| Literature DB >> 28344413 |
Ali M Ahmed1, Dalia M Hamed2, Nagwa T Elsharawy3.
Abstract
AIM: The main objectives of this study were for comparing the effect of batteries and deep litter rearing systems of domesticated Japanese quail, Coturnix coturnix japonica, on the concentration levels of cadmium, copper, lead, and zinc from the quail meat and offal in Ismailia, Egypt.Entities:
Keywords: batteries; deep litter; heavy metals; offal; poultry meat
Year: 2017 PMID: 28344413 PMCID: PMC5352855 DOI: 10.14202/vetworld.2017.262-269
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet World ISSN: 0972-8988
Statistical analytical results of mean concentration levels of cadmium, copper, lead, and zinc in water samples and feeds samples (n=20).
| Groups | Water samples | Feed samples | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Metals | Minimum | Maximum | Mean±SE | Minimum | Maximum | Mean±SE | |
| Group I | Cadmium | 0.001 | 0.014 | 0.010a±0.002 | 0.640 | 1.320 | 1.114a±0.128 |
| Copper | 0.014 | 0.036 | 0.027a±0.004 | 0.990 | 2.070 | 1.606a±0.174 | |
| Lead | 0.011 | 0.319 | 0.137a±0.015 | 5.340 | 6.290 | 5.822a±0.196 | |
| Zinc | 0.146 | 0.963 | 0.516a±0.134 | 30.25 | 38.90 | 35.11b±1.564 | |
| Group II | Cadmium | 0.011 | 0.400 | 0.093b±0.023 | 1.940 | 3.590 | 3.010b±0.291 |
| Copper | 0.056 | 1.348 | 0.832b±0.240 | 1.680 | 3.190 | 2.576b±0.258 | |
| Lead | 0.090 | 0.508 | 0.601b±0.038 | 5.170 | 7.210 | 5.852ab±0.396 | |
| Zinc | 0.241 | 5.210 | 1.651b±0.915 | 20.36 | 28.36 | 23.62a±1.345 | |
Group 1: Battery system, Group 2: Deep litter system, Mean in the column has different letter is significantly difference (p≤0.05). SE=Standard error
Statistical analytical results of mean concentration levels of cadmium and copper in quail meat samples (n=20).
| Items | Cadmium | Copper | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group I | Group II | Group I | Group II | |||||||||
| Meat | Offal | Meat | Offal | Meat | Offal | Meat | Offal | |||||
| Liver | Kidney | Liver | Kidney | Liver | Kidney | Liver | Kidney | |||||
| Minimum | 0.010 | 0.10 | 0.12 | 0.010 | 0.09 | 0.16 | 4.300 | 2.40 | 1.89 | 3.580 | 2.55 | 1.14 |
| Maximum | 0.110 | 0.28 | 0.41 | 0.041 | 0.23 | 0.36 | 7.800 | 9.25 | 6.63 | 7.510 | 9.14 | 6.34 |
| Mean±SE | 0.058a±0.02 | 0.15a±0.02 | 0.24b±0.01 | 0.086b±0.01 | 0.13ab±0.01 | 0.20ab±0.01 | 5.902a±0.59 | 8.32a±1.80 | 4.21c±1.52 | 6.092ab±0.54 | 8.88ab±1.32 | 5.00cd±10.2 |
Group I: Battery system, Group II: Deep litter system, Mean in the column has different letter is significantly difference (p≤0.05). SE=Standard error
Figure-1Frequency distribution of concentration levels of cadmium, copper, lead, and zinc in the quail meat with compared to Egyptian standard.
Statistical analytical results of mean concentration levels of lead and zinc in quail meat samples (n=20).
| Items | Lead | Zinc | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group I | Group II | Group I | Group II | |||||||||
| Meat | Offal | Meat | Offal | Meat | Offal | Meat | Offal | |||||
| Liver | Kidney | Liver | Kidney | Liver | Kidney | Liver | Kidney | |||||
| Minimum | 0.090 | 0.84 | 0.98 | 0.070 | 0.70 | 0.90 | 1.050 | 1.66 | 1.20 | 1.110 | 2.11 | 1.90 |
| Maximum | 0.730 | 2.54 | 3.02 | 0.450 | 2.01 | 2.14 | 1.420 | 532 | 6.21 | 1.380 | 6.11 | 5.55 |
| Mean±SE | 0.244a±0.05 | 1.05a±0.08 | 1.96a±0.07 | 0.136b±0.04 | 0.95b±0.04 | 1.56d±0.05 | 1.290a±0.06 | 3.41a±0.25 | 4.03c±1.01 | 1.280a±0.06 | 4.21ab±1.10 | 3.78cd±0.74 |
Group I: Battery system, Group II: Deep litter system, Mean in the column has different letter is significantly difference (p≤0.05). SE=Standard error