Literature DB >> 28348872

Phase variable DNA repeats in Neisseria gonorrhoeae influence transcription, translation, and protein sequence variation.

Marta A Zelewska1, Madhuri Pulijala1, Russell Spencer-Smith1, Hiba-Tun-Noor A Mahmood1, Billie Norman1, Colin P Churchward1, Alan Calder1, Lori A S Snyder1.   

Abstract

There are many types of repeated DNA sequences in the genomes of the species of the genus Neisseria, from homopolymeric tracts to tandem repeats of hundreds of bases. Some of these have roles in the phase-variable expression of genes. When a repeat mediates phase variation, reversible switching between tract lengths occurs, which in the species of the genus Neisseria most often causes the gene to switch between on and off states through frame shifting of the open reading frame. Changes in repeat tract lengths may also influence the strength of transcription from a promoter. For phenotypes that can be readily observed, such as expression of the surface-expressed Opa proteins or pili, verification that repeats are mediating phase variation is relatively straightforward. For other genes, particularly those where the function has not been identified, gathering evidence of repeat tract changes can be more difficult. Here we present analysis of the repetitive sequences that could mediate phase variation in the Neisseria gonorrhoeae strain NCCP11945 genome sequence and compare these results with other gonococcal genome sequences. Evidence is presented for an updated phase-variable gene repertoire in this species, including a class of phase variation that causes amino acid changes at the C-terminus of the protein, not previously described in N. gonorrhoeae.

Entities:  

Keywords:  C-terminal variation; gonococcus; homopolymeric tract; phase variation; simple sequence repeats

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28348872      PMCID: PMC5320596          DOI: 10.1099/mgen.0.000078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microb Genom        ISSN: 2057-5858


Sequence data for Neisseria gonorrhoeae strains investigated are available in GenBank under the following accession numbers: FA1090 (NC_002946.2; url - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/NC_002946.2); NCCP11945 (NC_011035.1; url – http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/NC_011035.1; & CP001050.1; url - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/CP001050.1); MS11 (NC_022240.1; url -http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/NC_022240.1); FA19 (NZ_CP012026.1; url – http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/NZ_CP012026.1); FA6140 (NZ_CP012027.1; url – http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/NZ_CP012027.1); 35/02 (NZ_CP012028.1; url – http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/NZ_CP012028.1). These were accessed on the 15th of April 2016 for use in this study. Sequence data were assessed via BLAST interrogation of the nr database restricted to the N. gonorrhoeae species (url – http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). Genome resequencing data for N. gonorrhoeae strain NCCP11945 has been deposited under BioProject PRJNA322254 (url – http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/322254). Genome resequencing data was assessed via Galaxy (url – usegalaxy.org).

Impact Statement

Phase variation plays a vital role in the ability of Neisseria gonorrhoeae to adapt to the various niche environments encountered. Through stochastic switching in the expression of key genes and regulatory systems, mediated by simple sequence repeats, the population of bacteria are diverse and readily able to survive in the face of selective pressures. Not all simple sequence repeats within the genome mediate phase variation. Previous investigations have sought to define the phase-variable repertoire of the species of the genus Neisseria and have identified a large number of candidates using a small number of genome sequences. With the availability of more genome sequence data and additional experimental data, we have refined the original repertoire to include those most likely to be phase-variable in N. gonorrhoeae. As these genes are important for survival, their definition as phase-variable is important for understanding pathogenesis and for potential future therapies. The advent of high-throughput sequencing has the potential to reveal additional cases of within-strain variations in repeat tracts, supporting phase-variable candidacy of genes.

Introduction

In Neisseria gonorrhoeae, the causative agent of gonorrhoea, DNA repeats are intimately linked to the biology of the organism. N. gonorrhoeae, and the closely related bacterial species Neisseria meningitidis, undergo phase-variable stochastic switching of gene expression for several surface structures, contributing to antigenic variation and immune evasion as well as niche adaptation in the course of infection (Bhat ; Moxon ; Carbonnelle ; Srikhanta ; Omer ). Phase variation is mediated by simple sequence repeats associated with genes. In the species of the genus Neisseria the vast majority contain homopolymeric tracts within the coding sequences (Snyder ). Comparative sequence analysis between a single N. gonorrhoeae and several N. meningitidis genome sequences identified over 100 potentially phase-variable genes (Snyder ), some of which have later been demonstrated to be phase-variable experimentally (Jordan ). Transcriptional and translational phase variation have been extensively studied in the species of the genus Neisseria, however an additional class of simple sequence repeat-mediated phase variation has been described in Helicobacter canadensis following whole-genome analysis (Snyder ). Simple sequence repeat-mediated changes in the presence or absence of C-terminal cell wall attachment motifs has also been described in Streptococcus agalactiae (Janulczyk ). In N. meningitidis, a gene fusion between pglB2 and the downstream phosphoglycosyltransferase gene appears to be mediated by a poly-A repeat tract (Viburiene ). With the availability of additional gonococcal genome sequences, the gonococcal phase-variable repertoire has here been re-assessed. As a result, phase variation in which repeats at the 3′ ends of genes mediate changes in the C-terminal sequence of the proteins is described as part of a refined phase-variable gene repertoire.

Methods

Identification of phase-variable genes.

Using the previous phase-variable gene repertoires reported for N. gonorrhoeae and N. meningitidis (Snyder ; Martin ; Jordan ), the homologues in N. gonorrhoeae strain NCCP11945 were sought (CP00150.1; Chung ). In addition, pattern search in xBASE (Chaudhuri ) was used to identify other repeats, based on previous evidence of phase variation in the species of the genus Neisseria: ≥ (G)8; ≥ (C)8; ≥ (CAAACAC)3; ≥ (CAAATAC)3; ≥ (CCCAA)3; ≥ (GCCA)3; ≥ (A)9; ≥ (T)9; ≥ (AAGC)3; ≥ (TTCC)3; and ≥ (CTTCT)3. No other repeats have been demonstrated to cause phase variation in this species. Genome sequences for N. gonorrhoeae strains NCCP11945 (NC_011035.1), FA1090 (NC_002946.2), FA19 (NZ_CP012026.1), FA6140 (NZ_CP012027.1), 35/02 (NZ_CP012028.1), and MS11 (NC_022240.1) were downloaded on 15ththApril 2016 and compared using progressive Mauve v2.3.1 (Darling ) to identify orthologues (Table S1, available in the online Supplementary Material).

