| Literature DB >> 28348509 |
Lei Xu1, Xuebo Zheng1, Hongbiao Cui2, Zhenqiu Zhu1, Jiani Liang3, Jing Zhou1.
Abstract
Natural biomass ash of agricultural residuals was collected from a power plant and modified with hexagonal mesoporous silica and functionalized with 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane. The physicochemical and morphological properties of the biomass ash were analyzed by ICP-OES, SEM, TEM-EDS, FTIR, and BET analysis. The adsorption behavior of the modified product for Cd2+ in aqueous solution was studied as a function of pH, initial metal concentration, equilibrium time, and temperature. Results showed that the specific surface area of the modified product was 9 times that of the natural biomass ash. The modified biomass ash exhibited high affinity for Cd2+ and its adsorption capacity increased sharply with increasing pH from 4.0 to 6.0. The maximum adsorption capacity was 23.95 mg/g in a pH 5 solution with an initial metal concentration of 50 mg/L and a contact time of 90 min. The adsorption of Cd2+ onto the modified biomass ash was well fitted to the Langmuir model and it followed pseudo-second-order kinetics. Thermodynamic analysis results showed that the adsorption of Cd2+ was spontaneous and endothermic in nature. The results suggest that the modified biomass ash is promising for use as an inexpensive and effective adsorbent for Cd2+ removal from aqueous solution.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28348509 PMCID: PMC5350408 DOI: 10.1155/2017/3695604
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bioinorg Chem Appl Impact factor: 7.778
Elemental composition of biomass ash analyzed by ICP-OES.
| Element | Si | Ca | K | Al | Fe | Mg | Na | P | S | Mn | Ni | Zn | Cu | Cr | Pb | Cd |
| Proportion (%) | 12.04 | 4.31 | 3.31 | 2.11 | 1.08 | 0.65 | 0.42 | 0.41 | 0.073 | 0.034 | 0.018 | 0.015 | 0.0035 | 0.0022 | 0.0005 | 0.0002 |
Figure 1(a) SEM of biomass ash at 20 KeV; magnification 500. (b) SEM of synthesized matrix at 20 keV; magnification 500. (c) EDS analysis of elemental composition of biomass ash. (d) EDS analysis of elemental composition of modified biomass ash and (e) FT-IR spectra: (a) biomass ash and (b) synthesized matrix.
Comparison of the BET analysis of functionalized hexagonal mesoporous silica, biomass ash, and synthesized matrix.
| Analysis | Sample | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| HMS-NH2 [ | Fly ash | Fly ash + HMS | |
| BET surface | 17 | 21.38 ± 0.17 | 185.81 ± 0.15 |
Figure 2Effect of pH on the adsorption of Cd2+ on biomass ash and modified biomass ash (initial concentrations of Cd2+, 50 mg/L; biomass ash concentration, 4 g/L; T = 30°C).
Comparison of Cd2+ adsorption capacities of different absorbents.
| Absorbent | Adsorption capacity (mg/g) | pH | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Synthesized matrix | 25.00 | 5 | |
| Peanut shell | 0.93 | 5 | [ |
| Banana peel | 5.71 | 5 | [ |
| Biochar | 28.1 | 5 | [ |
| Coal fly ash | 11.43 | 5 | [ |
| Bentonite | 13.5 | 5.5 | [ |
| Sepiolite | 8.11 | 5 | [ |
| Zeolite | 6.72 | 6.5 | [ |
| Activated carbon | 20.36 | 6 | [ |
Values of the constants and fitting of the adjusted adsorption models.
| Adsorbent | Temp (°C) | Langmuir | Freundlich | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Biomass ash | 30 | 20.83 | 1.37 | 0.996 | 6.85 | 13.53 | 0.976 |
| 45 | 21.73 | 1.44 | 0.995 | 6.54 | 14.25 | 0.982 | |
| 60 | 22.22 | 1.67 | 0.994 | 6.45 | 14.57 | 0.986 | |
|
| |||||||
| Modified biomass ash | 30 | 25.00 | 2.50 | 0.970 | 3.03 | 15.94 | 0.960 |
| 45 | 25.64 | 3.55 | 0.974 | 3.34 | 16.48 | 0.953 | |
| 60 | 25.67 | 6.94 | 0.976 | 3.12 | 18.01 | 0.967 | |
Figure 3Langmuir model fit of modified biomass ash at different temperature.
Figure 4Sorption kinetics: concentration and removal (%) of Cd2+ from aqueous solution versus sorption time (initial concentrations of Cd2+, 100 mg/L; biomass ash concentration, 2 g/L; T = 30°C; initial pH 5.0).
Kinetic parameters for biomass ash and the synthesized matrix.
| Adsorbent | Temp (°C) | Pseudo-first-order model | Pseudo-second-order model | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Biomass ash | 30 | 8.8 × 10−3 | 0.724 | 3.71 × 10−3 | 0.999 |
| Synthesized matrix | 9 × 10−3 | 0.433 | 1.60 × 10−2 | 1 | |
Figure 5Plots of the pseudo-second-order kinetics for the adsorptions of Cd2+ on biomass ash and the synthesized matrix (initial concentrations of Cd2+, 100 mg/L; biomass ash concentration, 2 g/L; T = 30°C; pH 5.0).
Thermodynamic parameters for the synthesized matrix.
| Temp (°C) | Thermodynamic parameters | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Δ | Δ | Δ | |
| 30 | −2.31 | 39.35 | 137.49 |
| 45 | −3.35 | ||
| 60 | −5.63 | ||