Literature DB >> 28348969

Kelussia odoratissima potentiates cytotoxic effects of radiation in HeLa cancer cell line.

Azar Hosseini1, Shima Saeidi Javadi2, Azar Fani-Pakdel3, Seyed Hadi Mousavi4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Cervical cancer is the second most common cause of death from cancer in women throughout the world. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cytotoxic activity of Kelussia odoratissima (K. odoratissima) extract associated with radiotherapy in cervical cancer cells (HeLa cell line).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Different concentration of the extract (25-500µg/ml) was tested in HeLa cell lines. Cell cytotoxicity of the extract and the effects of the extract on radiation (2Gy/min)-induced damages were assessed by MTT assay. Apoptosis was assessed using flow cytometric analysis. RESULT: K. odoratissima decreased cell viability in HeLa cell line in a concentration and time-dependent manner. When compared to the control, K. odoratissima induced a sub-G1 peak in the flow cytometry histogram of treated cells, indicating that apoptotic cell death is involved in K. odoratissima-induced toxicity. It was also shown that K. odoratissima sensitizes cells to radiation-induced toxicity.
CONCLUSION: Our result showed the extract increased the radiation effect. This observation may be related to the presence of active compounds such as phthalides and ferulic acid.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Apoptosis; Cytotoxicity; HeLa cell line; Kelussia odoratissima; Radiotherapy

Year:  2017        PMID: 28348969      PMCID: PMC5355819     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Avicenna J Phytomed        ISSN: 2228-7930


Introduction

Cervical cancer is common reason of death in women worldwide (Bosch et al., 2002 ▶). The important treatment for cervical cancer, is radiotherapy especially for locally advanced tumors, and led to cell death in tumorous tissues (Dunne-Daly CF, 1999 ▶). In the later stages of cancer, radiotherapy fails because of the presence of the radio-resistant tumor cells. The cytotoxic agent is very important in radiobiology because of increasing the oxidative damage of the tumor cells (Olive, 1998 ▶). Radiosensitizers are used to increase tumor cell killing because of they have less effect on normal tissues. Most of the radiosensitizers are chemical compounds which exhibit toxicity (Wardman, 2007 ▶). Natural products are active compounds used for treatment of diseases since ancient times. The studies have shown that dietary phytochemicals has shown useful effects in a treatment of pathological situation when used alone or in combination with radiation (Bhoslea et al., 2005 ▶). Phytochemicals can act as radiosensitizers in a variety of cancer cell lines, in vitro and in vivo (Bhoslea et al., 2005 ▶). Phytochemicals amplify the effects of irradiation by several modes including toxic reactions of free radicals, overriding cell cycle arrest, and inducing apoptosis (Zoberi et al., 2002 ▶). Umbelliferae has more than 450 genera and near 3700 species in the world (She et al., 2005 ▶). Kelussia is identified genus of this family and is represented by only one species, Kelussia odoratissima Mozaff. is found in Iran (Mozaffarian 2003 ▶). This medicinal plant is endemic to a limited area in western of Iran and is popularly called Karafse-Koohi. In traditional medicine, aerial parts of the plant are used for sedative. Also, K. odoratissima is consumed to treat hypertension, cardiovascular diseases and inflammation ulcers (Ahmadi et al., 2007 ▶). The antioxidant effects of the methanolic extract of the plant were investigated by several methods (Ahmadi et al., 2007 ▶). In the present study, for the first time, we analyzed the sensitizing effects of K. odoratissima when co-administered with γ–radiation, in human cervical cancer cell line.