Identification of repeat variation within N. gonorrhoeae strain NCCP11945.

N. gonorrhoeae strain NCCP11945 was grown on GC agar (Oxoid) with Kellogg’s (Kellogg ) and 5 % Fe(NO3)3 supplements at 37 °C in a candle tin for a period of 8 weeks with passages to fresh agar plates every 2 days or at 37 °C 5 % CO2 for a period of 20 weeks with passages to fresh agar plates every 2–3 days. At each passage, cells were scraped from the plate and resuspended in 1 ml of GC broth to a turbidity equivalent to a 0.5 McFarland standard before inoculation onto fresh plates using a sterile cotton swab. DNA was extracted from such resuspensions using the Puregene Yeast/Bacterial kit (Qiagen). A sample (1 µg or 100 ng) of the DNA was genome sequenced using the Ion Personal Genome Machine, Ion Express Fragment Library kit, Ion Express Template kit, and Ion Sequencing kit (Life Technologies) or using the Illumina-based methods of the MicrobesNG service (microbesng.uk). Sequence read data was interpreted using Galaxy on usegalaxy.org (Afgan ). Briefly, the reference sequence (NC_011035.1), Ion Torrent data for eight-week passages (KU1-4, KU1-45), Ion Torrent data for 20-week passages (KU1-95, KU1-96), and Illumina data for 20-week passages (2928-NS1_1 & 2929-NS1_2 and 2929-NS2_1 & 2929-NS2_2) were uploaded to Galaxy. The Ion Torrent bam format files were converted to fastq format using BAMTools Convert (Barnett ). FASTQ Groomer was used on all NGS data (Blankenberg ). Bowtie2 was used to map the reads against the reference (Langmead ; Langmead ) before visualisation using the Integrated Genomics Viewer (Robinson ; Thorvaldsdóttir ).

Results and Discussion

Phase variable genes

The phase-variable gene repertoire of N. gonorrhoeae strain NCCP11945 was investigated and compared against gonococcal strains FA1090, FA19, FA6140, 35/02, and MS11 to assess the presence of similar repeat tracts across the species and variations in repeat tract lengths between strains. Transcriptional phase variation is mediated by repeats within or associated with the promoter region (Fig. 1a). Changes in the repeat alters the level of transcription of the gene, as in fetA (frpB; NGK_2557) where differences in the length of the poly-C homopolymeric tract between the −10 and −35 promoter regions alters expression (Carson ). There are three transcriptional phase-variable genes in N. gonorrhoeae strain NCCP11945 (Table 1), fetA (NGK_2557), a lipoprotein (NGK_2186), and porA (NGK_0906/NGK_0907), yet in gonococci porA does not have an intact coding region. Variation in the repeats between gonococcal strains is found for all three transcriptional phase-variable genes (Table 1).
Fig. 1.

Illustrations of the types of phase variation in N. gonorrhoeae. (a): Transcriptional phase variation, in which changes in a repeat tract alter the facing and spacing of the −10 and −35 promoter elements and the level of transcription of the gene. Phase variation of fetA is used as an example, where it has been shown that differences in spacing of the −10 and −35 elements due to changes in the poly-C repeat tract alter expression levels, represented by the widths of the arrows (Carson ). (b): Translational phase variation, in which changes in a repeat tract towards the 5′ end of the coding sequence alter the reading frame of a coding region and switch expression on and off due to frame-shift. Phase variation of pilC is used as an example, where it has been shown that changes in the poly-G repeat tract generate frame-shifts which switch protein expression on and off (Jonsson ). (c): C-terminal phase variation, in which changes in a repeat tract towards the 3′ end of the coding sequence alter the reading frame of a coding region and switch the encoded C-terminal amino acids between the three reading frames. In the example NGK_1211, two of the reading frames result in different C-terminal ends to the protein, while the third generates a fusion with the downstream coding sequence, NGK_1212. Only some examples of C-terminal phase variation result in this type of fusion (Table 3).

Table 1.

Transcriptional phase variable genes in N. gonorrhoeae

GeneFA1090 locus*Repeat in FA1090*NCCP11945 locus†Repeat in NCCP11945†Repeat in FA19‡Repeat in FA6140§Repeat in 35/02||Repeat in MS11¶N. gonorrhoeae candidacy#Reference
porANGO_04715(T)11C(G)6TNGK_0906 & NGK_0907**(T)9C(G)6T(T)8C(G)8T(T)9C(G)6T(T)9C(G)6T(T)9C(G)6TTKnownvan der Ende et al. (1995)
LipoproteinNGO2047(A)9NGK_2186††(A)8(A)8(A)9(A)9(A)8Yes
fetA / frpBNGO2093(C)13NGK_2557(C)14(C)10(C)11(C)11(C)11KnownCarson et al. (2000)

*From the N. gonorrhoeae strain FA1090 genome sequence (NC_002946.2).

†From the N. gonorrhoeae strain NCCP11945 genome sequence (CP00150.1).

‡From the N. gonorrhoeae strain FA19 genome sequence (NZ_CP012026.1).

§From the N. gonorrhoeae strain FA6140 genome sequence (NZ_CP012027.1).

||From the N. gonorrhoeae strain 35/02 genome sequence (NZ_CP012028.1).

¶From the N. gonorrhoeae strain MS11 genome sequence (NC_022240.1).

#Gene phase variation candidacy in N. gonorrhoeae. Known, phase variation has been reported in the literature. Yes, there is evidence of repeat tract variation between strains supporting phase variation.

**This coding sequenc appears to be frame-shifted and annotated as two coding sequences.

††NGK_2186 and NGO2047 annotations are on opposite strands.

Illustrations of the types of phase variation in N. gonorrhoeae. (a): Transcriptional phase variation, in which changes in a repeat tract alter the facing and spacing of the −10 and −35 promoter elements and the level of transcription of the gene. Phase variation of fetA is used as an example, where it has been shown that differences in spacing of the −10 and −35 elements due to changes in the poly-C repeat tract alter expression levels, represented by the widths of the arrows (Carson ). (b): Translational phase variation, in which changes in a repeat tract towards the 5′ end of the coding sequence alter the reading frame of a coding region and switch expression on and off due to frame-shift. Phase variation of pilC is used as an example, where it has been shown that changes in the poly-G repeat tract generate frame-shifts which switch protein expression on and off (Jonsson ). (c): C-terminal phase variation, in which changes in a repeat tract towards the 3′ end of the coding sequence alter the reading frame of a coding region and switch the encoded C-terminal amino acids between the three reading frames. In the example NGK_1211, two of the reading frames result in different C-terminal ends to the protein, while the third generates a fusion with the downstream coding sequence, NGK_1212. Only some examples of C-terminal phase variation result in this type of fusion (Table 3).
Table 3.

