Literature DB >> 28348739

Effectiveness of an early mobilization program on functional capacity after coronary artery bypass surgery: A randomized controlled trial protocol.

Daniel da Costa Torres1, Priscila Maria Ramos Dos Santos1, Helder José Lima Reis2, Denise Moraes Paisani3, Luciana Dias Chiavegato1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Muscle atrophy and prolonged inactivity are associated with an increased sensation of fatigue and reduced functional capacity in the postoperative period in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Cardiac rehabilitation after hospital discharge is highly recommended and contributes to improvement in functional capacity and quality of life. However, few studies have evaluated the effectiveness of early mobilization protocols during hospitalization on the patterns of physical activity and functional capacity after coronary artery bypass grafting.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effectiveness of an early mobilization program on the functional capacity of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting in the short and long term.
METHODS: This is a prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blind trial protocol that will evaluate 66 consecutive patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Patients will be randomized into two training groups: the control group (N = 33), which will perform breathing exercises and the intervention group (N = 33), which will perform breathing exercises and aerobic exercises. The groups will receive treatment from first to the seventh postoperative day, twice daily. In the preoperative period, the following outcomes will be assessed: physical activity level (Baecke Questionnaire), Functional Independence Measure, and functional capacity (6-min walking test). Functional capacity will be reassessed after the 7th and 60th postoperative day. Pulmonary complications and length of hospital stay will also be evaluated. Statistical analysis will be calculated using linear mixed models and will be based on intention-to-treat. The level of significance will be set at α = 5%.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Early ambulation; coronary artery bypass grafting; exercise; length of stay; rehabilitation

Year:  2016        PMID: 28348739      PMCID: PMC5354181          DOI: 10.1177/2050312116682256

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  SAGE Open Med        ISSN: 2050-3121


Background

Cardiac surgery is a well-established procedure worldwide with excellent results for efficacy and safety in treating heart patients. Among the different types of treatments, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is considered an effective alternative for the treatment of ischemic heart disease. The indication for myocardial revascularization, especially in acute coronary syndromes (ACS), has as main objectives to improve ventricular function, reduce symptoms of myocardial ischemia, prevent progression to acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and reduce mortality.[1-3] However, the combination of the complexity of the procedure and the use of cardiopulmonary bypass (CB) has had a very positive association with the incidence of complications in the postoperative period.[4] The CB produces a systemic inflammatory response through the release of substances that impair immune response and that are widely known to increase capillary permeability and its deleterious effects,[5] the main ones being atelectasis, pleural effusion, and pneumonia complications such as respiratory[6] acute kidney injury[7,8] neuromuscular disorders, low cardiac output syndrome, postoperative bleeding, infection, and difficulty in glycemic control.[7] Systemic complications in the postoperative period increases the duration of mechanical ventilation and sedation[9] and promotes muscle weakness,[7] leading to a longer period in the intensive care unit (ICU) and a reduction in mobility.[10,11] The deleterious effects of immobility include decreased protein synthesis, increased proteolysis, and loss of muscle mass and strength, compromising functional capacity and ability to perform activities of daily living.[10,12-15] It is known that the likely consequences generated by immobility can last for months and even years after an ICU length of stay,[16-19] preventing patients from fully returning to baseline functional ability[15] and increasing the risk of hospital readmission.[20,21] The role of physical therapy in the ICU has been recently highlighted, as well as its importance in the practice of early mobilization[22-26] and exercise protocols for surgical patients.[27-30] It is feasible and safe to carry out a physical exercise protocol in the short term.[22] Physical therapy is also associated with decreased respiratory complications following cardiac surgery,[31] reduced loss of muscle strength,[32] decreased morbidity and mortality,[33] improved cognitive conditions,[34] and an increase in the number of days free of mechanical ventilation.[26] Despite reports of improvement in physical capacity due to early mobilization in patients after cardiac surgery, there is a lack of standardization regarding the intensity, type, frequency, and duration of exercise.[35] More studies are needed that concentrate on the importance of standardized protocols since the repercussions of these procedures can influence the patients for a long period after hospital discharge.[36,37] Thus, this study aims first to assess the effectiveness of early mobilization on the functional capacity of patients undergoing CABG and subsequently evaluate the possible influence on the length of the hospital stay and the development of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPC), emphasizing the importance of identifying the need for specific protocols for continued rehabilitation and new physical therapy strategies. Our hypothesis is that patients undergoing the early mobilization program will have improved 6-min walking test (6MWT) results (walked distance) at discharge on the 60th postoperative day compared to the patients who only carry out the breathing exercise program.

