Literature DB >> 28342274

A feasibility study for enrichment of highly aggressive cancer subpopulations by their biophysical properties via dielectrophoresis enhanced with synergistic fluid flow.

Temple Anne Douglas1, Jaka Cemazar1, Nikita Balani1, Daniel C Sweeney1, Eva M Schmelz2, Rafael V Davalos1.   

Abstract

A common problem with cancer treatment is the development of treatment resistance and tumor recurrence that result from treatments that kill most tumor cells yet leave behind aggressive cells to repopulate. Presented here is a microfluidic device that can be used to isolate tumor subpopulations to optimize treatment selection. Dielectrophoresis (DEP) is a phenomenon where particles are polarized by an electric field and move along the electric field gradient. Different cell subpopulations have different DEP responses depending on their bioelectrical phenotype, which, we hypothesize, correlate with aggressiveness. We have designed a microfluidic device in which a region containing posts locally distorts the electric field created by an AC voltage and forces cells toward the posts through DEP. This force is balanced with a simultaneous drag force from fluid motion that pulls cells away from the posts. We have shown that by adjusting the drag force, cells with aggressive phenotypes are influenced more by the DEP force and trap on posts while others flow through the chip unaffected. Utilizing single-cell trapping via cell-sized posts coupled with a drag-DEP force balance, we show that separation of similar cell subpopulations may be achieved, a result that was previously impossible with DEP alone. Separated subpopulations maintain high viability downstream, and remain in a native state, without fluorescent labeling. These cells can then be cultured to help select a therapy that kills aggressive subpopulations equally or better than the bulk of the tumor, mitigating resistance and recurrence.
© 2017 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biophysics; Cell separation; Heterogeneity; Microfluidics; Tumor

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28342274      PMCID: PMC5572319          DOI: 10.1002/elps.201600530

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electrophoresis        ISSN: 0173-0835            Impact factor:   3.535


  26 in total

1.  Isolation of prostate tumor initiating cells (TICs) through their dielectrophoretic signature.

Authors:  Alireza Salmanzadeh; Lina Romero; Hadi Shafiee; Roberto C Gallo-Villanueva; Mark A Stremler; Scott D Cramer; Rafael V Davalos
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 6.799

2.  Dielectrophoretic manipulation of particle mixtures employing asymmetric insulating posts.

Authors:  Mario A Saucedo-Espinosa; Alexandra LaLonde; Aytug Gencoglu; Maria F Romero-Creel; Jay R Dolas; Blanca H Lapizco-Encinas
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 3.535

Review 3.  Dielectrophoresis: an assessment of its potential to aid the research and practice of drug discovery and delivery.

Authors:  Ronald Pethig
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 15.470

4.  Electrorotation of liposomes: verification of dielectric multi-shell model for cells.

Authors:  K L Chan; P R Gascoyne; F F Becker; R Pethig
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1997-11-15

5.  Multilayer contactless dielectrophoresis: theoretical considerations.

Authors:  Michael B Sano; Alireza Salmanzadeh; Rafael V Davalos
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.535

Review 6.  The passive electrical properties of biological systems: their significance in physiology, biophysics and biotechnology.

Authors:  R Pethig; D B Kell
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  A single-cell-based model of tumor growth in vitro: monolayers and spheroids.

Authors:  Dirk Drasdo; Stefan Höhme
Journal:  Phys Biol       Date:  2005-07-12       Impact factor: 2.583

8.  Insulator-based dielectrophoresis for the selective concentration and separation of live bacteria in water.

Authors:  Blanca H Lapizco-Encinas; Blake A Simmons; Eric B Cummings; Yolanda Fintschenko
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.535

Review 9.  Intratumor heterogeneity: evolution through space and time.

Authors:  Charles Swanton
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Intra-abdominal fat depots represent distinct immunomodulatory microenvironments: a murine model.

Authors:  Courtney A Cohen; Amanda A Shea; C Lynn Heffron; Eva M Schmelz; Paul C Roberts
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  The latest advances on nonlinear insulator-based electrokinetic microsystems under direct current and low-frequency alternating current fields: a review.

Authors:  Blanca H Lapizco-Encinas
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 4.142

2.  Separation of Macrophages and Fibroblasts Using Contactless Dielectrophoresis and a Novel ImageJ Macro.

Authors:  Temple Anne Douglas; Nastaran Alinezhadbalalami; Nikita Balani; Eva M Schmelz; Rafael V Davalos
Journal:  Bioelectricity       Date:  2019-03-18

Review 3.  Microscale nonlinear electrokinetics for the analysis of cellular materials in clinical applications: a review.

Authors:  Blanca H Lapizco-Encinas
Journal:  Mikrochim Acta       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 5.833

4.  Characterization of sequentially-staged cancer cells using electrorotation.

Authors:  Claudia I Trainito; Daniel C Sweeney; Jaka Čemažar; Eva M Schmelz; Olivier Français; Bruno Le Pioufle; Rafael V Davalos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Multi-Stage Particle Separation based on Microstructure Filtration and Dielectrophoresis.

Authors:  Danfen Yin; Xiaoling Zhang; Xianwei Han; Jun Yang; Ning Hu
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 2.891

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.