Literature DB >> 28344028

Fracture patterns after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy of the mandibular ramus according to the Obwegeser/Dal Pont and Hunsuck/Epker modifications.

Stephan Christian Möhlhenrich1, Kristian Kniha2, Florian Peters2, Nassim Ayoub2, Evgeny Goloborodko2, Frank Hölzle2, Ulrike Fritz3, Ali Modabber2.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the fracture patterns after sagittal split osteotomy according to Obwegeser/Dal Pont (ODP) and Hunsuck/Epker (HE), as well as to investigate the relationship between lateral bone cut ending or angle and the incidence of unfavorable/bad splits. Postoperative cone-beam computed tomograms of 124 splits according to ODP and 60 according to HE were analyzed. ODP led to 75.8% and HE led to 60% lingual fractures with mandibular foramen contact. Horizontal fractures were found in 9.7% and 6.7%, respectively, and unfavorable/bad splits were found in 11.3% and 10%, respectively. The lateral osteotomy angle was 106.22° (SD 12.03)° for bad splits and 106.6° (SD 13.12)° for favorable splits. Correlations were found between favorable fracture patterns and split modifications and between buccal ending of the lateral bone cut and bad splits (p < 0.001). No relationship was observed between split modifications (p = 0.792) or the osteotomy angle (p = 0.937) and the incidence of unfavorable/bad splits. Split modifications had no influence on the incidence of unfavorable/bad splits, but the buccal ending of the lateral bone cut did have an influence. More lingual fractures with mandibular foramen contact are expected with the ODP modification. The osteotomy angle did not differ between favorable and bad splits.
Copyright © 2017 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BSSO; Bilateral sagittal split osteotomy; Fracture pattern; Hunsuck/Epker; Obwegeser/Dal Pont

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28344028     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2017.02.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg        ISSN: 1010-5182            Impact factor:   2.078


  3 in total

1.  Does the type of sagittal split ramus osteotomy influence fixation strength? Evaluation of the mechanical behavior of two types of fixation used in three types of sagittal split ramus osteotomy.

Authors:  Soraya da Silva Oliveira; Pedro Henrique Mattos de Carvalho; Cássio Edvard Sverzut; Alexandre Elias Trivellato
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2022-01-12

2.  Differences in the Buccal Bone Marrow Distance of ≤0.8 mm in the Mandible of Patients Undergoing Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy among the Different Skeletal Patterns: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Yu-Chuan Tseng; Shih-Wei Liang; Szu-Ting Chou; Shih-Chieh Chen; Chin-Yun Pan; Chun-Ming Chen
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 4.241

3.  Dal Pont vs Hunsuck: Which Technique Can Lead to a Lower Incidence of Bad Split during Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy? A Triple-blind Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Farhad Zeynalzadeh; Zahra Shooshtari; Majid Eshghpour; Seied Hosein Hoseini Zarch; Elahe Tohidi; Sahand Samieirad
Journal:  World J Plast Surg       Date:  2021-09
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.