Materials and Methods

Cell line and agents Human cervical cancer cell line (HeLa) was bought from Pasteur Institute (Tehran, Iran). Propidium iodides (PI), sodium citrate, Triton X-100, 4, 5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl, 2, 5-diphenyl tetrazolium (MTT) and Dulbecco’s Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) were prepared from Sigma (St Louis, MO, USA). Fetal bovine serum (FBS), Glucose-high Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM), penicillin and streptomycin were purchased from Gibco (Grand Island, NY). Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) was purchased from Merck. Preparation of Extract Aerial parts of K. odoratissima were collected from Zard-Kooh Mountains, Charmahal-e-Bakhtiari province, Iran and identified by the herbarium of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran (voucher specimen number: 35205). The plant was dried, powdered and subjected to extraction with 70% ethanol in a Soxhlet apparatus for 48 hr. The extract was then dried on a water bath, dissolved in DMSO and kept in freezer at -20oC until use. Cell culture HeLa cells were cultured in high glucose DMEM (4.5 g/l) supplemented with 10% FBS and 100 units/ml penicillin and 100 micrograms/ml streptomycin. All cells were maintained in a humidified atmosphere (90%) containing 5% CO2 at 370C. Cell proliferation (MTT) Assay Cells (5000/well) were seeded in 96-well culture plates and after 24 hr, the cells were treated with different concentrations of the extract (25-500µg/ml) and then, incubated for another 24, 48 and 72 hr. Cell viability was assessed by MTT assay 24, 48 and 72 hr after treatment with the extract. MTT solution in phosphate-buffered saline (5 mg/ml) was added to each well at a final concentration of 0.05%. After 3 hr, the formazan precipitate was dissolved in DMSO. The absorbance at 570 and 620 nm (background) was measured using a StatFAX303 plate reader. All treatments were carried out in triplicate. Combined plant extracts and irradiation cytotoxicity assay In the second experiment, cells were plated in 96-well plates at a 5×103 cells/well density and treated with the extracts as described above. After a 24 hr-treatment, cells were washed and maintained in PBS for irradiation. The irradiation was performed with a 60Co unit at a dose of 2 Gy, γ-rays during exponential cell growth as monolayers in 96-microwell plate (Magné et al., 2002 ▶). As controls, cells were treated only with radiation, and one plate was seeded but left without irradiation. Immediately after the irradiation, PBS was removed and cells were maintained in culture medium without extract. Cell viability was assessed by MTT assay, 66 hr after the irradiation (Torres et al., 2011 ▶). Cell apoptosis assay Apoptotic cells were detected using PI staining of small DNA fragments followed by flow cytometry. It has been reported that a sub-G1 peak that is reflective of DNA fragmentation can be observed following the incubation of cells in a hypotonic phosphate-citrate buffer containing a quantitative DNA-binding dye, such as PI. Apoptotic cells that have lost DNA will take up less stain and appear on the left side of the G1 peak in the histogram. Briefly, HeLa cells were seeded in wells of a 24-well plate, overnight. Then, cells were treated with different concentrations of the extract. Floating and adherent cells were then harvested and incubated with 750 µl of a hypotonic buffer (50 µg/ml PI in 0.1% sodium citrate with 0.1% Triton X-100) at 4 °C, in the dark, overnight. Next, flow cytometry was carried out using a FACScan flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson). A total of 10000 events were acquired with FACS. Statistical analysis One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Bonferroni’s post-hoc test for multiple comparisons, was used for data analysis. All results were expressed as mean ± SEM. A p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Cytotoxic effect of on cell viability For evaluation of the toxic effects of K. odoratissima, HeLa cells were incubated with different concentrations of the extract (25-500 µg/ml), and cell viability was determined 24, 48 and 72 hr after treatment. The extract decreased HeLa cells viability as a dose and time-dependently. Cell viability reduced after 24 hr at the doses of 100 (77.27±3.24%, p<0.05), 200 (72.39±1.5%, p<0.01), 250 (65.14±1.34%, p<0.01) and 500 µg/ml (56.4±4.46%, p<0.001) (Figure 1a).
Figure 1.

