| Literature DB >> 28348705 |
Oscar Fabregat-Andres1, Adolfo Munoz-Macho2, Guillermo Adell-Beltran2, Xavier Ibanez-Catala3, Agustin Macia3, Lorenzo Facila4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Prevention of cardiac events during competitive sports is fundamental. New technologies with remote monitoring systems integrated into clothing could facilitate the screening of heart disease. Our aim was to evaluate the feasibility of Nuubo system during a field stress test performed by soccer players, comparing results with treadmill ergospirometry as test reference.Entities:
Keywords: Cardiac screening; ECG monitoring; Ergospirometry; Exercise test; Soccer; Wireless device
Year: 2014 PMID: 28348705 PMCID: PMC5358170 DOI: 10.14740/cr333w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cardiol Res ISSN: 1923-2829
Baseline Characteristics of Participants, Yo-Yo Test and Ergospirometry Results, and Heart Rate Variability Parameters Estimated by Nuubo System
| General characteristics | n = 19 |
| Age (years) | 20.1 ± 1.8 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 22.4 ± 1.5 |
| Percentage body fat (%) | 11.8 ± 2.0 |
| Blood pressure (mm Hg) | 113.3 ± 9.3/67.3 ± 7.2 |
| YYIRT level 1 | n = 19 |
| Maximal heart rate (bpm)* | 187.7 ± 3.8 |
| Mean QTc (ms)* | 398.9 ± 20.2 |
| Distance (m) | 2,006.3 ± 282.9 |
| Median stage reached | 18.7 (17.6 - 20.7) |
| Estimated VO2 (mL/kg/min) | 53.3 ± 2.4 |
| Basal lactate (mmol/L) | 2.6 ± 0.7 |
| Maximal lactate (mmol/L) | 10.4 ± 1.7 |
| Ergospirometry | n = 19 |
| Maximal heart rate (bpm) | 190.1 ± 5.5 |
| Time (min) | 16.7 ± 0.9 |
| VO2 (mL/kg/min) | 53.7 ± 3.0 |
| Maximal lactate (mmol/L) | 8.5 ± 3.3 |
| Aerobic threshold (mL/kg/min) | 28.5 ± 6.1 |
| Anaerobic threshold (mL/kg/min) | 38.5 ± 4.7 |
| Heart rate variability parameters | n = 16 |
| Mean RR interval (ms) | 369.7 ± 27.6 |
| SDNN (ms) | 38.7 ± 19.0 |
| rMSDD (ms) | 19.1 ± 19.2 |
| pNN50 (%) | 2.82 ± 4.4 |
| Mean triangular index | 4.45 ± 1.5 |
| LF/HF ratio | 1.87 ± 1.0 |
BMI: body mass index; bpm: beats per minute; YYIRT: Yo-Yo intermittent recovery test; QTc: corrected QT interval; VO2: maximal oxygen uptake; g: unit of acceleration; SDNN: standard deviation of normal-to-normal RR intervals; rMSDD: square root of the mean squared differences of successive normal-to-normal RR intervals; pNN50: proportion of interval differences of successive normal-to-normal RR intervals; LF/HF ratio: ratio of low- to high-frequency power. *Calculated only on 16 adequate and interpretable ECG signals.
Comparative Results Between Yo-Yo Test With Nuubo’s Technology and Ergospirometry
| ICC (95% CI) | P value | |
|---|---|---|
| Quantitative variables | ||
| Baseline heart rate | 0.95 (0.87 - 0.97) | < 0.001 |
| Peak heart rate | 0.61 (0.21 - 0.83) | 0.003 |
| VO2 max | 0.84 (0.63 - 0.93) | < 0.001 |
ICC: intra-class correlation coefficient; CI: confidence interval; VO2: maximal oxygen uptake; PC: premature complex.
Figure 1Wireless electrocardiographic monitoring recordings of soccer players during Yo-Yo intermittent recovery test level 1. (A) Activity index during the three phases of the test: warming up, Yo-Yo test and recovery. Physical activity expressed in units of acceleration (g). (B) ECG recording of a patient with multiple artifacts in baseline signal, impeding an accurate analysis of QRS complexes. (C) Interpretable ECG recording.
Figure 2Relationship between treadmill ergospirometry and Yo-Yo intermittent recovery test level 1 in the calculation of maximum oxygen consumption (VO2 max).