C-terminal phase-variable genes in N. gonorrhoeae

GeneFA1090 locus*Repeat at in FA1090*NCCP11945 locus†Repeat in NCCP11945†Amino acids after the repeat in each frame of NCCP11945‡‡‡FA19§FA6140||35/02 ¶MA11#N. gonorrhoeae candidacy**
ispHNGO0072(G)8NGK_0106(G)8265061(G)8(G)8(G)8(G)8(Yes)
Menbrane proteinNGO0691(G)6NGK_1211(G)7238186^(G)7(G)6(G)7(G)7Yes
m afB cassetteWX61_RS02820(C)7NGK_1624(C)946237deletion††(C)10(C)8(C)10Yes
Pilin cassetteWX61_RS02820CCGCNGK_2161(C)820891¶(C)5GCCCCGCC(C)5CCT(C)5Yes

*From the N. gonorrhoeae strain FA1090 genome sequence (NC_002946.2).

†From the N. gonorrhoeae strain NCCP11945 genome sequence (CP00150.1).

‡In each column are the number of amino acids encoded 3′ of the repeat before the closest termination codon in each of the three reading frames.

§From the N. gonorrhoeae strain FA19 genome sequence (NZ_CP012026.1).

||From the N. gonorrhoeae strain FA6140 genome sequence (NZ_CP012027.1).

¶From the N. gonorrhoeae strain 35/02 genome sequence (NZ_CP012028.1).

#From the N. gonorrhoeae strain MS11 genome sequence (NC_022240.1).

**Gene phase variation candidacy in N. gonorrhoeae. Yes, there is evidence of repeat tract variation between strains supporting phase variation. (Yes), although there is no variation between strains investigated here, tracts of this length vary in other genes (Chen ; Shafer ; Adamczyk-Poplawska ).

††There is a 400 bp deletion in this strain encompassing the region that would contain this repeat.

*From the N. gonorrhoeae strain FA1090 genome sequence (NC_002946.2). †From the N. gonorrhoeae strain NCCP11945 genome sequence (CP00150.1). ‡From the N. gonorrhoeae strain FA19 genome sequence (NZ_CP012026.1). §From the N. gonorrhoeae strain FA6140 genome sequence (NZ_CP012027.1). ||From the N. gonorrhoeae strain 35/02 genome sequence (NZ_CP012028.1). ¶From the N. gonorrhoeae strain MS11 genome sequence (NC_022240.1). #Gene phase variation candidacy in N. gonorrhoeae. Known, phase variation has been reported in the literature. Yes, there is evidence of repeat tract variation between strains supporting phase variation. **This coding sequenc appears to be frame-shifted and annotated as two coding sequences. ††NGK_2186 and NGO2047 annotations are on opposite strands. Most common in the species of the genus Neisseria is translational phase-variation where, as in pilC, the repeat is within the 5′ portion of the coding region of the gene (Fig. 1b). Changes in the repeat tract generate frame-shift mutations in two of the three open reading frames, with the gene only being translated into protein when the repeat tract length puts the gene in-frame. Whilst many phase-variable genes in the species of the genus Neisseria contain homopolymeric tracts, some experience copy number changes in repetitive sequences, such as the CTTCT repeat in opa (Muralidharan ; Bhat ) or the AAGC repeat in autA (Peak ; Arenas ). In the N. gonorrhoeae strains examined here, the AAGC repeat in virG (NGK_0804) is only present in two or three copies (Table 2), rather than several copies as in NGK_0831a and autA (NGK_2082). Although virG has low copy number for the repeat, variations between strains are observed and strains with many copies may yet be identified [there are currently none >(AAGC)3 in the NCBI nr/nt or wgs databases], therefore it is placed amongst the phase-variable genes even though this may be at low frequency or be a strain-specific effect. There are 36 translational phase-variable genes in N. gonorrhoeae based on the species examined (Table 2).
Table 2.

