David Terence Thomas1, Sevim Yener2, Aybegum Kalyoncu2, Kayihan Uluc3, Yasar Bayri4, Adnan Dagcinar4, Tolga Dagli5, Halil Tugtepe6. 1. Department of Pediatric Surgery, Maltepe University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey. 2. Department of Pediatric Surgery, Marmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey. 3. Department of Neurology, Marmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey. 4. Department of Neurosurgery, Marmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey. 5. Division of Pediatric Urology, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Marmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey. 6. Division of Pediatric Urology, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Marmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey. htugtepe@yahoo.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the usefulness of somatosensory evoked potential as a screening tool for spinal pathologies in patients with treatment refractory overactive bladder. METHODS: This prospective study was performed between January 2011 and January 2014. Children >5 years old with treatment refractory overactive bladder were enrolled after exclusion of anatomical and neurological causes of incontinence. All patients underwent urodynamic studies, spinal MRI, and somatosensory evoked potential (SEP). Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were calculated for SEP. RESULTS: Thirty-one children (average age 8.3 ± 2.9 years) were included in the study. SEP was abnormal in 13 (41.9%), and MRI was abnormal in 8 (25.8%) patients. SEP was found to have a sensitivity of 87.5%, a specificity of 73.9%, positive predictive value of 53.85%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 94.4%. CONCLUSION: In patients with treatment refractory OAB, SEP is an important tool for the screening of tethered cord/spinal pathologies. Our results suggest that a child with a normal SEP study in this group of patients may not require further investigation with MRI.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the usefulness of somatosensory evoked potential as a screening tool for spinal pathologies in patients with treatment refractory overactive bladder. METHODS: This prospective study was performed between January 2011 and January 2014. Children >5 years old with treatment refractory overactive bladder were enrolled after exclusion of anatomical and neurological causes of incontinence. All patients underwent urodynamic studies, spinal MRI, and somatosensory evoked potential (SEP). Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were calculated for SEP. RESULTS: Thirty-one children (average age 8.3 ± 2.9 years) were included in the study. SEP was abnormal in 13 (41.9%), and MRI was abnormal in 8 (25.8%) patients. SEP was found to have a sensitivity of 87.5%, a specificity of 73.9%, positive predictive value of 53.85%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 94.4%. CONCLUSION: In patients with treatment refractory OAB, SEP is an important tool for the screening of tethered cord/spinal pathologies. Our results suggest that a child with a normal SEP study in this group of patients may not require further investigation with MRI.