The cytotoxic effect of K. odoratissima on HeLa cells. HeLa cells were treated with various concentrations of K. odoratissima for 24 (Figure 1a), 48 (Figure 1b), and 72 hr (Figure 1c). Viability was quantitated by the MTT assay. The data are expressed as mean±SEM (n = 3). *p<0.05, **p<0.01, and *** p< 0.001

After 48 hr, cell viability decreased at the doses of 50 (70.39±7.74%, p<0.05), 100 (62.97±1.48%, p<0.01), 200 (47.95±4.09%, p<0.001), 250 (39.67±2.17%, p<0.001) and 500 µg/ml (36.19±3.46%, p<0.001) (Figure 1b). Cell viability reduced after 72 hr at the doses of 50 (63.68±3.5%, p<0.001), 100 (57.21±1.33%, p<0.001), 200 (52.22±2.82%, p<0.001), 250 (35±1.7%, p<0.001) and 500 µg/ml (27±1.08%, p<0.001) (Figure 1c). Cytotoxic effect of co-administration of irradiation and the extract in HeLa cell line A single irradiation dose of 2 Gy/min reduced cell viability in HeLa cell line (57±2%, p<0.001). To investigate whether the extract can be an adjuvant treatment to radiotherapy, we treated the cells with plant extract 24, 48 and 72 hr before irradiation treatment. Co-administration of the irradiation and the extract improved the cytotoxic response in the cell line (Figure 2a, 2b and 2c). After a 24 hr-treatment, extract potentiated the effect of radiation at doses of 250 (25.62±1.44%, p<0.001) and 500 µg/ml (20±2.1%, p<0.001) (Figure 2a). After 48 (Figure 2b) and 72 h (Figure 2c), the extract increased the radiation effect at doses of 100-500 µg/ml and 50-500 µg/ml, respectively.
Figure 2

Evaluation of the cytotoxic effect of co-administration of irradiation and extract in HeLa cell line. HeLa cells were treated with different concentrations of K. odoratissima for 24 (Figure 2a), 48 (Figure 2b), and 72 hr (Figure e3c). Viability was quantitated by the MTT assay after 66 hr. The data are expressed as mean±SEM (n = 3). *** p<0.001 compared to control. ## p<0.01 and ### p< 0.001 compared to radiation group

The cytotoxic effect of K. odoratissima on HeLa cells. HeLa cells were treated with various concentrations of K. odoratissima for 24 (Figure 1a), 48 (Figure 1b), and 72 hr (Figure 1c). Viability was quantitated by the MTT assay. The data are expressed as mean±SEM (n = 3). *p<0.05, **p<0.01, and *** p< 0.001 Apoptosis-inducing activity of in HeLa cell line To evaluate the apoptotic activity of the extract, HeLa cells were incubated with different concentrations (100, 250 and 500 µg/ml) of the extract. Cell apoptosis was determined 24 hr after treatment. As shown in Figures 3a and 3b, the extract increased cell apoptosis in HeLa cell line in a concentration-dependent manner after 24 hr.
Figure 3

a) The role of apoptosis in K. odoratissima induced toxicity in HeLa cells. HeLa cells were treated with the extract for 24 hr. A sub-G1 peak, as an indicator of the presence of apoptotic cells, was induced in the K. odoratissima -treated cells but not in the control cells. b) The effects of the K. odoratissima on apoptosis in HeLa cells using PI staining and flow cytometry. **p<0.001 and ***p<0.001 versus control

Evaluation of the cytotoxic effect of co-administration of irradiation and extract in HeLa cell line. HeLa cells were treated with different concentrations of K. odoratissima for 24 (Figure 2a), 48 (Figure 2b), and 72 hr (Figure e3c). Viability was quantitated by the MTT assay after 66 hr. The data are expressed as mean±SEM (n = 3). *** p<0.001 compared to control. ## p<0.01 and ### p< 0.001 compared to radiation group a) The role of apoptosis in K. odoratissima induced toxicity in HeLa cells. HeLa cells were treated with the extract for 24 hr. A sub-G1 peak, as an indicator of the presence of apoptotic cells, was induced in the K. odoratissima -treated cells but not in the control cells. b) The effects of the K. odoratissima on apoptosis in HeLa cells using PI staining and flow cytometry. **p<0.001 and ***p<0.001 versus control