Translational phase-variable genes in N. gonorrhoeae

GeneFA1090 locus*Repeat in FA1090*NCCP11945 locus†Repeat in NCCP11945†Repeat in FA19‡Repeat in FA6140§Repeat in 35/02||Repeat in MS11¶N. gonorrhoeae candidacy#Reference
pilC2NGO0055(G)13NGK_0074(G)9(G)10(G)13(G)9CAGG(G)12KnownJonsson et al., 1991
opaNGO0066a(CTTCT)13CTTCGNGK_0096(CTTCT)8CTTCC(CTTCT)4CTTCCCTT(CTTCT)10CTTCC(CTTCT)6(CT TCC)2(CTTCT)8CTT CC KnownStern & Meyer, 1987
opaNGO0070(CTTCT)9CTTCGNGK_0102(CTTCT)7CTTCC(CTTCT)8CTTCC(CTTCT)17CTTCC(CTTCT)7CTT CC(CTTCT)7CTT CC KnownStern & Meyer, 1987
pglHNGO0086(C)10npnpno repeatno repeatno repeatnpKnownPower et al., 2003
pglGNGO0087A(C)7npnpA(C)9A(C)6A(C)6npKnownPower et al., 2003
pglENGO0207(CAAACAC)4NGK_0339(CAAACAC)8 (CAAATAC)3(CAAACAC)6CAAATACCAAACACCAAATAC(CAAACAC)10CAAATACCAAACACCAAATACCAAACAC(CAAATAC)2(CAAACAC)24 CAAATAC(CAAACAC)15(CAAATAC)3KnownPower et al., 2003
hsdSNGO_02155(G)7NGK_0571(G)7(G)8(G)9(G)7(G)7KnownAdamczyk-Poplawska et al., 2011
HypotheticalNGO0527(C)6A(C)9GCNGK_1405(C)6A(C)8GC(C)7A(C)4T(C )3GC(C)7A(C)4T(C)3GC(C)11A(C)8GC GC(C)6A(C)14GC CYes
modBNGO0545(CCCAA)12NGK_1384(CCCAA)11(CCCAA)12(CCCAA)4(CCCAA)11(CCCAA)7KnownSrikhanta et al., 2009
Replication initiation factorNGO_06135(C)8TTATCTAACA(G)7NGK_1957(C)11TTATCTAACA(G)8(C)7TTATCTAACA(G)7(C)6TTATCT AACA(G)5(C)11TTATCT AACA(G)8(C)10TTATCT AACA(G)7Yes
modANGO0641(GCCA)37NGK_1272(GCCA)18(GCCA)24GTCA(GCCA)24(GCCA)19(GCCA)24KnownSrikhanta et al., 2009
Replication initiation factorNGO_06695(C)8TTATCTAACA(G)7NGK_1486(C)9TTATCTAACA(G)7(C)7TTATCTAACA(G)7(C)9TTATCT AACA(G)6(C)11TTATCT AACA(G)8(C)9TTATCTA ACA(G)7Yes
opaNGO0950a(CTTCT)16CTTCCNGK_0847(CTTCT)19CTTCC(CTTCT)13CTTCC(CTTCT)16CTTCC(CTTCT)8CTT CC(CTTCT)4CTT CC KnownStern & Meyer, 1987
HypotheticalNGO0964(AAGC)4NGK_0831a(AAGC)8(AAGC)15(AAGC)7(AAGC)9(AAGC)7Yes
virGNGO0985(AAGC)3NGK_0804(AAGC)3(AAGC)2(AAGC)3(AAGC)3(AAGC)3Yes
opaNGO1040a(CTTCT)20CTTCCNGK_0749(CTTCT)20CTTCC(CTTCT)10CTTCC(CTTCT)7CTTCC(CTTCT)12CT TCC(CTTCT)13CT TCCCTTCT(C TTCC)2KnownStern & Meyer, 1987
opaNGO1073a(CTTCT)2CTTCCNGK_0693(CTTCT)10CTTCC(CTTCT)11CTTCC(CTTCT)12CTTCC(CTTCT)18CT TCC(CTTCT)7CTT CC KnownStern & Meyer, 1987
opaNGO1277a(CTTCT)11CTTCCNGK_1495(CTTCT)7CTTCCCTT(CTTCT)11CTTCC(CTTCT)11CTTCC(CTTCT)7CTT CC(CTTCT)8CTT CC KnownStern & Meyer, 1987
AdhesionNGO1445(CAAG)20CAAANGK_1705(CAAG)12CAAA(CAAG)12CAAA(CAAG)6CAAA(CAAG)9CAAA(CAAG)6CAAAYes
opaNGO1463a(CTTCT)10CTTCCNGK_1729(CTTCT)7CTTCC(CTTCT)11CTTCC(CTTCT)12CTTCC(CTTCT)12CT TCC(CTTCT)10CT TCC KnownStern & Meyer, 1987
opaNGO1513(CTTCT)12CTTCGNGK_1799(CTTCT)14CTTCCCTT(CTTCT)10CTTCCnp(CTTCT)6CTT CG(CTTCT)7CTT CG KnownStern & Meyer, 1987
opaNGO1553a(CTTCT)4CTTCCNGK_1847(CTTCT)9CT TCC(CTTCT)17CTTCC(CTTCT)8CTTCC(CTTCT)8CTT CC(CTTCT)14CT TCC KnownStern & Meyer, 1987
autANGO1689(AAGC)3NGK_2082(AAGC)3(AAGC)14(AAGC)3(AAGC)3(AAGC)3KnownPeak et al., 1999 ; Arenas et al., 2015
pgtANGO1765(G)11NGK_2516GGGAGCGGG(G)19(G)19GGGAGCGGGGGGAGCGGGKnownBanerjee et al., 2002
Repetitive large surface lipoproteinNGO_09875 & NGO_09870**(G)8NGK_2422 & NGK_2423**(G)7(G)7(G)7(G)7(G)7Yes
opaNGO1861a(CTTCT)13CTTCCNGK_2410(CTTCT)11CTTCC(CTTCT)13CTTCC(CTTCT)2CTTCC(CTTCT)13CT TCC(CTTCT)30CT TCC KnownStern & Meyer, 1987
pilC1NGO1912(G)11NGK_2342(G)13(G)11GGGC(G)11(G)15(G)11KnownJonsson et al., 1991
HypotheticalNGO1953(C)8NGK_2297(C)8(C)8(C)8(C)9(C)8Yes
Pyrimidine 5′- nucleotidaseNGO2055 & NGO2054**(C)6NGK_2176CAAACCCCCAAACCCCCAAACCCC(C)9(C)10Yes
opaNGO2060a(CTTCT)10CTTCGnpnpnp(CTTCT)6CTT CC(CTTCT)7CTT CC KnownStern & Meyer, 1987
opanpNGK_2170(CTTCT)14CTTCC npnpnpnpKnownStern & Meyer, 1987
lgtGNGO2072(C)11NGK_2534 & NGK_2533**(C)12(C)10(C)10(C)10(C)10KnownMackinnon et al., 2002
hpuANGO2110(G)9NGK_2581(G)10(G)9(G)9(G)8(G)8KnownChen et al., 1998
lgtANGO11610(G)11NGK_2630(G)11(G)14A(G)17A(G)20A(G)10AKnownErwin et al., 1996
lgtCNGO2156(G)14NGK_2632(G)13(G)13(G)10(G)16(G)8KnownShafer et al., 2002
lgtDNGO2158A(G)14NGK_2634A(G)16(G)13A(G)12A(G)18A(G)13KnownShafer et al., 2002

*From the N. gonorrhoeae strain FA1090 genome sequence (NC_002946.2).

†From the N. gonorrhoeae strain NCCP11945 genome sequence (CP00150.1).

‡From the N. gonorrhoeae strain FA19 genome sequence (NZ_CP012026.1).

§From the N. gonorrhoeae strain FA6140 genome sequence (NZ_CP012027.1).

||From the N. gonorrhoeae strain 35/02 genome sequence (NZ_CP012028.1).

¶From the N. gonorrhoeae strain MS11 genome sequence (NC_022240.1).

#Gene phase variation candidacy in N. gonorrhoeae. Known , phase variation has been reported in the literature. Yes, there is evidence of repeat tract variation between strains supporting phase variation.

**This coding sequence appears to be frame-shifted and annotated as two coding sequences.

np, The coding sequence is not present in this strain.

