Literature DB >> 28347134

Evaluating Droplet Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction for the Quantification of Human Genomic DNA: Lifting the Traceability Fog.

Margaret C Kline1, David L Duewer1.   

Abstract

Digital polymerase chain reaction (dPCR) end point platforms directly estimate the number of DNA target copies per reaction partition, λ, where the partitions are fixed-location chambers (cdPCR) or aqueous droplets floating in oil (ddPCR). For use in the certification of target concentration in primary calibrant certified reference materials (CRMs), both λ and the partition volume, V, must be metrologically traceable to some accessible reference system, ideally, the International System of Units (SI). The fixed spatial distribution of cdPCR chambers enables real-time monitoring of PCR amplification. Analysis of the resulting reaction curves enables validation of the critical dPCR assumptions that are essential for establishing the SI traceability of λ. We know of no direct method for validating these assumptions for ddPCR platforms. The manufacturers of the cdPCR and ddPCR systems available to us do not provide traceable partition volume specifications. Our colleagues at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have developed a reliable method for determining ddPCR droplet volume and have demonstrated that different ddPCR reagents yield droplets of somewhat different size. Thus, neither dPCR platform by itself provides metrologically traceable estimates of target concentration. We show here that evaluating split samples with both cdPCR and ddPCR platforms can transfer the λ traceability characteristics of a cdPCR assay to its ddPCR analogue, establishing fully traceable ddPCR estimates of CRM target concentration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28347134     DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b00240

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Chem        ISSN: 0003-2700            Impact factor:   6.986


  6 in total

1.  Evaluating digital PCR for the quantification of human nuclear DNA: determining target strandedness.

Authors:  Margaret C Kline; David L Duewer
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2020-05-30       Impact factor: 4.142

2.  Limitations of methods for measuring the concentration of human genomic DNA and oligonucleotide samples.

Authors:  Hua-Jun He; Erica V Stein; Paul DeRose; Kenneth D Cole
Journal:  Biotechniques       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 1.993

3.  Evaluating droplet digital PCR for the quantification of human genomic DNA: converting copies per nanoliter to nanograms nuclear DNA per microliter.

Authors:  David L Duewer; Margaret C Kline; Erica L Romsos; Blaza Toman
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 4.142

4.  Droplet volume variability as a critical factor for accuracy of absolute quantification using droplet digital PCR.

Authors:  Alexandra Bogožalec Košir; Carla Divieto; Jernej Pavšič; Stefano Pavarelli; David Dobnik; Tanja Dreo; Roberto Bellotti; Maria Paola Sassi; Jana Žel
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 4.142

5.  Steps to achieve quantitative measurements of microRNA using two step droplet digital PCR.

Authors:  Erica V Stein; David L Duewer; Natalia Farkas; Erica L Romsos; Lili Wang; Kenneth D Cole
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Development and interlaboratory evaluation of a NIST Reference Material RM 8366 for EGFR and MET gene copy number measurements.

Authors:  Hua-Jun He; Biswajit Das; Megan H Cleveland; Li Chen; Corinne E Camalier; Liang-Chun Liu; Kara L Norman; Andrew P Fellowes; Christopher R McEvoy; Steve P Lund; Jamie Almeida; Carolyn R Steffen; Chris Karlovich; P Mickey Williams; Kenneth D Cole
Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 3.694

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.