Methods

Study design

This study will be a randomized, controlled, single-blind trial. The study protocol was registered at Clinical Trials (NCT02312648) and approved by the local Ethics Committee (protocol number 34569214.5.0000.0064). This trial started recruiting patients on 2 February 2015, and data collection is likely to finish by February 2016. After signing the informed consent form, the patients will undergo a baseline assessment. Following surgery, patients extubated within 24 h will be randomly assigned into one of two groups: a control group (CG) or an intervention group (IG). At discharge, the groups will be assessed regarding functional capacity, PPC, and length of hospital stay. Functional capacity will be reevaluated 60 days after randomization (Figure 1).
Figure 1.

Study design.

Study design. The randomization scheme will be generated by a computer and carried out by an investigator who is not involved in the recruitment and treatment of patients. The allocation of the patients will be concealed using sequentially numbered, sealed, and opaque envelopes. On the first day of treatment after surgery, the envelope allocated to the patient will be opened by the physical therapist who provided the treatments. The patients will be informed that they will receive one of two different physical therapy approaches.

Participants, therapists, center

This study protocol will include consecutive patients admitted for elective and conventional CABG in a tertiary hospital according to the following criteria: both genders, age between 18 and 80 years, body mass index (BMI) between 20 and 30 kg/m2, hemodynamic stability with or without use of positive inotropic drugs, absence of arrhythmias and angina, mean blood pressure (MBP) 60 ⩽ MBP ⩽ 100 mmHg, heart rate (HR) 60 ⩽ HR ⩽ 100 bpm without respiratory distress such as nasal flaring, the use of accessory muscles, thoracoabdominal asynchrony, and a respiratory rate (RR) ⩽ 20 without signs of infection. The exclusion criteria are as follows: previous pulmonary disease and acute lung disease, mechanical ventilation >24 h, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <35% or >54%,[36,37] surgical reintervention, intraoperative death or any contraindications for the proposed measurements and/or treatment, contraindications for the 6MWT or any proposed protocol, orthopedic impairments, unstable angina, HR >120 bpm at rest, and systolic blood pressure >180 mmHg or diastolic >100 mmHg. All patients will be evaluated by the same investigator at three different times: preoperative period (first assessment), 7 days after the beginning of the protocol (second assessment), and 60 days after hospital discharge (third assessment). The first assessment will be performed up to 2 days before the operative procedure in the following sequence: demographic (age, weight, height, and BMI) and clinical data (ejection fraction, medications, and comorbidities) will be collected from medical records, lung function test (spirometry), physical activity level (Baecke Questionnaire), Functional Independence Measure (FIM), and functional capacity test (6MWT). After the postoperative procedure, a randomization program will randomly assign patients extubated within 24 h into two groups: the CG, which will perform breathing exercises or an IG, which will perform breathing exercises and early mobilization. Both will receive preoperative orientation about the surgical procedure, the importance of early ambulation, and cough stimulation. Standardized physical therapy will be provided from the first to the seventh postoperative day. The sessions will take place twice a day with an average time of 30 min each. After 30 days, the assessor will contact the patients by telephone to collect the following information: the presence of symptoms that suggest any cardiac abnormality, the need for hospitalization, and performing any physical activity. The second and third assessments will only measure functional capacity (6MWT) and will be performed by blinded assessors at hospital discharge and 60 days after discharge.

Intervention/control

A total of 52 patients will be randomly allocated to one of two groups: CG, which will perform a supervised respiratory exercise program (usual care), and IG, which will receive the same respiratory exercise program combined with an early mobilization program (Table 1). Following the standardized hospital protocol, all participants will perform exercises with bi-level positive airway pressure[41,42] (BIPAP® Synchrony) with orofacial interfaces from 30 to 60 min immediately after tracheal extubation according to the needs of each patient.
Table 1.

Early mobilization protocol (days).

Step[a]
Step 1Breathing exercises, 3 sets of 10 repetitions. Active upper and lower extremity exercises, 3 sets of 10 repetitions; bed inclined at 45° . Lower limb exercise on cycle[38] lasting 20 min (5-min warm-up, 10 min of low-intensity exercise, and 5-min recovery), 30 rpm ( rotation per minute)
Step 2Active exercises as in step 1. Stay in the upright position and perform walking on the spot for three series of 1 min.[39] Lower limb exercise on cycle ergometer, lasting 20 min.
Step 3Active exercises as in step 2. Ambulation within the inpatient ward (7 min). Transfer to an allocated chair beside the bed (at least 30 min).
Step 4Same exercises as in step 3. Ambulation within the inpatient ward (10 min). Transfer to an allocated chair beside the bed (at least 1 h).
Step 5Same exercises as in step 4. Ambulation within the inpatient ward (15 min). Transfer to an allocated chair beside the bed (at least 2 h).
Step 6Active exercises from the previous day. Ambulation within the inpatient ward (20 min). Step training (3 times continuously, 20 cm standardized step).[40]
Step 7Exercises from the previous day. Step training (6 times continuously, 20 cm standardized step).