*From the N. gonorrhoeae strain FA1090 genome sequence (NC_002946.2). †From the N. gonorrhoeae strain NCCP11945 genome sequence (CP00150.1). ‡From the N. gonorrhoeae strain FA19 genome sequence (NZ_CP012026.1). §From the N. gonorrhoeae strain FA6140 genome sequence (NZ_CP012027.1). ||From the N. gonorrhoeae strain 35/02 genome sequence (NZ_CP012028.1). ¶From the N. gonorrhoeae strain MS11 genome sequence (NC_022240.1). #Gene phase variation candidacy in N. gonorrhoeae. Known , phase variation has been reported in the literature. Yes, there is evidence of repeat tract variation between strains supporting phase variation. **This coding sequence appears to be frame-shifted and annotated as two coding sequences. np, The coding sequence is not present in this strain. In addition, a third class of repeat-mediated phase-variable gene was identified (Snyder ). In these C-terminal phase-variable genes, a repeat tract towards the 3′ of the coding region is able to alter the sequence at the C-terminus of the encoded protein (Fig. 1c). In N. gonorrhoeae strain NCCP11945, four of these C-terminal phase-variable genes were identified (Table 3). It is likely that in the case of the pilin sequence (NGK_2161), changes in the repeat are causing pilus protein changes, mediating antigenic variation through a phase-variable mechanism. Comparisons also show repeat tract variation in a membrane protein (NGK_1211) and mafB cassette (NGK_1624), supporting C-terminal phase variation in the species of the genus Neisseria Variations in the products of mafB cassettes are believed to contribute to competition between species within the niche (Jamet ). Although no variation was observed in these strains in ispH (NGK_0106), (G)8 repeats are known to vary in lgtC (NGK_1632), hpuA (NGK_2581), and hsdS (NGK_0571) (Table 2), therefore it is highly likely that the repeat in ispH also has the capacity to vary. *From the N. gonorrhoeae strain FA1090 genome sequence (NC_002946.2). †From the N. gonorrhoeae strain NCCP11945 genome sequence (CP00150.1). ‡In each column are the number of amino acids encoded 3′ of the repeat before the closest termination codon in each of the three reading frames. §From the N. gonorrhoeae strain FA19 genome sequence (NZ_CP012026.1). ||From the N. gonorrhoeae strain FA6140 genome sequence (NZ_CP012027.1). ¶From the N. gonorrhoeae strain 35/02 genome sequence (NZ_CP012028.1). #From the N. gonorrhoeae strain MS11 genome sequence (NC_022240.1). **Gene phase variation candidacy in N. gonorrhoeae. Yes, there is evidence of repeat tract variation between strains supporting phase variation. (Yes), although there is no variation between strains investigated here, tracts of this length vary in other genes (Chen ; Shafer ; Adamczyk-Poplawska ). ††There is a 400 bp deletion in this strain encompassing the region that would contain this repeat. A number of previously reported candidates are not supported by evidence of phase variation, based on the absence of tract length changes between the strains (Table 4). For example, although tract variation was reported for cvaA (NGK_0168), mafA-3 (NGK_2270), and dca (NGK_1830) in N. meningitidis (Martin ), there are no changes observed in the short (C)4 and (G)5 tracts in these genes in N. gonorrhoeae (Table 4). They are therefore unlikely to be phase-variable in this species. Likewise, neither of the dinucleotide-repeat-containing genes (NGK_1607 and NGK_2274) show variations (Table 4); dinucleotides are not likely to be phase-variable in the species of the genus Neisseria (Martin ). All of these genes contain short repeats that do not vary or alternative nucleotide sequences in the strains investigated (Table 4).
Table 4.

Genes for which there is no evidence of phase variation in N. gonorrhoeae

GeneFA1090 locus*Repeat in FA1090*NCCP11945 locus†Repeat in NCCP11945†Repeat in FA19‡Repeat in FA6140§Repeat in 35/02||Repeat in MS11¶N. gonorrhoeae candidacy#
Prolyl endopeptidaseNGO0026GGGGCGGNGK_0034GGGGCGGGGGGCGGGGGGCGGGGGGCGGGGGGCGGNo. Replacement tract
pill/wbpCNGO0065C(G)6NGK_0089**C(G)6C(G)6C(G)6C(G)6C(G)6No. No variation.
PhosphoesteraseNGO0081(C)7NGK_0 n 9(C)7(C)7(C)7(C)7(C)7No. No variation.
HypotheticalNGO0121(A)6NGK_0167(A)6(A)6(A)6(A)6(A)6No. No variation.
cvaANGO0123(C)4NGK_0168(C)4(C)4(C)4(C)4(C)4No. No variation.
potD -2NGO0206AA(C)5NGK_0338AA(C)5AA(C)5AA(C)5AA(C)5AA(C)5No. No variation.
HypotheticalNGO0532AACCGGCAAACANGK_1400AACCGGCAAACAAACCGGCAAACAAACCGGCAAACAAACCGGCAAACAAACCGGCAAACANo. Replacement tract
nifSNGO0636CCACACCCNGK_1278CCACACCCCCACACCCCCACACCCCCACACCCCCACACCCNo. Replacement tract
lldDNGO0639(G)7NGK_1275(G)7(G)7(G)7(G)7(G)7No. No variation.
Methylase NlalVNGO0676(A)9NGK_1230(A)9(A)9(A)9(A)9(A)9No. No variation.
dnaXNGO0743(C)7NGK_1135(C)7(C)7(C)7(C)7(C)7No. No variation.
mobANGO0754GGAAGGNGK_1123GGAAGGGGAAGGGGAAGGGGAAGGGGAAGGNo. Replacement tract
ppxNGO1041(C)7NGK_0745(C)7(C)7(C)7(C)7(07No. No variation.
fxP/ccoPNGO1371(AT)5NGK_1607(AT)5(AT)5(AT)5(AT)5(AT)5No. No variation.
HypotheticalNGO1384G(A)7NGK_1622(A)8(A)8(A)8(A)8G(A)7No. No variation in length.
pntANGO1470CCCTGCTGGNGK_1735CCCTGCTGGCCCTGCTGGCCCTGCTGGCCCTGCTGGCCCTGCTGGNo. Replacement tract
amiCNGO1501TTCGCCCNGK_1783TTCGCCCTTCGCCCTTCGCCCTTCGCCCTTCGCCCNo. Replacement tract
dcaNGO1540TGTGGGGGNGK_1830TGTGGGGGTGTGGGGGTGTGGGGGTGTGGGGGTGTGGGGGNo. Replacement tract
anmKNGO1583(C)7NGK_1884(C)7(C)7(C)7(C)7(C)7No. No variation.
dinGNGO1708(C)4T CCNGK_2106(C)4TCC(C)4TCC(C)4TCC(C)4TCC(C)4TCCNo. Replacement tract
rplKNGO1855(C)7NGK_2416(C)7(C)7(C)7(C)7(C)7No. No variation.
HypotheticalNGO1970(TA)5NGK_2274(TA)5(TA)5(TA)5(TA)5(TA)5No. No variation.
mafA -3NGO1972(G)5NGK_2270(G)5(G)5(G)5(G)5(G)5No. No variation.
mapNGO1983(C)6NGK_2258(C)6(C)6(C)6(C)6(C)6No. No variation.
plsXNGO2171(TTCC)3NGK_2652(TTCC)3(TTCC)3(TTCC)3(TTCC)3(TTCC)3No. No variation.
lbpANGO0260anrNGK_0401GGGGGCGGGGGGGCGGnrnrTGAAACGGNo. Replacement tract

