Literature DB >> 28342902

Spearman-Brown prophecy formula and Cronbach's alpha: different faces of reliability and opportunities for new applications.

Henrica C W de Vet1, Lidwine B Mokkink2, David G Mosmuller3, Caroline B Terwee2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: There are similarities between the different forms of reliability, such as internal consistency (internal reliability) and interrater and intrarater reliability. Reliability coefficients that are based on classical test theory can be expressed as intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), such as Cronbach's alpha. The Spearman-Brown prophecy formula (SB formula) is used to calculate the reliability when the number of items in a questionnaire is changed. This paper aims to increase insight into reliability studies by pointing to the assumptions of reliability coefficients, similarities between various coefficients, and the subsequent new applications of reliability coefficients. DESIGN, SETTINGS AND
RESULTS: The origin and assumptions of Cronbach's alpha and the SB formula are discussed. Cronbach's alpha is written as an ICC formula, using the well-known property that taking the average value of a number of ratings increases the reliability of a measurement. We illustrate with an example that the ICC formulas for average measurements of multiple raters and the SB formula give similar results. This implies that the SB formula can be used to decide on the number of measurements to be averaged and thus on the number of raters required, for obtaining measurements with acceptable reliability, even if the variance components of the ICC formula are not known. Using the same example, we illustrate the principle of "Cronbach's alpha if item deleted" to decide on the poorest performing raters in a set of raters.
CONCLUSION: These applications have different assumptions: the principle of "Cronbach's alpha if item deleted" is based on the assumption of a fixed set of items/raters and the SB formula is based on the assumption of random raters. The example also emphasizes the need for more raters in the design of the reliability study to obtain a robust estimation of reliability.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Classical test theory; Cronbach's alpha; Intraclass correlation coefficient; Reliability; Spearman–Brown prophecy formula

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28342902     DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.01.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  22 in total

1.  The Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of Confusion Assessment Method Based Scoring System for Delirium Severity (CAM-S).

Authors:  Xinchun Mei; Yupeng Chen; Hailin Zheng; Zhongyong Shi; Edward R Marcantonio; Zhongcong Xie; Yuan Shen
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 4.472

2.  Distinguishing semantic control and phonological control and their role in aphasic deficits: A task switching investigation.

Authors:  Joshua McCall; Candace M van der Stelt; Andrew DeMarco; J Vivian Dickens; Elizabeth Dvorak; Elizabeth Lacey; Sarah Snider; Rhonda Friedman; Peter Turkeltaub
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 3.054

3.  Validation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the questionnaire for the assessment of pelvic floor disorders and their risk factors during pregnancy and postpartum.

Authors:  Renata Cristina Martins da Silva Vieira; Jordana Barbosa da Silva; Ricardo de Carvalho Cavalli; Patricia Driusso
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 1.932

4.  Screening for more with less: Validation of the Global Appraisal of Individual Needs Quick v3 (GAIN-Q3) screeners.

Authors:  Michael L Dennis; Jordan P Davis
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2021-04-15

5.  Reliability and validity of the Persian version of readiness for inter-professional learning scale.

Authors:  Marzieh Ataollahi; Mitra Amini; Somayeh Delavari; Leila Bazrafkan; Peyman Jafari
Journal:  Int J Med Educ       Date:  2019-11-04

6.  Psychometric validation of Swedish and Arabic versions of two health literacy questionnaires, eHEALS and HLS-EU-Q16, for use in a Swedish context: a study protocol.

Authors:  Josefin M Wangdahl; Karuna Dahlberg; Maria Jaensson; Ulrica Nilsson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-09-17       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  The Swedish Version of the Electronic Health Literacy Scale: Prospective Psychometric Evaluation Study Including Thresholds Levels.

Authors:  Josefin Wångdahl; Maria Jaensson; Karuna Dahlberg; Ulrica Nilsson
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 4.773

8.  Reliability of Multiple Mini-Interviews and traditional interviews within and between institutions: a study of five California medical schools.

Authors:  Anthony Jerant; Mark C Henderson; Erin Griffin; Julie A Rainwater; Theodore R Hall; Carolyn J Kelly; Ellena M Peterson; David Wofsy; Peter Franks
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 2.463

9.  Validation of the Schieman and Young measurement scales for work contact, work-family conflict, working conditions, psychological distress and sleep problems in construction industry professionals.

Authors:  Paul Bowen; Rajen Govender; Peter Edwards
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Assessment of a Simulated Case-Based Measurement of Physician Diagnostic Performance.

Authors:  Souvik Chatterjee; Sanjay Desai; Reza Manesh; Junfeng Sun; Shantanu Nundy; Scott M Wright
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2019-01-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.