Each step corresponds to 1 day of postoperative intervention.

Early mobilization protocol (days). Each step corresponds to 1 day of postoperative intervention. The predetermined parameters will be as follows: adequate inspiratory pressure to maintain an optimal tidal volume within 6 to 8 mL/kg and expiratory pressure of 6 cmH2O[41] plus supplemental oxygen to maintain oxygen saturation above 95%. The exercises will be supervised by a physical therapist in both groups. Before performing the exercises, the patients will be asked to quantify their pain and, if they describe an intensity of more than three on the visual analog scale (VAS), a prescription of analgesics (containing moderate opioids) will be requested from their physician and a break will be taken at that moment until the sensation of pain gets better. Medication use as well as the pain (VAS) will be quantified (drug, dose, and frequency) for comparison between groups.

Early mobilization program

This program will be conducted only in the IG as described below (Table 1) and with respective images in Table 2.
Table 2.

Intervention group protocol.

Breathing exercises + active upper/lower extremity exercisesBreathing exercises, 3 sets of 10 repetitions. Active upper/lower extremity exercises, 3 sets of 10 repetitions; bed inclined at 45°.
Noninvasive ventilationAdequate inspiratory pressure to maintain an optimal tidal volume for each patient within 6 to 8 mL/kg; expiratory pressure of 6 cmH2O; supplemental oxygen to maintain oxygen saturation above 95%.
Cycle ergometerLower limb exercise on cycle ergometer lasting, 20 min (5-min warm-up, 10 min of low-intensity exercise, and 5-min recovery), 30 rpmmin.
Stationary positionThe patient will be encouraged to stay in the upright position and perform walking on the spot for 30 s.
Chair sittingTransfer to an allocated chair beside the bed and remain there for a predetermined time.
AmbulationPatient will be encouraged to walk in the unit for a predetermined period.
Step trainingStep training will begin with a standardized 20-cm step. The patient will be encouraged to step up and down with a predetermined protocol.
Intervention group protocol.

Outcomes measures

The primary outcome will be functional capacity (6MWT), which will be measured preoperatively, at discharge after 7 days of the protocol, and after 60 postoperative days. The secondary variables will be the incidence of PPC and the length of the hospital stay.

Procedures

Pulmonary function

The patients will perform spirometry according to the American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society guidelines.[43] The variables considered will be the forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) and the forced expiratory volume/forced vital capacity (FEV/FVC) ratio in absolute values and as a percentage of the predicted values according to the prediction equations described for the Brazilian population.[44]

Physical activity level

The Baecke Habitual Physical Activity Questionnaire consists of 16 questions concerning three components from the past 12 months: occupational activities score (8 questions), physical exercise during leisure activities score (4 questions), and leisure and locomotion physical activities score (4 questions).[45,46] The patients will be considered sedentary when the score is <9, active when the score is between 9 and 16, and athletic when the score is >16.[45]

FIM

The FIM is an instrument that assesses the disability level of patients with functional restrictions of different origins. Its primary objective is to quantitatively evaluate the level of assistance required for a person to perform a series of motor and cognitive tasks needed for daily living. The evaluated activities include self-care, mobility, walking, toileting, communication, and cognition, including memory, social interaction, and problem solving.[47] Each of these activities is assessed and receives a score of 1 (total dependence) to 7 (complete independence), thus the total score ranges from 18 to 126.[47,48]

Borg perception test

The perceived level of respiratory discomfort during physical effort will be evaluated by the modified Borg scale, ranging from 0 (least effort) to 10 (most effort). The patient will be instructed regarding the use of the scale and prompted for the spontaneous choice of a value.[49]

Primary outcome

Functional capacity

The 6MWT will be performed according to the recommendations of the American Thoracic Society.[50] The patients will be instructed to walk the greatest distance at the highest speed possible for a period of 6 min. The walking course must be 30 m in length. An assessor will provide standardized encouragement every minute. The patient will be allowed to rest during the test if required and this time will be included in the total time of the test. The test will be performed twice with a 1-h interval between tests. The best distance will be recorded. Normal predicted values of the 6MWT distance (p6MWD) will be calculated using the equations proposed by Britto et al.[51] The minimum clinically significant difference considered will be 25 m.[52]