*From the N. gonorrhoeae strain FA1090 genome sequence (NC_002946.2).

†From the N. gonorrhoeae strain NCCP11945 genome sequence (CP00150.1).

‡From the N. gonorrhoeae strain FA19 genome sequence (NZ_CP012026.1).

§From the N. gonorrhoeae strain FA6140 genome sequence (NZ_CP012027.1).

||From the N. gonorrhoeae strain 35/02 genome sequence (NZ_CP012028.1).

¶From the N. gonorrhoeae strain MS11 genome sequence (NC_022240.1).

#Gene phase variation candidacy in N. gonorrhoeae. No. Replacement tract: due to the replacement of the repeat tract with other nucleotides, this is not phase-variable. No. No variation: due to no observed variation in the repeat tract, this is not phase-variable. No. No variation in length: due to the equal length tract in all strains, this is not phase-variable.

**This coding sequence contains a point mutation, which generates a premature termination codon.

nr, The region of the coding sequence containing the repeat tract does not have homology to the aligned region in these strains.

*From the N. gonorrhoeae strain FA1090 genome sequence (NC_002946.2). †From the N. gonorrhoeae strain NCCP11945 genome sequence (CP00150.1). ‡From the N. gonorrhoeae strain FA19 genome sequence (NZ_CP012026.1). §From the N. gonorrhoeae strain FA6140 genome sequence (NZ_CP012027.1). ||From the N. gonorrhoeae strain 35/02 genome sequence (NZ_CP012028.1). ¶From the N. gonorrhoeae strain MS11 genome sequence (NC_022240.1). #Gene phase variation candidacy in N. gonorrhoeae. No. Replacement tract: due to the replacement of the repeat tract with other nucleotides, this is not phase-variable. No. No variation: due to no observed variation in the repeat tract, this is not phase-variable. No. No variation in length: due to the equal length tract in all strains, this is not phase-variable. **This coding sequence contains a point mutation, which generates a premature termination codon. nr, The region of the coding sequence containing the repeat tract does not have homology to the aligned region in these strains. This analysis identified 29 genes that are known to be phase variable (Tables 1, 2), either in N. gonorrhoeae or N. meningitidis including 12 paralogues of opa (11 in each strain; Muralidharan ; Bhat ) and 17 other known phase-variable genes (Stern ; Jonsson ; Van der Ende ; Erwin ; Chen ; Peak ; Carson ; Banerjee ; Mackinnon ; Shafer ; Power ; Srikhanta ; Adamczyk-Poplawska ; Arenas ). Thirteen additional genes have variations in the repeat tracts when the six N. gonorrhoeae genome sequences are compared, one transcriptional, nine translational, and three C-terminal repeats. Based on homology and presence of conserved domains, these genes are believed to encode two replication initiation factors, an adhesion protein, a pyrimidine 5′-nucleotidase, two lipoproteins, two membrane proteins, two secreted proteins, and three hypothetical proteins (Tables 1–3). Combined with the previous data on repeat variation within and between gonococcal strains and demonstration of phase variation (Sparling ; Yang ; Lewis ; Snyder ; Power ; Jordan ; Srikhanta ), a revised repertoire of 43 transcriptional (Table 1), translational (Table 2), and C-terminal (Table 3) phase-variable genes is proposed for N. gonorrhoeae as a species. This is fewer than previous predictions (76 in Jordan ) and thus far two-thirds (67 %, 29 out of 43) have been experimentally demonstrated to be phase-variable (Tables 1, 2). The additional 14 genes, 13 of which show strain-to-strain repeat variation, require additional investigation.

Phase variable repeat copy number variation in vitro

Previously, for H. canadensis, 454 and Illumina genome sequence read data was used to support candidacy of phase-variable genes (Snyder ). In the present study, Ion Torrent and Illumina genome sequence read data from N. gonorrhoeae strain NCCP11945 that had been passaged in the laboratory for 8 weeks or for 20 weeks was analysed for changes to phase-variable repeats for the 14 genes for which there is no within-strain evidence of phase variation (Tables 1–3). Changes were observed in known phase-variable genes pilC1, opa, and fetA, suggesting that read data can support phase variability by demonstrating within-strain variation in tracts (Table 5). Of the 14 genes, only virG (NGK_0804) and the pyrimidine 5′-nucleotidase (NGK_2176) showed no changes in repeats (Table 5). Probably, the virG (AAGC)3 copy number is too low to vary, however there may be strains with greater copy number in which it would. Likewise, the poly-C repeat in NGK_2176 has been replaced with CAAACCCC in strain NCCP11945 and therefore would not be expected to phase vary in this strain, however phase variation is likely in strain MS11, for example.
Table 5.

