Literature DB >> 28342775

The Cash and Counseling model of self-directed long-term care: Effectiveness with young adults with disabilities.

Melissa L Harry1, Kevin J Mahoney2, Ellen K Mahoney3, Ce Shen4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Young adults with disabilities face numerous barriers to independence and achieving markers of adulthood. Qualitative evidence suggests that flexible, self-directed budgets for purchasing home and community-based services might help fill an identified service gap and help improve the transition to adulthood for this group.
OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of the Cash and Counseling model of self-directed budgets for young adults with long-term care disabilities by analyzing secondary data from the Cash and Counseling Demonstration and Evaluation randomized control trial.
METHODS: We compared nine-month community involvement, satisfaction rating, health status rating compared to peers, and unmet needs outcomes using bivariate and multivariate logistic regression. Our sample included 456 participants aged 18 to 30 randomized to treatment groups with the opportunity to receive Cash and Counseling (n = 207) or control groups eligible for agency-based care (n = 249), whether self-reported (n = 128) or by proxy (n = 328).
RESULTS: Multivariate logistic regression models showed that compared to controls at nine-month follow-up, treatment group members had significantly greater odds of being very satisfied with life, when care was received, the care arrangement, transportation, help around the house and community, personal care, and getting along with paid attendants, and significantly lower odds of unmet needs with medication and routine health care at home and with transportation.
CONCLUSIONS: Cash and Counseling performed better than or comparable with agency-based care for young adults with long-term care disabilities, suggesting its viability as a service option for this population.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Disability; Home and community-based services; Long-term care; Self-directed budget; Young adult

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28342775     DOI: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2017.03.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Disabil Health J        ISSN: 1876-7583            Impact factor:   2.554


  3 in total

1.  Exploring Metro and Non-metro Differences in Satisfaction With Services and Community Participation Among Low-Income Personal Assistance Service Users.

Authors:  Rayna Sage; Krys Standley; Genna M Mashinchi
Journal:  Front Rehabil Sci       Date:  2022-06-02

2.  Understanding the factors that influence the quality of paid disability support for adults with acquired neurological disability and complex needs: a scoping review protocol.

Authors:  Megan Topping; Jacinta Douglas; Di Winkler
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-12-29       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Preference of Older Adults for Flexibility in Service and Providers in Community-Based Social Care: A Discrete Choice Experiment.

Authors:  Kailu Wang; Eliza Lai-Yi Wong; Amy Yuen-Kwan Wong; Annie Wai-Ling Cheung; Eng-Kiong Yeoh
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-08       Impact factor: 3.390

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.