Secondary outcomes

PPC

PPC will be diagnosed by the clinician if one or more of the following criteria are present: (1) pneumonia[53]—presence of radiological evidence of pulmonary infiltration associated with at least two signs, including purulent sputum, elevated body temperature (>38.0°C) or leukocytosis (⩾25% above baseline preoperative value); (2) tracheobronchitis—marked increase in sputum production or presence of purulent sputum in a patient with a normal chest X-ray; (3) atelectasis with clinical repercussions[54]—radiological evidence of lung atelectasis associated with dyspnea; (4) hypoxemia under SpO2 <85% and a need for oxygen;[55] (5) Acute respiratory failure—acute deficiency of gas exchange with need for invasive or noninvasive mechanical ventilation. Length of the hospital stay and mortality will be evaluated. Postoperative analgesia will be managed by the medical staff, and the VAS will be used before each treatment session to evaluate the need for medication.

Data analysis

Sample size calculation will be based on the main outcome (functional capacity, walked distance in the 6MWT), considering a previous study with 93 patients that aimed to determine whether a physiotherapy-supervised walking program might improve walking capacity of patients undergoing CABG surgery,[41] and estimating a minimal difference between groups of 25 m with a standard deviation of 32 m, with a power of 80% and an alpha of 5%. The result will be a sample size of 33 participants per group. The data will be double entered, and the intention-to-treat analysis will be performed. The effects of the intervention on patient functionality will be calculated using a linear mixed model, which will incorporate the terms for the treatment, time, and treatment by time interactions. The level of significance will be set at α = 5%. The data will be analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) 21.

Expected results

It is expected that, after the performance of the mobilization protocol, started earlier, the patients in the IG will have an improvement in the distance walked in the 6MWT, which will be assessed during 7 postoperative days and 60 days after hospital discharge, and will have less time in ICU and lower prevalence of pulmonary complications, when compared to the CG. It is also expected that with the results obtained from this study, it will be possible to introduce an early mobilization protocol in the ICU routinely unit and sensitize the medical board about the importance of proper physiotherapy conduct.

Potential study limitations

As the protocol has already been registered, we cannot change or add any variables, for example, the level of pain and the adherence of the patients to the therapy after discharge. We will need to control the variables to avoid possible future bias. The physical therapists from the hospital team will be trained to do the same evaluations with all patients, but it is clear to us (the authors) that because there are a large number of physical therapists inside the hospital, this could be also a bias. Each intervention will be controlled to guarantee the best quality of the study.
  49 in total

1.  ATS statement: guidelines for the six-minute walk test.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2002-07-01       Impact factor: 21.405

2.  ACC/AHA 2004 guideline update for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1999 Guidelines for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery).

Authors:  Kim A Eagle; Robert A Guyton; Ravin Davidoff; Fred H Edwards; Gordon A Ewy; Timothy J Gardner; James C Hart; Howard C Herrmann; L David Hillis; Adolph M Hutter; Bruce Whitney Lytle; Robert A Marlow; William C Nugent; Thomas A Orszulak
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-10-05       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  AARC clinical practice guideline. Oxygen therapy in the home or alternate site health care facility--2007 revision & update.

Authors: 
Journal:  Respir Care       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.258

4.  Reproducibility of cadence-free 6-minute step test in subjects with COPD.

Authors:  Joyce Nf da Costa; Juliano F Arcuri; Ivana L Gonçalves; Simone F Davi; Bruna V Pessoa; Mauricio Jamami; Valéria Ap Di Lorenzo
Journal:  Respir Care       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 2.258

5.  Bed rest in health and critical illness: a body systems approach.

Authors:  Chris Winkelman
Journal:  AACN Adv Crit Care       Date:  2009 Jul-Sep

6.  In-hospital mortality in cardiac surgery patients after readmission to the intensive care unit: a single-center experience with 10,992 patients.