Discussion

Cancer is a problem in developing and developed countries. The World Health Organization (February, 2014) has been reported that 8.2 million patients died from cancer in 2012. It has been also estimated that the number of annual cancer cases would increase from 14 million in 2012 to 22 million within the next two decades (WHO, 2014). Currently, the main treatments for cancer are chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgery. Some of the mostly used chemotherapy drugs include methotrexate as an anti-metabolite, cisplatin and doxorubicin which interact with DNA, taxanes which are antitubulin agents, hormones and drugs that affect on molecular targests (Nussbaumer et al., 2011 ▶). But, using of these drugs in clinic led to several adverse effects such as hair loss, suppression of bone marrow, drug resistance, gastrointestinal lesions, neurologic dysfunction and cardiac toxicity (Nussbaumer et al., 2011 ▶; Monsuez et al., 2010 ▶; Dropcho 2011 ▶). As result, the researchers attempt to find new anticancer agents which have lower side effects and higher efficacy. The recent investigations have been shown natural products are appropriate sources for treatment of different diseases. Vinca alkaloids such as vinblastine and vincristine that are used in clinical as anti-cancer agents are derived from plant. Other anti-cancer drugs which are obtained from herbs are including paclitaxel, the epipodophyllotoxin derivative etoposide, and the camptothecin derivatives, topotecan and irinotecan (Cragg and Newman, 2005 ▶). These drugs act via different mechanisms for example Vinca alkaloids and paclitaxel inhibit microtubule assembly, supression of DNA topoisomerase II (etoposide) and DNA topoisomerase I inhibition such as campothecin derivatives. Also, the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) may play role in anti-cancer effects of these drugs (Alexandre et al., 2006 ▶; Gorman et al., 1997 ▶; Alexandre et al., 2007 ▶). The induction of oxidative stress by pro-oxidant agents is a strategy for killing of cancer cells (Pelicano et al., 2004 ▶; Renschler 2004 ▶; Schumacker 2006 ▶; Lopez-Lazaro 2007 ▶). Carcinogenesis agents increase ROS level in cancer cells. Pro-oxidant agents increase the cellular levels of ROS, therefore, they can induce carcinogenic effects. Increasing of ROS level by pro-oxidant agents in cancer cells led to death of these cells. The most of natural products have anti-oxidant and pro-oxidant properties. For example, curcumin can act as cancer chemo-preventive, carcinogenic, and chemotherapeutic agents which depends on the applied concentration (Lopez-Lazaro 2007 ▶; Lopez-Lazaro 2008 ▶). The recent investigations have been reported that ionizing radiation increase the production of ROS in cells (Dal-Pizzol et al., 2003 ▶). Therefore, using of ionizing radiation may sensitize cancer cells to cytotoxic agents via oxidative stress increment. In this study, the cytotoxic effect of K. odoratissima in combination with radiation was evaluated for the first time. Our findings showed that the extract potentiated the effects of radiation. K. odoratissima belongs to umbelliferae. Phytochemical studies have shown that K. odoratissima contains coumarins, phenolics, flavonoids, terpenoids, phthalides and ferulic acid (Dewick 2011 ▶; Sajjadi et al., 2012 ▶). Recent studies have shown that some compounds such as phthalides and ferulic acid, potentiated the radiation effect (Qi et al., 2015 ▶; Bandugula and Prasad, 2013 ▶). Qi and co-workers showed combination of phthalides with radiation increased radio-sensitivity in human liver cancer cells via modulating caspase-dependent apoptosis protein (Qi et al., 2015 ▶). Also, ferulic acid, a dietary phenolic acid, increased radiosensitizing in NCI-H460 cells through a pro-oxidant mechanism (Reddy and Prasad, 2011 ▶). Combining glycolytic inhibition with plant-derived phenolics is a new approach being considered to selectively kill cancer cells. Plant phenolic compounds are as antioxidant agents, but they also have been shown pro-oxidant properties in cancer cells; this effect is related to acidic environment in cancer cells and the presence of high levels of peroxidases which act on phenolics and produce phenoxy radicals (Lee and Lee, 2006 ▶). Therefore, phenolic phytochemicals may play role in cancer therapy via increment of radio-sensitization in cancer cells (Garg et al., 2005 ▶). The levels of ROS in tumor cells is higher than normal cells, therefore they are more sensitive to oxidative stress generated by anti-cancer agents (Trachootham et al., 2009 ▶). Also programmed cell death increase in cancer cells by ROS. For example phenolic phytochemicals induce apoptosis in cancer cells via ROS generation (Garg et al., 2005 ▶). According to our results, the extract increased the radiation effect. This observation may be related to the presence of active compounds such as phthalides and ferulic acid.
  27 in total

