCormick; Max Aebi; David Toby; Vincent Arlet
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Skipped versus consecutive pedicle screw constructs for correction of Lenke 1 curves.

Authors:  Simon Morr; Alexandra Carrer; Luis Ignacio Alvarez-García de Quesada; Juan Carlos Rodriguez-Olaverri
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  CoCr rods provide better frontal correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated by all-pedicle screw fixation.

Authors:  Mayalen Lamerain; Manon Bachy; Marion Delpont; Reda Kabbaj; Pierre Mary; Raphaël Vialle
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Do anchor density or pedicle screw density correlate with short-term outcome measures in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery?

Authors:  Sandra Gebhart; Timothy B Alton; Viviana Bompadre; Walter F Krengel
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Monaxial versus multiaxial thoracic pedicle screws in the correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Timothy R Kuklo; Benjamin K Potter; David W Polly; Lawrence G Lenke
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Evaluation of pedicle screw placement in the deformed spine using intraoperative plain radiographs: a comparison with computerized tomography.

Authors:  Yongjung J Kim; Lawrence G Lenke; Gene Cheh; K Daniel Riew
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis curves between 70 degrees and 100 degrees: is anterior release necessary?

Authors:  Scott J Luhmann; Lawrence G Lenke; Yongjung J Kim; Keith H Bridwell; Mario Schootman
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Posterior fusion only for thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis of more than 80 degrees: pedicle screws versus hybrid instrumentation.

Authors:  Mario Di Silvestre; Georgios Bakaloudis; Francesco Lolli; Francesco Vommaro; Konstantinos Martikos; Patrizio Parisini
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-08-12       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Correlation of scoliosis curve correction with the number and type of fixation anchors.

Authors:  David H Clements; Randal R Betz; Peter O Newton; Michael Rohmiller; Michelle C Marks; Tracey Bastrom
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Comparative Analysis of Interval, Skipped, and Key-vertebral Pedicle Screw Strategies for Correction in Patients With Lenke Type 1 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Authors:  Fei Wang; Xi-Ming Xu; Yanghu Lu; Xian-Zhao Wei; Xiao-Dong Zhu; Ming Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.889

View more
  1 in total

1.  Complications, Reoperations, and Mid-Term Outcomes Following Anterior Vertebral Body Tethering Versus Posterior Spinal Fusion: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Max Shin; Gabriel R Arguelles; Patrick J Cahill; John M Flynn; Keith D Baldwin; Jason B Anari
Journal:  JB JS Open Access       Date:  2021-06-23
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.