Authors:  Radoslaw Litwinowicz; Krzysztof Bartus; Rafal Drwila; Boguslaw Kapelak; Janusz Konstanty-Kalandyk; Robert Sobczynski; Karol Wierzbicki; Magdalena Bartuś; Anna Chrapusta; Tomasz Timek; Stanislaw Bartus; Krzysztof Oles; Jerzy Sadowski
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 2.628

7.  Hospital readmissions after cardiac surgery: is it a game worth playing?

Authors:  Hersh Maniar
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 5.209

8.  Bed rest promotes reductions in walking speed, functional parameters, and aerobic fitness in older, healthy adults.

Authors:  Robert H Coker; Nicholas P Hays; Rick H Williams; Robert R Wolfe; William J Evans
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 6.053

Review 9.  Secondary prevention through cardiac rehabilitation: from knowledge to implementation. A position paper from the Cardiac Rehabilitation Section of the European Association of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Massimo Francesco Piepoli; Ugo Corrà; Werner Benzer; Birna Bjarnason-Wehrens; Paul Dendale; Dan Gaita; Hannah McGee; Miguel Mendes; Josef Niebauer; Ann-Dorthe Olsen Zwisler; Jean-Paul Schmid
Journal:  Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil       Date:  2010-02

10.  Adaptation to low-intensity exercise on a cycle ergometer by patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing phase I cardiac rehabilitation.

Authors:  Atsuhiko Matsunaga; Takashi Masuda; Misao N Ogura; Masakazu Saitoh; Yusuke Kasahara; Takami Iwamura; Minako Yamaoka-Tojo; Kiyotaka Sato; Tohru Izumi
Journal:  Circ J       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.993

View more
  9 in total

1.  Impact of early mobilization on clinical and functional outcomes in patients submitted to coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  André Luiz Lisboa Cordeiro; Andressa Dos Santos Lima; Carliane Moreira De Oliveira; Jaqueline Purificação De Sá; André Raimundo França Guimarães
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2022-04-15

Review 2.  Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease.

Authors:  Grace Dibben; James Faulkner; Neil Oldridge; Karen Rees; David R Thompson; Ann-Dorthe Zwisler; Rod S Taylor
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-11-06

3.  The benefit of a preoperative respiratory protocol and musculoskeletal exercise in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Paolo Nardi; Calogera Pisano; Claudia Altieri; Dario Buioni; Carlo Pedicelli; Silvia Saulle; Romana Dandi; Alessia Romano; Annamaria Servadio; Alessandra Gianlorenzi; Katia Emili; Giovanni Ruvolo
Journal:  Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol       Date:  2020-07-20

4.  Comparisons and correlations of pain intensity and respiratory and peripheral muscle strength in the pre- and postoperative periods of cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Thayse Campos de Menezes; Daniela Bassi; Ricardo César Cavalcanti; Juliana Emanuelle Santos Luz Barros; Karolyne Soares Barbosa Granja; Ana Carolina do Nascimento Calles; Ana Luiza Exel
Journal:  Rev Bras Ter Intensiva       Date:  2018 Oct-Dec

5.  The effect of preoperative respiratory physiotherapy and motor exercise in patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery: short-term results.

Authors:  Paolo Nardi; Antonio Pellegrino; Calogera Pisano; Sara Rita Vacirca; Deborah Anselmi; Silvia Saulle; Romana Dandi; Alessia Romano; Annamaria Servadio; Alessandra Gianlorenzi; Giovanni Ruvolo
Journal:  Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol       Date:  2019-06-28

6.  Factors Determining the Functional State of Cardiac Surgery Patients with Complicated Postoperative Period.

Authors:  Alexey N Sumin; Pavel A Oleinik; Andrey V Bezdenezhnykh; Natalia A Bezdenezhnykh
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 4.614

7.  Effectiveness of early cardiac rehabilitation in patients with heart valve surgery: a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Wei Xue; Zhang Xinlan; Zheng Xiaoyan
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 1.573

8.  Delivery of Acute Rehabilitation to a Postcoronary Artery Bypass Graft COVID-19 Patient in a Pandemic Environment.

Authors:  Praveen Jayaprabha Surendran; Prasobh Jacob; Cornelia Sonia Carr; Amr Salah Omar; Suraj Sudarsanan; Shiny Shiju; Yazan Hasan Othman Albadwan; Syed Abdul Ansari Matharsa; Gigi Mathew; Dinesh Kumar Selvamani
Journal:  Heart Views       Date:  2022-07-23

9.  Efficacy of Early and Enhanced Respiratory Physiotherapy and Mobilization after On-Pump Cardiac Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Georgios Afxonidis; Dimitrios V Moysidis; Andreas S Papazoglou; Christos Tsagkaris; Anna Loudovikou; Georgios Tagarakis; Georgios T Karapanagiotidis; Ioannis A Alexiou; Christophoros Foroulis; Kyriakos Anastasiadis
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-15
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.