Matthew Luckman1, Didier Hans2, Natalia Cortez3, Kyle K Nishiyama3, Sanchita Agarawal3, Chengchen Zhang3, Lucas Nikkel4, Sapna Iyer5, Maria Fusaro6, Edward X Guo7, Donald J McMahon3, Elizabeth Shane3, Thomas L Nickolas8. 1. Institute of Human Nutrition and Departments of. 2. Center of Bone Diseases, Bone and Joint Department, Medical University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland. 3. Medicine and. 4. Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York. 5. Department of Medicine, Kaiser Oakland Medical Center, Oakland, California; and. 6. Institute of Clinical Physiology, National Research Council, Pisa, Italy. 7. Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, New York. 8. Medicine and tln2001@cumc.columbia.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Studies using high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography showed progressive abnormalities in cortical and trabecular microarchitecture and biomechanical competence over the first year after kidney transplantation. However, high-resolution peripheral computed tomography is a research tool lacking wide availability. In contrast, the trabecular bone score is a novel and widely available tool that uses gray-scale variograms of the spine image from dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry to assess trabecular quality. There are no studies assessing whether trabecular bone score characterizes bone quality in kidney transplant recipients. DESIGN, SETTINGS, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Between 2009 and 2010, we conducted a study to assess changes in peripheral skeletal microarchitecture, measured by high-resolution peripheral computed tomography, during the first year after transplantation in 47 patients managed with early corticosteroid-withdrawal immunosuppression. All adult first-time transplant candidates were eligible. Patients underwent imaging with high-resolution peripheral computed tomography and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry pretransplantation and 3, 6, and 12 months post-transplantation. We now test if, during the first year after transplantation, trabecular bone score assesses the evolution of bone microarchitecture and biomechanical competence as determined by high-resolution peripheral computed tomography. RESULTS: At baseline and follow-up, among the 72% and 78%, respectively, of patients having normal bone mineral density by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, 53% and 50%, respectively, were classified by trabecular bone score as having high fracture risk. At baseline, trabecular bone score correlated with spine, hip, and ultradistal radius bone mineral density by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and cortical area, density, thickness, and porosity; trabecular density, thickness, separation, and heterogeneity; and stiffness and failure load by high-resolution peripheral computed tomography. Longitudinally, each percentage increase in trabecular bone score was associated with increases in trabecular number (0.35%±1.4%); decreases in trabecular thickness (-0.45%±0.15%), separation (-0.40%±0.15%), and network heterogeneity (-0.48%±0.20%); and increases in failure load (0.22%±0.09%) by high-resolution peripheral computed tomography (all P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Trabecular bone score may be a useful method to assess and monitor bone quality and strength and classify fracture risk in kidney transplant recipients.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Studies using high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography showed progressive abnormalities in cortical and trabecular microarchitecture and biomechanical competence over the first year after kidney transplantation. However, high-resolution peripheral computed tomography is a research tool lacking wide availability. In contrast, the trabecular bone score is a novel and widely available tool that uses gray-scale variograms of the spine image from dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry to assess trabecular quality. There are no studies assessing whether trabecular bone score characterizes bone quality in kidney transplant recipients. DESIGN, SETTINGS, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Between 2009 and 2010, we conducted a study to assess changes in peripheral skeletal microarchitecture, measured by high-resolution peripheral computed tomography, during the first year after transplantation in 47 patients managed with early corticosteroid-withdrawal immunosuppression. All adult first-time transplant candidates were eligible. Patients underwent imaging with high-resolution peripheral computed tomography and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry pretransplantation and 3, 6, and 12 months post-transplantation. We now test if, during the first year after transplantation, trabecular bone score assesses the evolution of bone microarchitecture and biomechanical competence as determined by high-resolution peripheral computed tomography. RESULTS: At baseline and follow-up, among the 72% and 78%, respectively, of patients having normal bone mineral density by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, 53% and 50%, respectively, were classified by trabecular bone score as having high fracture risk. At baseline, trabecular bone score correlated with spine, hip, and ultradistal radius bone mineral density by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and cortical area, density, thickness, and porosity; trabecular density, thickness, separation, and heterogeneity; and stiffness and failure load by high-resolution peripheral computed tomography. Longitudinally, each percentage increase in trabecular bone score was associated with increases in trabecular number (0.35%±1.4%); decreases in trabecular thickness (-0.45%±0.15%), separation (-0.40%±0.15%), and network heterogeneity (-0.48%±0.20%); and increases in failure load (0.22%±0.09%) by high-resolution peripheral computed tomography (all P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Trabecular bone score may be a useful method to assess and monitor bone quality and strength and classify fracture risk in kidney transplant recipients.
Authors: Barbara Campolina Silva; Stephanie Boutroy; Chiyuan Zhang; Donald Jay McMahon; Bin Zhou; Ji Wang; Julia Udesky; Serge Cremers; Marta Sarquis; Xiang-Dong Edward Guo; Didier Hans; John Paul Bilezikian Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2013-03-22 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Helena Johansson; John A Kanis; Anders Odén; Eugene McCloskey; Roland D Chapurlat; Claus Christiansen; Steve R Cummings; Adolfo Diez-Perez; John A Eisman; Saeko Fujiwara; Claus-C Glüer; David Goltzman; Didier Hans; Kay-Tee Khaw; Marc-Antoine Krieg; Heikki Kröger; Andrea Z LaCroix; Edith Lau; William D Leslie; Dan Mellström; L Joseph Melton; Terence W O'Neill; Julie A Pasco; Jerilynn C Prior; David M Reid; Fernando Rivadeneira; Tjerd van Staa; Noriko Yoshimura; M Carola Zillikens Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: R Kocijan; C Muschitz; J Haschka; D Hans; A Nia; A Geroldinger; M Ardelt; R Wakolbinger; H Resch Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2015-05-09 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: N C Harvey; C C Glüer; N Binkley; E V McCloskey; M-L Brandi; C Cooper; D Kendler; O Lamy; A Laslop; B M Camargos; J-Y Reginster; R Rizzoli; J A Kanis Journal: Bone Date: 2015-05-16 Impact factor: 4.398
Authors: Eugene V McCloskey; Anders Odén; Nicholas C Harvey; William D Leslie; Didier Hans; Helena Johansson; John A Kanis Journal: Calcif Tissue Int Date: 2015-03-22 Impact factor: 4.333