Genes for which there is sequencing-based evidence of phase variation in N. gonorrhoeae strain NCCP11945

GeneFA1090 locus*Repeat in FA1090*NCCP11945 locus†Repeat in NCCP11945†Repeat in FA19‡Repeat in FA6140§Repeat in 35/02||Repeat in MS11¶ N. gonorrhoeae candidacy#Ion Torrent* *Illumina††
ispHNGO0072(G)8NGK_0106(G)8(G)8(G)8(G)8(G)8(yes)Repeat variesRepeat does not vary
virGNGO0985(AAGC)3NGK_0804(AAGC)3(AAGC)2(AAGC)3(AAGC)3(AAGC)3YesRepeat does not varyRepeat does not vary
HypotheticalNGO0964(AAGC)4NGK_0831a(AAGC)8(AAGC)15(AAGC)7(AAGC)9(AAGC)7YesRepeat variesRepeat varies
Membrane proteinNGO0691(G)6NGK_1211(G)7(G)7(G)6(G)7(G)7YesRepeat variesRepeat does not vary
HypotheticalNGO0527(C)6A(C)9GCNGK_1405(C)6A(C)8GC(C)7A(C)4T(C)3GC(C)7A(C)4T(C)3GC(C)11A(C)8GCGC(C)6A(C)14GCCYesRepeat variesRepeat does not vary
Replication initiation factorNGO_06695(C)8TTATCTAACA(G)7NGK1486(C)9TTATCTAACA(G)7(C)7TTATCTAACA(G)7(C)9TTATCTAACA(G)6(C)11TT ATCTAACA(G)8(C)9T T AT CT AACA(G)7YesRepeat variesRepeat varies
mafB cassetteNGO1386(C)7NGK_1624(C)9{deletion}(C)10(C)8(C)10YesRepeat variesRepeat varies
AdhesionNGO1445(CAAG)20CAAANGK_1705(CAAG)12CAAA(CAAG)12CAAA(CAAG)6CAAA(CAAG)9CAAA(CAAG)6CAA AYesRepeat variesRepeat varies
Replication initiation factorNGO_06135(C)8TTATCTAACA(G)7NGK_1957(C)11TTATCTAACA(G)8(C)7TTATCTAACA(G)7(C)6TTATCTAACA(G)5(C)11TTATCTAACA(G)8(C)10T TAT C TAACA(G)7YesRepeat variesRepeat varies
Pilin cassetteNGO_11140CCGCNGK_2161(C)8(C)5GCCCCGCC(C)5CCT (C)5YesRepeat variesRepeat varies
Pyrimidine 5′-nucleotidaseNGO2055 & NGO2054II(C)6NGK_2176CAAACCCCCAAACCCCCAAACCCC(C)9(C)10YesNo repeatNo repeat
LipoproteinNGO2047(A)9NGK_2186§§(A)8(A)8(A)9(A)9(A)8YesRepeat variesRepeat varies
HypotheticalNGO1953(C)8NGK_2297(C)8(C)8(C)8(C)9(C)8YesRepeat variesRepeat does not vary
Repetitive large surface lipoproteinNGO_09875 & NGO_09870II(G)8NGK_2422 & NGK_2423||(G)7(G)7(G)7(G)7(G)7YesRepeat variesRepeat does not vary
fetA / frpBNGO2093(C)13NGK_2557(C)14(C)10(C)11(C)11(C)11KnownRepeat variesRepeat varies
pilC 1NGO1912(G)11NGK_2342(G)13(G)11GGGC(G)11(G)15(G)11KnownRepeat variesRepeat varies
opaNGO0950a(CTTCT)16CTTCCNGK_0847(CTTCT)19CTTCC(CTTCT)13CTTCC(CTTCT)16CTTCC(CTTCT)8CTTCC(CT T CT )4CT TCCKnownNo reads through repeatRepeat varies

*From the N. gonorrhoeae strain FA1090 genome sequence (NC_002946.2).

†From the N. gonorrhoeae strain NCCP11945 genome sequence (CP00150.1).

‡From the N. gonorrhoeae strain FA19 genome sequence (NZ_CP012026.1).

§From the N. gonorrhoeae strain FA6140 genome sequence (NZ_CP012027.1).

||From the N. gonorrhoeae strain 35/02 genome sequence (NZ_CP012028.1).

¶From the N. gonorrhoeae strain MS11 genome sequence (NC_022240.1).

#Gene phase variation candidacy in N. gonorrhoeae. Known, phase variation has been reported in the literature. Yes, there is evidence of repeat tract variation between strains supporting phase variation. (Yes), although there is no variation between strains investigated here, tracts of this length vary on other genes (Chen ; Shafer ; Adamczyk-Poplawska ).

**Based on Ion Torrent sequencing data from cultures grown with passage for 8 weeks and from cultures grown with passage for 20 weeks (accession numbers SRR3547950, SRR3547951, SRR3547952, SRR3547953).

††Based on Illumina sequencing data from cultures grown with passage for 20 weeks (accession numbers SRR3547954, SRR3547955, SRR3547956, SRR3547957).

‡‡There is a 400 bp deletion in this strain encompassing the region that would contain this repeat.

§§NGK_2186 and NGO2047 annotations are on opposite strands.

||||This coding sequence appears to be frame-shifted and annotated as two coding sequences.

*From the N. gonorrhoeae strain FA1090 genome sequence (NC_002946.2). †From the N. gonorrhoeae strain NCCP11945 genome sequence (CP00150.1). ‡From the N. gonorrhoeae strain FA19 genome sequence (NZ_CP012026.1). §From the N. gonorrhoeae strain FA6140 genome sequence (NZ_CP012027.1). ||From the N. gonorrhoeae strain 35/02 genome sequence (NZ_CP012028.1). ¶From the N. gonorrhoeae strain MS11 genome sequence (NC_022240.1). #Gene phase variation candidacy in N. gonorrhoeae. Known, phase variation has been reported in the literature. Yes, there is evidence of repeat tract variation between strains supporting phase variation. (Yes), although there is no variation between strains investigated here, tracts of this length vary on other genes (Chen ; Shafer ; Adamczyk-Poplawska ). **Based on Ion Torrent sequencing data from cultures grown with passage for 8 weeks and from cultures grown with passage for 20 weeks (accession numbers SRR3547950, SRR3547951, SRR3547952, SRR3547953). ††Based on Illumina sequencing data from cultures grown with passage for 20 weeks (accession numbers SRR3547954, SRR3547955, SRR3547956, SRR3547957). ‡‡There is a 400 bp deletion in this strain encompassing the region that would contain this repeat. §§NGK_2186 and NGO2047 annotations are on opposite strands. ||||This coding sequence appears to be frame-shifted and annotated as two coding sequences. The Ion Torrent sequencing technology has been criticised for generating homopolymer-associated indels (Loman ) and that the tracts can be incorrect at more than eight bases (Quail ), the optimal length for phase variation. Homopolymeric tracts in Illumina data are believed to be less error prone (Schirmer ). However, repeat sequence data from Illumina often agreed with Ion Torrent on the presence of variation (9 of 14 genes with variation in Ion Torrent, Table 5). When the Illumina data did not show repeat variation, this often corresponded to relatively low read coverage of the region compared to the Ion Torrent data (Table S2). It is currently impossible to differentiate genuine biologically induced indels from sequencing errors (Narzisi & Schatz, 2015). We may find that what we ascribe to errors can also be subtle changes that are constantly being generated within the bacterial population. From this data, the expected biological variation supporting phase variation appears to be present in N. gonorrhoeae strain NCCP11945 for 12 as yet unexplored genes.

