| Literature DB >> 28344279 |
Muhammad Humayun1, Zhijun Li2, Liqun Sun3, Xuliang Zhang4, Fazal Raziq5, Amir Zada6, Yang Qu7, Liqiang Jing8.
Abstract
In this work we have successfully fabricated nanocrystalline anatase TiO₂/perovskite-type porous nanosized LaFeO₃ (T/P-LFO) nanocomposites using a simple wet chemical method. It is clearly demonstrated by means of atmosphere-controlled steady-state surface photovoltage spectroscopy (SPS) responses, photoluminescence spectra, and fluorescence spectra related to the formed OH- radical amount that the photogenerated charge carriers in the resultant T/P-LFO nanocomposites with a proper mole ratio percentage of TiO₂ display much higher separation in comparison to the P-LFO alone. This is highly responsible for the improved visible-light activities of T/P-LFO nanocomposites for photocatalytic degradation of gas-phase acetaldehyde and liquid-phase phenol. This work will provide a feasible route to synthesize visible-light responsive nano-photocatalysts for efficient solar energy utilization.Entities:
Keywords: X-ray diffraction; catalytic properties; chemical synthesis; nanostructures; semiconductors
Year: 2016 PMID: 28344279 PMCID: PMC5302529 DOI: 10.3390/nano6010022
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns (A) and UV-vis diffuse reflectance (UV-vis DRS) spectra (B) of Porous-LaFeO3 (P-LFO) TiO2 (T) and TiO2/P-LFO (T/P-LFO) nanocomposites; Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image of P-LFO with inset selected area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern (C); TEM image of 9T/P-LFO with inset high resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) image (D).
Figure 2Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) micrograph of P-LFO (A) and 9T/P-LFO nanocomposite (B).
Figure 3X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) survey spectra of P-LFO and 9T/P-LFO nanocomposite (A); with high resolution images La3d (B); Fe2p (C); O1s (D); Ti2p (E).
Figure 4N2 adsorption/desorption isotherms (A) and pore diameter (B) of P-LFO and 9T/P-LFO nanocomposite.
Figure 5Surface photovoltage spectroscopy (SPS) responses of P-LFO (A) and 9T/P-LFO (B) in different atmospheres; SPS responses of P-LFO and T/P-LFO nanocomposites in air (C); Photoluminescence (PL) responses of P-LFO and T/P-LFO nanocomposites (D).
Figure 6Visible-light photocatalytic activity for acetaldehyde and phenol degradation (A) and OH− radical amount related Fluorescence spectra (B) of P-LFO and T/P-LFO nanocomposites.
Figure 7Scheme for energy band gaps and the mechanism for photogenerated charge separation and transfer in the fabricated T/P-LFO nanocomposite.