Review 1.  Principles of radiotherapy and radiobiology.

Authors:  C F Dunne-Daly
Journal:  Semin Oncol Nurs       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.315

2.  The neurologic side effects of chemotherapeutic agents.

Authors:  Edward J Dropcho
Journal:  Continuum (Minneap Minn)       Date:  2011-02

Review 3.  The roles of polyphenols in cancer chemoprevention.

Authors:  Ki Won Lee; Hyong Joo Lee
Journal:  Biofactors       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  AC480, formerly BMS-599626, a pan Her inhibitor, enhances radiosensitivity and radioresponse of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cells in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Mylin A Torres; Uma Raju; David Molkentine; Oliver Riesterer; Luka Milas; K Kian Ang
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2010-02-02       Impact factor: 3.850

5.  Accumulation of hydrogen peroxide is an early and crucial step for paclitaxel-induced cancer cell death both in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Jérôme Alexandre; Frédéric Batteux; Carole Nicco; Christiane Chéreau; Alexis Laurent; Loïc Guillevin; Bernard Weill; François Goldwasser
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2006-07-01       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 6.  Dual role of hydrogen peroxide in cancer: possible relevance to cancer chemoprevention and therapy.

Authors:  Miguel López-Lázaro
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2006-12-05       Impact factor: 8.679

Review 7.  Chemical radiosensitizers for use in radiotherapy.

Authors:  P Wardman
Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)       Date:  2007-05-02       Impact factor: 4.126

Review 8.  The emerging role of reactive oxygen species in cancer therapy.

Authors:  Markus F Renschler
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 9.  Anticancer and carcinogenic properties of curcumin: considerations for its clinical development as a cancer chemopreventive and chemotherapeutic agent.

Authors:  Miguel López-Lázaro
Journal:  Mol Nutr Food Res       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 5.914

Review 10.  ROS stress in cancer cells and therapeutic implications.

Authors:  Helene Pelicano; Dennis Carney; Peng Huang
Journal:  Drug Resist Updat       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 18.500

View more
  2 in total

1.  Evaluation of Therapeutic Potential of Eugenol-A Natural Derivative of Syzygium aromaticum on Cervical Cancer

Authors:  Arunava Das; Harshadha K; Dhinesh Kannan S K; Hari Raj K; Bindhu Jayaprakash
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2018-07-27

2.  Synergistic effects of Ferula gummosa and radiotherapy on induction of cytotoxicity in HeLa cell line.

Authors:  Seyed Hamid Forouzmand; Seyed Hadi Mousavi; Vahid Vazifedan; Mahnaz Nourbakhsh; Jamshidkhan Chamani; Azar Hoseini; Azar Fanipakdel
Journal:  Avicenna J Phytomed       Date:  2018 Sep-Oct
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.