Conclusion

In conclusion, N. gonorrhoeae possesses three different mechanisms for phase variation: transcriptional; translational; and C-terminal. Stochastic systems obviously play important roles in the biology of the organism given the variety and number of genes involved. The functions of previously unexplored phase-variable genes, including one transcriptional phase-variable gene, nine translational phase-variable genes, and four C-terminal phase-variable genes require further investigation.
  46 in total

1.  Performance comparison of benchtop high-throughput sequencing platforms.

Authors:  Nicholas J Loman; Raju V Misra; Timothy J Dallman; Chrystala Constantinidou; Saheer E Gharbia; John Wain; Mark J Pallen
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 54.908

2.  Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2.

Authors:  Ben Langmead; Steven L Salzberg
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2012-03-04       Impact factor: 28.547

3.  Phase variation of HpuAB and HmbR, two distinct haemoglobin receptors of Neisseria meningitidis DNM2.

Authors:  L A Lewis; M Gipson; K Hartman; T Ownbey; J Vaughn; D W Dyer
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.501

4.  Comparative whole-genome analyses reveal over 100 putative phase-variable genes in the pathogenic Neisseria spp.

Authors:  Lori A S Snyder; Sarah A Butcher; Nigel J Saunders
Journal:  Microbiology       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.777

5.  Identification of a gene (lpt-3) required for the addition of phosphoethanolamine to the lipopolysaccharide inner core of Neisseria meningitidis and its role in mediating susceptibility to bactericidal killing and opsonophagocytosis.

Authors:  Fiona G Mackinnon; Andrew D Cox; Joyce S Plested; Christoph M Tang; Katherine Makepeace; Philip A Coull; J Claire Wright; Ronald Chalmers; Derek W Hood; James C Richards; E Richard Moxon
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.501

Review 6.  Meningococcal interactions with the host.

Authors:  Etienne Carbonnelle; Darryl J Hill; Philippe Morand; Natalie J Griffiths; Sandrine Bourdoulous; Isabel Murillo; Xavier Nassif; Mumtaz Virji
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2009-05-28       Impact factor: 3.641

7.  NEISSERIA GONORRHOEAE. I. VIRULENCE GENETICALLY LINKED TO CLONAL VARIATION.

Authors:  D S KELLOGG; W L PEACOCK; W E DEACON; L BROWN; D I PIRKLE
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1963-06       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  Phase variation of gonococcal pili by frameshift mutation in pilC, a novel gene for pilus assembly.

Authors:  A B Jonsson; G Nyberg; S Normark
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 11.598

9.  A tale of three next generation sequencing platforms: comparison of Ion Torrent, Pacific Biosciences and Illumina MiSeq sequencers.

Authors:  Michael A Quail; Miriam Smith; Paul Coupland; Thomas D Otto; Simon R Harris; Thomas R Connor; Anna Bertoni; Harold P Swerdlow; Yong Gu
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  Shining a light on dark sequencing: characterising errors in Ion Torrent PGM data.

Authors:  Lauren M Bragg; Glenn Stone; Margaret K Butler; Philip Hugenholtz; Gene W Tyson
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  8 in total

1.  Phase-Variable Genotypes Sweetened by Glycosylation Phenotypes.

Authors:  Nathan J Weyand
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 2.  Molecular Regulatory Mechanisms Drive Emergent Pathogenetic Properties of Neisseria gonorrhoeae.

Authors:  Ashwini Sunkavalli; Ryan McClure; Caroline Genco
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-04-28

3.  The low-molecular-mass, penicillin-binding proteins DacB and DacC combine to modify peptidoglycan cross-linking and allow stable Type IV pilus expression in Neisseria gonorrhoeae.

Authors:  Kyle P Obergfell; Ryan E Schaub; Lauren L Priniski; Joseph P Dillard; H Steven Seifert
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2018-04-15       Impact factor: 3.979

4.  Fourteen Draft Genome Sequences for the First Reported Cases of Azithromycin-Resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae in Ireland.

Authors:  Micheál Mac Aogáin; Nicholas Fennelly; Anne Walsh; Yvonne Lynagh; Michaël Bekaert; Brendan Lawlor; Paul Walsh; Brian Kelly; Thomas R Rogers; Brendan Crowley
Journal:  Genome Announc       Date:  2017-06-08

5.  Expansion of a urethritis-associated Neisseria meningitidis clade in the United States with concurrent acquisition of N. gonorrhoeae alleles.

Authors:  Adam C Retchless; Cécilia B Kretz; How-Yi Chang; Jose A Bazan; A Jeanine Abrams; Abigail Norris Turner; Laurel T Jenkins; David L Trees; Yih-Ling Tzeng; David S Stephens; Jessica R MacNeil; Xin Wang
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 3.969

6.  Investigating Potential Chromosomal Rearrangements during Laboratory Culture of Neisseria gonorrhoeae.

Authors:  Russell Spencer-Smith; Simon W Gould; Madhuri Pulijala; Lori A S Snyder
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2018-01-20

7.  Microevolution of Neisseria lactamica during nasopharyngeal colonisation induced by controlled human infection.

Authors:  Anish Pandey; David W Cleary; Jay R Laver; Andrew Gorringe; Alice M Deasy; Adam P Dale; Paul D Morris; Xavier Didelot; Martin C J Maiden; Robert C Read
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Gauging the epidemic potential of a widely circulating non-invasive meningococcal strain in Africa.

Authors:  Ola Brønstad Brynildsrud; Vegard Eldholm; Adelina Rakhimova; Paul A Kristiansen; Dominique A Caugant
Journal:  Microb Genom       Date:  2019-08
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.