Literature DB >> 28346643

Evaluating the quality and readability of Internet information sources regarding the treatment of swallowing disorders.

Ashley P O'Connell Ferster1, Amanda Hu.   

Abstract

The Internet has become a popular resource for patient education. The information it provides, however, is rarely peer-reviewed, and its quality may be a concern. Since the average American reads at an 8th grade level, the American Medical Association and the National Institutes of Health have recommended that health information be written at a 4th to 6th grade level. We performed a study to assess the quality and readability of online information regarding the treatment of swallowing disorders. A Google search for "swallowing treatment" was conducted. We studied the first 50 websites that appeared on the search engine's results with the use of the DISCERN quality index tool, the Flesch Ease of Reading Score (FRES), and the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) readability test. DISCERN is a validated 16-item questionnaire used to assess the quality of written health information; FRES and FKGL are used to assess readability. We classified the websites as either patient-targeted or professional-targeted sites, as well as either major or minor. The overall DISCERN score was 1.61 ± 0.61 (range: 1 to 5), the overall FRES was 39.1 ± 19.0 (range: 1 to 100), and the overall FKGL was 11.8 ± 3.4 (range: 3 to 12). As would be expected, patient-targeted websites had significantly higher FRES and significantly lower FKGL scores than did the professional-targeted websites (p = 0.01 and p = 0.04, respectively); there was no significant difference between the two in DISCERN scores. The major websites had significantly higher DISCERN scores than did the minor sites (p = 0.002); there were no significant differences in FRES and FKGL scores. We conclude that online information sources regarding the treatment of swallowing disorders were of suboptimal quality in that information was written at a level too difficult for the average American to easily understand. Also, the patient-targeted websites were written at a lower reading level, and the major websites contained a higher quality of information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28346643     DOI: 10.1177/014556131709600312

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Nose Throat J        ISSN: 0145-5613            Impact factor:   1.697


  8 in total

1.  Assessment of Online Patient Education Material About Dysphagia.

Authors:  Sarah M Steiner; Bonnie K Slavych; Richard I Zraick
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 2.733

2.  Evaluation of the Quality of Otolaryngology Information on Persian Websites.

Authors:  Ali Kouhi; Sasan Dabiri; Alireza Mohseni; Mohammadtaha Kouchakinezhad Eramsadati
Journal:  Iran J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-07

3.  Assessment of the quality and readability of online information on autopsy for the general public: a cross-sectional analysis.

Authors:  Brian Hanley; Philip Brown; Shane O'Neill; Michael Osborn
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Readability and quality assessment of internet-based patient education materials related to nasal septoplasty.

Authors:  Elysia M Grose; Connor P Holmes; Kaishan A Aravinthan; Vincent Wu; John M Lee
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2021-03-17

5.  Internet-Based Patient Education Materials Regarding Diabetic Foot Ulcers: Readability and Quality Assessment.

Authors:  David Michael Lee; Elysia Grose; Karen Cross
Journal:  JMIR Diabetes       Date:  2022-01-11

6.  Readability of Online Materials Related to Vocal Cord Leukoplakia.

Authors:  Matthew Shneyderman; Grace E Snow; Ruth Davis; Simon Best; Lee M Akst
Journal:  OTO Open       Date:  2021-08-09

7.  Quality and readability of online information on idiopathic subglottic stenosis.

Authors:  Austin Heffernan; Amanda Hu
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-08-10

8.  Readability of the American, Canadian, and British Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Societies' Patient Materials.

Authors:  Joo Hyun Kim; Elysia Grose; Justine Philteos; David Forner; Christopher W Noel; Vincent Wu; Antoine Eskander
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2021-08-10       Impact factor: 5.591

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.