Literature DB >> 28347592

A review of the established and suspected causes of variations in human sex ratio at birth.

William H James1, Victor Grech2.   

Abstract

The human sex ratio (proportion male) at birth (SRB) varies with many variables. Some of this variation has an established proximate cause. For instance, low SRB (more females) at birth are associated with various forms of stressful events or circumstances during or prior to pregnancy. These low SRB are almost certainly mainly caused by maternal-stress-induced male foetal loss. Other types of SRB variation are thought to be caused by hormonal variation in either or both parents around the time of conception. One or other of these two types of proximate cause seems to be responsible for most of the established variation of SRB. This will be illustrated here in respect of some selected forms of SRB variation. It seems likely that a clarification of the hormonal causes of SRB variation will also help explain the striking (apparent) inconsistencies in the results of reported tests of the influential Trivers-Willard hypothesis. It is further proposed that an appreciation of the evidence that parental hormones influence SRB may enhance understanding of several important pathologies (hepatitis B, toxoplasmosis, testicular cancer, prostate cancer and autism).
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28347592     DOI: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2017.03.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Early Hum Dev        ISSN: 0378-3782            Impact factor:   2.079


  10 in total

1.  Detecting the Effects of Early-Life Exposures: Why Fecundity Matters.

Authors:  Jenna Nobles; Amar Hamoudi
Journal:  Popul Res Policy Rev       Date:  2019-11-26

Review 2.  Selection in utero and population health: Theory and typology of research.

Authors:  Tim A Bruckner; Ralph Catalano
Journal:  SSM Popul Health       Date:  2018-06-02

3.  Outcome of the 2016 United States presidential election and the subsequent sex ratio at birth in Canada: an ecological study.

Authors:  Ravi Retnakaran; Chang Ye
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  GWAS on birth year infant mortality rates provides evidence of recent natural selection.

Authors:  Yuchang Wu; Shiro Furuya; Zihang Wang; Jenna E Nobles; Jason M Fletcher; Qiongshi Lu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 12.779

5.  Observable variations in human sex ratio at birth.

Authors:  Yanan Long; Qi Chen; Henrik Larsson; Andrey Rzhetsky
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  COVID-19 onset reduced the sex ratio at birth in South Africa.

Authors:  Gwinyai Masukume; Margaret Ryan; Rumbidzai Masukume; Dorota Zammit; Victor Grech; Witness Mapanga
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 3.061

7.  Increased male live-birth rates after blastocyst-stage frozen-thawed embryo transfers compared with cleavage-stage frozen-thawed embryo transfers: a SART registry study.

Authors:  Barry E Perlman; Evelyn Minis; Patricia Greenberg; Kavitha Krishnamoorthy; Sara S Morelli; Sangita K Jindal; Peter G McGovern
Journal:  F S Rep       Date:  2021-02-26

8.  NO BABY BOOM OR SEX RATIO CHANGES FOLLOWING FIFTY SHADES OF GREY IN ENGLAND AND WALES.

Authors:  Victor Grech
Journal:  Ulster Med J       Date:  2017-09-12

9.  Genetic responsiveness of African buffalo to environmental stressors: A role for epigenetics in balancing autosomal and sex chromosome interactions?

Authors:  Pim van Hooft; Eric R Dougherty; Wayne M Getz; Barend J Greyling; Bas J Zwaan; Armanda D S Bastos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  How does the two-child policy affect the sex ratio at birth in China? A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  S L Fan; C N Xiao; Y K Zhang; Y L Li; X L Wang; L Wang
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 3.295

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.