Literature DB >> 28342296

Control of osmotic pressure to improve cell viability in cell-laden tissue engineering constructs.

A F Carvalho1,2, L Gasperini1,2, R S Ribeiro1,2, A P Marques1,2, R L Reis1,2.   

Abstract

Design of tissue engineering strategies deals with the need to balance both biomaterials characteristics and techniques specificities, often resulting in cell-compromising processing conditions. One important factor often disregarded is the osmotic pressure to which cells are exposed. An in-house microfluidic system was used to prove that addition of an osmotic regulator significantly benefits the generation of viable cell-laden hydrogels under harsh processing conditions. Human adipose-derived stem cells were resuspended in 1.5% alginate and 1% gellan gum (GG; w/v) solutions containing different concentrations (0.12 m, 0.25 m and 1.5 m) of sucrose as osmotic regulator. GG (in water) and alginate (in water or phosphate-buffered saline) solutions were used to vary the conditions under which cells were kept prior processing. Independently of the polymer, addition of sucrose did not affect the processing conditions or the viscosity of the solutions, except at 1.5 m. The obtained results clearly demonstrate that inclusion of 0.25 m sucrose during processing of the cell-laden hydrogels allowed to keep cell viability around 80%, in opposition to the 20% observed in its absence, both for GG and alginate-derived hydrogels prepared in water. Impressively, the level of cell viability observed with the inclusion of 0.25 m sucrose, 76% for GG and 86% for alginate, was similar to that obtained with the standard alginate solution prepared in phosphate-buffered saline (82%). The beneficial effect of sucrose was observed within the first 5 min of processing and was maintained for prolonged experimental setups with viability values above 50%, even after a 2-h time-frame and independently of the material.
Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bioprinting; cell viability; cell-laden hydrogels; microfluidics; osmotic regulator; sucrose

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28342296     DOI: 10.1002/term.2432

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Tissue Eng Regen Med        ISSN: 1932-6254            Impact factor:   3.963


  2 in total

1.  Relaxation of Extracellular Matrix Forces Directs Crypt Formation and Architecture in Intestinal Organoids.

Authors:  Ella A Hushka; F Max Yavitt; Tobin E Brown; Peter J Dempsey; Kristi S Anseth
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 9.933

Review 2.  Biomechanical factors in three-dimensional tissue bioprinting.

Authors:  Liqun Ning; Carmen J Gil; Boeun Hwang; Andrea S Theus; Lilanni Perez; Martin L Tomov; Holly Bauser-Heaton; Vahid Serpooshan
Journal:  Appl Phys Rev       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 19.162

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.